diff mbox series

[v3,06/10] iio: afe: rescale: add offset support

Message ID 20210701010034.303088-7-liambeguin@gmail.com
State New
Headers show
Series iio: afe: add temperature rescaling support | expand

Commit Message

Liam Beguin July 1, 2021, 1 a.m. UTC
From: Liam Beguin <lvb@xiphos.com>

This is a preparatory change required for the addition of temperature
sensing front ends.

Signed-off-by: Liam Beguin <lvb@xiphos.com>
---
 drivers/iio/afe/iio-rescale.c | 63 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 1 file changed, 63 insertions(+)

Comments

Jonathan Cameron July 4, 2021, 4:53 p.m. UTC | #1
On Wed, 30 Jun 2021 21:00:30 -0400
Liam Beguin <liambeguin@gmail.com> wrote:

> From: Liam Beguin <lvb@xiphos.com>

> 

> This is a preparatory change required for the addition of temperature

> sensing front ends.

> 

> Signed-off-by: Liam Beguin <lvb@xiphos.com>

Hi Liam.

A few remaining things inline.

Looking good in general.

Jonathan

> ---

>  drivers/iio/afe/iio-rescale.c | 63 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

>  1 file changed, 63 insertions(+)

> 

> diff --git a/drivers/iio/afe/iio-rescale.c b/drivers/iio/afe/iio-rescale.c

> index 8f79c582519c..c8750286c308 100644

> --- a/drivers/iio/afe/iio-rescale.c

> +++ b/drivers/iio/afe/iio-rescale.c

> @@ -32,6 +32,7 @@ struct rescale {

>  	bool chan_processed;

>  	s32 numerator;

>  	s32 denominator;

> +	s32 offset;

>  };

>  

>  static int rescale_read_raw(struct iio_dev *indio_dev,

> @@ -39,6 +40,8 @@ static int rescale_read_raw(struct iio_dev *indio_dev,

>  			    int *val, int *val2, long mask)

>  {

>  	struct rescale *rescale = iio_priv(indio_dev);

> +	int scale, scale2;

> +	int schan_off = 0;

>  	s64 tmp, tmp2;

>  	u32 factor;

>  	int ret;

> @@ -99,6 +102,62 @@ static int rescale_read_raw(struct iio_dev *indio_dev,

>  			dev_err(&indio_dev->dev, "unsupported type %d\n", ret);

>  			return -EOPNOTSUPP;

>  		}

> +	case IIO_CHAN_INFO_OFFSET:

> +		/*

> +		 * Processed channels are scaled 1-to-1 and source offset is

> +		 * already taken into account.

> +		 *

> +		 * In other cases, the final offset value is defined by:

> +		 *	offset = schan_offset + rescaler_offset / schan_scale


Maths is right, but perhaps useful to express how this is derived as I had
to scribble it down to check.

		Want to express real world measurement as:
		scale * (raw + offset)
		Given we applying scale and offset recursively we have.
		rescaler_scale * (schan_scale * (raw + schan_offset) + rescaler_offset) 
		which can be rearrange into the correct form at.
		rescaler_scale *schan_scale* (raw + (schan_offset + rescaler_offset/schan_scale))
		Thus the scale and offset we expose to userspace should be.
		scale = rescaler_scale * schan_scale
		offset = schan_offset + rescaler_offset/schan_scale;


> +		 */

> +		if (rescale->chan_processed) {

> +			*val = rescale->offset;

> +			return IIO_VAL_INT;

> +		}

> +

> +		if (iio_channel_has_info(rescale->source->channel,

> +					 IIO_CHAN_INFO_OFFSET)) {

> +			ret = iio_read_channel_offset(rescale->source,

> +						      &schan_off, NULL);

> +			if (ret < 0)

> +				return ret;

if you've returned in the first branch of the if, no need to worry about the
else for checking the second condition.

			if (ret != IIO_VAL_INT)
				return...


