Message ID | 20210421023807.1540290-1-ray.huang@amd.com |
---|---|
State | New |
Headers | show |
Series | [v2] x86, sched: Fix the AMD CPPC maximum perf on some specific generations | expand |
On Wed, Apr 21, 2021 at 09:42:15PM +0800, Fontenot, Nathan wrote: > On 4/20/2021 9:38 PM, Huang Rui wrote: > > Some AMD Ryzen generations has different calculation method on maximum > > perf. 255 is not for all asics, some specific generations should use 166 > > as the maximum perf. Otherwise, it will report incorrect frequency value > > like below: > > > > ~ → lscpu | grep MHz > > CPU MHz: 3400.000 > > CPU max MHz: 7228.3198 > > CPU min MHz: 2200.0000 > > > > Fixes: 41ea667227ba ("x86, sched: Calculate frequency invariance for AMD systems") > > Fixes: 3c55e94c0ade ("cpufreq: ACPI: Extend frequency tables to cover boost frequencies") > > > > Reported-by: Jason Bagavatsingham <jason.bagavatsingham@gmail.com> > > Tested-by: Jason Bagavatsingham <jason.bagavatsingham@gmail.com> > > Bugzilla: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=211791 > > Signed-off-by: Huang Rui <ray.huang@amd.com> > > Cc: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com> > > Cc: Nathan Fontenot <nathan.fontenot@amd.com> > > Cc: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com> > > Cc: Borislav Petkov <bp@suse.de> > > Cc: x86@kernel.org > > Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org > > --- > > > > Changes from V1 -> V2: > > - Enhance the commit message. > > - Move amd_get_highest_perf() into amd.c. > > - Refine the implementation of switch-case. > > - Cc stable mail list. > > > > --- > > arch/x86/include/asm/processor.h | 2 ++ > > arch/x86/kernel/cpu/amd.c | 22 ++++++++++++++++++++++ > > arch/x86/kernel/smpboot.c | 2 +- > > drivers/cpufreq/acpi-cpufreq.c | 19 +++++++++++++++++++ > > 4 files changed, 44 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) > > > > diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/processor.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/processor.h > > index f1b9ed5efaa9..908bcaea1361 100644 > > --- a/arch/x86/include/asm/processor.h > > +++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/processor.h > > @@ -804,8 +804,10 @@ DECLARE_PER_CPU(u64, msr_misc_features_shadow); > > > > #ifdef CONFIG_CPU_SUP_AMD > > extern u32 amd_get_nodes_per_socket(void); > > +extern u32 amd_get_highest_perf(void); > > #else > > static inline u32 amd_get_nodes_per_socket(void) { return 0; } > > +static inline u32 amd_get_highest_perf(void) { return 0; } > > #endif > > > > static inline uint32_t hypervisor_cpuid_base(const char *sig, uint32_t leaves) > > diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/amd.c b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/amd.c > > index 347a956f71ca..aadb691d9357 100644 > > --- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/amd.c > > +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/amd.c > > @@ -1170,3 +1170,25 @@ void set_dr_addr_mask(unsigned long mask, int dr) > > break; > > } > > } > > + > > +u32 amd_get_highest_perf(void) > > +{ > > + struct cpuinfo_x86 *c = &boot_cpu_data; > > + u32 cppc_max_perf = 225; > > + > > + switch (c->x86) { > > + case 0x17: > > + if ((c->x86_model >= 0x30 && c->x86_model < 0x40) || > > + (c->x86_model >= 0x70 && c->x86_model < 0x80)) > > + cppc_max_perf = 166; > > + break; > > + case 0x19: > > + if ((c->x86_model >= 0x20 && c->x86_model < 0x30) || > > + (c->x86_model >= 0x40 && c->x86_model < 0x70)) > > + cppc_max_perf = 166; > > + break; > > + } > > + > > + return cppc_max_perf; > > +} > > +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(amd_get_highest_perf); > > Should this be an update to cpp_get_perf_caps()? > > This approach would ensure that all callers have the correct value > and remove the need to fix up individual