diff mbox series

[RFC] tools: Factor Clang, LLC and LLVM utils definitions

Message ID 20210116095413.72820-1-sedat.dilek@gmail.com
State Superseded
Headers show
Series [RFC] tools: Factor Clang, LLC and LLVM utils definitions | expand

Commit Message

Sedat Dilek Jan. 16, 2021, 9:54 a.m. UTC
When dealing with BPF/BTF/pahole and DWARF v5 I wanted to build bpftool.

While looking into the source code I found duplicate assignments
in misc tools for the LLVM eco system, e.g. clang and llvm-objcopy.

Move the Clang, LLC and/or LLVM utils definitions to
tools/scripts/Makefile.include file and add missing
includes where needed.
Honestly, I was inspired by commit c8a950d0d3b9
("tools: Factor HOSTCC, HOSTLD, HOSTAR definitions").

I tested with bpftool and perf on Debian/testing AMD64 and
LLVM/Clang v11.1.0-rc1.

Build instructions:

[ make and make-options ]
MAKE="make V=1"
MAKE_OPTS="HOSTCC=clang HOSTCXX=clang++ HOSTLD=ld.lld CC=clang LD=ld.lld LLVM=1 LLVM_IAS=1"
MAKE_OPTS="$MAKE_OPTS PAHOLE=/opt/pahole/bin/pahole"

[ clean-up ]
$MAKE $MAKE_OPTS -C tools/ clean

[ bpftool ]
$MAKE $MAKE_OPTS -C tools/bpf/bpftool/

[ perf ]
PYTHON=python3 $MAKE $MAKE_OPTS -C tools/perf/

I was careful with respecting the user's wish to override custom compiler,
linker, GNU/binutils and/or LLVM utils settings.

Some personal notes:
1. I have NOT tested with cross-toolchain for other archs (cross compiler/linker etc.).
2. This patch is on top of Linux v5.11-rc3.

I hope to get some feedback from especially Linux-bpf folks.

Signed-off-by: Sedat Dilek <sedat.dilek@gmail.com>
---
 tools/bpf/bpftool/Makefile                  | 2 --
 tools/bpf/runqslower/Makefile               | 3 ---
 tools/build/feature/Makefile                | 4 ++--
 tools/perf/Makefile.perf                    | 1 -
 tools/scripts/Makefile.include              | 7 +++++++
 tools/testing/selftests/bpf/Makefile        | 3 +--
 tools/testing/selftests/tc-testing/Makefile | 3 +--
 7 files changed, 11 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)

Comments

Jiri Olsa Jan. 20, 2021, 10:35 p.m. UTC | #1
On Sat, Jan 16, 2021 at 10:54:04AM +0100, Sedat Dilek wrote:
> When dealing with BPF/BTF/pahole and DWARF v5 I wanted to build bpftool.

> 

> While looking into the source code I found duplicate assignments

> in misc tools for the LLVM eco system, e.g. clang and llvm-objcopy.

> 

> Move the Clang, LLC and/or LLVM utils definitions to

> tools/scripts/Makefile.include file and add missing

> includes where needed.

> Honestly, I was inspired by commit c8a950d0d3b9

> ("tools: Factor HOSTCC, HOSTLD, HOSTAR definitions").

> 

> I tested with bpftool and perf on Debian/testing AMD64 and

> LLVM/Clang v11.1.0-rc1.

> 

> Build instructions:

> 

> [ make and make-options ]

> MAKE="make V=1"

> MAKE_OPTS="HOSTCC=clang HOSTCXX=clang++ HOSTLD=ld.lld CC=clang LD=ld.lld LLVM=1 LLVM_IAS=1"

> MAKE_OPTS="$MAKE_OPTS PAHOLE=/opt/pahole/bin/pahole"

> 

> [ clean-up ]

> $MAKE $MAKE_OPTS -C tools/ clean

> 

> [ bpftool ]

> $MAKE $MAKE_OPTS -C tools/bpf/bpftool/

> 

> [ perf ]

> PYTHON=python3 $MAKE $MAKE_OPTS -C tools/perf/

> 

> I was careful with respecting the user's wish to override custom compiler,

> linker, GNU/binutils and/or LLVM utils settings.

> 

> Some personal notes:

> 1. I have NOT tested with cross-toolchain for other archs (cross compiler/linker etc.).

> 2. This patch is on top of Linux v5.11-rc3.

> 

> I hope to get some feedback from especially Linux-bpf folks.

