Message ID | 20210122135734.750091426@linuxfoundation.org |
---|---|
State | New |
Headers | show |
Series | None | expand |
On Fri, Jan 22, 2021 at 03:12:45PM +0100, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > From: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net> > > [ no upstream commit ] > > Fix a potential kernel address leakage for the prerequisite where there is > a BPF program attached to the cgroup/setsockopt hook. The latter can only > be attached under root, however, if the attached program returns 1 to then > run the related kernel handler, an unprivileged program could probe for > kernel addresses that way. The reason this is possible is that we're under > set_fs(KERNEL_DS) when running the kernel setsockopt handler. Aside from > old cBPF there is also SCTP's struct sctp_getaddrs_old which contains > pointers in the uapi struct that further need copy_from_user() inside the > handler. In the normal case this would just return -EFAULT, but under a > temporary KERNEL_DS setting the memory would be copied and we'd end up at > a different error code, that is, -EINVAL, for both cases given subsequent > validations fail, which then allows the app to distinguish and make use of > this fact for probing the address space. In case of later kernel versions > this issue won't work anymore thanks to Christoph Hellwig's work that got > rid of the various temporary set_fs() address space overrides altogether. > One potential option for 5.4 as the only affected stable kernel with the > least complexity would be to remap those affected -EFAULT copy_from_user() > error codes with -EINVAL such that they cannot be probed anymore. Risk of > breakage should be rather low for this particular error case. > > Fixes: 0d01da6afc54 ("bpf: implement getsockopt and setsockopt hooks") > Reported-by: Ryota Shiga (Flatt Security) > Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net> > Cc: Stanislav Fomichev <sdf@google.com> > Cc: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com> > Cc: Marcelo Ricardo Leitner <marcelo.leitner@gmail.com> > Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> For sctp bits, Acked-by: Marcelo Ricardo Leitner <marcelo.leitner@gmail.com> ... > --- a/net/sctp/socket.c > +++ b/net/sctp/socket.c > @@ -1319,7 +1319,7 @@ static int __sctp_setsockopt_connectx(st > > kaddrs = memdup_user(addrs, addrs_size); > if (IS_ERR(kaddrs)) > - return PTR_ERR(kaddrs); > + return PTR_ERR(kaddrs) == -EFAULT ? -EINVAL : PTR_ERR(kaddrs); > > /* Allow security module to validate connectx addresses. */ > err = security_sctp_bind_connect(sk, SCTP_SOCKOPT_CONNECTX, > >
On Fri, Jan 22, 2021 at 01:55:45PM -0300, Marcelo Ricardo Leitner wrote: > On Fri, Jan 22, 2021 at 03:12:45PM +0100, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > > From: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net> > > > > [ no upstream commit ] > > > > Fix a potential kernel address leakage for the prerequisite where there is > > a BPF program attached to the cgroup/setsockopt hook. The latter can only > > be attached under root, however, if the attached program returns 1 to then > > run the related kernel handler, an unprivileged program could probe for > > kernel addresses that way. The reason this is possible is that we're under > > set_fs(KERNEL_DS) when running the kernel setsockopt handler. Aside from > > old cBPF there is also SCTP's struct sctp_getaddrs_old which contains > > pointers in the uapi struct that further need copy_from_user() inside the > > handler. In the normal case this would just return -EFAULT, but under a > > temporary KERNEL_DS setting the memory would be copied and we'd end up at > > a different error code, that is, -EINVAL, for both cases given subsequent > > validations fail, which then allows the app to distinguish and make use of > > this fact for probing the address space. In case of later kernel versions > > this issue won't work anymore thanks to Christoph Hellwig's work that got > > rid of the various temporary set_fs() address space overrides altogether. > > One potential option for 5.4 as the only affected stable kernel with the > > least complexity would be to remap those affected -EFAULT copy_from_user() > > error codes with -EINVAL such that they cannot be probed anymore. Risk of > > breakage should be rather low for this particular error case. > > > > Fixes: 0d01da6afc54 ("bpf: implement getsockopt and setsockopt hooks") > > Reported-by: Ryota Shiga (Flatt Security) > > Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net> > > Cc: Stanislav Fomichev <sdf@google.com> > > Cc: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com> > > Cc: Marcelo Ricardo Leitner <marcelo.leitner@gmail.com> > > Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> > > For sctp bits, > Acked-by: Marcelo Ricardo Leitner <marcelo.leitner@gmail.com> Thanks for the review!
--- a/net/core/filter.c +++ b/net/core/filter.c @@ -1475,7 +1475,7 @@ struct bpf_prog *__get_filter(struct soc if (copy_from_user(prog->insns, fprog->filter, fsize)) { __bpf_prog_free(prog); - return ERR_PTR(-EFAULT); + return ERR_PTR(-EINVAL); } prog->len = fprog->len; --- a/net/sctp/socket.c +++ b/net/sctp/socket.c @@ -1319,7 +1319,7 @@ static int __sctp_setsockopt_connectx(st kaddrs = memdup_user(addrs, addrs_size); if (IS_ERR(kaddrs)) - return PTR_ERR(kaddrs); + return PTR_ERR(kaddrs) == -EFAULT ? -EINVAL : PTR_ERR(kaddrs); /* Allow security module to validate connectx addresses. */ err = security_sctp_bind_connect(sk, SCTP_SOCKOPT_CONNECTX,