mbox series

[v4,0/5] Some optimizations related to sgx

Message ID 20210201132653.35690-1-tianjia.zhang@linux.alibaba.com
Headers show
Series Some optimizations related to sgx | expand

Message

tianjia.zhang Feb. 1, 2021, 1:26 p.m. UTC
This is an optimization of a set of sgx-related codes, each of which
is independent of the patch. Because the second and third patches have
conflicting dependencies, these patches are put together.

---
v4 changes:
  * Improvements suggested by review

v3 changes:
  * split free_cnt count and spin lock optimization into two patches

v2 changes:
  * review suggested changes

Tianjia Zhang (5):
  selftests/x86: Use getauxval() to simplify the code in sgx
  x86/sgx: Reduce the locking range in sgx_sanitize_section()
  x86/sgx: Optimize the free_cnt count in sgx_epc_section
  x86/sgx: Allows ioctl PROVISION to execute before CREATE
  x86/sgx: Remove redundant if conditions in sgx_encl_create

 arch/x86/kernel/cpu/sgx/driver.c   |  1 +
 arch/x86/kernel/cpu/sgx/ioctl.c    |  8 ++++----
 arch/x86/kernel/cpu/sgx/main.c     | 13 +++++--------
 tools/testing/selftests/sgx/main.c | 24 ++++--------------------
 4 files changed, 14 insertions(+), 32 deletions(-)

Comments

Jarkko Sakkinen Feb. 2, 2021, 9:54 p.m. UTC | #1
On Mon, Feb 01, 2021 at 09:26:51PM +0800, Tianjia Zhang wrote:
> 'section->free_cnt' represents the free page in sgx_epc_section,

> which is assigned once after initialization. In fact, just after the

> initialization is completed, the pages are in the init_laundry_list

> list and cannot be allocated. This needs to be recovered by EREMOVE

> of function sgx_sanitize_section() before it can be used as a page

> that can be allocated. The sgx_sanitize_section() will be called in

> the kernel thread ksgxd.

> 

> This patch moves the initialization of 'section->free_cnt' from the

> initialization function sgx_setup_epc_section() to the function

> sgx_sanitize_section(), and then accumulates the count after the

> successful execution of EREMOVE. This seems to be more reasonable,

> free_cnt will also truly reflect the allocatable free pages in EPC.

> 

> Sined-off-by: Tianjia Zhang <tianjia.zhang@linux.alibaba.com>

> Reviewed-by: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>


I just copy-paste my earlier response to save time sice you  seem
to save time by ignoring it and spamming with the same obviously
illegit patch.

https://lore.kernel.org/linux-sgx/YBGlodsOaX4cWAtl@kernel.org/

/Jarkko
Jarkko Sakkinen Feb. 2, 2021, 10:02 p.m. UTC | #2
On Mon, Feb 01, 2021 at 09:26:49PM +0800, Tianjia Zhang wrote:
> Simplify the sgx code implemntation by using library function

> getauxval() instead of a custom function to get the base address

> of vDSO.

> 

> Signed-off-by: Tianjia Zhang <tianjia.zhang@linux.alibaba.com>


Reviewed-by: Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko@kernel.org>


This needs also ack from Shuah.

/Jarkko

> ---

>  tools/testing/selftests/sgx/main.c | 24 ++++--------------------

>  1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 20 deletions(-)

> 

> diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/sgx/main.c b/tools/testing/selftests/sgx/main.c

> index 724cec700926..5167505fbb46 100644

> --- a/tools/testing/selftests/sgx/main.c

> +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/sgx/main.c

> @@ -15,6 +15,7 @@

>  #include <sys/stat.h>

>  #include <sys/time.h>

>  #include <sys/types.h>

> +#include <sys/auxv.h>

>  #include "defines.h"

>  #include "main.h"

>  #include "../kselftest.h"

> @@ -28,24 +29,6 @@ struct vdso_symtab {

>  	Elf64_Word *elf_hashtab;

>  };

>  

> -static void *vdso_get_base_addr(char *envp[])

