Message ID | 1630643340-10373-1-git-send-email-rajpat@codeaurora.org |
---|---|
Headers | show |
Series | Add QSPI and QUPv3 DT nodes for SC7280 SoC | expand |
On Fri, Sep 03, 2021 at 09:58:59AM +0530, Rajesh Patil wrote: > From: Roja Rani Yarubandi <rojay@codeaurora.org> > > Add QUPv3 wrapper_1 DT nodes for SC7280 SoC. > > Signed-off-by: Roja Rani Yarubandi <rojay@codeaurora.org> > Signed-off-by: Rajesh Patil <rajpat@codeaurora.org> > --- > arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sc7280.dtsi | 709 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > 1 file changed, 709 insertions(+) > > diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sc7280.dtsi b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sc7280.dtsi > index 32d1354..8fe54bf 100644 > --- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sc7280.dtsi > +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sc7280.dtsi > + qup_spi8_data_clk: qup-spi8-data-clk { > + pins = "gpio32", "gpio33", "gpio34"; > + function = "qup10"; > + }; > + > + qup_spi8_cs: qup-spi8-cs { > + pins = "gpio35"; > + function = "qup10"; > + }; As for wrapper_0, I think we still want the nodes to configure the CS as GPIO. If there are no other reasons to re-spin these could be added with a follow-up patch, so: Reviewed-by: Matthias Kaehlcke <mka@chromium.org>
On 2021-09-03 22:52, Matthias Kaehlcke wrote: > On Fri, Sep 03, 2021 at 09:58:59AM +0530, Rajesh Patil wrote: >> From: Roja Rani Yarubandi <rojay@codeaurora.org> >> >> Add QUPv3 wrapper_1 DT nodes for SC7280 SoC. >> >> Signed-off-by: Roja Rani Yarubandi <rojay@codeaurora.org> >> Signed-off-by: Rajesh Patil <rajpat@codeaurora.org> >> --- >> arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sc7280.dtsi | 709 >> +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ >> 1 file changed, 709 insertions(+) >> >> diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sc7280.dtsi >> b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sc7280.dtsi >> index 32d1354..8fe54bf 100644 >> --- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sc7280.dtsi >> +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sc7280.dtsi > >> + qup_spi8_data_clk: qup-spi8-data-clk { >> + pins = "gpio32", "gpio33", "gpio34"; >> + function = "qup10"; >> + }; >> + >> + qup_spi8_cs: qup-spi8-cs { >> + pins = "gpio35"; >> + function = "qup10"; >> + }; > > As for wrapper_0, I think we still want the nodes to configure the CS > as GPIO. > > If there are no other reasons to re-spin these could be added with a > follow-up > patch, so: > shall we add all removed qup_spiN_cs_gpio nodes? > Reviewed-by: Matthias Kaehlcke <mka@chromium.org>
On Thu, Sep 09, 2021 at 10:14:18AM +0530, rajpat@codeaurora.org wrote: > On 2021-09-03 22:52, Matthias Kaehlcke wrote: > > On Fri, Sep 03, 2021 at 09:58:59AM +0530, Rajesh Patil wrote: > > > From: Roja Rani Yarubandi <rojay@codeaurora.org> > > > > > > Add QUPv3 wrapper_1 DT nodes for SC7280 SoC. > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Roja Rani Yarubandi <rojay@codeaurora.org> > > > Signed-off-by: Rajesh Patil <rajpat@codeaurora.org> > > > --- > > > arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sc7280.dtsi | 709 > > > +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > > > 1 file changed, 709 insertions(+) > > > > > > diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sc7280.dtsi > > > b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sc7280.dtsi > > > index 32d1354..8fe54bf 100644 > > > --- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sc7280.dtsi > > > +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sc7280.dtsi > > > > > + qup_spi8_data_clk: qup-spi8-data-clk { > > > + pins = "gpio32", "gpio33", "gpio34"; > > > + function = "qup10"; > > > + }; > > > + > > > + qup_spi8_cs: qup-spi8-cs { > > > + pins = "gpio35"; > > > + function = "qup10"; > > > + }; > > > > As for wrapper_0, I think we still want the nodes to configure the CS as > > GPIO. > > > > If there are no other reasons to re-spin these could be added with a > > follow-up > > patch, so: > > > shall we add all removed qup_spiN_cs_gpio nodes? Yes