Message ID | 20210517100240.3323-1-david.plowman@raspberrypi.com |
---|---|
Headers | show |
Series | New V4L2 controls V4L2_CID_NOTIFY_GAIN_XXX | expand |
Hi David, Thanks for the patch. Cc'ing Laurent, too. On Mon, May 17, 2021 at 11:02:40AM +0100, David Plowman wrote: > Add documentation for each of the controls > > V4L2_CID_NOTIFY_GAIN_RED > V4L2_CID_NOTIFY_GAIN_GREENR > V4L2_CID_NOTIFY_GAIN_BLUE > V4L2_CID_NOTIFY_GAIN_GREENB > > These controls are required by sensors that need to know what colour > gains will be applied to pixels by downstream processing (such as by > an ISP), though the sensor does not apply these gains itself. > > Signed-off-by: David Plowman <david.plowman@raspberrypi.com> > --- > .../media/v4l/ext-ctrls-image-source.rst | 28 +++++++++++++++++++ > 1 file changed, 28 insertions(+) > > diff --git a/Documentation/userspace-api/media/v4l/ext-ctrls-image-source.rst b/Documentation/userspace-api/media/v4l/ext-ctrls-image-source.rst > index de43f5c8486d..f824d6c36ae8 100644 > --- a/Documentation/userspace-api/media/v4l/ext-ctrls-image-source.rst > +++ b/Documentation/userspace-api/media/v4l/ext-ctrls-image-source.rst > @@ -72,3 +72,31 @@ Image Source Control IDs > * - __u32 > - ``height`` > - Height of the area. > + > +``V4L2_CID_NOTIFY_GAIN_RED (integer)`` > + Notify the sensor what gain will be applied to red pixels by the > + subsequent processing (such as by an ISP). The sensor is merely > + informed of this value in case it performs processing that requires > + it, but it is not applied to the output pixels themselves. The > + units are determined by the sensor driver. I wonder if this should say the default value should reflect gain of 1. It probably wouldn't hurt at least. > + > +``V4L2_CID_NOTIFY_GAIN_GREENR (integer)`` > + Notify the sensor what gain will be applied to green pixels (on > + red rows) by subsequent processing (such as by an ISP). The sensor > + is merely informed of this value in case it performs processing > + that requires it, but it is not applied to the output pixels > + themselves. The units are determined by the sensor driver. > + > +``V4L2_CID_NOTIFY_GAIN_BLUE (integer)`` > + Notify the sensor what gain will be applied to blue pixels by the > + subsequent processing (such as by an ISP). The sensor is merely > + informed of this value in case it performs processing that requires > + it, but it is not applied to the output pixels themselves. The > + units are determined by the sensor driver. > + > +``V4L2_CID_NOTIFY_GAIN_GREENB (integer)`` > + Notify the sensor what gain will be applied to green pixels (on > + blue rows) by subsequent processing (such as by an ISP). The sensor > + is merely informed of this value in case it performs processing > + that requires it, but it is not applied to the output pixels > + themselves. The units are determined by the sensor driver. -- Kind regards, Sakari Ailus
Added Laurent to cc. On Wed, May 19, 2021 at 10:01:21PM +0300, Sakari Ailus wrote: > Hi David, > > Thanks for the patch. > > Cc'ing Laurent, too. > > On Mon, May 17, 2021 at 11:02:40AM +0100, David Plowman wrote: > > Add documentation for each of the controls > > > > V4L2_CID_NOTIFY_GAIN_RED > > V4L2_CID_NOTIFY_GAIN_GREENR > > V4L2_CID_NOTIFY_GAIN_BLUE > > V4L2_CID_NOTIFY_GAIN_GREENB > > > > These controls are required by sensors that need to know what colour > > gains will be applied to pixels by downstream processing (such as by > > an ISP), though the sensor does not apply these gains itself. > > > > Signed-off-by: David Plowman <david.plowman@raspberrypi.com> > > --- > > .../media/v4l/ext-ctrls-image-source.rst | 28 +++++++++++++++++++ > > 1 file changed, 28 insertions(+) > > > > diff --git a/Documentation/userspace-api/media/v4l/ext-ctrls-image-source.rst b/Documentation/userspace-api/media/v4l/ext-ctrls-image-source.rst > > index de43f5c8486d..f824d6c36ae8 100644 > > --- a/Documentation/userspace-api/media/v4l/ext-ctrls-image-source.rst > > +++ b/Documentation/userspace-api/media/v4l/ext-ctrls-image-source.rst > > @@ -72,3 +72,31 @@ Image Source Control IDs > > * - __u32 > > - ``height`` > > - Height of the area. > > + > > +``V4L2_CID_NOTIFY_GAIN_RED (integer)`` > > + Notify the sensor what gain will be applied to red pixels