callers to use this new > routine to get the correct value. > It's a good idea to modify cppc_get_perf_caps() to correct the right highest perf. I would like to keep amd_get_highest_perf() function in amd.c as well because it can be called in other spaces without querying an ACPI register in case only wants to get highest perf value. --- diff --git a/drivers/acpi/cppc_acpi.c b/drivers/acpi/cppc_acpi.c index 69057fcd2c04..58e72b6e222f 100644 --- a/drivers/acpi/cppc_acpi.c +++ b/drivers/acpi/cppc_acpi.c @@ -1107,8 +1107,12 @@ int cppc_get_perf_caps(int cpunum, struct cppc_perf_caps *perf_caps) } } - cpc_read(cpunum, highest_reg, &high); - perf_caps->highest_perf = high; + if (boot_cpu_data.x86_vendor == X86_VENDOR_AMD) { + perf_caps->highest_perf = amd_get_highest_perf(); + } else { + cpc_read(cpunum, highest_reg, &high); + perf_caps->highest_perf = high; + } cpc_read(cpunum, lowest_reg, &low); perf_caps->lowest_perf = low; --- Thanks, Ray
On Wed, Apr 21, 2021 at 4:38 AM Huang Rui <ray.huang@amd.com> wrote: > > Some AMD Ryzen generations has different calculation method on maximum > perf. 255 is not for all asics, some specific generations should use 166 > as the maximum perf. Otherwise, it will report incorrect frequency value > like below: > > ~ → lscpu | grep MHz > CPU MHz: 3400.000 > CPU max MHz: 7228.3198 > CPU min MHz: 2200.0000 > > Fixes: 41ea667227ba ("x86, sched: Calculate frequency invariance for AMD systems") > Fixes: 3c55e94c0ade ("cpufreq: ACPI: Extend frequency tables to cover boost frequencies") > > Reported-by: Jason Bagavatsingham <jason.bagavatsingham@gmail.com> > Tested-by: Jason Bagavatsingham <jason.bagavatsingham@gmail.com> > Bugzilla: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=211791 > Signed-off-by: Huang Rui <ray.huang@amd.com> > Cc: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com> > Cc: Nathan Fontenot <nathan.fontenot@amd.com> > Cc: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com> > Cc: Borislav Petkov <bp@suse.de> > Cc: x86@kernel.org > Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org > --- > > Changes from V1 -> V2: > - Enhance the commit message. > - Move amd_get_highest_perf() into amd.c. > - Refine the implementation of switch-case. > - Cc stable mail list. > > --- > arch/x86/include/asm/processor.h | 2 ++ > arch/x86/kernel/cpu/amd.c | 22 ++++++++++++++++++++++ > arch/x86/kernel/smpboot.c | 2 +- > drivers/cpufreq/acpi-cpufreq.c | 19 +++++++++++++++++++ > 4 files changed, 44 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/processor.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/processor.h > index f1b9ed5efaa9..908bcaea1361 100644 > --- a/arch/x86/include/asm/processor.h > +++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/processor.h > @@ -804,8 +804,10 @@ DECLARE_PER_CPU(u64, msr_misc_features_shadow); > > #ifdef CONFIG_CPU_SUP_AMD > extern u32 amd_get_nodes_per_socket(void); > +extern u32 amd_get_highest_perf(void); > #else > static inline u32 amd_get_nodes_per_socket(void) { return 0; } > +static inline u32 amd_get_highest_perf(void) { return 0; } > #endif > > static inline uint32_t hypervisor_cpuid_base(const char *sig, uint32_t leaves) > diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/amd.c b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/amd.c > index 347a956f71ca..aadb691d9357 100644 > --- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/amd.c > +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/amd.c > @@ -1170,3 +1170,25 @@ void set_dr_addr_mask(unsigned long mask, int dr) > break; > } > } > + > +u32 amd_get_highest_perf(void) > +{ > + struct cpuinfo_x86 *c = &boot_cpu_data; > + u32 cppc_max_perf = 225; The extra local variable is redundant. > + > + switch (c->x86) { > + case 0x17: > + if ((c->x86_model >= 0x30 && c->x86_model < 0x40) || > + (c->x86_model >= 0x70 && c->x86_model < 0x80)) > + cppc_max_perf = 166; > + break; Also it would be cleaner to write this as if (c->x86 == 0x17 && ((c->x86_model >= 0x30 && c->x86_model < 0x40) || (c->x86_model >= 0x70 && c->x86_model < 0x80)) return 166; And analogously below. > + case 0x19: > + if ((c->x86_model >= 0x20 && c->x86_model < 0x30) || > + (c->x86_model >= 0x40 && c->x86_model < 0x70)) > + cppc_max_perf = 166; > + break; > + } > + > + return cppc_max_perf; And here return 225; > +} > +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(amd_get_highest_perf); > diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/smpboot.c b/arch/x86/kernel/smpboot.c > index 02813a7f3a7c..7bec57d04a87 100644 > --- a/arch/x86/kernel/smpboot.c > +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/smpboot.c > @@ -2046,7 +2046,7 @@ static bool amd_set_max_freq_ratio(void) > return false; > } > > - highest_perf = perf_caps.highest_perf; > + highest_perf = amd_get_highest_perf(); > nominal_perf = perf_caps.nominal_perf; > > if (!highest_perf || !nominal_perf) { > diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/acpi-cpufreq.c b/drivers/cpufreq/acpi-cpufreq.c > index d1bbc16fba4b..3f0a19dd658c 100644 > --- a/drivers/cpufreq/acpi-cpufreq.c > +++ b/drivers/cpufreq/acpi-cpufreq.c > @@ -630,6 +630,22 @@ static int acpi_cpufreq_blacklist(struct cpuinfo_x86 *c) > #endif > > #ifdef CONFIG_ACPI_CPPC_LIB > + > +static u64 get_amd_max_boost_ratio(unsigned int cpu, u64 nominal_perf) > +{ > + u64 boost_ratio, cppc_max_perf; > + > + if (!nominal_perf) > + return 0; > + > + cppc_max_perf = amd_get_highest_perf(); > + > + boost_ratio = div_u64(cppc_max_perf << SCHED_CAPACITY_SHIFT, > + nominal_perf); > + > + return boost_ratio; > +} The function above is not necessary if I'm not mistaken. > + > static u64 get_max_boost_ratio(unsigned int cpu) > { > struct cppc_perf_caps perf_caps; > @@ -646,6 +662,9 @@ static u64 get_max_boost_ratio(unsigned int cpu) > return 0; > } > > + if (boot_cpu_data.x86_vendor == X86_VENDOR_AMD) > + return get_amd_max_boost_ratio(cpu, perf_caps.nominal_perf); > + > highest_perf = perf_caps.highest_perf; The above can be written as if (boot_cpu_data.x86_vendor == X86_VENDOR_AMD) highest_perf = amd_get_highest_perf(); else highest_perf = perf_caps.highest_perf; > nominal_perf = perf_caps.nominal_perf; > > --
On Fri, Apr 23, 2021 at 11:19:46PM +0800, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > On Wed, Apr 21, 2021 at 4:38 AM Huang Rui <ray.huang@amd.com> wrote: > > > > Some AMD Ryzen generations has different calculation method on maximum > > perf. 255 is not for all asics, some specific generations should use 166 > > as the maximum perf. Otherwise, it will report incorrect frequency value > > like below: > > > > ~ $B"*(B lscpu | grep MHz > > CPU MHz: 3400.000 > > CPU max MHz: 7228.3198 > > CPU min MHz: 2200.0000 > > > > Fixes: 41ea667227ba ("x86, sched: Calculate frequency invariance for AMD systems") > > Fixes: 3c55e94c0ade ("cpufreq: ACPI: Extend frequency tables to cover boost frequencies") > > > > Reported-by: Jason Bagavatsingham <jason.bagavatsingham@gmail.com> > > Tested-by: Jason Bagavatsingham <jason.bagavatsingham@gmail.com> > > Bugzilla: https://nam11.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fbugzilla.kernel.org%2Fshow_bug.cgi%3Fid%3D211791&data=04%7C01%7Cray.huang%40amd.com%7C5069cfd46dfe4f0c504208d9066b41be%7C3dd8961fe4884e608e11a82d994e183d%7C0%7C0%7C637547880005034494%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C1000&sdata=YSgziLlmyJlAxMQceGlx%2FB1EgN50h512ai1F4ypXoD8%3D&reserved=0 > > Signed-off-by: Huang Rui <ray.huang@amd.com> > > Cc: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com> > > Cc: Nathan Fontenot <nathan.fontenot@amd.com> > > Cc: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com> > > Cc: