diff mbox series

[net,v3] ppp: fix refcount underflow on channel unbridge

Message ID 20210107181315.3128-1-tparkin@katalix.com
State New
Headers show
Series [net,v3] ppp: fix refcount underflow on channel unbridge | expand

Commit Message

Tom Parkin Jan. 7, 2021, 6:13 p.m. UTC
When setting up a channel bridge, ppp_bridge_channels sets the
pch->bridge field before taking the associated reference on the bridge
file instance.

This opens up a refcount underflow bug if ppp_bridge_channels called
via. iotcl runs concurrently with ppp_unbridge_channels executing via.
file release.

The bug is triggered by ppp_bridge_channels taking the error path
through the 'err_unset' label.  In this scenario, pch->bridge is set,
but the reference on the bridged channel will not be taken because
the function errors out.  If ppp_unbridge_channels observes pch->bridge
before it is unset by the error path, it will erroneously drop the
reference on the bridged channel and cause a refcount underflow.

To avoid this, ensure that ppp_bridge_channels holds a reference on
each channel in advance of setting the bridge pointers.

Signed-off-by: Tom Parkin <tparkin@katalix.com>
Fixes: 4cf476ced45d ("ppp: add PPPIOCBRIDGECHAN and PPPIOCUNBRIDGECHAN ioctls")
---
v3:
 * remove bool tracking variable in ppp_bridge_channels and re-read
   pch->bridge instead
 * add missing tags
v2:
 * rework ppp_bridge_channels code to avoid the race condition in
   preference to holding ppp_mutex while calling ppp_unbridge_channels
---
 drivers/net/ppp/ppp_generic.c | 12 +++++++++---
 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

Comments

Guillaume Nault Jan. 8, 2021, 8:57 p.m. UTC | #1
On Thu, Jan 07, 2021 at 06:13:15PM +0000, Tom Parkin wrote:
> When setting up a channel bridge, ppp_bridge_channels sets the

> pch->bridge field before taking the associated reference on the bridge

> file instance.

> 

> This opens up a refcount underflow bug if ppp_bridge_channels called

> via. iotcl runs concurrently with ppp_unbridge_channels executing via.

> file release.

> 

> The bug is triggered by ppp_bridge_channels taking the error path

> through the 'err_unset' label.  In this scenario, pch->bridge is set,

> but the reference on the bridged channel will not be taken because

> the function errors out.  If ppp_unbridge_channels observes pch->bridge

> before it is unset by the error path, it will erroneously drop the

> reference on the bridged channel and cause a refcount underflow.

> 

> To avoid this, ensure that ppp_bridge_channels holds a reference on

> each channel in advance of setting the bridge pointers.


Thanks for following up on this!

Acked-by: Guillaume Nault <gnault@redhat.com>
Jakub Kicinski Jan. 9, 2021, 3:23 a.m. UTC | #2
On Fri, 8 Jan 2021 21:57:50 +0100 Guillaume Nault wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 07, 2021 at 06:13:15PM +0000, Tom Parkin wrote:

> > When setting up a channel bridge, ppp_bridge_channels sets the

> > pch->bridge field before taking the associated reference on the bridge

> > file instance.

> > 

> > This opens up a refcount underflow bug if ppp_bridge_channels called

> > via. iotcl runs concurrently with ppp_unbridge_channels executing via.

> > file release.

> > 

> > The bug is triggered by ppp_bridge_channels taking the error path

> > through the 'err_unset' label.  In this scenario, pch->bridge is set,

> > but the reference on the bridged channel will not be taken because

> > the function errors out.  If ppp_unbridge_channels observes pch->bridge

> > before it is unset by the error path, it will erroneously drop the

> > reference on the bridged channel and cause a refcount underflow.

> > 

> > To avoid this, ensure that ppp_bridge_channels holds a reference on

> > each channel in advance of setting the bridge pointers.  

> 

> Thanks for following up on this!

> 

> Acked-by: Guillaume Nault <gnault@redhat.com>


Applied, thanks!
Tom Parkin Jan. 11, 2021, 10:28 a.m. UTC | #3
On  Fri, Jan 08, 2021 at 21:57:50 +0100, Guillaume Nault wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 07, 2021 at 06:13:15PM +0000, Tom Parkin wrote:

> > When setting up a channel bridge, ppp_bridge_channels sets the

> > pch->bridge field before taking the associated reference on the bridge

> > file instance.

> > 

> > This opens up a refcount underflow bug if ppp_bridge_channels called

> > via. iotcl runs concurrently with ppp_unbridge_channels executing via.

> > file release.

> > 

> > The bug is triggered by ppp_bridge_channels taking the error path

> > through the 'err_unset' label.  In this scenario, pch->bridge is set,

> > but the reference on the bridged channel will not be taken because

> > the function errors out.  If ppp_unbridge_channels observes pch->bridge

> > before it is unset by the error path, it will erroneously drop the

> > reference on the bridged channel and cause a refcount underflow.

> > 

> > To avoid this, ensure that ppp_bridge_channels holds a reference on

> > each channel in advance of setting the bridge pointers.

> 

> Thanks for following up on this!

> 

> Acked-by: Guillaume Nault <gnault@redhat.com>


Thanks again for reviewing, Guillaume.
diff mbox series

Patch

diff --git a/drivers/net/ppp/ppp_generic.c b/drivers/net/ppp/ppp_generic.c
index 09c27f7773f9..d445ecb1d0c7 100644
--- a/drivers/net/ppp/ppp_generic.c
+++ b/drivers/net/ppp/ppp_generic.c
@@ -623,6 +623,7 @@  static int ppp_bridge_channels(struct channel *pch, struct channel *pchb)
 		write_unlock_bh(&pch->upl);
 		return -EALREADY;
 	}
+	refcount_inc(&pchb->file.refcnt);
 	rcu_assign_pointer(pch->bridge, pchb);
 	write_unlock_bh(&pch->upl);
 
@@ -632,19 +633,24 @@  static int ppp_bridge_channels(struct channel *pch, struct channel *pchb)
 		write_unlock_bh(&pchb->upl);
 		goto err_unset;
 	}
+	refcount_inc(&pch->file.refcnt);
 	rcu_assign_pointer(pchb->bridge, pch);
 	write_unlock_bh(&pchb->upl);
 
-	refcount_inc(&pch->file.refcnt);
-	refcount_inc(&pchb->file.refcnt);
-
 	return 0;
 
 err_unset:
 	write_lock_bh(&pch->upl);
+	/* Re-read pch->bridge with upl held in case it was modified concurrently */
+	pchb = rcu_dereference_protected(pch->bridge, lockdep_is_held(&pch->upl));
 	RCU_INIT_POINTER(pch->bridge, NULL);
 	write_unlock_bh(&pch->upl);
 	synchronize_rcu();
+
+	if (pchb)
+		if (refcount_dec_and_test(&pchb->file.refcnt))
+			ppp_destroy_channel(pchb);
+
 	return -EALREADY;
 }