Message ID | 20210617060546.26933-1-cw00.choi@samsung.com |
---|---|
Headers | show |
Series | PM / devfreq: Add cpu based scaling support to passive governor | expand |
On Thu, Jun 17, 2021 at 03:05:46PM +0900, Chanwoo Choi wrote: > In order to keep the consistent coding style between passive_devfreq > and passive_cpufreq, use common code for handling required opp property. > Also remove the unneed conditional statement and unify the comment > of both passive_devfreq and passive_cpufreq when getting the target frequency. > > Signed-off-by: Chanwoo Choi <cw00.choi@samsung.com> > --- > drivers/devfreq/governor_passive.c | 80 ++++++------------------------ > 1 file changed, 15 insertions(+), 65 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/devfreq/governor_passive.c b/drivers/devfreq/governor_passive.c > index 07e864509b7e..7102cb7eb30d 100644 > --- a/drivers/devfreq/governor_passive.c > +++ b/drivers/devfreq/governor_passive.c > @@ -91,66 +91,17 @@ static int get_target_freq_with_devfreq(struct devfreq *devfreq, > struct devfreq_passive_data *p_data > = (struct devfreq_passive_data *)devfreq->data; > struct devfreq *parent_devfreq = (struct devfreq *)p_data->parent; > - unsigned long child_freq = ULONG_MAX; > - struct dev_pm_opp *opp, *p_opp; > - int i, count; > - > - /* > - * If the devfreq device with passive governor has the specific method > - * to determine the next frequency, should use the get_target_freq() > - * of struct devfreq_passive_data. > - */ > - if (p_data->get_target_freq) > - return p_data->get_target_freq(devfreq, freq); > - > - /* > - * If the parent and passive devfreq device uses the OPP table, > - * get the next frequency by using the OPP table. > - */ > - > - /* > - * - parent devfreq device uses the governors except for passive. > - * - passive devfreq device uses the passive governor. > - * > - * Each devfreq has the OPP table. After deciding the new frequency > - * from the governor of parent devfreq device, the passive governor > - * need to get the index of new frequency on OPP table of parent > - * device. And then the index is used for getting the suitable > - * new frequency for passive devfreq device. > - */ > - if (!devfreq->profile || !devfreq->profile->freq_table > - || devfreq->profile->max_state <= 0) > - return -EINVAL; > - > - /* > - * The passive governor have to get the correct frequency from OPP > - * list of parent device. Because in this case, *freq is temporary > - * value which is decided by ondemand governor. > - */ > - if (devfreq->opp_table && parent_devfreq->opp_table) { > - p_opp = devfreq_recommended_opp(parent_devfreq->dev.parent, > - freq, 0); > - if (IS_ERR(p_opp)) > - return PTR_ERR(p_opp); > - > - opp = dev_pm_opp_xlate_required_opp(parent_devfreq->opp_table, > - devfreq->opp_table, p_opp); > - dev_pm_opp_put(p_opp); > - > - if (IS_ERR(opp)) > - goto no_required_opp; > - > - *freq = dev_pm_opp_get_freq(opp); > - dev_pm_opp_put(opp); > - > - return 0; > - } > + unsigned long target_freq; > + int i; > + > + /* Get target freq via required opps */ > + target_freq = get_taget_freq_by_required_opp(parent_devfreq->dev.parent, > + parent_devfreq->opp_table, > + devfreq->opp_table, *freq); s/get_taget_freq_by_required_opp/get_target_freq_by_required_opp/ Also need to be fixed in "[3/4] PM / devfreq: Add cpu based scaling support to passive governor". > + if (target_freq) > + goto out; > > -no_required_opp: > - /* > - * Get the OPP table's index of decided frequency by governor > - * of parent device. > - */ > + /* Use Interpolation if required opps is not available */ s/Interpolation/interpolation/ > for (i = 0; i < parent_devfreq->profile->max_state; i++) > if (parent_devfreq->profile->freq_table[i] == *freq) > break; > @@ -158,16 +109,15 @@ static int get_target_freq_with_devfreq(struct devfreq *devfreq, > if (i == parent_devfreq->profile->max_state) > return -EINVAL; > > - /* Get the suitable frequency by using index of parent device. */ > if (i < devfreq->profile->max_state) { > - child_freq = devfreq->profile->freq_table[i]; > + target_freq = devfreq->profile->freq_table[i]; > } else { > - count = devfreq->profile->max_state; > - child_freq = devfreq->profile->freq_table[count - 1]; > + i = devfreq->profile->max_state; > + target_freq = devfreq->profile->freq_table[i - 1]; > } > > - /* Return the suitable frequency for passive device. */ > - *freq = child_freq; > +out: > + *freq = target_freq; You might want to split the child_freq => target_freq and commentary change into a separate patch, since it is not directly related with the switch to get_target_freq_by_required_opp().
