diff mbox series

[1/3] dt-bindings: power: Introduce 'assigned-performance-states' property

Message ID 20201224111210.1214-2-rojay@codeaurora.org
State New
Headers show
Series [1/3] dt-bindings: power: Introduce 'assigned-performance-states' property | expand

Commit Message

Roja Rani Yarubandi Dec. 24, 2020, 11:12 a.m. UTC
While most devices within power-domains which support performance states,
scale the performance state dynamically, some devices might want to
set a static/default performance state while the device is active.
These devices typically would also run off a fixed clock and not support
dynamically scaling the device's performance, also known as DVFS
techniques.

Add a property 'assigned-performance-states' which client devices can
use to set this default performance state on their power-domains.

Signed-off-by: Roja Rani Yarubandi <rojay@codeaurora.org>
---
 .../bindings/power/power-domain.yaml          | 49 +++++++++++++++++++
 1 file changed, 49 insertions(+)

Comments

Rob Herring (Arm) Dec. 26, 2020, 12:16 a.m. UTC | #1
On Thu, 24 Dec 2020 16:42:08 +0530, Roja Rani Yarubandi wrote:
> While most devices within power-domains which support performance states,
> scale the performance state dynamically, some devices might want to
> set a static/default performance state while the device is active.
> These devices typically would also run off a fixed clock and not support
> dynamically scaling the device's performance, also known as DVFS
> techniques.
> 
> Add a property 'assigned-performance-states' which client devices can
> use to set this default performance state on their power-domains.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Roja Rani Yarubandi <rojay@codeaurora.org>
> ---
>  .../bindings/power/power-domain.yaml          | 49 +++++++++++++++++++
>  1 file changed, 49 insertions(+)
> 

My bot found errors running 'make dt_binding_check' on your patch:

yamllint warnings/errors:
./Documentation/devicetree/bindings/power/power-domain.yaml:72:8: [warning] wrong indentation: expected 6 but found 7 (indentation)

dtschema/dtc warnings/errors:

See https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/1420485

This check can fail if there are any dependencies. The base for a patch
series is generally the most recent rc1.

If you already ran 'make dt_binding_check' and didn't see the above
error(s), then make sure 'yamllint' is installed and dt-schema is up to
date:

pip3 install dtschema --upgrade

Please check and re-submit.
Rob Herring (Arm) Dec. 31, 2020, 3:49 p.m. UTC | #2
On Thu, Dec 24, 2020 at 04:42:08PM +0530, Roja Rani Yarubandi wrote:
> While most devices within power-domains which support performance states,

> scale the performance state dynamically, some devices might want to

> set a static/default performance state while the device is active.

> These devices typically would also run off a fixed clock and not support

> dynamically scaling the device's performance, also known as DVFS

> techniques.

> 

> Add a property 'assigned-performance-states' which client devices can

> use to set this default performance state on their power-domains.

> 

> Signed-off-by: Roja Rani Yarubandi <rojay@codeaurora.org>

> ---

>  .../bindings/power/power-domain.yaml          | 49 +++++++++++++++++++

>  1 file changed, 49 insertions(+)

> 

> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/power/power-domain.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/power/power-domain.yaml

> index aed51e9dcb11..a42977a82d06 100644

> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/power/power-domain.yaml

> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/power/power-domain.yaml

> @@ -66,6 +66,18 @@ properties:

>        by the given provider should be subdomains of the domain specified

>        by this binding.

>  

> +  assigned-performance-states:

> +    $ref: /schemas/types.yaml#/definitions/uint32-array

> +    description:

> +       Some devices might need to configure their power domains in a default

> +       performance state while the device is active. These devices typcially

> +       would also run off a fixed clock and not support dynamically scaling

> +       the device's performance, also known as DVFS techniques. Each cell in

> +       performance state value corresponds to one power domain specified as

> +       part of the power-domains property. Performance state value can be an

> +       opp-level inside an OPP table of the power-domain and need not match

> +       with any OPP table performance state.


Couldn't this just be an additional cell in 'power-domains'?