> 

> Signed-off-by: Sedat Dilek <sedat.dilek@gmail.com>

> ---

>  tools/bpf/bpftool/Makefile                  | 2 --

>  tools/bpf/runqslower/Makefile               | 3 ---

>  tools/build/feature/Makefile                | 4 ++--

>  tools/perf/Makefile.perf                    | 1 -


for tools/build and tools/perf

Acked-by: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@redhat.com>


jirka

>  tools/scripts/Makefile.include              | 7 +++++++

>  tools/testing/selftests/bpf/Makefile        | 3 +--

>  tools/testing/selftests/tc-testing/Makefile | 3 +--

>  7 files changed, 11 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)

> 

> diff --git a/tools/bpf/bpftool/Makefile b/tools/bpf/bpftool/Makefile

> index f897cb5fb12d..71c14efa6e91 100644

> --- a/tools/bpf/bpftool/Makefile

> +++ b/tools/bpf/bpftool/Makefile


SNIP
Andrii Nakryiko Jan. 22, 2021, 12:04 a.m. UTC | #2
On Wed, Jan 20, 2021 at 2:36 PM Jiri Olsa <jolsa@redhat.com> wrote:
>
> On Sat, Jan 16, 2021 at 10:54:04AM +0100, Sedat Dilek wrote:
> > When dealing with BPF/BTF/pahole and DWARF v5 I wanted to build bpftool.
> >
> > While looking into the source code I found duplicate assignments
> > in misc tools for the LLVM eco system, e.g. clang and llvm-objcopy.
> >
> > Move the Clang, LLC and/or LLVM utils definitions to
> > tools/scripts/Makefile.include file and add missing
> > includes where needed.
> > Honestly, I was inspired by commit c8a950d0d3b9
> > ("tools: Factor HOSTCC, HOSTLD, HOSTAR definitions").
> >
> > I tested with bpftool and perf on Debian/testing AMD64 and
> > LLVM/Clang v11.1.0-rc1.
> >
> > Build instructions:
> >
> > [ make and make-options ]
> > MAKE="make V=1"
> > MAKE_OPTS="HOSTCC=clang HOSTCXX=clang++ HOSTLD=ld.lld CC=clang LD=ld.lld LLVM=1 LLVM_IAS=1"
> > MAKE_OPTS="$MAKE_OPTS PAHOLE=/opt/pahole/bin/pahole"
> >
> > [ clean-up ]
> > $MAKE $MAKE_OPTS -C tools/ clean
> >
> > [ bpftool ]
> > $MAKE $MAKE_OPTS -C tools/bpf/bpftool/
> >
> > [ perf ]
> > PYTHON=python3 $MAKE $MAKE_OPTS -C tools/perf/
> >
> > I was careful with respecting the user's wish to override custom compiler,
> > linker, GNU/binutils and/or LLVM utils settings.
> >
> > Some personal notes:
> > 1. I have NOT tested with cross-toolchain for other archs (cross compiler/linker etc.).
> > 2. This patch is on top of Linux v5.11-rc3.
> >
> > I hope to get some feedback from especially Linux-bpf folks.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Sedat Dilek <sedat.dilek@gmail.com>
> > ---
> >  tools/bpf/bpftool/Makefile                  | 2 --
> >  tools/bpf/runqslower/Makefile               | 3 ---
> >  tools/build/feature/Makefile                | 4 ++--
> >  tools/perf/Makefile.perf                    | 1 -
>
> for tools/build and tools/perf
>
> Acked-by: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@redhat.com>
>

It's pretty straightforward and looks good for bpftool and runqslower,
but I couldn't apply directly to test due to merge conflicts.

Also, which tree this should go through, given it touches multiple
parts under tools/?

> jirka
>
> >  tools/scripts/Makefile.include              | 7 +++++++
> >  tools/testing/selftests/bpf/Makefile        | 3 +--
> >  tools/testing/selftests/tc-testing/Makefile | 3 +--
> >  7 files changed, 11 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/tools/bpf/bpftool/Makefile b/tools/bpf/bpftool/Makefile
> > index f897cb5fb12d..71c14efa6e91 100644
> > --- a/tools/bpf/bpftool/Makefile
> > +++ b/tools/bpf/bpftool/Makefile
>
> SNIP
>
Sedat Dilek Jan. 22, 2021, 12:12 a.m. UTC | #3
On Fri, Jan 22, 2021 at 1:04 AM Andrii Nakryiko
<andrii.nakryiko@gmail.com> wrote:
>

> On Wed, Jan 20, 2021 at 2:36 PM Jiri Olsa <jolsa@redhat.com> wrote:

> >

> > On Sat, Jan 16, 2021 at 10:54:04AM +0100, Sedat Dilek wrote:

> > > When dealing with BPF/BTF/pahole and DWARF v5 I wanted to build bpftool.

