| Message ID | 1395738060-18489-1-git-send-email-hanjun.guo@linaro.org |
|---|---|
| State | New |
| Headers | show |
Hi Hanjun, On 25/03/14 09:00, Hanjun Guo wrote: > After commit 74397174989e5 (arm64: Fix duplicated Kconfig entries), > I still get a duplicate Power management options section in linux-next > git repo, may be due to some merge conflicts, anyway, fix that in this > patch. > I reported this and Mark Brown posted the patch[1]. I assumed it is already pulled, but looks like that's not the case. Regards, Sudeep [1] http://www.spinics.net/lists/arm-kernel/msg314472.html -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Hi Sudeep, On 2014-3-25 18:00, Sudeep Holla wrote: > Hi Hanjun, > > On 25/03/14 09:00, Hanjun Guo wrote: >> After commit 74397174989e5 (arm64: Fix duplicated Kconfig entries), >> I still get a duplicate Power management options section in linux-next >> git repo, may be due to some merge conflicts, anyway, fix that in this >> patch. >> > I reported this and Mark Brown posted the patch[1]. > I assumed it is already pulled, but looks like that's not the case. [...] > [1] http://www.spinics.net/lists/arm-kernel/msg314472.html Yes, I noticed this patch in arm maillist, and I can see that this patch was already merged into linux-next, but I still got duplicate Power management options in the Kconfig: --------------------------------- menu "Power management options" source "kernel/power/Kconfig" config ARCH_SUSPEND_POSSIBLE def_bool y config ARM64_CPU_SUSPEND def_bool PM_SLEEP endmenu menu "CPU Power Management" source "drivers/cpuidle/Kconfig" source "drivers/cpufreq/Kconfig" endmenu menu "Power management options" source "kernel/power/Kconfig" source "drivers/cpufreq/Kconfig" endmenu -------------------------------- here is the link: https://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/next/linux-next.git/tree/arch/arm64/Kconfig Thanks Hanjun > -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Hi Hanjun, On 25/03/14 11:09, Hanjun Guo wrote: > Hi Sudeep, > > On 2014-3-25 18:00, Sudeep Holla wrote: >> Hi Hanjun, >> >> On 25/03/14 09:00, Hanjun Guo wrote: >>> After commit 74397174989e5 (arm64: Fix duplicated Kconfig entries), >>> I still get a duplicate Power management options section in linux-next >>> git repo, may be due to some merge conflicts, anyway, fix that in this >>> patch. >>> >> I reported this and Mark Brown posted the patch[1]. >> I assumed it is already pulled, but looks like that's not the case. > [...] >> [1] http://www.spinics.net/lists/arm-kernel/msg314472.html [...] > here is the link: > https://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/next/linux-next.git/tree/arch/arm64/Kconfig > Just had a look at the linux-next tree and looks like the original commit: "cpufreq: enable ARM drivers on arm64" is pulled by both Catalin and Rafael which has resulted in the fixup patch[1] not removing the duplicate entry cleanly. If not too late it better to ask either Rafael or Catalin to drop both patches from their tree, instead of creating 4 patches in total to enable cpufreq :) Regards, Sudeep -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
On 2014-3-27 19:12, Sudeep Holla wrote: > Hi Hanjun, > > On 25/03/14 11:09, Hanjun Guo wrote: >> Hi Sudeep, >> >> On 2014-3-25 18:00, Sudeep Holla wrote: >>> Hi Hanjun, >>> >>> On 25/03/14 09:00, Hanjun Guo wrote: >>>> After commit 74397174989e5 (arm64: Fix duplicated Kconfig entries), >>>> I still get a duplicate Power management options section in linux-next >>>> git repo, may be due to some merge conflicts, anyway, fix that in this >>>> patch. >>>> >>> I reported this and Mark Brown posted the patch[1]. >>> I assumed it is already pulled, but looks like that's not the case. >> [...] >>> [1] http://www.spinics.net/lists/arm-kernel/msg314472.html > > [...] > >> here is the link: >> https://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/next/linux-next.git/tree/arch/arm64/Kconfig >> > > Just had a look at the linux-next tree and looks like the original commit: > "cpufreq: enable ARM drivers on arm64" is pulled by both Catalin and Rafael > which has resulted in the fixup patch[1] not removing the duplicate entry > cleanly. > > If not too late it better to ask either Rafael or Catalin to drop both patches > from their tree, instead of creating 4 patches in total to enable cpufreq :) Rafael is on vacation now. Catalin, could you please handle this? Thanks Hanjun -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
On Thursday, March 27, 2014 08:34:39 PM Hanjun Guo wrote: > On 2014-3-27 19:12, Sudeep Holla wrote: > > Hi Hanjun, > > > > On 25/03/14 11:09, Hanjun Guo wrote: > >> Hi Sudeep, > >> > >> On 2014-3-25 18:00, Sudeep Holla wrote: > >>> Hi Hanjun, > >>> > >>> On 25/03/14 09:00, Hanjun Guo wrote: > >>>> After commit 74397174989e5 (arm64: Fix duplicated Kconfig entries), > >>>> I still get a duplicate Power management options section in linux-next > >>>> git repo, may be due to some merge conflicts, anyway, fix that in this > >>>> patch. > >>>> > >>> I reported this and Mark Brown posted the patch[1]. > >>> I assumed it is already pulled, but looks like that's not the case. > >> [...] > >>> [1] http://www.spinics.net/lists/arm-kernel/msg314472.html > > > > [...] > > > >> here is the link: > >> https://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/next/linux-next.git/tree/arch/arm64/Kconfig > >> > > > > Just had a look at the linux-next tree and looks like the original commit: > > "cpufreq: enable ARM drivers on arm64" is pulled by both Catalin and Rafael > > which has resulted in the fixup patch[1] not removing the duplicate entry > > cleanly. > > > > If not too late it better to ask either Rafael or Catalin to drop both patches > > from their tree, instead of creating 4 patches in total to enable cpufreq :) > > Rafael is on vacation now. > > Catalin, could you please handle this? Well, not really, I'm at a conference now. Anyway, I'd rather not drop anything, but if you send me a revert, I can apply it. Thanks!
diff --git a/arch/arm64/Kconfig b/arch/arm64/Kconfig index d9f23ad..6085dca 100644 --- a/arch/arm64/Kconfig +++ b/arch/arm64/Kconfig @@ -317,24 +317,12 @@ config ARCH_SUSPEND_POSSIBLE config ARM64_CPU_SUSPEND def_bool PM_SLEEP -endmenu - -menu "CPU Power Management" - source "drivers/cpuidle/Kconfig" source "drivers/cpufreq/Kconfig" endmenu -menu "Power management options" - -source "kernel/power/Kconfig" - -source "drivers/cpufreq/Kconfig" - -endmenu - source "net/Kconfig" source "drivers/Kconfig"
After commit 74397174989e5 (arm64: Fix duplicated Kconfig entries), I still get a duplicate Power management options section in linux-next git repo, may be due to some merge conflicts, anyway, fix that in this patch. Signed-off-by: Hanjun Guo <hanjun.guo@linaro.org> --- Based on linux-next repo, weird, did I miss something? --- arch/arm64/Kconfig | 12 ------------ 1 file changed, 12 deletions(-)