> -{

> -	Elf64_auxv_t *auxv;

> -	int i;

> -

> -	for (i = 0; envp[i]; i++)

> -		;

> -

> -	auxv = (Elf64_auxv_t *)&envp[i + 1];

> -

> -	for (i = 0; auxv[i].a_type != AT_NULL; i++) {

> -		if (auxv[i].a_type == AT_SYSINFO_EHDR)

> -			return (void *)auxv[i].a_un.a_val;

> -	}

> -

> -	return NULL;

> -}

> -

>  static Elf64_Dyn *vdso_get_dyntab(void *addr)

>  {

>  	Elf64_Ehdr *ehdr = addr;

> @@ -162,7 +145,7 @@ static int user_handler(long rdi, long rsi, long rdx, long ursp, long r8, long r

>  	return 0;

>  }

>  

> -int main(int argc, char *argv[], char *envp[])

> +int main(int argc, char *argv[])

>  {

>  	struct sgx_enclave_run run;

>  	struct vdso_symtab symtab;

> @@ -203,7 +186,8 @@ int main(int argc, char *argv[], char *envp[])

>  	memset(&run, 0, sizeof(run));

>  	run.tcs = encl.encl_base;

>  

> -	addr = vdso_get_base_addr(envp);

> +	/* Get vDSO base address */

> +	addr = (void *)getauxval(AT_SYSINFO_EHDR);

>  	if (!addr)

>  		goto err;

>  

> -- 

> 2.19.1.3.ge56e4f7

> 

>
Jarkko Sakkinen Feb. 2, 2021, 10:04 p.m. UTC | #3
On Mon, Feb 01, 2021 at 09:26:53PM +0800, Tianjia Zhang wrote:
> In this scenario, there is no case where va_page is NULL, and

> the error has been checked. The if condition statement here is


if-condition, i.e. dash missing

> redundant, so remove the condition detection.

> 

> Signed-off-by: Tianjia Zhang <tianjia.zhang@linux.alibaba.com>

> ---

>  arch/x86/kernel/cpu/sgx/ioctl.c | 7 ++++---

>  1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

> 

> diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/sgx/ioctl.c b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/sgx/ioctl.c

> index 1c6ecf9fbeff..719c21cca569 100644

> --- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/sgx/ioctl.c

> +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/sgx/ioctl.c

> @@ -66,9 +66,10 @@ static int sgx_encl_create(struct sgx_encl *encl, struct sgx_secs *secs)

>  	va_page = sgx_encl_grow(encl);

>  	if (IS_ERR(va_page))

>  		return PTR_ERR(va_page);

> -	else if (va_page)

> -		list_add(&va_page->list, &encl->va_pages);

> -	/* else the tail page of the VA page list had free slots. */

> +	if (!va_page)

> +		return -EIO;

> +

> +	list_add(&va_page->list, &encl->va_pages);

>  

>  	/* The extra page goes to SECS. */

>  	encl_size = secs->size + PAGE_SIZE;

> -- 

> 2.19.1.3.ge56e4f7

> 

> 


Acked-by: Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko@kernel.org>


/Jarkko
Shuah Khan Feb. 9, 2021, 12:09 a.m. UTC | #4
On 2/2/21 3:02 PM, Jarkko Sakkinen wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 01, 2021 at 09:26:49PM +0800, Tianjia Zhang wrote:

>> Simplify the sgx code implemntation by using library function

>> getauxval() instead of a custom function to get the base address

>> of vDSO.

>>

>> Signed-off-by: Tianjia Zhang <tianjia.zhang@linux.alibaba.com>

> 

> Reviewed-by: Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko@kernel.org>

> 

> This needs also ack from Shuah.

> 


Looks good to me. Thank you.

