Message ID | 20210901180606.11686-1-benl@squareup.com |
---|---|
State | New |
Headers | show |
Series | [v2] wcn36xx: handle connection loss indication | expand |
Benjamin Li <benl@squareup.com> writes: > Firmware sends delete_sta_context_ind when it detects the AP has gone > away in STA mode. Right now the handler for that indication only handles > AP mode; fix it to also handle STA mode. > > Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org > Signed-off-by: Benjamin Li <benl@squareup.com> > Reviewed-by: Bryan O'Donoghue <bryan.odonoghue@linaro.org> > Reviewed-by: Loic Poulain <loic.poulain@linaro.org> How well is this tested? I'm pondering should I queue this to v5.15 or v5.16, at the moment I'm leaning towards v5.16. -- https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-wireless/list/ https://wireless.wiki.kernel.org/en/developers/documentation/submittingpatches
On 9/2/21 9:37 AM, Kalle Valo wrote: > Benjamin Li <benl@squareup.com> writes: > >> Firmware sends delete_sta_context_ind when it detects the AP has gone >> away in STA mode. Right now the handler for that indication only handles >> AP mode; fix it to also handle STA mode. >> >> Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org >> Signed-off-by: Benjamin Li <benl@squareup.com> >> Reviewed-by: Bryan O'Donoghue <bryan.odonoghue@linaro.org> >> Reviewed-by: Loic Poulain <loic.poulain@linaro.org> > > How well is this tested? I'm pondering should I queue this to v5.15 or > v5.16, at the moment I'm leaning towards v5.16. > It was an issue reported during internal testing, and the patch has not yet had soak time with our quality team/field devices. v5.16 sounds fine. Ben
diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/ath/wcn36xx/smd.c b/drivers/net/wireless/ath/wcn36xx/smd.c index 57fa857b290b..f6bea896abe8 100644 --- a/drivers/net/wireless/ath/wcn36xx/smd.c +++ b/drivers/net/wireless/ath/wcn36xx/smd.c @@ -2623,30 +2623,52 @@ static int wcn36xx_smd_delete_sta_context_ind(struct wcn36xx *wcn, size_t len) { struct wcn36xx_hal_delete_sta_context_ind_msg *rsp = buf; - struct wcn36xx_vif *tmp; + struct wcn36xx_vif *vif_priv; + struct ieee80211_vif *vif; + struct ieee80211_bss_conf *bss_conf; struct ieee80211_sta *sta; + bool found = false; if (len != sizeof(*rsp)) { wcn36xx_warn("Corrupted delete sta indication\n"); return -EIO; } - wcn36xx_dbg(WCN36XX_DBG_HAL, "delete station indication %pM index %d\n", - rsp->addr2, rsp->sta_id); + wcn36xx_dbg(WCN36XX_DBG_HAL, + "delete station indication %pM index %d reason %d\n", + rsp->addr2, rsp->sta_id, rsp->reason_code); - list_for_each_entry(tmp, &wcn->vif_list, list) { + list_for_each_entry(vif_priv, &wcn->vif_list, list) { rcu_read_lock(); - sta = ieee80211_find_sta(wcn36xx_priv_to_vif(tmp), rsp->addr2); - if (sta) - ieee80211_report_low_ack(sta, 0); + vif = wcn36xx_priv_to_vif(vif_priv); + + if (vif->type == NL80211_IFTYPE_STATION) { + /* We could call ieee80211_find_sta too, but checking + * bss_conf is clearer. + */ + bss_conf = &vif->bss_conf; + if (vif_priv->sta_assoc && + !memcmp(bss_conf->bssid, rsp->addr2, ETH_ALEN)) { + found = true; + wcn36xx_dbg(WCN36XX_DBG_HAL, + "connection loss bss_index %d\n", + vif_priv->bss_index); + ieee80211_connection_loss(vif); + } + } else { + sta = ieee80211_find_sta(vif, rsp->addr2); + if (sta) { + found = true; + ieee80211_report_low_ack(sta, 0); + } + } + rcu_read_unlock(); - if (sta) + if (found) return 0; } - wcn36xx_warn("STA with addr %pM and index %d not found\n", - rsp->addr2, - rsp->sta_id); + wcn36xx_warn("BSS or STA with addr %pM not found\n", rsp->addr2); return -ENOENT; }