Message ID | 20210907212543.20220-1-ansuelsmth@gmail.com |
---|---|
State | Accepted |
Commit | cf96921876dcee4d6ac07b9de470368a075ba9ad |
Headers | show |
Series | [v2,1/2] drivers: thermal: tsens: fix wrong check for tzd in irq handlers | expand |
On Tue, Sep 07, 2021 at 11:25:43PM +0200, Ansuel Smith wrote: > The function can loop and lock the system if for whatever reason the bit > for the target sensor is NEVER valid. This is the case if a sensor is > disabled by the factory and the valid bit is never reported as actually > valid. Add a timeout check and exit if a timeout occurs. As this is > a very rare condition, handle the timeout only if the first read fails. > While at it also rework the function to improve readability. > > Signed-off-by: Ansuel Smith <ansuelsmth@gmail.com> > --- > drivers/thermal/qcom/tsens.c | 40 +++++++++++++++++++++++------------- > 1 file changed, 26 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/thermal/qcom/tsens.c b/drivers/thermal/qcom/tsens.c > index b1162e566a70..1ff244176beb 100644 > --- a/drivers/thermal/qcom/tsens.c > +++ b/drivers/thermal/qcom/tsens.c > @@ -599,26 +599,38 @@ int get_temp_tsens_valid(const struct tsens_sensor *s, int *temp) > int hw_id = s->hw_id; > u32 temp_idx = LAST_TEMP_0 + hw_id; > u32 valid_idx = VALID_0 + hw_id; > + unsigned long timeout; > u32 valid; > int ret; > > /* VER_0 doesn't have VALID bit */ > - if (tsens_version(priv) >= VER_0_1) { > + if (tsens_version(priv) == VER_0) > + goto get_temp; > + > + ret = regmap_field_read(priv->rf[valid_idx], &valid); > + if (ret || valid) > + goto check_valid; > + > + timeout = jiffies + msecs_to_jiffies(20); > + do { > + /* Valid bit is 0 for 6 AHB clock cycles. > + * At 19.2MHz, 1 AHB clock is ~60ns. > + * We should enter this loop very, very rarely. > + */ > + ndelay(400); > ret = regmap_field_read(priv->rf[valid_idx], &valid); > - if (ret) > - return ret; > - while (!valid) { > - /* Valid bit is 0 for 6 AHB clock cycles. > - * At 19.2MHz, 1 AHB clock is ~60ns. > - * We should enter this loop very, very rarely. > - */ > - ndelay(400); > - ret = regmap_field_read(priv->rf[valid_idx], &valid); > - if (ret) > - return ret; > - } > - } > + if (ret || valid) > + goto check_valid; > + } while (time_before(jiffies, timeout)); > + > + return -ETIMEDOUT; > + > +check_valid: > + /* Check ret of valid bit read */ > + if (ret) > + return ret; > > +get_temp: > /* Valid bit is set, OK to read the temperature */ > *temp = tsens_hw_to_mC(s, temp_idx); I still think that something like this would be clearer than the multiple jumps to 'check_valid': ret = regmap_field_read(priv->rf[valid_idx], &valid); if (ret) return ret; timeout = jiffies + msecs_to_jiffies(20); while (!valid) { /* Valid bit is 0 for 6 AHB clock cycles. * At 19.2MHz, 1 AHB clock is ~60ns. * We should enter this loop very, very rarely. */ ndelay(400); ret = regmap_field_read(priv->rf[valid_idx], &valid); if (ret) return ret; if (time_after(jiffies, timeout)) return -ETIMEDOUT; }; That said, I'm just a random dude, so my opinion isn't really important, as long as the maintainers are happy with the change :)
Applied, thanks On 07/09/2021 23:25, Ansuel Smith wrote: > Some device can have some thermal sensor disabled from the factory. The > current 2 irq handler functions check all the sensor by default and the > check if the sensor was actually registered is wrong. The tzd is > actually never set if the registration fail hence the IS_ERR check is > wrong. > > Signed-off-by: Ansuel Smith <ansuelsmth@gmail.com> > Reviewed-by: Matthias Kaehlcke <mka@chromium.org> > --- > drivers/thermal/qcom/tsens.c | 4 ++-- > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/thermal/qcom/tsens.c b/drivers/thermal/qcom/tsens.c > index 4c7ebd1d3f9c..b1162e566a70 100644 > --- a/drivers/thermal/qcom/tsens.c > +++ b/drivers/thermal/qcom/tsens.c > @@ -417,7 +417,7 @@ static irqreturn_t tsens_critical_irq_thread(int irq, void *data) > const struct tsens_sensor *s = &priv->sensor[i]; > u32 hw_id = s->hw_id; > > - if (IS_ERR(s->tzd)) > + if (!s->tzd) > continue; > if (!tsens_threshold_violated(priv, hw_id, &d)) > continue; > @@ -467,7 +467,7 @@ static irqreturn_t tsens_irq_thread(int irq, void *data) > const struct tsens_sensor *s = &priv->sensor[i]; > u32 hw_id = s->hw_id; > > - if (IS_ERR(s->tzd)) > + if (!s->tzd) > continue; > if (!tsens_threshold_violated(priv, hw_id, &d)) > continue; > -- <http://www.linaro.org/> Linaro.org │ Open source software for ARM SoCs Follow Linaro: <http://www.facebook.com/pages/Linaro> Facebook | <http://twitter.com/#!/linaroorg> Twitter | <http://www.linaro.org/linaro-blog/> Blog
diff --git a/drivers/thermal/qcom/tsens.c b/drivers/thermal/qcom/tsens.c index 4c7ebd1d3f9c..b1162e566a70 100644 --- a/drivers/thermal/qcom/tsens.c +++ b/drivers/thermal/qcom/tsens.c @@ -417,7 +417,7 @@ static irqreturn_t tsens_critical_irq_thread(int irq, void *data) const struct tsens_sensor *s = &priv->sensor[i]; u32 hw_id = s->hw_id; - if (IS_ERR(s->tzd)) + if (!s->tzd) continue; if (!tsens_threshold_violated(priv, hw_id, &d)) continue; @@ -467,7 +467,7 @@ static irqreturn_t tsens_irq_thread(int irq, void *data) const struct tsens_sensor *s = &priv->sensor[i]; u32 hw_id = s->hw_id; - if (IS_ERR(s->tzd)) + if (!s->tzd) continue; if (!tsens_threshold_violated(priv, hw_id, &d)) continue;