diff mbox series

[net] net: bridge: use switchdev for port flags set through sysfs too

Message ID 20210207194733.1811529-1-olteanv@gmail.com
State New
Headers show
Series [net] net: bridge: use switchdev for port flags set through sysfs too | expand

Commit Message

Vladimir Oltean Feb. 7, 2021, 7:47 p.m. UTC
From: Vladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@nxp.com>

Looking through patchwork I don't see that there was any consensus to
use switchdev notifiers only in case of netlink provided port flags but
not sysfs (as a sort of deprecation, punishment or anything like that),
so we should probably keep the user interface consistent in terms of
functionality.

http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/project/netdev/patch/20170605092043.3523-3-jiri@resnulli.us/
http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/project/netdev/patch/20170608064428.4785-3-jiri@resnulli.us/

Fixes: 3922285d96e7 ("net: bridge: Add support for offloading port attributes")
Signed-off-by: Vladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@nxp.com>
---
 net/bridge/br_sysfs_if.c | 9 ++++++---
 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

Comments

Nikolay Aleksandrov Feb. 8, 2021, 11:11 a.m. UTC | #1
On 07/02/2021 21:47, Vladimir Oltean wrote:
> From: Vladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@nxp.com>

> 

> Looking through patchwork I don't see that there was any consensus to

> use switchdev notifiers only in case of netlink provided port flags but

> not sysfs (as a sort of deprecation, punishment or anything like that),

> so we should probably keep the user interface consistent in terms of

> functionality.

> 

> http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/project/netdev/patch/20170605092043.3523-3-jiri@resnulli.us/

> http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/project/netdev/patch/20170608064428.4785-3-jiri@resnulli.us/

> 

> Fixes: 3922285d96e7 ("net: bridge: Add support for offloading port attributes")

> Signed-off-by: Vladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@nxp.com>

> ---

>  net/bridge/br_sysfs_if.c | 9 ++++++---

>  1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

> 

> diff --git a/net/bridge/br_sysfs_if.c b/net/bridge/br_sysfs_if.c

> index 96ff63cde1be..5aea9427ffe1 100644

> --- a/net/bridge/br_sysfs_if.c

> +++ b/net/bridge/br_sysfs_if.c

> @@ -59,9 +59,8 @@ static BRPORT_ATTR(_name, 0644,					\

>  static int store_flag(struct net_bridge_port *p, unsigned long v,

>  		      unsigned long mask)

>  {

> -	unsigned long flags;

> -

> -	flags = p->flags;

> +	unsigned long flags = p->flags;

> +	int err;

>  

>  	if (v)

>  		flags |= mask;

> @@ -69,6 +68,10 @@ static int store_flag(struct net_bridge_port *p, unsigned long v,

>  		flags &= ~mask;

>  

>  	if (flags != p->flags) {

> +		err = br_switchdev_set_port_flag(p, flags, mask);

> +		if (err)

> +			return err;

> +

>  		p->flags = flags;

>  		br_port_flags_change(p, mask);

>  	}

> 


Acked-by: Nikolay Aleksandrov <nikolay@nvidia.com>
patchwork-bot+netdevbpf@kernel.org Feb. 8, 2021, 11:50 p.m. UTC | #2
Hello:

This patch was applied to netdev/net-next.git (refs/heads/master):

On Sun,  7 Feb 2021 21:47:33 +0200 you wrote:
> From: Vladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@nxp.com>

> 

> Looking through patchwork I don't see that there was any consensus to

> use switchdev notifiers only in case of netlink provided port flags but

> not sysfs (as a sort of deprecation, punishment or anything like that),

> so we should probably keep the user interface consistent in terms of

> functionality.

> 

> [...]


Here is the summary with links:
  - [net] net: bridge: use switchdev for port flags set through sysfs too
    https://git.kernel.org/netdev/net-next/c/8043c845b63a

You are awesome, thank you!
--
Deet-doot-dot, I am a bot.
https://korg.docs.kernel.org/patchwork/pwbot.html
diff mbox series

Patch

diff --git a/net/bridge/br_sysfs_if.c b/net/bridge/br_sysfs_if.c
index 96ff63cde1be..5aea9427ffe1 100644
--- a/net/bridge/br_sysfs_if.c
+++ b/net/bridge/br_sysfs_if.c
@@ -59,9 +59,8 @@  static BRPORT_ATTR(_name, 0644,					\
 static int store_flag(struct net_bridge_port *p, unsigned long v,
 		      unsigned long mask)
 {
-	unsigned long flags;
-
-	flags = p->flags;
+	unsigned long flags = p->flags;
+	int err;
 
 	if (v)
 		flags |= mask;
@@ -69,6 +68,10 @@  static int store_flag(struct net_bridge_port *p, unsigned long v,
 		flags &= ~mask;
 
 	if (flags != p->flags) {
+		err = br_switchdev_set_port_flag(p, flags, mask);
+		if (err)
+			return err;
+
 		p->flags = flags;
 		br_port_flags_change(p, mask);
 	}