> > >

> > > While looking into the source code I found duplicate assignments

> > > in misc tools for the LLVM eco system, e.g. clang and llvm-objcopy.

> > >

> > > Move the Clang, LLC and/or LLVM utils definitions to

> > > tools/scripts/Makefile.include file and add missing

> > > includes where needed.

> > > Honestly, I was inspired by commit c8a950d0d3b9

> > > ("tools: Factor HOSTCC, HOSTLD, HOSTAR definitions").

> > >

> > > I tested with bpftool and perf on Debian/testing AMD64 and

> > > LLVM/Clang v11.1.0-rc1.

> > >

> > > Build instructions:

> > >

> > > [ make and make-options ]

> > > MAKE="make V=1"

> > > MAKE_OPTS="HOSTCC=clang HOSTCXX=clang++ HOSTLD=ld.lld CC=clang LD=ld.lld LLVM=1 LLVM_IAS=1"

> > > MAKE_OPTS="$MAKE_OPTS PAHOLE=/opt/pahole/bin/pahole"

> > >

> > > [ clean-up ]

> > > $MAKE $MAKE_OPTS -C tools/ clean

> > >

> > > [ bpftool ]

> > > $MAKE $MAKE_OPTS -C tools/bpf/bpftool/

> > >

> > > [ perf ]

> > > PYTHON=python3 $MAKE $MAKE_OPTS -C tools/perf/

> > >

> > > I was careful with respecting the user's wish to override custom compiler,

> > > linker, GNU/binutils and/or LLVM utils settings.

> > >

> > > Some personal notes:

> > > 1. I have NOT tested with cross-toolchain for other archs (cross compiler/linker etc.).

> > > 2. This patch is on top of Linux v5.11-rc3.

> > >

> > > I hope to get some feedback from especially Linux-bpf folks.

> > >

> > > Signed-off-by: Sedat Dilek <sedat.dilek@gmail.com>

> > > ---

> > >  tools/bpf/bpftool/Makefile                  | 2 --

> > >  tools/bpf/runqslower/Makefile               | 3 ---

> > >  tools/build/feature/Makefile                | 4 ++--

> > >  tools/perf/Makefile.perf                    | 1 -

> >

> > for tools/build and tools/perf

> >

> > Acked-by: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@redhat.com>

> >

>

> It's pretty straightforward and looks good for bpftool and runqslower,

> but I couldn't apply directly to test due to merge conflicts.

>

> Also, which tree this should go through, given it touches multiple

> parts under tools/?

>


Sorry, for the conflicts.
AFAICS I should do this again against Linux v5.11-rc4 vanilla?
Is this OK to you?

Good hint, cannot say through which tree this should go through.

- Sedat -

> > jirka

> >

> > >  tools/scripts/Makefile.include              | 7 +++++++

> > >  tools/testing/selftests/bpf/Makefile        | 3 +--

> > >  tools/testing/selftests/tc-testing/Makefile | 3 +--

> > >  7 files changed, 11 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)