Acked-by: Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>


thanks,
-- Shuah
tianjia.zhang Feb. 11, 2021, 6:05 a.m. UTC | #5
On 2/3/21 5:54 AM, Jarkko Sakkinen wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 01, 2021 at 09:26:51PM +0800, Tianjia Zhang wrote:

>> 'section->free_cnt' represents the free page in sgx_epc_section,

>> which is assigned once after initialization. In fact, just after the

>> initialization is completed, the pages are in the init_laundry_list

>> list and cannot be allocated. This needs to be recovered by EREMOVE

>> of function sgx_sanitize_section() before it can be used as a page

>> that can be allocated. The sgx_sanitize_section() will be called in

>> the kernel thread ksgxd.

>>

>> This patch moves the initialization of 'section->free_cnt' from the

>> initialization function sgx_setup_epc_section() to the function

>> sgx_sanitize_section(), and then accumulates the count after the

>> successful execution of EREMOVE. This seems to be more reasonable,

>> free_cnt will also truly reflect the allocatable free pages in EPC.

>>

>> Sined-off-by: Tianjia Zhang <tianjia.zhang@linux.alibaba.com>

>> Reviewed-by: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>

> 

> I just copy-paste my earlier response to save time sice you  seem

> to save time by ignoring it and spamming with the same obviously

> illegit patch.

> 

> https://lore.kernel.org/linux-sgx/YBGlodsOaX4cWAtl@kernel.org/

> 

> /Jarkko

> 


Sorry for the late reply, I already responded in the original email.

Best regards,
Tianjia
tianjia.zhang Feb. 11, 2021, 6:17 a.m. UTC | #6
On 2/3/21 6:04 AM, Jarkko Sakkinen wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 01, 2021 at 09:26:53PM +0800, Tianjia Zhang wrote:

>> In this scenario, there is no case where va_page is NULL, and

>> the error has been checked. The if condition statement here is

> 

> if-condition, i.e. dash missing

> 


Will do in the next patch.

Thanks,
Tianjia

>> redundant, so remove the condition detection.

>>

>> Signed-off-by: Tianjia Zhang <tianjia.zhang@linux.alibaba.com>

>> ---

>>   arch/x86/kernel/cpu/sgx/ioctl.c | 7 ++++---

>>   1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

>>

>> diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/sgx/ioctl.c b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/sgx/ioctl.c

>> index 1c6ecf9fbeff..719c21cca569 100644

>> --- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/sgx/ioctl.c

>> +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/sgx/ioctl.c

>> @@ -66,9 +66,10 @@ static int sgx_encl_create(struct sgx_encl *encl, struct sgx_secs *secs)

>>   	va_page = sgx_encl_grow(encl);

>>   	if (IS_ERR(va_page))

>>   		return PTR_ERR(va_page);

>> -	else if (va_page)

>> -		list_add(&va_page->list, &encl->va_pages);

>> -	/* else the tail page of the VA page list had free slots. */

>> +	if (!va_page)

>> +		return -EIO;

>> +

>> +	list_add(&va_page->list, &encl->va_pages);

>>   

>>   	/* The extra page goes to SECS. */

>>   	encl_size = secs->size + PAGE_SIZE;

>> -- 

>> 2.19.1.3.ge56e4f7

>>

>>

> 

> Acked-by: Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko@kernel.org>

> 

> /Jarkko

>
Jarkko Sakkinen Feb. 12, 2021, 12:20 p.m. UTC | #7
On Mon, Feb 08, 2021 at 05:09:21PM -0700, Shuah Khan wrote:
> On 2/2/21 3:02 PM, Jarkko Sakkinen wrote:

> > On Mon, Feb 01, 2021 at 09:26:49PM +0800, Tianjia Zhang wrote:

> > > Simplify the sgx code implemntation by using library function

> > > getauxval() instead of a custom function to get the base address

> > > of vDSO.

> > > 

> > > Signed-off-by: Tianjia Zhang <tianjia.zhang@linux.alibaba.com>

> > 

> > Reviewed-by: Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko@kernel.org>

> > 

> > This needs also ack from Shuah.

> > 

> 

> Looks good to me. Thank you.

> 

> Acked-by: Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>

> 

> thanks,

> -- Shuah


Thank you.

/Jarkko