mbox series

[0/2] Fix for machines without numa

Message ID 20210222220750.12911-1-jkacur@redhat.com
Headers show
Series Fix for machines without numa | expand

Message

John Kacur Feb. 22, 2021, 10:07 p.m. UTC 
Trying to return the code to a state where numa is required at compile
time but not at runtime

- The first patch should allow cyclictest to run on a machine
without numa.

- The second patch is a clean-up of some old code

The code is pushed in git to branch unstable/devel/no-numa-runtime
so that people can test before I integrate the code back in the main
branch

Thanks

John

John Kacur (2):
  rt-tests: Don't assume numa is available at runtime
  rt-tests: remove rt_numa_bitmask_count in rt_numa.h

 src/cyclictest/cyclictest.c |  8 ++------
 src/cyclictest/rt_numa.h    | 12 ------------
 src/lib/rt-numa.c           | 17 +++++++++++------
 src/signaltest/signaltest.c |  8 ++------
 4 files changed, 15 insertions(+), 30 deletions(-)

Comments

Kurt Kanzenbach Feb. 24, 2021, 9:25 a.m. UTC | #1 
Hi John,

On Mon Feb 22 2021, John Kacur wrote:
> Trying to return the code to a state where numa is required at compile

> time but not at runtime

>

> - The first patch should allow cyclictest to run on a machine

> without numa.

>

> - The second patch is a clean-up of some old code

>

> The code is pushed in git to branch unstable/devel/no-numa-runtime

> so that people can test before I integrate the code back in the main

> branch


arm32 seems to work fine.

Tested-by: Kurt Kanzenbach <kurt@linutronix.de> # arm32


Thanks,
Kurt
John Kacur Feb. 25, 2021, 3:36 a.m. UTC | #2 
On Wed, 24 Feb 2021, Kurt Kanzenbach wrote:

> Hi John,

> 

> On Mon Feb 22 2021, John Kacur wrote:

> > Trying to return the code to a state where numa is required at compile

> > time but not at runtime

> >

> > - The first patch should allow cyclictest to run on a machine

> > without numa.

> >

> > - The second patch is a clean-up of some old code

> >

> > The code is pushed in git to branch unstable/devel/no-numa-runtime

> > so that people can test before I integrate the code back in the main

> > branch

> 

> arm32 seems to work fine.

> 

> Tested-by: Kurt Kanzenbach <kurt@linutronix.de> # arm32

> 

> Thanks,

> Kurt

> 


Thanks, I added your tested by and merged all the changes into
unstable/devel/latest

John