| Message ID | 1615549235-27700-3-git-send-email-hector.yuan@mediatek.com |
|---|---|
| State | New |
| Headers | show |
| Series | [v11,1/2] cpufreq: mediatek-hw: Add support for CPUFREQ HW | expand |
On Fri, Mar 12, 2021 at 07:40:35PM +0800, Hector Yuan wrote: > From: "Hector.Yuan" <hector.yuan@mediatek.com> > > Add devicetree bindings for MediaTek HW driver. > > Signed-off-by: Hector.Yuan <hector.yuan@mediatek.com> > --- > .../bindings/cpufreq/cpufreq-mediatek-hw.yaml | 127 ++++++++++++++++++++ > 1 file changed, 127 insertions(+) > create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/cpufreq/cpufreq-mediatek-hw.yaml > > diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/cpufreq/cpufreq-mediatek-hw.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/cpufreq/cpufreq-mediatek-hw.yaml > new file mode 100644 > index 0000000..0f3ad47 > --- /dev/null > +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/cpufreq/cpufreq-mediatek-hw.yaml > @@ -0,0 +1,127 @@ > +# SPDX-License-Identifier: (GPL-2.0-only OR BSD-2-Clause) > +%YAML 1.2 > +--- > +$id: http://devicetree.org/schemas/cpufreq/cpufreq-mediatek-hw.yaml# > +$schema: http://devicetree.org/meta-schemas/core.yaml# > + > +title: MediaTek's CPUFREQ Bindings > + > +maintainers: > + - Hector Yuan <hector.yuan@mediatek.com> > + > +description: > + CPUFREQ HW is a hardware engine used by MediaTek > + SoCs to manage frequency in hardware. It is capable of controlling frequency > + for multiple clusters. > + > +properties: > + compatible: > + const: mediatek,cpufreq-hw > + > + reg: > + minItems: 1 > + maxItems: 2 > + description: | > + Addresses and sizes for the memory of the > + HW bases in each frequency domain. > + > + "#performance-domain-cells": A common binding schema for this and 'performance-domains' needs to land first. > + description: > + Number of cells in a performance domain specifier. Typically 0 for nodes > + representing a single performance domain and 1 for nodes providing > + multiple performance domains (e.g. performance controllers), but can be > + any value as specified by device tree binding documentation of particular > + provider. > + enum: [ 0, 1 ] > + > +required: > + - compatible > + - reg > + - "#performance-domain-cells" > + > +additionalProperties: true > + > +examples: > + - | > + cpus { > + #address-cells = <1>; > + #size-cells = <0>; > + > + cpu0: cpu@0 { > + device_type = "cpu"; > + compatible = "arm,cortex-a55"; > + enable-method = "psci"; > + performance-domains = <&performance 0>; > + reg = <0x000>; > + }; > + > + cpu1: cpu@100 { > + device_type = "cpu"; > + compatible = "arm,cortex-a55"; > + enable-method = "psci"; > + performance-domains = <&performance 0>; > + reg = <0x100>; > + }; > + > + cpu2: cpu@200 { > + device_type = "cpu"; > + compatible = "arm,cortex-a55"; > + enable-method = "psci"; > + performance-domains = <&performance 0>; > + reg = <0x200>; > + }; > + > + cpu3: cpu@300 { > + device_type = "cpu"; > + compatible = "arm,cortex-a55"; > + enable-method = "psci"; > + performance-domains = <&performance 0>; > + reg = <0x300>; > + }; > + > + cpu4: cpu@400 { > + device_type = "cpu"; > + compatible = "arm,cortex-a55"; > + enable-method = "psci"; > + performance-domains = <&performance 1>; Seems a bit odd that a55 and a75 share a perf domain? > + reg = <0x400>; > + }; > + > + cpu5: cpu@500 { > + device_type = "cpu"; > + compatible = "arm,cortex-a55"; > + enable-method = "psci"; > + performance-domains = <&performance 1>; > + reg = <0x500>; > + }; > + > + cpu6: cpu@600 { > + device_type = "cpu"; > + compatible = "arm,cortex-a75"; > + enable-method = "psci"; > + performance-domains = <&performance 1>; > + reg = <0x600>; > + }; > + > + cpu7: cpu@700 { Do we really need to show 8 cores to show how to use this binding? > + device_type = "cpu"; > + compatible = "arm,cortex-a75"; > + enable-method = "psci"; > + performance-domains = <&performance 1>; > + reg = <0x700>; > + }; > + }; > + > + /* ... */ > + > + soc { > + #address-cells = <2>; > + #size-cells = <2>; > + > + performance: performance-controller@11bc00 { > + compatible = "mediatek,cpufreq-hw"; > + reg = <0 0x0011bc10 0 0x120>, <0 0x0011bd30 0 0x120>; > + > + #performance-domain-cells = <1>; > + }; > + }; > -- > 1.7.9.5 >
On Tue, Mar 30, 2021 at 08:26:43AM +0530, Viresh Kumar wrote: > On 24-03-21, 10:07, Rob Herring wrote: > > On Fri, Mar 12, 2021 at 07:40:35PM +0800, Hector Yuan wrote: > > > From: "Hector.Yuan" <hector.yuan@mediatek.com> > > > > > > Add devicetree bindings for MediaTek HW driver. > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Hector.Yuan <hector.yuan@mediatek.com> > > > --- > > > .../bindings/cpufreq/cpufreq-mediatek-hw.yaml | 127 ++++++++++++++++++++ > > > 1 file changed, 127 insertions(+) > > > create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/cpufreq/cpufreq-mediatek-hw.yaml > > > > > > diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/cpufreq/cpufreq-mediatek-hw.