Hi Matthias, On 21. 6. 23. 오전 3:35, Matthias Kaehlcke wrote: > On Thu, Jun 17, 2021 at 03:05:46PM +0900, Chanwoo Choi wrote: >> In order to keep the consistent coding style between passive_devfreq >> and passive_cpufreq, use common code for handling required opp property. >> Also remove the unneed conditional statement and unify the comment >> of both passive_devfreq and passive_cpufreq when getting the target frequency. >> >> Signed-off-by: Chanwoo Choi <cw00.choi@samsung.com> >> --- >> drivers/devfreq/governor_passive.c | 80 ++++++------------------------ >> 1 file changed, 15 insertions(+), 65 deletions(-) >> >> diff --git a/drivers/devfreq/governor_passive.c b/drivers/devfreq/governor_passive.c >> index 07e864509b7e..7102cb7eb30d 100644 >> --- a/drivers/devfreq/governor_passive.c >> +++ b/drivers/devfreq/governor_passive.c >> @@ -91,66 +91,17 @@ static int get_target_freq_with_devfreq(struct devfreq *devfreq, >> struct devfreq_passive_data *p_data >> = (struct devfreq_passive_data *)devfreq->data; >> struct devfreq *parent_devfreq = (struct devfreq *)p_data->parent; >> - unsigned long child_freq = ULONG_MAX; >> - struct dev_pm_opp *opp, *p_opp; >> - int i, count; >> - >> - /* >> - * If the devfreq device with passive governor has the specific method >> - * to determine the next frequency, should use the get_target_freq() >> - * of struct devfreq_passive_data. >> - */ >> - if (p_data->get_target_freq) >> - return p_data->get_target_freq(devfreq, freq); >> - >> - /* >> - * If the parent and passive devfreq device uses the OPP table, >> - * get the next frequency by using the OPP table. >> - */ >> - >> - /* >> - * - parent devfreq device uses the governors except for passive. >> - * - passive devfreq device uses the passive governor. >> - * >> - * Each devfreq has the OPP table. After deciding the new frequency >> - * from the governor of parent devfreq device, the passive governor >> - * need to get the index of new frequency on OPP table of parent >> - * device. And then the index is used for getting the suitable >> - * new frequency for passive devfreq device. >> - */ >> - if (!devfreq->profile || !devfreq->profile->freq_table >> - || devfreq->profile->max_state <= 0) >> - return -EINVAL; >> - >> - /* >> - * The passive governor have to get the correct frequency from OPP >> - * list of parent device. Because in this case, *freq is temporary >> - * value which is decided by ondemand governor. >> - */ >> - if (devfreq->opp_table && parent_devfreq->opp_table) { >> - p_opp = devfreq_recommended_opp(parent_devfreq->dev.parent, >> - freq, 0); >> - if (IS_ERR(p_opp)) >> - return PTR_ERR(p_opp); >> - >> - opp = dev_pm_opp_xlate_required_opp(parent_devfreq->opp_table, >> - devfreq->opp_table, p_opp); >> - dev_pm_opp_put(p_opp); >> - >> - if (IS_ERR(opp)) >> - goto no_required_opp; >> - >> - *freq = dev_pm_opp_get_freq(opp); >> - dev_pm_opp_put(opp); >> - >> - return 0; >> - } >> + unsigned long target_freq; >> + int i; >> + >> + /* Get target freq via required opps */ >> + target_freq = get_taget_freq_by_required_opp(parent_devfreq->dev.parent, >> + parent_devfreq->opp_table, >> + devfreq->opp_table, *freq); > > s/get_taget_freq_by_required_opp/get_target_freq_by_required_opp/ > > Also need to be fixed in "[3/4] PM / devfreq: Add cpu based scaling > support to passive governor". Thanks for catch. I'll fix it. > >> + if (target_freq) >> + goto out; >> >> -no_required_opp: >> - /* >> - * Get the OPP table's index of decided frequency by governor >> - * of parent device. >> - */ >> + /* Use Interpolation if required opps is not available */ > > s/Interpolation/interpolation/ I'll fix it. > >> for (i = 0; i < parent_devfreq->profile->max_state; i++) >> if (parent_devfreq->profile->freq_table[i] == *freq) >> break; >> @@ -158,16 +109,15 @@ static int get_target_freq_with_devfreq(struct devfreq *devfreq, >> if (i == parent_devfreq->profile->max_state) >> return -EINVAL; >> >> - /* Get the suitable frequency by using index of parent device. */ >> if (i < devfreq->profile->max_state) { >> - child_freq = devfreq->profile->freq_table[i]; >> + target_freq = devfreq->profile->freq_table[i]; >> } else { >> - count = devfreq->profile->max_state; >> - child_freq = devfreq->profile->freq_table[count - 1]; >> + i = devfreq->profile->max_state; >> + target_freq = devfreq->profile->freq_table[i - 1]; >> } >> >> - /* Return the suitable frequency for passive device. */ >> - *freq = child_freq; >> +out: >> + *freq = target_freq; > > You might want to split the child_freq => target_freq and commentary change into > a separate patch, since it is not directly related with the switch to > get_target_freq_by_required_opp(). OK. I will not change about child_freq -> target_freq. -- Best Regards, Samsung Electronics Chanwoo Choi