> > >

> > > diff --git a/tools/bpf/bpftool/Makefile b/tools/bpf/bpftool/Makefile

> > > index f897cb5fb12d..71c14efa6e91 100644

> > > --- a/tools/bpf/bpftool/Makefile

> > > +++ b/tools/bpf/bpftool/Makefile

> >

> > SNIP

> >
Sedat Dilek Jan. 22, 2021, 12:21 a.m. UTC | #4
On Fri, Jan 22, 2021 at 1:12 AM Sedat Dilek <sedat.dilek@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> On Fri, Jan 22, 2021 at 1:04 AM Andrii Nakryiko
> <andrii.nakryiko@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > On Wed, Jan 20, 2021 at 2:36 PM Jiri Olsa <jolsa@redhat.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > On Sat, Jan 16, 2021 at 10:54:04AM +0100, Sedat Dilek wrote:
> > > > When dealing with BPF/BTF/pahole and DWARF v5 I wanted to build bpftool.
> > > >
> > > > While looking into the source code I found duplicate assignments
> > > > in misc tools for the LLVM eco system, e.g. clang and llvm-objcopy.
> > > >
> > > > Move the Clang, LLC and/or LLVM utils definitions to
> > > > tools/scripts/Makefile.include file and add missing
> > > > includes where needed.
> > > > Honestly, I was inspired by commit c8a950d0d3b9
> > > > ("tools: Factor HOSTCC, HOSTLD, HOSTAR definitions").
> > > >
> > > > I tested with bpftool and perf on Debian/testing AMD64 and
> > > > LLVM/Clang v11.1.0-rc1.
> > > >
> > > > Build instructions:
> > > >
> > > > [ make and make-options ]
> > > > MAKE="make V=1"
> > > > MAKE_OPTS="HOSTCC=clang HOSTCXX=clang++ HOSTLD=ld.lld CC=clang LD=ld.lld LLVM=1 LLVM_IAS=1"
> > > > MAKE_OPTS="$MAKE_OPTS PAHOLE=/opt/pahole/bin/pahole"
> > > >
> > > > [ clean-up ]
> > > > $MAKE $MAKE_OPTS -C tools/ clean
> > > >
> > > > [ bpftool ]
> > > > $MAKE $MAKE_OPTS -C tools/bpf/bpftool/
> > > >
> > > > [ perf ]
> > > > PYTHON=python3 $MAKE $MAKE_OPTS -C tools/perf/
> > > >
> > > > I was careful with respecting the user's wish to override custom compiler,
> > > > linker, GNU/binutils and/or LLVM utils settings.
> > > >
> > > > Some personal notes:
> > > > 1. I have NOT tested with cross-toolchain for other archs (cross compiler/linker etc.).
> > > > 2. This patch is on top of Linux v5.11-rc3.
> > > >
> > > > I hope to get some feedback from especially Linux-bpf folks.
> > > >
> > > > Signed-off-by: Sedat Dilek <sedat.dilek@gmail.com>
> > > > ---
> > > >  tools/bpf/bpftool/Makefile                  | 2 --
> > > >  tools/bpf/runqslower/Makefile               | 3 ---
> > > >  tools/build/feature/Makefile                | 4 ++--
> > > >  tools/perf/Makefile.perf                    | 1 -
> > >
> > > for tools/build and tools/perf
> > >
> > > Acked-by: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@redhat.com>
> > >
> >
> > It's pretty straightforward and looks good for bpftool and runqslower,
> > but I couldn't apply directly to test due to merge conflicts.
> >
> > Also, which tree this should go through, given it touches multiple
> > parts under tools/?
> >
>
> Sorry, for the conflicts.
> AFAICS I should do this again against Linux v5.11-rc4 vanilla?
> Is this OK to you?
>

I re-checked:
This patch was on top of Linux v5.11-rc3 and applies cleanly against
Linux v5.11-rc.

Please let me know if I should adapt to a different Git tree.

- Sedat -

> Good hint, cannot say through which tree this should go through.
>
> - Sedat -
>
> > > jirka
> > >
> > > >  tools/scripts/Makefile.include              | 7 +++++++
> > > >  tools/testing/selftests/bpf/Makefile        | 3 +--
> > > >  tools/testing/selftests/tc-testing/Makefile | 3 +--
> > > >  7 files changed, 11 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
> > > >
> > > > diff --git a/tools/bpf/bpftool/Makefile b/tools/bpf/bpftool/Makefile
> > > > index f897cb5fb12d..71c14efa6e91 100644
> > > > --- a/tools/bpf/bpftool/Makefile
> > > > +++ b/tools/bpf/bpftool/Makefile
> > >
> > > SNIP
> > >
Sedat Dilek Jan. 22, 2021, 12:25 a.m. UTC | #5
On Fri, Jan 22, 2021 at 1:21 AM Sedat Dilek <sedat.dilek@gmail.com> wrote:
>

> On Fri, Jan 22, 2021 at 1:12 AM Sedat Dilek <sedat.dilek@gmail.com> wrote:

> >

> > On Fri, Jan 22, 2021 at 1:04 AM Andrii Nakryiko

> > <andrii.nakryiko@gmail.com> wrote:

> > >

> > > On Wed, Jan 20, 2021 at 2:36 PM Jiri Olsa <jolsa@redhat.com> wrote:

> > > >

> > > > On Sat, Jan 16, 2021 at 10:54:04AM +0100, Sedat Dilek wrote:

> > > > > When dealing with BPF/BTF/pahole and DWARF v5 I wanted to build bpftool.

> > > > >

> > > > > While looking into the source code I found duplicate assignments

> > > > > in misc tools for the LLVM eco system, e.g. clang and llvm-objcopy.