by the > > + subsequent processing (such as by an ISP). The sensor is merely > > + informed of this value in case it performs processing that requires > > + it, but it is not applied to the output pixels themselves. The > > + units are determined by the sensor driver. > > I wonder if this should say the default value should reflect gain of 1. It > probably wouldn't hurt at least. > > > + > > +``V4L2_CID_NOTIFY_GAIN_GREENR (integer)`` > > + Notify the sensor what gain will be applied to green pixels (on > > + red rows) by subsequent processing (such as by an ISP). The sensor > > + is merely informed of this value in case it performs processing > > + that requires it, but it is not applied to the output pixels > > + themselves. The units are determined by the sensor driver. > > + > > +``V4L2_CID_NOTIFY_GAIN_BLUE (integer)`` > > + Notify the sensor what gain will be applied to blue pixels by the > > + subsequent processing (such as by an ISP). The sensor is merely > > + informed of this value in case it performs processing that requires > > + it, but it is not applied to the output pixels themselves. The > > + units are determined by the sensor driver. > > + > > +``V4L2_CID_NOTIFY_GAIN_GREENB (integer)`` > > + Notify the sensor what gain will be applied to green pixels (on > > + blue rows) by subsequent processing (such as by an ISP). The sensor > > + is merely informed of this value in case it performs processing > > + that requires it, but it is not applied to the output pixels > > + themselves. The units are determined by the sensor driver. > > -- > Kind regards, > > Sakari Ailus -- Sakari Ailus
Hello, On Wed, May 19, 2021 at 10:01:49PM +0300, Sakari Ailus wrote: > Added Laurent to cc. > > On Wed, May 19, 2021 at 10:01:21PM +0300, Sakari Ailus wrote: > > Hi David, > > > > Thanks for the patch. > > > > Cc'ing Laurent, too. > > > > On Mon, May 17, 2021 at 11:02:40AM +0100, David Plowman wrote: > > > Add documentation for each of the controls > > > > > > V4L2_CID_NOTIFY_GAIN_RED > > > V4L2_CID_NOTIFY_GAIN_GREENR > > > V4L2_CID_NOTIFY_GAIN_BLUE > > > V4L2_CID_NOTIFY_GAIN_GREENB > > > > > > These controls are required by sensors that need to know what colour > > > gains will be applied to pixels by downstream processing (such as by > > > an ISP), though the sensor does not apply these gains itself. > > > > > > Signed-off-by: David Plowman <david.plowman@raspberrypi.com> > > > --- > > > .../media/v4l/ext-ctrls-image-source.rst | 28 +++++++++++++++++++ > > > 1 file changed, 28 insertions(+) > > > > > > diff --git a/Documentation/userspace-api/media/v4l/ext-ctrls-image-source.rst b/Documentation/userspace-api/media/v4l/ext-ctrls-image-source.rst > > > index de43f5c8486d..f824d6c36ae8 100644 > > > --- a/Documentation/userspace-api/media/v4l/ext-ctrls-image-source.rst > > > +++ b/Documentation/userspace-api/media/v4l/ext-ctrls-image-source.rst > > > @@ -72,3 +72,31 @@ Image Source Control IDs > > > * - __u32 > > > - ``height`` > > > - Height of the area. > > > + > > > +``V4L2_CID_NOTIFY_GAIN_RED (integer)`` > > > + Notify the sensor what gain will be applied to red pixels by the > > > + subsequent processing (such as by an ISP). The sensor is merely > > > + informed of this value in case it performs processing that requires > > > + it, but it is not applied to the output pixels themselves. The > > > + units are determined by the sensor driver. > > > > I wonder if this should say the default value should reflect gain of 1. It > > probably wouldn't hurt at least. Seems reasonable to me. David, do you think we could also document that the values of these controls are linear, or would that be too restrictive ? > > > + > > > +``V4L2_CID_NOTIFY_GAIN_GREENR (integer)`` > > > + Notify the sensor what gain will be applied to green pixels (on > > > + red rows) by subsequent processing (such as by an ISP). The sensor > > > + is merely informed of this value in case it performs processing > > > + that requires it, but it is not applied to the output pixels > > > + themselves. The units are determined by the sensor driver. > > > + > > > +``V4L2_CID_NOTIFY_GAIN_BLUE (integer)`` > > > + Notify the sensor what gain will be applied to blue pixels by the > > > + subsequent processing (such as