> +			else if (ret != IIO_VAL_INT)

> +				return -EOPNOTSUPP;

> +		}

> +

> +		ret = iio_read_channel_scale(rescale->source, &scale, &scale2);

> +		switch (ret) {

> +		case IIO_VAL_FRACTIONAL:

> +			tmp = (s64)rescale->offset * scale2;

> +			*val = div_s64(tmp, scale) + schan_off;

> +			return IIO_VAL_INT;

> +		case IIO_VAL_INT:

> +			*val = div_s64(rescale->offset, scale) + schan_off;

> +			return IIO_VAL_INT;

> +		case IIO_VAL_FRACTIONAL_LOG2:

> +			tmp = (s64)rescale->offset * (1 << scale2);

> +			*val = div_s64(tmp, scale) + schan_off;

> +			return IIO_VAL_INT;

> +		case IIO_VAL_INT_PLUS_NANO:

> +			tmp = (s64)rescale->offset * 1000000000UL;

> +			tmp2 = ((s64)scale * 1000000000UL) + scale2;

> +			factor = gcd(tmp, tmp2);

> +			tmp /= factor;

> +			tmp2 /= factor;


What is the benefit to doing gcd division before div_s64?

> +			*val = div_s64(tmp, tmp2) + schan_off;

> +			return IIO_VAL_INT;

> +		case IIO_VAL_INT_PLUS_MICRO:

> +			tmp = (s64)rescale->offset * 1000000UL;

> +			tmp2 = ((s64)scale * 1000000UL) + scale2;

> +			factor = gcd(tmp, tmp2);

> +			tmp /= factor;

> +			tmp2 /= factor;

> +			*val = div_s64(tmp, tmp2) + schan_off;

> +			return IIO_VAL_INT;

> +		default:

> +			dev_err(&indio_dev->dev, "unsupported type %d\n", ret);

> +			return -EOPNOTSUPP;

> +		}

>  	default:

>  		return -EINVAL;

>  	}

> @@ -175,6 +234,9 @@ static int rescale_configure_channel(struct device *dev,

>  	chan->info_mask_separate = BIT(IIO_CHAN_INFO_RAW) |

>  		BIT(IIO_CHAN_INFO_SCALE);

>  

> +	if (rescale->offset)

> +	    chan->info_mask_separate |= BIT(IIO_CHAN_INFO_OFFSET);

> +

>  	/*

>  	 * Using .read_avail() is fringe to begin with and makes no sense

>  	 * whatsoever for processed channels, so we make sure that this cannot

> @@ -339,6 +401,7 @@ static int rescale_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)

>  	rescale->cfg = of_device_get_match_data(dev);

>  	rescale->numerator = 1;

>  	rescale->denominator = 1;

> +	rescale->offset = 0;

>  

>  	ret = rescale->cfg->props(dev, rescale);

>  	if (ret)
Liam Beguin July 5, 2021, 4:27 a.m. UTC | #2
On Sun Jul 4, 2021 at 12:53 PM EDT, Jonathan Cameron wrote:
> On Wed, 30 Jun 2021 21:00:30 -0400

> Liam Beguin <liambeguin@gmail.com> wrote:

>

> > From: Liam Beguin <lvb@xiphos.com>

> > 

> > This is a preparatory change required for the addition of temperature

> > sensing front ends.

> > 

> > Signed-off-by: Liam Beguin <lvb@xiphos.com>

> Hi Liam.

>

> A few remaining things inline.

>

> Looking good in general.

>

> Jonathan

>

> > ---

> >  drivers/iio/afe/iio-rescale.c | 63 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

> >  1 file changed, 63 insertions(+)

> > 

> > diff --git a/drivers/iio/afe/iio-rescale.c b/drivers/iio/afe/iio-rescale.c

> > index 8f79c582519c..c8750286c308 100644

> > --- a/drivers/iio/afe/iio-rescale.c

> > +++ b/drivers/iio/afe/iio-rescale.c

> > @@ -32,6 +32,7 @@ struct rescale {

> >  	bool chan_processed;

> >  	s32 numerator;

> >  	s32 denominator;

> > +	s32 offset;

> >  };

> >  

> >  static int rescale_read_raw(struct iio_dev *indio_dev,

> > @@ -39,6 +40,8 @@ static int rescale_read_raw(struct iio_dev *indio_dev,

> >  			    int *val, int *val2, long mask)

> >  {

> >  	struct rescale *rescale = iio_priv(indio_dev);

> > +	int scale, scale2;

> > +	int schan_off = 0;

> >  	s64 tmp, tmp2;

> >  	u32 factor;

> >  	int ret;

> > @@ -99,6 +102,62 @@ static int rescale_read_raw(struct iio_dev *indio_dev,

> >  			dev_err(&indio_dev->dev, "unsupported type %d\n", ret);

> >  			return -EOPNOTSUPP;

> >  		}

> > +	case IIO_CHAN_INFO_OFFSET:

> > +		/*

> > +		 * Processed channels are scaled 1-to-1 and source offset is

> > +		 * already taken into account.