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/cpufreq/cpufreq-mediatek-hw.yaml > > > new file mode 100644 > > > index 0000000..0f3ad47 > > > --- /dev/null > > > +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/cpufreq/cpufreq-mediatek-hw.yaml > > > @@ -0,0 +1,127 @@ > > > +# SPDX-License-Identifier: (GPL-2.0-only OR BSD-2-Clause) > > > +%YAML 1.2 > > > +--- > > > +$id: http://devicetree.org/schemas/cpufreq/cpufreq-mediatek-hw.yaml# > > > +$schema: http://devicetree.org/meta-schemas/core.yaml# > > > + > > > +title: MediaTek's CPUFREQ Bindings > > > + > > > +maintainers: > > > + - Hector Yuan <hector.yuan@mediatek.com> > > > + > > > +description: > > > + CPUFREQ HW is a hardware engine used by MediaTek > > > + SoCs to manage frequency in hardware. It is capable of controlling frequency > > > + for multiple clusters. > > > + > > > +properties: > > > + compatible: > > > + const: mediatek,cpufreq-hw > > > + > > > + reg: > > > + minItems: 1 > > > + maxItems: 2 > > > + description: | > > > + Addresses and sizes for the memory of the > > > + HW bases in each frequency domain. > > > + > > > + "#performance-domain-cells": > > > > A common binding schema for this and 'performance-domains' needs to land > > first. > > Sudeep, what happened to the series you had on this ? This patchset > has been blocked for a long time now, can we get that merged soonish > somehow ? Sorry, it slipped through the cracks. I posted this as a fix for SCMI which we fixed it later. This got de-prioritised in my todo list. Sorry for that. I think main problem I had is to write a proper select statement in YAML scheme to check the DT nodes when it is present. I couldn't get anything similar for reference from clocks. I had "select: false" which I knew was not acceptable as it can't go throw dt_bindings_check. I am happy if someone wants to pick up and work on that to push the change or provide suggestions that I can try out. I am unable to spend more time trying to understand whole YAML schema ATM.
diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/cpufreq/cpufreq-mediatek-hw.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/cpufreq/cpufreq-mediatek-hw.yaml new file mode 100644 index 0000000..0f3ad47 --- /dev/null +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/cpufreq/cpufreq-mediatek-hw.yaml @@ -0,0 +1,127 @@ +# SPDX-License-Identifier: (GPL-2.0-only OR BSD-2-Clause) +%YAML 1.2 +--- +$id: http://devicetree.org/schemas/cpufreq/cpufreq-mediatek-hw.yaml# +$schema: http://devicetree.org/meta-schemas/core.yaml# + +title: MediaTek's CPUFREQ Bindings + +maintainers: + - Hector Yuan <hector.yuan@mediatek.com> + +description: + CPUFREQ HW is a hardware engine used by MediaTek + SoCs to manage frequency in hardware. It is capable of controlling frequency + for multiple clusters. + +properties: + compatible: + const: mediatek,cpufreq-hw + + reg: + minItems: 1 + maxItems: 2 + description: | + Addresses and sizes for the memory of the + HW bases in each frequency domain. + + "#performance-domain-cells": + description: + Number of cells in a performance domain specifier. Typically 0 for nodes + representing a single performance domain and 1 for nodes providing + multiple performance domains (e.g. performance controllers), but can be + any value as specified by device tree binding documentation of particular + provider. + enum: [ 0, 1 ] + +required: + - compatible + - reg + - "#performance-domain-cells" + +additionalProperties: true + +examples: + - | + cpus { + #address-cells = <1>; + #size-cells = <0>; + + cpu0: cpu@0 { + device_type = "cpu"; + compatible = "arm,cortex-a55"; + enable-method = "psci"; + performance-domains = <&performance 0>; + reg = <0x000>; + }; + + cpu1: cpu@100 { + device_type = "cpu"; + compatible = "arm,cortex-a55"; + enable-method = "psci"; + performance-domains = <&performance 0>; + reg = <0x100>; + }; + + cpu2: cpu@200 { + device_type = "cpu"; + compatible = "arm,cortex-a55"; + enable-method = "psci"; + performance-domains = <&performance 0>; + reg = <0x200>; + }; + + cpu3: cpu@300 { + device_type = "cpu"; + compatible = "arm,cortex-a55"; + enable-method = "psci"; + performance-domains = <&performance 0>; + reg = <0x300>; + }; + + cpu4: cpu@400 { + device_type = "cpu"; + compatible = "arm,cortex-a55"; + enable-method = "psci"; + performance-domains = <&performance 1>; + reg = <0x400>; + }; + + cpu5: cpu@500 { + device_type = "cpu"; + compatible = "arm,cortex-a55"; + enable-method = "psci"; + performance-domains = <&performance 1>; + reg = <0x500>; + }; + + cpu6: cpu@600 { + device_type = "cpu"; + compatible = "arm,cortex-a75"; + enable-method = "psci"; + performance-domains = <&performance 1>; + reg = <0x600>; + }; + + cpu7: cpu@700 { + device_type = "cpu"; + compatible = "arm,cortex-a75"; + enable-method = "psci"; + performance-domains = <&performance 1>; + reg = <0x700>; + }; + }; + + /* ... */ + + soc { + #address-cells = <2>; + #size-cells = <2>; + + performance: performance-controller@11bc00 { + compatible = "mediatek,cpufreq-hw"; + reg = <0 0x0011bc10 0 0x120>, <0 0x0011bd30 0 0x120>; + + #performance-domain-cells = <1>; + }; + };