> +

>  required:

>    - "#power-domain-cells"

>  

> @@ -131,3 +143,40 @@ examples:

>              min-residency-us = <7000>;

>          };

>      };

> +

> +  - |

> +    parent4: power-controller@12340000 {

> +        compatible = "foo,power-controller";

> +        reg = <0x12340000 0x1000>;

> +        #power-domain-cells = <0>;

> +    };

> +

> +    parent5: power-controller@43210000 {

> +        compatible = "foo,power-controller";

> +        reg = <0x43210000 0x1000>;

> +        #power-domain-cells = <0>;

> +        operating-points-v2 = <&power_opp_table>;

> +

> +        power_opp_table: opp-table {

> +            compatible = "operating-points-v2";

> +

> +            power_opp_low: opp1 {

> +                opp-level = <16>;

> +            };

> +

> +            rpmpd_opp_ret: opp2 {

> +                opp-level = <64>;

> +            };

> +

> +            rpmpd_opp_svs: opp3 {

> +                opp-level = <256>;

> +            };

> +        };

> +    };

> +

> +    child4: consumer@12341000 {

> +        compatible = "foo,consumer";

> +        reg = <0x12341000 0x1000>;

> +        power-domains = <&parent4>, <&parent5>;

> +        assigned-performance-states = <0>, <256>;

> +    };

> -- 

> QUALCOMM INDIA, on behalf of Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member 

> of Code Aurora Forum, hosted by The Linux Foundation

>
Ulf Hansson Jan. 8, 2021, 9:39 a.m. UTC | #3
On Thu, 31 Dec 2020 at 16:49, Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org> wrote:
>

> On Thu, Dec 24, 2020 at 04:42:08PM +0530, Roja Rani Yarubandi wrote:

> > While most devices within power-domains which support performance states,

> > scale the performance state dynamically, some devices might want to

> > set a static/default performance state while the device is active.

> > These devices typically would also run off a fixed clock and not support

> > dynamically scaling the device's performance, also known as DVFS

> > techniques.

> >

> > Add a property 'assigned-performance-states' which client devices can

> > use to set this default performance state on their power-domains.

> >

> > Signed-off-by: Roja Rani Yarubandi <rojay@codeaurora.org>

> > ---

> >  .../bindings/power/power-domain.yaml          | 49 +++++++++++++++++++

> >  1 file changed, 49 insertions(+)

> >

> > diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/power/power-domain.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/power/power-domain.yaml

> > index aed51e9dcb11..a42977a82d06 100644

> > --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/power/power-domain.yaml

> > +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/power/power-domain.yaml

> > @@ -66,6 +66,18 @@ properties:

> >        by the given provider should be subdomains of the domain specified

> >        by this binding.

> >

> > +  assigned-performance-states:

> > +    $ref: /schemas/types.yaml#/definitions/uint32-array

> > +    description:

> > +       Some devices might need to configure their power domains in a default

> > +       performance state while the device is active. These devices typcially

> > +       would also run off a fixed clock and not support dynamically scaling

> > +       the device's performance, also known as DVFS techniques. Each cell in

> > +       performance state value corresponds to one power domain specified as

> > +       part of the power-domains property. Performance state value can be an

> > +       opp-level inside an OPP table of the power-domain and need not match

> > +       with any OPP table performance state.

>

> Couldn't this just be an additional cell in 'power-domains'?


Right. Some SoCs already use the cell to specify per device SoC
specific data [1].

Although, I am wondering if we shouldn't consider
"assigned-performance-states" as a more generic binding. I think it
would be somewhat comparable with the existing "assigned-clock-rates"
binding, don't you think?

[...]

Kind regards
Uffe

[1]
Documentation/devicetree/bindings/soc/ti/sci-pm-domain.txt
Bjorn Andersson Jan. 15, 2021, 4:15 p.m. UTC | #4
On Thu 24 Dec 05:12 CST 2020, Roja Rani Yarubandi wrote:

> While most devices within power-domains which support performance states,

> scale the performance state dynamically, some devices might want to

> set a static/default performance state while the device is active.

> These devices typically would also run off a fixed clock and not support

> dynamically scaling the device's performance, also known as DVFS

> techniques.

> 

> Add a property 'assigned-performance-states' which client devices can

> use to set this default performance state on their power-domains.

> 

> Signed-off-by: Roja Rani Yarubandi <rojay@codeaurora.org>

> ---

>  .../bindings/power/power-domain.yaml          | 49 +++++++++++++++++++

>  1 file changed, 49 insertions(+)

> 

> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/power/power-domain.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/power/power-domain.yaml

> index aed51e9dcb11..a42977a82d06 100644

> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/power/power-domain.yaml

> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/power/power-domain.yaml

> @@ -66,6 +66,18 @@ properties:

>        by the given provider should be subdomains of the domain specified

>        by this binding.

