| Message ID | 20210428033204.133471-2-richard.henderson@linaro.org |
|---|---|
| State | New |
| Headers | show |
| Series | linux-user/s390x: some signal fixes | expand |
On 28.04.21 05:32, Richard Henderson wrote: > Noticed via gitlab clang-user job: > > TEST signals on s390x > ../linux-user/s390x/signal.c:258:9: runtime error: \ > 1.84467e+19 is outside the range of representable values of \ > type 'unsigned long' > > Which points to the fact that we were performing a double-to-uint64_t > conversion while storing the fp registers, instead of just copying > the data across. > > Turns out there are several errors: > > target_ulong is the size of the target register, whereas abi_ulong > is the target 'unsigned long' type. Not a big deal here, since we > only support 64-bit s390x, but not correct either. > > In target_sigcontext and target ucontext, we used a host pointer > instead of a target pointer, aka abi_ulong. > > Signed-off-by: Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org> > --- > linux-user/s390x/signal.c | 23 ++++++++++++----------- > 1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/linux-user/s390x/signal.c b/linux-user/s390x/signal.c > index b68b44ae7e..e5bc4f0358 100644 > --- a/linux-user/s390x/signal.c > +++ b/linux-user/s390x/signal.c > @@ -37,13 +37,14 @@ > > typedef struct { > target_psw_t psw; > - target_ulong gprs[__NUM_GPRS]; > - unsigned int acrs[__NUM_ACRS]; > + abi_ulong gprs[__NUM_GPRS]; > + abi_uint acrs[__NUM_ACRS]; > } target_s390_regs_common; > > typedef struct { > - unsigned int fpc; > - double fprs[__NUM_FPRS]; > + uint32_t fpc; > + uint32_t pad; > + uint64_t fprs[__NUM_FPRS]; > } target_s390_fp_regs; > > typedef struct { > @@ -51,22 +52,22 @@ typedef struct { > target_s390_fp_regs fpregs; > } target_sigregs; > > -struct target_sigcontext { > - target_ulong oldmask[_SIGCONTEXT_NSIG_WORDS]; > - target_sigregs *sregs; > -}; > +typedef struct { > + abi_ulong oldmask[_SIGCONTEXT_NSIG_WORDS]; > + abi_ulong sregs; > +} target_sigcontext; > > typedef struct { > uint8_t callee_used_stack[__SIGNAL_FRAMESIZE]; > - struct target_sigcontext sc; > + target_sigcontext sc; > target_sigregs sregs; > int signo; > uint8_t retcode[S390_SYSCALL_SIZE]; > } sigframe; > > struct target_ucontext { > - target_ulong tuc_flags; > - struct target_ucontext *tuc_link; > + abi_ulong tuc_flags; > + abi_ulong tuc_link; > target_stack_t tuc_stack; > target_sigregs tuc_mcontext; > target_sigset_t tuc_sigmask; /* mask last for extensibility */ > Reviewed-by: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com> -- Thanks, David / dhildenb
diff --git a/linux-user/s390x/signal.c b/linux-user/s390x/signal.c index b68b44ae7e..e5bc4f0358 100644 --- a/linux-user/s390x/signal.c +++ b/linux-user/s390x/signal.c @@ -37,13 +37,14 @@ typedef struct { target_psw_t psw; - target_ulong gprs[__NUM_GPRS]; - unsigned int acrs[__NUM_ACRS]; + abi_ulong gprs[__NUM_GPRS]; + abi_uint acrs[__NUM_ACRS]; } target_s390_regs_common; typedef struct { - unsigned int fpc; - double fprs[__NUM_FPRS]; + uint32_t fpc; + uint32_t pad; + uint64_t fprs[__NUM_FPRS]; } target_s390_fp_regs; typedef struct { @@ -51,22 +52,22 @@ typedef struct { target_s390_fp_regs fpregs; } target_sigregs; -struct target_sigcontext { - target_ulong oldmask[_SIGCONTEXT_NSIG_WORDS]; - target_sigregs *sregs; -}; +typedef struct { + abi_ulong oldmask[_SIGCONTEXT_NSIG_WORDS]; + abi_ulong sregs; +} target_sigcontext; typedef struct { uint8_t callee_used_stack[__SIGNAL_FRAMESIZE]; - struct target_sigcontext sc; + target_sigcontext sc; target_sigregs sregs; int signo; uint8_t retcode[S390_SYSCALL_SIZE]; } sigframe; struct target_ucontext { - target_ulong tuc_flags; - struct target_ucontext *tuc_link; + abi_ulong tuc_flags; + abi_ulong tuc_link; target_stack_t tuc_stack; target_sigregs tuc_mcontext; target_sigset_t tuc_sigmask; /* mask last for extensibility */
Noticed via gitlab clang-user job: TEST signals on s390x ../linux-user/s390x/signal.c:258:9: runtime error: \ 1.84467e+19 is outside the range of representable values of \ type 'unsigned long' Which points to the fact that we were performing a double-to-uint64_t conversion while storing the fp registers, instead of just copying the data across. Turns out there are several errors: target_ulong is the size of the target register, whereas abi_ulong is the target 'unsigned long' type. Not a big deal here, since we only support 64-bit s390x, but not correct either. In target_sigcontext and target ucontext, we used a host pointer instead of a target pointer, aka abi_ulong. Signed-off-by: Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org> --- linux-user/s390x/signal.c | 23 ++++++++++++----------- 1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-) -- 2.25.1