mbox series

[RESEND,0/5] ARM/arm64: arm_pm_restart removal

Message ID 20210604140357.2602028-1-lee.jones@linaro.org
Headers show
Series ARM/arm64: arm_pm_restart removal | expand

Message

Lee Jones June 4, 2021, 2:03 p.m. UTC 
This is a rebase/refresh of a set sent out, reviewed,
then forgotten about.  It's still considered useful.

Here is an excerpt from the previous attempt:

 "Hi Russell, ARM SoC maintainers,

 here's the full set of patches that remove arm_pm_restart as discussed
 earlier. There's some background on the series in this thread:

	https://lore.kernel.org/linux-arm-kernel/20170130110512.6943-1-thierry.reding@gmail.com/

 I also have a set of patches that build on top of this and try to add
 something slightly more formal by adding a power/reset framework that
 driver can register with. If we can get this series merged, I'll find
 some time to refresh those patches and send out for review again.

 Thierry"

Guenter Roeck (5):
  ARM: xen: Register with kernel restart handler
  drivers: firmware: psci: Register with kernel restart handler
  ARM: Register with kernel restart handler
  ARM64: Remove arm_pm_restart()
  ARM: Remove arm_pm_restart()

 arch/arm/include/asm/system_misc.h   |  1 -
 arch/arm/kernel/reboot.c             |  6 +-----
 arch/arm/kernel/setup.c              | 20 ++++++++++++++++++--
 arch/arm/xen/enlighten.c             | 12 ++++++++++--
 arch/arm64/include/asm/system_misc.h |  2 --
 arch/arm64/kernel/process.c          |  7 +------
 drivers/firmware/psci/psci.c         | 12 ++++++++++--
 7 files changed, 40 insertions(+), 20 deletions(-)


-- 
2.31.1

Comments

Florian Fainelli Oct. 25, 2021, 11:29 p.m. UTC | #1 
On 6/4/21 7:03 AM, Lee Jones wrote:
> This is a rebase/refresh of a set sent out, reviewed,

> then forgotten about.  It's still considered useful.

> 

> Here is an excerpt from the previous attempt:

> 

>  "Hi Russell, ARM SoC maintainers,

> 

>  here's the full set of patches that remove arm_pm_restart as discussed

>  earlier. There's some background on the series in this thread:

> 

> 	https://lore.kernel.org/linux-arm-kernel/20170130110512.6943-1-thierry.reding@gmail.com/

> 

>  I also have a set of patches that build on top of this and try to add

>  something slightly more formal by adding a power/reset framework that

>  driver can register with. If we can get this series merged, I'll find

>  some time to refresh those patches and send out for review again.


What happened to this patch series? Is there any chance we will get it
included at some point? It is included in the Android13-5.10 tree AFAICT
-- 
Florian
Dmitry Osipenko Oct. 25, 2021, 11:55 p.m. UTC | #2 
26.10.2021 02:29, Florian Fainelli пишет:
> On 6/4/21 7:03 AM, Lee Jones wrote:

>> This is a rebase/refresh of a set sent out, reviewed,

>> then forgotten about.  It's still considered useful.

>>

>> Here is an excerpt from the previous attempt:

>>

>>  "Hi Russell, ARM SoC maintainers,

>>

>>  here's the full set of patches that remove arm_pm_restart as discussed

>>  earlier. There's some background on the series in this thread:

>>

>> 	https://lore.kernel.org/linux-arm-kernel/20170130110512.6943-1-thierry.reding@gmail.com/

>>

>>  I also have a set of patches that build on top of this and try to add

>>  something slightly more formal by adding a power/reset framework that

>>  driver can register with. If we can get this series merged, I'll find

>>  some time to refresh those patches and send out for review again.

> 

> What happened to this patch series? Is there any chance we will get it

> included at some point? It is included in the Android13-5.10 tree AFAICT

> 


It's in mainline since v5.14, AFAICS.
Guenter Roeck Oct. 26, 2021, 1:02 a.m. UTC | #3 
On 10/25/21 4:55 PM, Dmitry Osipenko wrote:
> 26.10.2021 02:29, Florian Fainelli пишет:

>> On 6/4/21 7:03 AM, Lee Jones wrote:

>>> This is a rebase/refresh of a set sent out, reviewed,

>>> then forgotten about.  It's still considered useful.

>>>

>>> Here is an excerpt from the previous attempt:

>>>

>>>   "Hi Russell, ARM SoC maintainers,

>>>

>>>   here's the full set of patches that remove arm_pm_restart as discussed

>>>   earlier. There's some background on the series in this thread:

>>>

>>> 	https://lore.kernel.org/linux-arm-kernel/20170130110512.6943-1-thierry.reding@gmail.com/

>>>

>>>   I also have a set of patches that build on top of this and try to add

>>>   something slightly more formal by adding a power/reset framework that

>>>   driver can register with. If we can get this series merged, I'll find

>>>   some time to refresh those patches and send out for review again.

>>

>> What happened to this patch series? Is there any chance we will get it

>> included at some point? It is included in the Android13-5.10 tree AFAICT

>>

> 

> It's in mainline since v5.14, AFAICS.

> 


Yes, indeed.

Guenter
Florian Fainelli Oct. 26, 2021, 1:55 a.m. UTC | #4 
On 10/25/2021 6:02 PM, Guenter Roeck wrote:
> On 10/25/21 4:55 PM, Dmitry Osipenko wrote:

>> 26.10.2021 02:29, Florian Fainelli пишет:

>>> On 6/4/21 7:03 AM, Lee Jones wrote:

>>>> This is a rebase/refresh of a set sent out, reviewed,

>>>> then forgotten about.  It's still considered useful.

>>>>

>>>> Here is an excerpt from the previous attempt:

>>>>

>>>>   "Hi Russell, ARM SoC maintainers,

>>>>

>>>>   here's the full set of patches that remove arm_pm_restart as 

>>>> discussed

>>>>   earlier. There's some background on the series in this thread:

>>>>

>>>>     https://lore.kernel.org/linux-arm-kernel/20170130110512.6943-1-thierry.reding@gmail.com/ 

>>>>

>>>>

>>>>   I also have a set of patches that build on top of this and try to add

>>>>   something slightly more formal by adding a power/reset framework that

>>>>   driver can register with. If we can get this series merged, I'll find

>>>>   some time to refresh those patches and send out for review again.

>>>

>>> What happened to this patch series? Is there any chance we will get it

>>> included at some point? It is included in the Android13-5.10 tree AFAICT

>>>

>>

>> It's in mainline since v5.14, AFAICS.

>>

> 

> Yes, indeed.


Great, thanks!
-- 
Florian