Message ID | 20210914185830.1378771-3-richard.henderson@linaro.org |
---|---|
State | New |
Headers | show |
Series | gitlab-ci: Add riscv64 cross builds | expand |
On 9/14/21 8:58 PM, Richard Henderson wrote: > Signed-off-by: Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org> > --- > .gitlab-ci.d/crossbuilds.yml | 14 ++++++++++++++ > 1 file changed, 14 insertions(+) Reviewed-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <f4bug@amsat.org>
On Tue, Sep 14, 2021 at 3:58 PM Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org> wrote: > > Signed-off-by: Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org> > --- > .gitlab-ci.d/crossbuilds.yml | 14 ++++++++++++++ > 1 file changed, 14 insertions(+) > Reviewed-by: Willian Rampazzo <willianr@redhat.com>
On 9/14/21 8:58 PM, Richard Henderson wrote: > Signed-off-by: Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org> > --- > .gitlab-ci.d/crossbuilds.yml | 14 ++++++++++++++ > 1 file changed, 14 insertions(+) > > diff --git a/.gitlab-ci.d/crossbuilds.yml b/.gitlab-ci.d/crossbuilds.yml > index f10168db2e..0fe4a55ac5 100644 > --- a/.gitlab-ci.d/crossbuilds.yml > +++ b/.gitlab-ci.d/crossbuilds.yml > @@ -124,6 +124,20 @@ cross-ppc64el-user: > variables: > IMAGE: debian-ppc64el-cross > > +cross-riscv64-system: > + extends: .cross_system_build_job > + needs: > + job: riscv64-debian-cross-container > + variables: > + IMAGE: debian-riscv64-cross > + > +cross-riscv64-user: > + extends: .cross_user_build_job > + needs: > + job: riscv64-debian-cross-container > + variables: > + IMAGE: debian-riscv64-cross > + Pending discussion on patch #1 of this series, I believe this job is likely going to fail, so must use the 'allow_failure: true' tag or something else (manual?). Meanwhile this is sorted out: NAcked-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <f4bug@amsat.org>
On 9/15/21 8:03 AM, Philippe Mathieu-Daudé wrote: > On 9/14/21 8:58 PM, Richard Henderson wrote: >> Signed-off-by: Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org> >> --- >> .gitlab-ci.d/crossbuilds.yml | 14 ++++++++++++++ >> 1 file changed, 14 insertions(+) >> >> diff --git a/.gitlab-ci.d/crossbuilds.yml b/.gitlab-ci.d/crossbuilds.yml >> index f10168db2e..0fe4a55ac5 100644 >> --- a/.gitlab-ci.d/crossbuilds.yml >> +++ b/.gitlab-ci.d/crossbuilds.yml >> @@ -124,6 +124,20 @@ cross-ppc64el-user: >> variables: >> IMAGE: debian-ppc64el-cross >> >> +cross-riscv64-system: >> + extends: .cross_system_build_job >> + needs: >> + job: riscv64-debian-cross-container >> + variables: >> + IMAGE: debian-riscv64-cross >> + >> +cross-riscv64-user: >> + extends: .cross_user_build_job >> + needs: >> + job: riscv64-debian-cross-container >> + variables: >> + IMAGE: debian-riscv64-cross >> + > > Pending discussion on patch #1 of this series, I believe > this job is likely going to fail, so must use the > 'allow_failure: true' tag or something else (manual?). > Meanwhile this is sorted out: > NAcked-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <f4bug@amsat.org> My only question is whether it's the image creation step that should be allowed to fail. If the dpkg deps weren't so broken as to not install, I *think* we should be able to rely on the result for the cross-build. At least that's how I'd prefer to arrange things, if it works... r~
On 9/15/21 6:32 PM, Richard Henderson wrote: > On 9/15/21 8:03 AM, Philippe Mathieu-Daudé wrote: >> On 9/14/21 8:58 PM, Richard Henderson wrote: >>> Signed-off-by: Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org> >>> --- >>> .gitlab-ci.d/crossbuilds.yml | 14 ++++++++++++++ >>> 1 file changed, 14 insertions(+) >>> >>> diff --git a/.gitlab-ci.d/crossbuilds.yml b/.gitlab-ci.d/crossbuilds.yml >>> index f10168db2e..0fe4a55ac5 100644 >>> --- a/.gitlab-ci.d/crossbuilds.yml >>> +++ b/.gitlab-ci.d/crossbuilds.yml >>> @@ -124,6 +124,20 @@ cross-ppc64el-user: >>> variables: >>> IMAGE: debian-ppc64el-cross >>> +cross-riscv64-system: >>> + extends: .cross_system_build_job >>> + needs: >>> + job: riscv64-debian-cross-container >>> + variables: >>> + IMAGE: debian-riscv64-cross >>> + >>> +cross-riscv64-user: >>> + extends: .cross_user_build_job >>> + needs: >>> + job: riscv64-debian-cross-container >>> + variables: >>> + IMAGE: debian-riscv64-cross >>> + >> >> Pending discussion on patch #1 of this series, I believe >> this job is likely going to fail, so must use the >> 'allow_failure: true' tag or something else (manual?). >> Meanwhile this is sorted out: >> NAcked-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <f4bug@amsat.org> > > My only question is whether it's the image creation step that should be > allowed to fail. If the dpkg deps weren't so broken as to not install, I > *think* we should be able to rely on the result for the cross-build. We have multiple possibilities: (1) Have all jobs depending on riscv64-debian-cross-container use 'allow_failure: true' (see commit d3a4e41da25 "gitlab-ci: Fix 'when:' condition in acceptance...") (2) Use a working snapshot date, see commit b4048a7cd10 ("docker: Use a stable snapshot for Debian Sid") (3) Manually push a built image to mainstream (qemu-project namespace) and have forks (try to build) or pull from mainstream Hmm I had a (4) but forgot about it... Anyhow, I personally prefer (2) over (1) because we can use it as gating. 'allow_failure' jobs are *not* gating and we often miss their failures.
diff --git a/.gitlab-ci.d/crossbuilds.yml b/.gitlab-ci.d/crossbuilds.yml index f10168db2e..0fe4a55ac5 100644 --- a/.gitlab-ci.d/crossbuilds.yml +++ b/.gitlab-ci.d/crossbuilds.yml @@ -124,6 +124,20 @@ cross-ppc64el-user: variables: IMAGE: debian-ppc64el-cross +cross-riscv64-system: + extends: .cross_system_build_job + needs: + job: riscv64-debian-cross-container + variables: + IMAGE: debian-riscv64-cross + +cross-riscv64-user: + extends: .cross_user_build_job + needs: + job: riscv64-debian-cross-container + variables: + IMAGE: debian-riscv64-cross + cross-s390x-system: extends: .cross_system_build_job needs:
Signed-off-by: Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org> --- .gitlab-ci.d/crossbuilds.yml | 14 ++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 14 insertions(+) -- 2.25.1