> > > > >

> > > > > Move the Clang, LLC and/or LLVM utils definitions to

> > > > > tools/scripts/Makefile.include file and add missing

> > > > > includes where needed.

> > > > > Honestly, I was inspired by commit c8a950d0d3b9

> > > > > ("tools: Factor HOSTCC, HOSTLD, HOSTAR definitions").

> > > > >

> > > > > I tested with bpftool and perf on Debian/testing AMD64 and

> > > > > LLVM/Clang v11.1.0-rc1.

> > > > >

> > > > > Build instructions:

> > > > >

> > > > > [ make and make-options ]

> > > > > MAKE="make V=1"

> > > > > MAKE_OPTS="HOSTCC=clang HOSTCXX=clang++ HOSTLD=ld.lld CC=clang LD=ld.lld LLVM=1 LLVM_IAS=1"

> > > > > MAKE_OPTS="$MAKE_OPTS PAHOLE=/opt/pahole/bin/pahole"

> > > > >

> > > > > [ clean-up ]

> > > > > $MAKE $MAKE_OPTS -C tools/ clean

> > > > >

> > > > > [ bpftool ]

> > > > > $MAKE $MAKE_OPTS -C tools/bpf/bpftool/

> > > > >

> > > > > [ perf ]

> > > > > PYTHON=python3 $MAKE $MAKE_OPTS -C tools/perf/

> > > > >

> > > > > I was careful with respecting the user's wish to override custom compiler,

> > > > > linker, GNU/binutils and/or LLVM utils settings.

> > > > >

> > > > > Some personal notes:

> > > > > 1. I have NOT tested with cross-toolchain for other archs (cross compiler/linker etc.).

> > > > > 2. This patch is on top of Linux v5.11-rc3.

> > > > >

> > > > > I hope to get some feedback from especially Linux-bpf folks.

> > > > >

> > > > > Signed-off-by: Sedat Dilek <sedat.dilek@gmail.com>

> > > > > ---

> > > > >  tools/bpf/bpftool/Makefile                  | 2 --

> > > > >  tools/bpf/runqslower/Makefile               | 3 ---

> > > > >  tools/build/feature/Makefile                | 4 ++--

> > > > >  tools/perf/Makefile.perf                    | 1 -

> > > >

> > > > for tools/build and tools/perf

> > > >

> > > > Acked-by: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@redhat.com>

> > > >

> > >

> > > It's pretty straightforward and looks good for bpftool and runqslower,

> > > but I couldn't apply directly to test due to merge conflicts.

> > >

> > > Also, which tree this should go through, given it touches multiple

> > > parts under tools/?

> > >

> >

> > Sorry, for the conflicts.

> > AFAICS I should do this again against Linux v5.11-rc4 vanilla?

> > Is this OK to you?

> >

>

> I re-checked:

> This patch was on top of Linux v5.11-rc3 and applies cleanly against

> Linux v5.11-rc.

>


Bullshit.

I will send out a v2 against Linux v5.11-rc4 - was on the wrong local
Git branch.

- Sedat -

> Please let me know if I should adapt to a different Git tree.

>

> - Sedat -

>

> > Good hint, cannot say through which tree this should go through.

> >

> > - Sedat -

> >

> > > > jirka

> > > >

> > > > >  tools/scripts/Makefile.include              | 7 +++++++

> > > > >  tools/testing/selftests/bpf/Makefile        | 3 +--

> > > > >  tools/testing/selftests/tc-testing/Makefile | 3 +--

> > > > >  7 files changed, 11 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)

> > > > >

> > > > > diff --git a/tools/bpf/bpftool/Makefile b/tools/bpf/bpftool/Makefile

> > > > > index f897cb5fb12d..71c14efa6e91 100644

> > > > > --- a/tools/bpf/bpftool/Makefile

> > > > > +++ b/tools/bpf/bpftool/Makefile

> > > >

> > > > SNIP

> > > >
diff mbox series

Patch

diff --git a/tools/bpf/bpftool/Makefile b/tools/bpf/bpftool/Makefile
index f897cb5fb12d..71c14efa6e91 100644
--- a/tools/bpf/bpftool/Makefile
+++ b/tools/bpf/bpftool/Makefile
@@ -75,8 +75,6 @@  endif
 