Borislav Petkov <bp@suse.de> > > Cc: x86@kernel.org > > Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org > > --- > > > > Changes from V1 -> V2: > > - Enhance the commit message. > > - Move amd_get_highest_perf() into amd.c. > > - Refine the implementation of switch-case. > > - Cc stable mail list. > > > > --- > > arch/x86/include/asm/processor.h | 2 ++ > > arch/x86/kernel/cpu/amd.c | 22 ++++++++++++++++++++++ > > arch/x86/kernel/smpboot.c | 2 +- > > drivers/cpufreq/acpi-cpufreq.c | 19 +++++++++++++++++++ > > 4 files changed, 44 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) > > > > diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/processor.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/processor.h > > index f1b9ed5efaa9..908bcaea1361 100644 > > --- a/arch/x86/include/asm/processor.h > > +++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/processor.h > > @@ -804,8 +804,10 @@ DECLARE_PER_CPU(u64, msr_misc_features_shadow); > > > > #ifdef CONFIG_CPU_SUP_AMD > > extern u32 amd_get_nodes_per_socket(void); > > +extern u32 amd_get_highest_perf(void); > > #else > > static inline u32 amd_get_nodes_per_socket(void) { return 0; } > > +static inline u32 amd_get_highest_perf(void) { return 0; } > > #endif > > > > static inline uint32_t hypervisor_cpuid_base(const char *sig, uint32_t leaves) > > diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/amd.c b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/amd.c > > index 347a956f71ca..aadb691d9357 100644 > > --- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/amd.c > > +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/amd.c > > @@ -1170,3 +1170,25 @@ void set_dr_addr_mask(unsigned long mask, int dr) > > break; > > } > > } > > + > > +u32 amd_get_highest_perf(void) > > +{ > > + struct cpuinfo_x86 *c = &boot_cpu_data; > > + u32 cppc_max_perf = 225; > > The extra local variable is redundant. > > > + > > + switch (c->x86) { > > + case 0x17: > > + if ((c->x86_model >= 0x30 && c->x86_model < 0x40) || > > + (c->x86_model >= 0x70 && c->x86_model < 0x80)) > > + cppc_max_perf = 166; > > + break; > > Also it would be cleaner to write this as > > if (c->x86 == 0x17 && ((c->x86_model >= 0x30 && c->x86_model < 0x40) || > (c->x86_model >= 0x70 && c->x86_model < 0x80)) > return 166; > > And analogously below. > > > + case 0x19: > > + if ((c->x86_model >= 0x20 && c->x86_model < 0x30) || > > + (c->x86_model >= 0x40 && c->x86_model < 0x70)) > > + cppc_max_perf = 166; > > + break; > > + } > > + > > + return cppc_max_perf; > > And here > > return 225; > > > +} > > +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(amd_get_highest_perf); > > diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/smpboot.c b/arch/x86/kernel/smpboot.c > > index 02813a7f3a7c..7bec57d04a87 100644 > > --- a/arch/x86/kernel/smpboot.c > > +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/smpboot.c > > @@ -2046,7 +2046,7 @@ static bool amd_set_max_freq_ratio(void) > > return false; > > } > > > > - highest_perf = perf_caps.highest_perf; > > + highest_perf = amd_get_highest_perf(); > > nominal_perf = perf_caps.nominal_perf; > > > > if (!highest_perf || !nominal_perf) { > > diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/acpi-cpufreq.c b/drivers/cpufreq/acpi-cpufreq.c > > index d1bbc16fba4b..3f0a19dd658c 100644 > > --- a/drivers/cpufreq/acpi-cpufreq.c > > +++ b/drivers/cpufreq/acpi-cpufreq.c > > @@ -630,6 +630,22 @@ static int acpi_cpufreq_blacklist(struct cpuinfo_x86 *c) > > #endif > > > > #ifdef CONFIG_ACPI_CPPC_LIB > > + > > +static u64 get_amd_max_boost_ratio(unsigned int cpu, u64 nominal_perf) > > +{ > > + u64 boost_ratio, cppc_max_perf; > > + > > + if (!nominal_perf) > > + return 0; > > + > > + cppc_max_perf = amd_get_highest_perf(); > > + > > + boost_ratio = div_u64(cppc_max_perf << SCHED_CAPACITY_SHIFT, > > + nominal_perf); > > + > > + return boost_ratio; > > +} > > The function above is not necessary if I'm not mistaken. > Yes, right. > > + > > static u64 get_max_boost_ratio(unsigned int cpu) > > { > > struct cppc_perf_caps perf_caps; > > @@ -646,6 +662,9 @@ static u64 get_max_boost_ratio(unsigned int cpu) > > return 0; > > } > > > > + if (boot_cpu_data.x86_vendor == X86_VENDOR_AMD) > > + return get_amd_max_boost_ratio(cpu, perf_caps.nominal_perf); > > + > > highest_perf = perf_caps.highest_perf; > > The above can be written as > > if (boot_cpu_data.x86_vendor == X86_VENDOR_AMD) > highest_perf = amd_get_highest_perf(); > else > highest_perf = perf_caps.highest_perf; > Thanks to simplify the implementation. Will update it in V4. Best Regards, Ray
diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/processor.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/processor.h index f1b9ed5efaa9..908bcaea1361 100644 --- a/arch/x86/include/asm/processor.h +++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/processor.h @@ -804,8 +804,10 @@ DECLARE_PER_CPU(u64, msr_misc_features_shadow); #ifdef CONFIG_CPU_SUP_AMD extern u32 amd_get_nodes_per_socket(void); +extern u32 amd_get_highest_perf(void); #else static inline u32 amd_get_nodes_per_socket(void) { return 0; } +static inline u32 amd_get_highest_perf(void) { return 0; } #endif static inline uint32_t hypervisor_cpuid_base(const char *sig, uint32_t leaves) diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/amd.c b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/amd.c index 347a956f71ca..aadb691d9357 100644 --- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/amd.c +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/amd.c @@ -1170,3 +1170,25 @@ void set_dr_addr_mask(unsigned long mask, int dr) break; } } + +u32 amd_get_highest_perf(void) +{ + struct cpuinfo_x86 *c = &boot_cpu_data; + u32 cppc_max_perf = 225; + + switch (c->x86) { + case 0x17: + if ((c->x86_model >= 0x30 && c->x86_model < 0x40) || + (c->x86_model >= 0x70 && c->x86_model < 0x80)) + cppc_max_perf = 166; + break; + case 0x19: + if ((c->x86_model >= 0x20 && c->x86_model < 0x30) || + (c->x86_model >= 0x40 && c->x86_model < 0x70)) + cppc_max_perf = 166; + break; + } + + return cppc_max_perf; +} +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(amd_get_highest_perf); diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/smpboot.c b/arch/x86/kernel/smpboot.c index 02813a7f3a7c..7bec57d04a87 100644 --- a/arch/x86/kernel/smpboot.c +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/smpboot.c @@ -2046,7 +2046,7 @@ static bool amd_set_max_freq_ratio(void) return false; } - highest_perf = perf_caps.highest_perf; + highest_perf = amd_get_highest_perf(); nominal_perf = perf_caps.nominal_perf; if (!highest_perf || !nominal_perf) { diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/acpi-cpufreq.c b/drivers/cpufreq/acpi-cpufreq.c index d1bbc16fba4b..3f0a19dd658c 100644 --- a/drivers/cpufreq/acpi-cpufreq.c +++ b/drivers/cpufreq/acpi-cpufreq.c @@ -630,6 +630,22 @@ static int acpi_cpufreq_blacklist(struct cpuinfo_x86 *c) #endif #ifdef CONFIG_ACPI_CPPC_LIB + +static u64 get_amd_max_boost_ratio(unsigned int cpu, u64 nominal_perf) +{ + u64 boost_ratio, cppc_max_perf; + + if (!nominal_perf) + return 0; + + cppc_max_perf = amd_get_highest_perf(); + + boost_ratio = div_u64(cppc_max_perf << SCHED_CAPACITY_SHIFT, + nominal_perf); + + return boost_ratio; +} + static u64 get_max_boost_ratio(unsigned int cpu) { struct cppc_perf_caps perf_caps; @@ -646,6 +662,9 @@ static u64 get_max_boost_ratio(unsigned int cpu) return 0; } + if (boot_cpu_data.x86_vendor == X86_VENDOR_AMD) + return get_amd_max_boost_ratio(cpu, perf_caps.nominal_perf); + highest_perf = perf_caps.highest_perf; nominal_perf = perf_caps.nominal_perf;