Message ID | 1612519857-30714-1-git-send-email-liulongfang@huawei.com |
---|---|
Headers | show |
Series | crypto:hisilicon/sec - fixes some coding style | expand |
On Fri, Feb 05, 2021 at 06:10:57PM +0800, Longfang Liu wrote: > If this configuration item is not turned on, > the allocation of crypto_tfm will fail when > the shash algorithm calculates the hash > through the software. > > Signed-off-by: Longfang Liu <liulongfang@huawei.com> > --- > arch/arm64/configs/defconfig | 2 +- > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/arch/arm64/configs/defconfig b/arch/arm64/configs/defconfig > index 8383016..7cfc9b6 100644 > --- a/arch/arm64/configs/defconfig > +++ b/arch/arm64/configs/defconfig > @@ -117,7 +117,7 @@ CONFIG_KVM=y > CONFIG_ARM64_CRYPTO=y > CONFIG_CRYPTO_SHA1_ARM64_CE=y > CONFIG_CRYPTO_SHA2_ARM64_CE=y > -CONFIG_CRYPTO_SHA512_ARM64_CE=m > +CONFIG_CRYPTO_SHA512_ARM64_CE=y If this is truly needed then it should be enabled through Kconfig. Cheers,
On 2021/2/5 19:44, Herbert Xu write: > On Fri, Feb 05, 2021 at 06:10:57PM +0800, Longfang Liu wrote: >> If this configuration item is not turned on, >> the allocation of crypto_tfm will fail when >> the shash algorithm calculates the hash >> through the software. >> >> Signed-off-by: Longfang Liu <liulongfang@huawei.com> >> --- >> arch/arm64/configs/defconfig | 2 +- >> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) >> >> diff --git a/arch/arm64/configs/defconfig b/arch/arm64/configs/defconfig >> index 8383016..7cfc9b6 100644 >> --- a/arch/arm64/configs/defconfig >> +++ b/arch/arm64/configs/defconfig >> @@ -117,7 +117,7 @@ CONFIG_KVM=y >> CONFIG_ARM64_CRYPTO=y >> CONFIG_CRYPTO_SHA1_ARM64_CE=y >> CONFIG_CRYPTO_SHA2_ARM64_CE=y >> -CONFIG_CRYPTO_SHA512_ARM64_CE=m >> +CONFIG_CRYPTO_SHA512_ARM64_CE=y > > If this is truly needed then it should be enabled through Kconfig. > > Cheers, > Hi Herbert, The option select CRYPTO_SHA512 already exists in Kconfig. Can I change it to this: select CRYPTO_SHA512 || CRYPTO_SHA512_ARM64_CE Thanks, Longfang Liu.
On Sun, 7 Feb 2021 at 03:47, liulongfang <liulongfang@huawei.com> wrote: > > On 2021/2/5 19:44, Herbert Xu write: > > On Fri, Feb 05, 2021 at 06:10:57PM +0800, Longfang Liu wrote: > >> If this configuration item is not turned on, > >> the allocation of crypto_tfm will fail when > >> the shash algorithm calculates the hash > >> through the software. > >> > >> Signed-off-by: Longfang Liu <liulongfang@huawei.com> > >> --- > >> arch/arm64/configs/defconfig | 2 +- > >> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > >> > >> diff --git a/arch/arm64/configs/defconfig b/arch/arm64/configs/defconfig > >> index 8383016..7cfc9b6 100644 > >> --- a/arch/arm64/configs/defconfig > >> +++ b/arch/arm64/configs/defconfig > >> @@ -117,7 +117,7 @@ CONFIG_KVM=y > >> CONFIG_ARM64_CRYPTO=y > >> CONFIG_CRYPTO_SHA1_ARM64_CE=y > >> CONFIG_CRYPTO_SHA2_ARM64_CE=y > >> -CONFIG_CRYPTO_SHA512_ARM64_CE=m > >> +CONFIG_CRYPTO_SHA512_ARM64_CE=y > > > > If this is truly needed then it should be enabled through Kconfig. > > > > Cheers, > > > Hi Herbert, > The option select CRYPTO_SHA512 already exists in Kconfig. In that case, how can the shash TFM allocation fail? > Can I change it to this: select CRYPTO_SHA512 || CRYPTO_SHA512_ARM64_CE No, you cannot select expressions like that. Could you please explain the problem you are trying to solve?