> > +		 *

> > +		 * In other cases, the final offset value is defined by:

> > +		 *	offset = schan_offset + rescaler_offset / schan_scale

>

> Maths is right, but perhaps useful to express how this is derived as I

> had

> to scribble it down to check.

>

> Want to express real world measurement as:

> scale * (raw + offset)

> Given we applying scale and offset recursively we have.

> rescaler_scale * (schan_scale * (raw + schan_offset) + rescaler_offset)

> which can be rearrange into the correct form at.

> rescaler_scale *schan_scale* (raw + (schan_offset +

> rescaler_offset/schan_scale))

> Thus the scale and offset we expose to userspace should be.

> scale = rescaler_scale * schan_scale

> offset = schan_offset + rescaler_offset/schan_scale;

>


Understood, I'll update the comment with more details.

>

> > +		 */

> > +		if (rescale->chan_processed) {

> > +			*val = rescale->offset;

> > +			return IIO_VAL_INT;

> > +		}

> > +

> > +		if (iio_channel_has_info(rescale->source->channel,

> > +					 IIO_CHAN_INFO_OFFSET)) {

> > +			ret = iio_read_channel_offset(rescale->source,

> > +						      &schan_off, NULL);

> > +			if (ret < 0)

> > +				return ret;

> if you've returned in the first branch of the if, no need to worry about

> the

> else for checking the second condition.

>

> if (ret != IIO_VAL_INT)

> return...


Right, I'll combine both statements.

>

>

> > +			else if (ret != IIO_VAL_INT)

> > +				return -EOPNOTSUPP;

> > +		}

> > +

> > +		ret = iio_read_channel_scale(rescale->source, &scale, &scale2);

> > +		switch (ret) {

> > +		case IIO_VAL_FRACTIONAL:

> > +			tmp = (s64)rescale->offset * scale2;

> > +			*val = div_s64(tmp, scale) + schan_off;

> > +			return IIO_VAL_INT;

> > +		case IIO_VAL_INT:

> > +			*val = div_s64(rescale->offset, scale) + schan_off;

> > +			return IIO_VAL_INT;

> > +		case IIO_VAL_FRACTIONAL_LOG2:

> > +			tmp = (s64)rescale->offset * (1 << scale2);

> > +			*val = div_s64(tmp, scale) + schan_off;

> > +			return IIO_VAL_INT;

> > +		case IIO_VAL_INT_PLUS_NANO:

> > +			tmp = (s64)rescale->offset * 1000000000UL;

> > +			tmp2 = ((s64)scale * 1000000000UL) + scale2;

> > +			factor = gcd(tmp, tmp2);

> > +			tmp /= factor;

> > +			tmp2 /= factor;

>

> What is the benefit to doing gcd division before div_s64?

>


You're right the GCD division is unnecessary here, will drop.

> > +			*val = div_s64(tmp, tmp2) + schan_off;

> > +			return IIO_VAL_INT;

> > +		case IIO_VAL_INT_PLUS_MICRO:

> > +			tmp = (s64)rescale->offset * 1000000UL;

> > +			tmp2 = ((s64)scale * 1000000UL) + scale2;

> > +			factor = gcd(tmp, tmp2);

> > +			tmp /= factor;

> > +			tmp2 /= factor;

> > +			*val = div_s64(tmp, tmp2) + schan_off;

> > +			return IIO_VAL_INT;

> > +		default:

> > +			dev_err(&indio_dev->dev, "unsupported type %d\n", ret);

> > +			return -EOPNOTSUPP;

> > +		}

> >  	default:

> >  		return -EINVAL;

> >  	}

> > @@ -175,6 +234,9 @@ static int rescale_configure_channel(struct device *dev,

> >  	chan->info_mask_separate = BIT(IIO_CHAN_INFO_RAW) |

> >  		BIT(IIO_CHAN_INFO_SCALE);

> >  

> > +	if (rescale->offset)

> > +	    chan->info_mask_separate |= BIT(IIO_CHAN_INFO_OFFSET);

> > +

> >  	/*

> >  	 * Using .read_avail() is fringe to begin with and makes no sense

> >  	 * whatsoever for processed channels, so we make sure that this cannot

> > @@ -339,6 +401,7 @@ static int rescale_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)

> >  	rescale->cfg = of_device_get_match_data(dev);

> >  	rescale->numerator = 1;

> >  	rescale->denominator = 1;

> > +	rescale->offset = 0;

> >  

> >  	ret = rescale->cfg->props(dev, rescale);

