| Message ID | 20210803150904.80119-1-colin.king@canonical.com |
|---|---|
| State | New |
| Headers | show |
| Series | [next] brcmfmac: firmware: Fix uninitialized variable ret | expand |
Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org> writes: > On Tue, Aug 3, 2021 at 5:09 PM Colin King <colin.king@canonical.com> wrote: > >> From: Colin Ian King <colin.king@canonical.com> >> >> Currently the variable ret is uninitialized and is only set if >> the pointer alt_path is non-null. Fix this by ininitializing ret >> to zero. >> >> Addresses-Coverity: ("Uninitialized scalar variable") >> Fixes: 5ff013914c62 ("brcmfmac: firmware: Allow per-board firmware binaries") >> Signed-off-by: Colin Ian King <colin.king@canonical.com> > > Nice catch! > Reviewed-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org> I assume this will be fixed by Linus' patch "brcmfmac: firmware: Fix firmware loading" and I should drop Colin's patch, correct?
On 05-08-2021 15:53, Kalle Valo wrote: > Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org> writes: > >> On Tue, Aug 3, 2021 at 5:09 PM Colin King <colin.king@canonical.com> wrote: >> >>> From: Colin Ian King <colin.king@canonical.com> >>> >>> Currently the variable ret is uninitialized and is only set if >>> the pointer alt_path is non-null. Fix this by ininitializing ret >>> to zero. >>> >>> Addresses-Coverity: ("Uninitialized scalar variable") >>> Fixes: 5ff013914c62 ("brcmfmac: firmware: Allow per-board firmware binaries") >>> Signed-off-by: Colin Ian King <colin.king@canonical.com> >> >> Nice catch! >> Reviewed-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org> > > I assume this will be fixed by Linus' patch "brcmfmac: firmware: Fix > firmware loading" and I should drop Colin's patch, correct? That would be my assumption as well, but not sure when he will submit another revision of it. You probably know what to do ;-) Regards, Arend
On 06/08/2021 12:23, Arend van Spriel wrote: > On 05-08-2021 15:53, Kalle Valo wrote: >> Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org> writes: >> >>> On Tue, Aug 3, 2021 at 5:09 PM Colin King <colin.king@canonical.com> >>> wrote: >>> >>>> From: Colin Ian King <colin.king@canonical.com> >>>> >>>> Currently the variable ret is uninitialized and is only set if >>>> the pointer alt_path is non-null. Fix this by ininitializing ret >>>> to zero. >>>> >>>> Addresses-Coverity: ("Uninitialized scalar variable") >>>> Fixes: 5ff013914c62 ("brcmfmac: firmware: Allow per-board firmware >>>> binaries") >>>> Signed-off-by: Colin Ian King <colin.king@canonical.com> >>> >>> Nice catch! >>> Reviewed-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org> >> >> I assume this will be fixed by Linus' patch "brcmfmac: firmware: Fix >> firmware loading" and I should drop Colin's patch, correct? > > That would be my assumption as well, but not sure when he will submit > another revision of it. You probably know what to do ;-) I'd prefer my patch to be dropped in preference to Linus' fix. > > Regards, > Arend
Colin Ian King <colin.king@canonical.com> writes: > On 06/08/2021 12:23, Arend van Spriel wrote: >> On 05-08-2021 15:53, Kalle Valo wrote: >>> Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org> writes: >>> >>>> On Tue, Aug 3, 2021 at 5:09 PM Colin King <colin.king@canonical.com> >>>> wrote: >>>> >>>>> From: Colin Ian King <colin.king@canonical.com> >>>>> >>>>> Currently the variable ret is uninitialized and is only set if >>>>> the pointer alt_path is non-null. Fix this by ininitializing ret >>>>> to zero. >>>>> >>>>> Addresses-Coverity: ("Uninitialized scalar variable") >>>>> Fixes: 5ff013914c62 ("brcmfmac: firmware: Allow per-board firmware >>>>> binaries") >>>>> Signed-off-by: Colin Ian King <colin.king@canonical.com> >>>> >>>> Nice catch! >>>> Reviewed-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org> >>> >>> I assume this will be fixed by Linus' patch "brcmfmac: firmware: Fix >>> firmware loading" and I should drop Colin's patch, correct? >> >> That would be my assumption as well, but not sure when he will submit >> another revision of it. You probably know what to do ;-) > > I'd prefer my patch to be dropped in preference to Linus' fix. Ok, I'll then drop Colin's patch. -- https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-wireless/list/ https://wireless.wiki.kernel.org/en/developers/documentation/submittingpatches
diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/broadcom/brcm80211/brcmfmac/firmware.c b/drivers/net/wireless/broadcom/brcm80211/brcmfmac/firmware.c index adfdfc654b10..4f387e868120 100644 --- a/drivers/net/wireless/broadcom/brcm80211/brcmfmac/firmware.c +++ b/drivers/net/wireless/broadcom/brcm80211/brcmfmac/firmware.c @@ -680,7 +680,7 @@ int brcmf_fw_get_firmwares(struct device *dev, struct brcmf_fw_request *req, struct brcmf_fw_item *first = &req->items[0]; struct brcmf_fw *fwctx; char *alt_path; - int ret; + int ret = 0; brcmf_dbg(TRACE, "enter: dev=%s\n", dev_name(dev)); if (!fw_cb)