On 2021/2/7 16:02, Ard Biesheuvel wrote: > On Sun, 7 Feb 2021 at 03:47, liulongfang <liulongfang@huawei.com> wrote: >> >> On 2021/2/5 19:44, Herbert Xu write: >>> On Fri, Feb 05, 2021 at 06:10:57PM +0800, Longfang Liu wrote: >>>> If this configuration item is not turned on, >>>> the allocation of crypto_tfm will fail when >>>> the shash algorithm calculates the hash >>>> through the software. >>>> >>>> Signed-off-by: Longfang Liu <liulongfang@huawei.com> >>>> --- >>>> arch/arm64/configs/defconfig | 2 +- >>>> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) >>>> >>>> diff --git a/arch/arm64/configs/defconfig b/arch/arm64/configs/defconfig >>>> index 8383016..7cfc9b6 100644 >>>> --- a/arch/arm64/configs/defconfig >>>> +++ b/arch/arm64/configs/defconfig >>>> @@ -117,7 +117,7 @@ CONFIG_KVM=y >>>> CONFIG_ARM64_CRYPTO=y >>>> CONFIG_CRYPTO_SHA1_ARM64_CE=y >>>> CONFIG_CRYPTO_SHA2_ARM64_CE=y >>>> -CONFIG_CRYPTO_SHA512_ARM64_CE=m >>>> +CONFIG_CRYPTO_SHA512_ARM64_CE=y >>> >>> If this is truly needed then it should be enabled through Kconfig. >>> >>> Cheers, >>> >> Hi Herbert, >> The option select CRYPTO_SHA512 already exists in Kconfig. > > In that case, how can the shash TFM allocation fail? > Hi After comparison and investigation, the problem is that the header file "crypto/internal/hash.h" is not added. After adding this header file, which CRYPTO_SHA512_ARM64_C compilation option does not need to be enabled. I will modify it in the next patch. >> Can I change it to this: select CRYPTO_SHA512 || CRYPTO_SHA512_ARM64_CE > > No, you cannot select expressions like that. > > Could you please explain the problem you are trying to solve? > . > When allocation shash TFM with hmac(sha512)-cbc(aes) algorithm, TFM will return an error. Thanks Longfang.
On 2021/2/5 19:44, Herbert Xu Wrote: > On Fri, Feb 05, 2021 at 06:10:57PM +0800, Longfang Liu wrote: >> If this configuration item is not turned on, >> the allocation of crypto_tfm will fail when >> the shash algorithm calculates the hash >> through the software. >> >> Signed-off-by: Longfang Liu <liulongfang@huawei.com> >> --- >> arch/arm64/configs/defconfig | 2 +- >> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) >> >> diff --git a/arch/arm64/configs/defconfig b/arch/arm64/configs/defconfig >> index 8383016..7cfc9b6 100644 >> --- a/arch/arm64/configs/defconfig >> +++ b/arch/arm64/configs/defconfig >> @@ -117,7 +117,7 @@ CONFIG_KVM=y >> CONFIG_ARM64_CRYPTO=y >> CONFIG_CRYPTO_SHA1_ARM64_CE=y >> CONFIG_CRYPTO_SHA2_ARM64_CE=y >> -CONFIG_CRYPTO_SHA512_ARM64_CE=m >> +CONFIG_CRYPTO_SHA512_ARM64_CE=y > > If this is truly needed then it should be enabled through Kconfig. > > Cheers, > Hi, Since patch3 is an unnecessary patch, can you just remove it and merge patch1 and patch2? Thanks, Longfang.
On Sat, Feb 20, 2021 at 05:51:22PM +0800, liulongfang wrote: . > Since patch3 is an unnecessary patch, > can you just remove it and merge patch1 and patch2? Please repost. Thanks, -- Email: Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au> Home Page: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/ PGP Key: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/pubkey.txt
On 2021/3/4 12:41, Herbert Xu wrote: > On Sat, Feb 20, 2021 at 05:51:22PM +0800, liulongfang wrote: > . >> Since patch3 is an unnecessary patch, >> can you just remove it and merge patch1 and patch2? > > Please repost. > > Thanks, > Ok. Thanks, Longfang