Message ID | 20210329113103.11003-1-zhiyong.tao@mediatek.com |
---|---|
Headers | show |
Series | Mediatek pinctrl patch on mt8195 | expand |
On Mon, Mar 29, 2021 at 2:32 PM Zhiyong Tao <zhiyong.tao@mediatek.com> wrote: > > This series includes 6 patches: > 1.add pinctrl file on mt8195. > 2.add pinctrl binding document on mt8195. > 3.add pinctrl device node on mt8195. > 4.add pinctrl driver on MT8195. > 5.add pinctrl drive for I2C related pins on MT8195. > 6.add pinctrl rsel setting on MT8195. Patch series w/o version is de facto v1. Dropping to v0 seems not right. You missed changelog. So, send v2 properly. Material to study: https://www.kernel.org/doc/html/latest/process/submitting-patches.html
On Mon, Mar 29, 2021 at 2:49 PM zhiyong tao <zhiyong.tao@mediatek.com> wrote: > On Mon, 2021-03-29 at 14:35 +0300, Andy Shevchenko wrote: > > On Mon, Mar 29, 2021 at 2:32 PM Zhiyong Tao <zhiyong.tao@mediatek.com> wrote: > > > > > > This series includes 6 patches: > > > 1.add pinctrl file on mt8195. > > > 2.add pinctrl binding document on mt8195. > > > 3.add pinctrl device node on mt8195. > > > 4.add pinctrl driver on MT8195. > > > 5.add pinctrl drive for I2C related pins on MT8195. > > > 6.add pinctrl rsel setting on MT8195. > > > > Patch series w/o version is de facto v1. > > Dropping to v0 seems not right. > > You missed changelog. > > > > So, send v2 properly. > > > > Material to study: > > https://www.kernel.org/doc/html/latest/process/submitting-patches.html > > > > Hi Andy, > > There is not any change between v0 and v1. so we send "Resend v0" as v2 > in this time.Is it also properly? and we send the version which is v3 in > next time. Sounds good to me, just make sure you put a changelog explaining all these history twists.