by an ISP). The sensor is merely > > > + informed of this value in case it performs processing that requires > > > + it, but it is not applied to the output pixels themselves. The > > > + units are determined by the sensor driver. > > > + > > > +``V4L2_CID_NOTIFY_GAIN_GREENB (integer)`` > > > + Notify the sensor what gain will be applied to green pixels (on > > > + blue rows) by subsequent processing (such as by an ISP). The sensor > > > + is merely informed of this value in case it performs processing > > > + that requires it, but it is not applied to the output pixels > > > + themselves. The units are determined by the sensor driver. -- Regards, Laurent Pinchart
Hi Sakari, Laurent, everyone Thanks for the feedback. On Mon, 24 May 2021 at 02:07, Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com> wrote: > > Hello, > > On Wed, May 19, 2021 at 10:01:49PM +0300, Sakari Ailus wrote: > > Added Laurent to cc. > > > > On Wed, May 19, 2021 at 10:01:21PM +0300, Sakari Ailus wrote: > > > Hi David, > > > > > > Thanks for the patch. > > > > > > Cc'ing Laurent, too. > > > > > > On Mon, May 17, 2021 at 11:02:40AM +0100, David Plowman wrote: > > > > Add documentation for each of the controls > > > > > > > > V4L2_CID_NOTIFY_GAIN_RED > > > > V4L2_CID_NOTIFY_GAIN_GREENR > > > > V4L2_CID_NOTIFY_GAIN_BLUE > > > > V4L2_CID_NOTIFY_GAIN_GREENB > > > > > > > > These controls are required by sensors that need to know what colour > > > > gains will be applied to pixels by downstream processing (such as by > > > > an ISP), though the sensor does not apply these gains itself. > > > > > > > > Signed-off-by: David Plowman <david.plowman@raspberrypi.com> > > > > --- > > > > .../media/v4l/ext-ctrls-image-source.rst | 28 +++++++++++++++++++ > > > > 1 file changed, 28 insertions(+) > > > > > > > > diff --git a/Documentation/userspace-api/media/v4l/ext-ctrls-image-source.rst b/Documentation/userspace-api/media/v4l/ext-ctrls-image-source.rst > > > > index de43f5c8486d..f824d6c36ae8 100644 > > > > --- a/Documentation/userspace-api/media/v4l/ext-ctrls-image-source.rst > > > > +++ b/Documentation/userspace-api/media/v4l/ext-ctrls-image-source.rst > > > > @@ -72,3 +72,31 @@ Image Source Control IDs > > > > * - __u32 > > > > - ``height`` > > > > - Height of the area. > > > > + > > > > +``V4L2_CID_NOTIFY_GAIN_RED (integer)`` > > > > + Notify the sensor what gain will be applied to red pixels by the > > > > + subsequent processing (such as by an ISP). The sensor is merely > > > > + informed of this value in case it performs processing that requires > > > > + it, but it is not applied to the output pixels themselves. The > > > > + units are determined by the sensor driver. > > > > > > I wonder if this should say the default value should reflect gain of 1. It > > > probably wouldn't hurt at least. > > Seems reasonable to me. Yes, I think this is a good idea. > > David, do you think we could also document that the values of these > controls are linear, or would that be too restrictive ? That's an interesting point. I guess I was drawing on the precedent set by analogue gain, but in many respects mandating a linear response, and not letting device specific units escape the driver, might be more convenient for application code. The typical use would, I expect, involve firmware reading colour gains from an ISP and passing them in here. As such, linear is quite likely to be desirable. In the event that there is a conversion to be done, the driver can always take care of it. Further, if we want to go with linear values, I wonder whether we should go all the way and specify it fully. For example we could mandate u8.8 values, so that 256 means 1.0x - this already feels like more than enough range and precision. There's a slight question in my mind as to whether we should specify the range of the control too, in particular whether gains can be less than unity or not. Again, this would be kind to applications, but drivers might have to re-interpret it internally for "fussy" sensors. Any other opinions on that? One side effect of specifying the meaning precisely is that all four necessarily become identical. I hadn't mentioned this previously, but having them different would clearly be a right nuisance! If that sounds