| Message ID | 20210820033057.13063-1-jing.yangyang@zte.com.cn |
|---|---|
| State | New |
| Headers | show |
| Series | [linux-next] tools: fix warning comparing pointer to 0 | expand |
Hi CGEL,
Thank you for the patch! Yet something to improve:
[auto build test ERROR on next-20210819]
url: https://github.com/0day-ci/linux/commits/CGEL/tools-fix-warning-comparing-pointer-to-0/20210820-113325
base: 33e65b1f975cd2814fc0ea9617250fc4c1d7a553
config: x86_64-rhel-8.3-kselftests (attached as .config)
compiler: gcc-9 (Debian 9.3.0-22) 9.3.0
reproduce:
# apt-get install sparse
# sparse version: v0.6.3-348-gf0e6938b-dirty
# https://github.com/0day-ci/linux/commit/b8c00506ae6f75c8d0dcc46b55962bb93b6bbeb5
git remote add linux-review https://github.com/0day-ci/linux
git fetch --no-tags linux-review CGEL/tools-fix-warning-comparing-pointer-to-0/20210820-113325
git checkout b8c00506ae6f75c8d0dcc46b55962bb93b6bbeb5
# save the attached .config to linux build tree
make W=1 C=1 CF='-fdiagnostic-prefix -D__CHECK_ENDIAN__' O=build_dir ARCH=x86_64 SHELL=/bin/bash -C tools/testing/selftests/bpf install
If you fix the issue, kindly add following tag as appropriate
Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
All errors (new ones prefixed by >>):
In file included from progs/profiler1.c:6:
>> progs/profiler.inc.h:364:7: error: use of undeclared identifier 'kill_dat'; did you mean 'kill_data'?
if (!kill_dat)
^~~~~~~~
kill_data
progs/profiler.inc.h:362:26: note: 'kill_data' declared here
struct var_kill_data_t* kill_data = bpf_map_lookup_elem(&data_heap, &zero);
^
>> progs/profiler.inc.h:544:7: error: use of undeclared identifier 'allowed_fil'; did you mean 'allowed_file'?
if (!allowed_fil)
^~~~~~~~~~~
allowed_file
progs/profiler.inc.h:542:8: note: 'allowed_file' declared here
bool* allowed_file = bpf_map_lookup_elem(&allowed_file_inodes, &ino);
^
2 errors generated.
---
0-DAY CI Kernel Test Service, Intel Corporation
https://lists.01.org/hyperkitty/list/kbuild-all@lists.01.org
On 8/20/21 5:30 AM, CGEL wrote: > From: jing yangyang <jing.yangyang@zte.com.cn> > > Fix the following coccicheck warning: > ./tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/profiler.inc.h:364:18-22:WARNING > comparing pointer to 0 > ./tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/profiler.inc.h:537:23-27:WARNING > comparing pointer to 0 > ./tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/profiler.inc.h:544:21-25:WARNING > comparing pointer to 0 > ./tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/profiler.inc.h:770:13-17:WARNING > comparing pointer to 0 > > Reported-by: Zeal Robot <zealci@zte.com.cn> > Signed-off-by: jing yangyang <jing.yangyang@zte.com.cn> Please properly explain in the commit message what this 'fixes' exactly and why it is needed. > --- > tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/profiler.inc.h | 8 ++++---- > 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/profiler.inc.h b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/profiler.inc.h > index 4896fdf..5c0bdab 100644 > --- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/profiler.inc.h > +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/profiler.inc.h > @@ -361,7 +361,7 @@ static INLINE void* populate_var_metadata(struct var_metadata_t* metadata, > int zero = 0; > struct var_kill_data_t* kill_data = bpf_map_lookup_elem(&data_heap, &zero); > > - if (kill_data == NULL) > + if (!kill_dat) And please don't send broken stuff like this. > return NULL; > struct task_struct* task = (struct task_struct*)bpf_get_current_task(); > > @@ -534,14 +534,14 @@ static INLINE bool is_dentry_allowed_for_filemod(struct dentry* file_dentry, > *device_id = dev_id; > bool* allowed_device = bpf_map_lookup_elem(&allowed_devices, &dev_id); > > - if (allowed_device == NULL) > + if (!allowed_device) > return false; > > u64 ino = BPF_CORE_READ(file_dentry, d_inode, i_ino); > *file_ino = ino; > bool* allowed_file = bpf_map_lookup_elem(&allowed_file_inodes, &ino); > > - if (allowed_file == NULL) > + if (!allowed_fil) ... same. You did not bother to compile test even. > if (!is_ancestor_in_allowed_inodes(BPF_CORE_READ(file_dentry, d_parent))) > return false; > return true; > @@ -689,7 +689,7 @@ int raw_tracepoint__sched_process_exec(struct bpf_raw_tracepoint_args* ctx) > u64 inode = BPF_CORE_READ(bprm, file, f_inode, i_ino); > > bool* should_filter_binprm = bpf_map_lookup_elem(&disallowed_exec_inodes, &inode); > - if (should_filter_binprm != NULL) > + if (should_filter_binprm) > goto out; > > int zero = 0; >
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/profiler.inc.h b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/profiler.inc.h index 4896fdf..5c0bdab 100644 --- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/profiler.inc.h +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/profiler.inc.h @@ -361,7 +361,7 @@ static INLINE void* populate_var_metadata(struct var_metadata_t* metadata, int zero = 0; struct var_kill_data_t* kill_data = bpf_map_lookup_elem(&data_heap, &zero); - if (kill_data == NULL) + if (!kill_dat) return NULL; struct task_struct* task = (struct task_struct*)bpf_get_current_task(); @@ -534,14 +534,14 @@ static INLINE bool is_dentry_allowed_for_filemod(struct dentry* file_dentry, *device_id = dev_id; bool* allowed_device = bpf_map_lookup_elem(&allowed_devices, &dev_id); - if (allowed_device == NULL) + if (!allowed_device) return false; u64 ino = BPF_CORE_READ(file_dentry, d_inode, i_ino); *file_ino = ino; bool* allowed_file = bpf_map_lookup_elem(&allowed_file_inodes, &ino); - if (allowed_file == NULL) + if (!allowed_fil) if (!is_ancestor_in_allowed_inodes(BPF_CORE_READ(file_dentry, d_parent))) return false; return true; @@ -689,7 +689,7 @@ int raw_tracepoint__sched_process_exec(struct bpf_raw_tracepoint_args* ctx) u64 inode = BPF_CORE_READ(bprm, file, f_inode, i_ino); bool* should_filter_binprm = bpf_map_lookup_elem(&disallowed_exec_inodes, &inode); - if (should_filter_binprm != NULL) + if (should_filter_binprm) goto out; int zero = 0;