 INSTALL ?= install
 RM ?= rm -f
-CLANG ?= clang
-LLVM_STRIP ?= llvm-strip
 
 FEATURE_USER = .bpftool
 FEATURE_TESTS = libbfd disassembler-four-args reallocarray zlib libcap \
diff --git a/tools/bpf/runqslower/Makefile b/tools/bpf/runqslower/Makefile
index 4d5ca54fcd4c..9d9fb6209be1 100644
--- a/tools/bpf/runqslower/Makefile
+++ b/tools/bpf/runqslower/Makefile
@@ -3,9 +3,6 @@  include ../../scripts/Makefile.include
 
 OUTPUT ?= $(abspath .output)/
 
-CLANG ?= clang
-LLC ?= llc
-LLVM_STRIP ?= llvm-strip
 BPFTOOL_OUTPUT := $(OUTPUT)bpftool/
 DEFAULT_BPFTOOL := $(BPFTOOL_OUTPUT)bpftool
 BPFTOOL ?= $(DEFAULT_BPFTOOL)
diff --git a/tools/build/feature/Makefile b/tools/build/feature/Makefile
index 89ba522e377d..3e55edb3ea54 100644
--- a/tools/build/feature/Makefile
+++ b/tools/build/feature/Makefile
@@ -1,4 +1,6 @@ 
 # SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
+include ../../scripts/Makefile.include
+
 FILES=                                          \
          test-all.bin                           \
          test-backtrace.bin                     \
@@ -76,8 +78,6 @@  FILES=                                          \
 FILES := $(addprefix $(OUTPUT),$(FILES))
 
 PKG_CONFIG ?= $(CROSS_COMPILE)pkg-config
-LLVM_CONFIG ?= llvm-config
-CLANG ?= clang
 
 all: $(FILES)
 
diff --git a/tools/perf/Makefile.perf b/tools/perf/Makefile.perf
index 62f3deb1d3a8..f4df7534026d 100644
--- a/tools/perf/Makefile.perf
+++ b/tools/perf/Makefile.perf
@@ -176,7 +176,6 @@  endef
 LD += $(EXTRA_LDFLAGS)
 
 PKG_CONFIG = $(CROSS_COMPILE)pkg-config
-LLVM_CONFIG ?= llvm-config
 
 RM      = rm -f
 LN      = ln -f
diff --git a/tools/scripts/Makefile.include b/tools/scripts/Makefile.include
index 1358e89cdf7d..4255e71f72b7 100644
--- a/tools/scripts/Makefile.include
+++ b/tools/scripts/Makefile.include
@@ -69,6 +69,13 @@  HOSTCC  ?= gcc
 HOSTLD  ?= ld
 endif
 
+# Some tools require Clang, LLC and/or LLVM utils
+CLANG		?= clang
+LLC		?= llc
+LLVM_CONFIG	?= llvm-config
+LLVM_OBJCOPY	?= llvm-objcopy
+LLVM_STRIP	?= llvm-strip
+
 ifeq ($(CC_NO_CLANG), 1)
 EXTRA_WARNINGS += -Wstrict-aliasing=3
 endif
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/Makefile b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/Makefile
index c51df6b91bef..952e2bc5f3bc 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/Makefile
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/Makefile
@@ -1,6 +1,7 @@ 
 # SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
 include ../../../../scripts/Kbuild.include
 include ../../../scripts/Makefile.arch
+include ../../../scripts/Makefile.include
 
 CXX ?= $(CROSS_COMPILE)g++
 
@@ -18,8 +19,6 @@  ifneq ($(wildcard $(GENHDR)),)
   GENFLAGS := -DHAVE_GENHDR
 endif
 
-CLANG		?= clang
-LLVM_OBJCOPY	?= llvm-objcopy
 BPF_GCC		?= $(shell command -v bpf-gcc;)
 SAN_CFLAGS	?=
 CFLAGS += -g -rdynamic -Wall -O2 $(GENFLAGS) $(SAN_CFLAGS)		\
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/tc-testing/Makefile b/tools/testing/selftests/tc-testing/Makefile
index 91fee5c43274..4d639279f41e 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/tc-testing/Makefile
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/tc-testing/Makefile
@@ -1,4 +1,5 @@ 
 # SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
+include ../../../scripts/Makefile.include
 
 top_srcdir = $(abspath ../../../..)
 APIDIR := $(top_scrdir)/include/uapi
@@ -7,8 +8,6 @@  TEST_GEN_FILES = action.o
 KSFT_KHDR_INSTALL := 1
 include ../lib.mk
 
-CLANG ?= clang
-LLC   ?= llc
 PROBE := $(shell $(LLC) -march=bpf -mcpu=probe -filetype=null /dev/null 2>&1)
 
 ifeq ($(PROBE),)