good to everyone I'll make up a second version with updated documentation. Thanks and best regards David > > > > > + > > > > +``V4L2_CID_NOTIFY_GAIN_GREENR (integer)`` > > > > + Notify the sensor what gain will be applied to green pixels (on > > > > + red rows) by subsequent processing (such as by an ISP). The sensor > > > > + is merely informed of this value in case it performs processing > > > > + that requires it, but it is not applied to the output pixels > > > > + themselves. The units are determined by the sensor driver. > > > > + > > > > +``V4L2_CID_NOTIFY_GAIN_BLUE (integer)`` > > > > + Notify the sensor what gain will be applied to blue pixels by the > > > > + subsequent processing (such as by an ISP). The sensor is merely > > > > + informed of this value in case it performs processing that requires > > > > + it, but it is not applied to the output pixels themselves. The > > > > + units are determined by the sensor driver. > > > > + > > > > +``V4L2_CID_NOTIFY_GAIN_GREENB (integer)`` > > > > + Notify the sensor what gain will be applied to green pixels (on > > > > + blue rows) by subsequent processing (such as by an ISP). The sensor > > > > + is merely informed of this value in case it performs processing > > > > + that requires it, but it is not applied to the output pixels > > > > + themselves. The units are determined by the sensor driver. > > -- > Regards, > > Laurent Pinchart
Hi David, On Mon, May 24, 2021 at 11:31:22AM +0100, David Plowman wrote: > Hi Sakari, Laurent, everyone > > Thanks for the feedback. > > On Mon, 24 May 2021 at 02:07, Laurent Pinchart > <laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com> wrote: > > > > Hello, > > > > On Wed, May 19, 2021 at 10:01:49PM +0300, Sakari Ailus wrote: > > > Added Laurent to cc. > > > > > > On Wed, May 19, 2021 at 10:01:21PM +0300, Sakari Ailus wrote: > > > > Hi David, > > > > > > > > Thanks for the patch. > > > > > > > > Cc'ing Laurent, too. > > > > > > > > On Mon, May 17, 2021 at 11:02:40AM +0100, David Plowman wrote: > > > > > Add documentation for each of the controls > > > > > > > > > > V4L2_CID_NOTIFY_GAIN_RED > > > > > V4L2_CID_NOTIFY_GAIN_GREENR > > > > > V4L2_CID_NOTIFY_GAIN_BLUE > > > > > V4L2_CID_NOTIFY_GAIN_GREENB > > > > > > > > > > These controls are required by sensors that need to know what colour > > > > > gains will be applied to pixels by downstream processing (such as by > > > > > an ISP), though the sensor does not apply these gains itself. > > > > > > > > > > Signed-off-by: David Plowman <david.plowman@raspberrypi.com> > > > > > --- > > > > > .../media/v4l/ext-ctrls-image-source.rst | 28 +++++++++++++++++++ > > > > > 1 file changed, 28 insertions(+) > > > > > > > > > > diff --git a/Documentation/userspace-api/media/v4l/ext-ctrls-image-source.rst b/Documentation/userspace-api/media/v4l/ext-ctrls-image-source.rst > > > > > index de43f5c8486d..f824d6c36ae8 100644 > > > > > --- a/Documentation/userspace-api/media/v4l/ext-ctrls-image-source.rst > > > > > +++ b/Documentation/userspace-api/media/v4l/ext-ctrls-image-source.rst > > > > > @@ -72,3 +72,31 @@ Image Source Control IDs > > > > > * - __u32 > > > > > - ``height`` > > > > > - Height of the area. > > > > > + > > > > > +``V4L2_CID_NOTIFY_GAIN_RED (integer)`` > > > > > + Notify the sensor what gain will be applied to red pixels by the > > > > > + subsequent processing (such as by an ISP). The sensor is merely > > > > > + informed of this value in case it performs processing that requires > > > > > + it, but it is not applied to the output pixels themselves. The > > > > > + units are determined by the sensor driver. > > > > > > > > I wonder if this should say the default value should reflect gain of 1. It > > > > probably wouldn't hurt at least. > > > > Seems reasonable to me. > > Yes, I think this is a good idea. > > > > > David, do you think we could also document that the values of these > > controls are linear, or would that be too restrictive ? > > That's an interesting point. I guess I was drawing on the precedent > set by analogue gain, but in many respects mandating a linear > response, and not letting device specific units escape the driver, > might be more convenient for application code. > > The typical use would, I