>  

> +  assigned-performance-states:

> +    $ref: /schemas/types.yaml#/definitions/uint32-array

> +    description:

> +       Some devices might need to configure their power domains in a default

> +       performance state while the device is active. These devices typcially

> +       would also run off a fixed clock and not support dynamically scaling

> +       the device's performance, also known as DVFS techniques. Each cell in

> +       performance state value corresponds to one power domain specified as

> +       part of the power-domains property. Performance state value can be an

> +       opp-level inside an OPP table of the power-domain and need not match

> +       with any OPP table performance state.

> +

>  required:

>    - "#power-domain-cells"

>  

> @@ -131,3 +143,40 @@ examples:

>              min-residency-us = <7000>;

>          };

>      };

> +

> +  - |

> +    parent4: power-controller@12340000 {

> +        compatible = "foo,power-controller";

> +        reg = <0x12340000 0x1000>;

> +        #power-domain-cells = <0>;

> +    };

> +

> +    parent5: power-controller@43210000 {

> +        compatible = "foo,power-controller";

> +        reg = <0x43210000 0x1000>;

> +        #power-domain-cells = <0>;

> +        operating-points-v2 = <&power_opp_table>;

> +

> +        power_opp_table: opp-table {

> +            compatible = "operating-points-v2";

> +

> +            power_opp_low: opp1 {

> +                opp-level = <16>;

> +            };

> +

> +            rpmpd_opp_ret: opp2 {

> +                opp-level = <64>;

> +            };

> +

> +            rpmpd_opp_svs: opp3 {

> +                opp-level = <256>;

> +            };

> +        };

> +    };

> +

> +    child4: consumer@12341000 {

> +        compatible = "foo,consumer";

> +        reg = <0x12341000 0x1000>;

> +        power-domains = <&parent4>, <&parent5>;

> +        assigned-performance-states = <0>, <256>;


May I ask how this is different from saying something like:

	required-opps = <&??>, <&rpmpd_opp_svs>:

Regards,
Bjorn

> +    };

> -- 

> QUALCOMM INDIA, on behalf of Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member 

> of Code Aurora Forum, hosted by The Linux Foundation

>
diff mbox series

Patch

diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/power/power-domain.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/power/power-domain.yaml
index aed51e9dcb11..a42977a82d06 100644
--- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/power/power-domain.yaml
+++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/power/power-domain.yaml
@@ -66,6 +66,18 @@  properties:
       by the given provider should be subdomains of the domain specified
       by this binding.
 
+  assigned-performance-states:
+    $ref: /schemas/types.yaml#/definitions/uint32-array
+    description:
+       Some devices might need to configure their power domains in a default
+       performance state while the device is active. These devices typcially
+       would also run off a fixed clock and not support dynamically scaling
+       the device's performance, also known as DVFS techniques. Each cell in
+       performance state value corresponds to one power domain specified as
+       part of the power-domains property. Performance state value can be an
+       opp-level inside an OPP table of the power-domain and need not match
+       with any OPP table performance state.
+
 required:
   - "#power-domain-cells"
 
@@ -131,3 +143,40 @@  examples:
             min-residency-us = <7000>;
         };
     };
+
+  - |
+    parent4: power-controller@12340000 {
+        compatible = "foo,power-controller";
+        reg = <0x12340000 0x1000>;
+        #power-domain-cells = <0>;
+    };
+
+    parent5: power-controller@43210000 {
+        compatible = "foo,power-controller";
+        reg = <0x43210000 0x1000>;
+        #power-domain-cells = <0>;
+        operating-points-v2 = <&power_opp_table>;
+
+        power_opp_table: opp-table {
+            compatible = "operating-points-v2";
+
+            power_opp_low: opp1 {
+                opp-level = <16>;
+            };
+
+            rpmpd_opp_ret: opp2 {
+                opp-level = <64>;
+            };
+
+            rpmpd_opp_svs: opp3 {
+                opp-level = <256>;
+            };
+        };
+    };
+
+    child4: consumer@12341000 {
+        compatible = "foo,consumer";
+        reg = <0x12341000 0x1000>;
+        power-domains = <&parent4>, <&parent5>;
+        assigned-performance-states = <0>, <256>;
+    };