> >  	if (ret)
diff mbox series

Patch

diff --git a/drivers/iio/afe/iio-rescale.c b/drivers/iio/afe/iio-rescale.c
index 8f79c582519c..c8750286c308 100644
--- a/drivers/iio/afe/iio-rescale.c
+++ b/drivers/iio/afe/iio-rescale.c
@@ -32,6 +32,7 @@  struct rescale {
 	bool chan_processed;
 	s32 numerator;
 	s32 denominator;
+	s32 offset;
 };
 
 static int rescale_read_raw(struct iio_dev *indio_dev,
@@ -39,6 +40,8 @@  static int rescale_read_raw(struct iio_dev *indio_dev,
 			    int *val, int *val2, long mask)
 {
 	struct rescale *rescale = iio_priv(indio_dev);
+	int scale, scale2;
+	int schan_off = 0;
 	s64 tmp, tmp2;
 	u32 factor;
 	int ret;
@@ -99,6 +102,62 @@  static int rescale_read_raw(struct iio_dev *indio_dev,
 			dev_err(&indio_dev->dev, "unsupported type %d\n", ret);
 			return -EOPNOTSUPP;
 		}
+	case IIO_CHAN_INFO_OFFSET:
+		/*
+		 * Processed channels are scaled 1-to-1 and source offset is
+		 * already taken into account.
+		 *
+		 * In other cases, the final offset value is defined by:
+		 *	offset = schan_offset + rescaler_offset / schan_scale
+		 */
+		if (rescale->chan_processed) {
+			*val = rescale->offset;
+			return IIO_VAL_INT;
+		}
+
+		if (iio_channel_has_info(rescale->source->channel,
+					 IIO_CHAN_INFO_OFFSET)) {
+			ret = iio_read_channel_offset(rescale->source,
+						      &schan_off, NULL);
+			if (ret < 0)
+				return ret;
+			else if (ret != IIO_VAL_INT)
+				return -EOPNOTSUPP;
+		}
+
+		ret = iio_read_channel_scale(rescale->source, &scale, &scale2);
+		switch (ret) {
+		case IIO_VAL_FRACTIONAL:
+			tmp = (s64)rescale->offset * scale2;
+			*val = div_s64(tmp, scale) + schan_off;
+			return IIO_VAL_INT;
+		case IIO_VAL_INT:
+			*val = div_s64(rescale->offset, scale) + schan_off;
+			return IIO_VAL_INT;
+		case IIO_VAL_FRACTIONAL_LOG2:
+			tmp = (s64)rescale->offset * (1 << scale2);
+			*val = div_s64(tmp, scale) + schan_off;
+			return IIO_VAL_INT;
+		case IIO_VAL_INT_PLUS_NANO:
+			tmp = (s64)rescale->offset * 1000000000UL;
+			tmp2 = ((s64)scale * 1000000000UL) + scale2;
+			factor = gcd(tmp, tmp2);
+			tmp /= factor;
+			tmp2 /= factor;
+			*val = div_s64(tmp, tmp2) + schan_off;
+			return IIO_VAL_INT;
+		case IIO_VAL_INT_PLUS_MICRO:
+			tmp = (s64)rescale->offset * 1000000UL;
+			tmp2 = ((s64)scale * 1000000UL) + scale2;
+			factor = gcd(tmp, tmp2);
+			tmp /= factor;
+			tmp2 /= factor;
+			*val = div_s64(tmp, tmp2) + schan_off;
+			return IIO_VAL_INT;
+		default:
+			dev_err(&indio_dev->dev, "unsupported type %d\n", ret);
+			return -EOPNOTSUPP;
+		}
 	default:
 		return -EINVAL;
 	}
@@ -175,6 +234,9 @@  static int rescale_configure_channel(struct device *dev,
 	chan->info_mask_separate = BIT(IIO_CHAN_INFO_RAW) |
 		BIT(IIO_CHAN_INFO_SCALE);
 
+	if (rescale->offset)
+	    chan->info_mask_separate |= BIT(IIO_CHAN_INFO_OFFSET);
+
 	/*
 	 * Using .read_avail() is fringe to begin with and makes no sense
 	 * whatsoever for processed channels, so we make sure that this cannot
@@ -339,6 +401,7 @@  static int rescale_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
 	rescale->cfg = of_device_get_match_data(dev);
 	rescale->numerator = 1;
 	rescale->denominator = 1;
+	rescale->offset = 0;
 
 	ret = rescale->cfg->props(dev, rescale);
 	if (ret)