expect, involve firmware reading colour gains > from an ISP and passing them in here. As such, linear is quite likely > to be desirable. In the event that there is a conversion to be done, > the driver can always take care of it. I don't see issues with the approach. > > Further, if we want to go with linear values, I wonder whether we > should go all the way and specify it fully. For example we could > mandate u8.8 values, so that 256 means 1.0x - this already feels like > more than enough range and precision. > > There's a slight question in my mind as to whether we should specify > the range of the control too, in particular whether gains can be less > than unity or not. Again, this would be kind to applications, but > drivers might have to re-interpret it internally for "fussy" sensors. > Any other opinions on that? The controls API already can provide this information, I wouldn't add it to the documentation of a specific control. > > One side effect of specifying the meaning precisely is that all four > necessarily become identical. I hadn't mentioned this previously, but > having them different would clearly be a right nuisance! Agreed. > > If that sounds good to everyone I'll make up a second version with > updated documentation. I wonder how it'd look like if all these controls had a single explanation instead of one for each. I don't think we've done this earlier, but they're all pretty much alike and used together in any case. -- Regards, Sakari Ailus
Hi David, On 17/05/2021 12:02, David Plowman wrote: > Hi > > I'd like to propose some new V4L2 controls as defined in the attached > patches. The controls are: > > V4L2_CID_NOTIFY_GAIN_RED > V4L2_CID_NOTIFY_GAIN_GREENR > V4L2_CID_NOTIFY_GAIN_BLUE > V4L2_CID_NOTIFY_GAIN_GREENB > > The purpose of these controls is to be able to notify a raw sensor > what colour gains will be applied by subsequent processing (such as by > an ISP). Equivalently we can think of them as telling the sensor what > the white point is. Note that the sensor is told these gains but does > not apply them - which the choice of name is trying to convey. > > Some sensors need to know these numbers for the processing that they > perform. Here I'm thinking in particular of so-called "quad Bayer" > (also sometimes "tetracell") sensors that have a special read-out mode > that converts the non-standard Bayer pattern into a standard one, also > at full resolution. > > Sensors of this type are becoming quite common on cell phones where, > for example, a 48MP sensor may be able to deliver multiple exposures > at 12MP (for HDR processing perhaps) but they may also have a mode as > described above where they can generate a standard Bayer output at > 48MP. This processing works better - we might expect less colour > aliasing? - when the sensor knows what values correspond to "white". > > One question in my mind is whether it's worth having a control for > each green channel. The sensor I'm currently looking at only wants a > single green gain, but perhaps it's one of those instances where it > would be annoying to put in a single gain and discover, sometime > later, a sensor that wants both. Opinions on the matter always > appreciated! I think I would like to see this series in combination with an actual sensor driver + ISP that uses them. I am a bit concerned about the fact that the units are sensor-specific, so how would an ISP driver be able to set them in a sensor-independent manner? It seems that this would require knowledge about the sensor internals, which is something you want to avoid in a ISP driver. Perhaps this should be a multiplication factor instead? I.e. if the value is X, then the ISP calculated red as the original red value times (X / 100). So if X = 212, then the red gain factor is 2.12. It's probably best to have two controls for green IMHO. Regards, Hans > > Thanks very much and best regards > > David > > David Plowman (2): > media: v4l2-ctrls: Add V4L2_CID_NOTIFY_GAIN_XXX controls > media: v4l2-ctrls: Document V4L2_CID_NOTIFY_GAIN_XXX controls > > .../media/v4l/ext-ctrls-image-source.rst | 28 +++++++++++++++++++ > drivers/media/v4l2-core/v4l2-ctrls.c | 4 +++ > include/uapi/linux/v4l2-controls.h | 4 +++ > 3 files changed, 36 insertions(+) >