| Message ID | 20201217234337.1983732-7-djrscally@gmail.com |
|---|---|
| State | New |
| Headers | show |
| Series | Add functionality to ipu3-cio2 driver allowing software_node connections to sensors on platforms designed for Windows | expand |
Hi Daniel, Thank you for the patch. On Thu, Dec 17, 2020 at 11:43:31PM +0000, Daniel Scally wrote: > From: Heikki Krogerus <heikki.krogerus@linux.intel.com> > > This implements the remaining .graph_* callbacks in the > fwnode operations structure for the software nodes. That makes > the fwnode_graph*() functions available in the drivers also > when software nodes are used. > > The implementation tries to mimic the "OF graph" as much as > possible, but there is no support for the "reg" device > property. The ports will need to have the index in their > name which starts with "port@" (for example "port@0", "port@1", > ...) and endpoints will use the index of the software node > that is given to them during creation. The port nodes can > also be grouped under a specially named "ports" subnode, > just like in DT, if necessary. > > The remote-endpoints are reference properties under the > endpoint nodes that are named "remote-endpoint". > > Signed-off-by: Heikki Krogerus <heikki.krogerus@linux.intel.com> > Co-developed-by: Daniel Scally <djrscally@gmail.com> > Signed-off-by: Daniel Scally <djrscally@gmail.com> > --- > Changes in v2: > > - Changed commit to specify port name prefix as port@ > - Accounted for that rename in *parse_endpoint() > > drivers/base/swnode.c | 110 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++- > 1 file changed, 109 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/base/swnode.c b/drivers/base/swnode.c > index 2b90d380039b..0d14d5ebe441 100644 > --- a/drivers/base/swnode.c > +++ b/drivers/base/swnode.c > @@ -540,6 +540,110 @@ software_node_get_reference_args(const struct fwnode_handle *fwnode, > return 0; > } > > +static struct fwnode_handle * > +swnode_graph_find_next_port(const struct fwnode_handle *parent, > + struct fwnode_handle *port) > +{ > + struct fwnode_handle *old = port; > + > + while ((port = software_node_get_next_child(parent, old))) { > + if (!strncmp(to_swnode(port)->node->name, "port", 4)) Maybe we'll need to limit this to matching on "port" or "port@[0-9]+" to avoid false positives, but that can be done later, if needed. > + return port; > + old = port; > + } > + > + return NULL; > +} > + > +static struct fwnode_handle * > +software_node_graph_get_next_endpoint(const struct fwnode_handle *fwnode, > + struct fwnode_handle *endpoint) > +{ > + struct swnode *swnode = to_swnode(fwnode); > + struct fwnode_handle *old = endpoint; > + struct fwnode_handle *parent; > + struct fwnode_handle *port; > + > + if (!swnode) > + return NULL; > + > + if (endpoint) { > + port = software_node_get_parent(endpoint); Here the reference count to port is incremented. > + parent = software_node_get_parent(port); > + } else { > + parent = software_node_get_named_child_node(fwnode, "ports"); > + if (!parent) > + parent = software_node_get(&swnode->fwnode); > + > + port = swnode_graph_find_next_port(parent, NULL); But here it isn't, software_node_get_next_child() doesn't deal with reference counts. > + } > + > + for (; port; port = swnode_graph_find_next_port(parent, port)) { So if the loop terminates normally, the reference acquired in the first branch of the if will be leaked. > + endpoint = software_node_get_next_child(port, old); > + if (endpoint) { > + fwnode_handle_put(port); While in this case the reference not acquired in the second branch of the if will be released incorrectly. I think it's software_node_get_next_child() that needs to be fixed if I'm not mistaken. > + break; > + } > + > + /* No more endpoints for that port, so stop passing old */ > + old = NULL; I wonder if you could drop the 'old' variable and use 'enpoint' in the call to software_node_get_next_child(). You could then drop these two lines. > + } > + > + fwnode_handle_put(parent); > + > + return endpoint; > +} > + > +static struct fwnode_handle * > +software_node_graph_get_remote_endpoint(const struct fwnode_handle *fwnode) > +{ > + struct swnode *swnode = to_swnode(fwnode); > + const struct software_node_ref_args *ref; > + const struct property_entry *prop; > + > + if (!swnode) > + return NULL; > + > + prop = property_entry_get(swnode->node->properties, "remote-endpoint"); > + if (!prop || prop->type != DEV_PROP_REF || prop->is_inline) > + return NULL; > + > + ref = prop->pointer; > + > + return software_node_get(software_node_fwnode(ref[0].node)); > +} > + > +static struct fwnode_handle * > +software_node_graph_get_port_parent(struct fwnode_handle *fwnode) > +{ > + struct swnode *swnode = to_swnode(fwnode); > + struct fwnode_handle *parent; > + > + if (!strcmp(swnode->parent->node->name, "ports")) > + parent = &swnode->parent->parent->fwnode; > + else > + parent = &swnode->parent->fwnode; > + > + return software_node_get(parent); > +} > + > +static int > +software_node_graph_parse_endpoint(const struct fwnode_handle *fwnode, > + struct fwnode_endpoint *endpoint) > +{ > + struct swnode *swnode = to_swnode(fwnode); > + int ret; > + > + ret = kstrtou32(swnode->parent->node->name + 5, 10, &endpoint->port); > + if (ret) > + return ret; > + > + endpoint->id = swnode->id; > + endpoint->local_fwnode = fwnode; > + > + return 0; > +} > + > static const struct fwnode_operations software_node_ops = { > .get = software_node_get, > .put = software_node_put, > @@ -551,7 +655,11 @@ static const struct fwnode_operations software_node_ops = { > .get_parent = software_node_get_parent, > .get_next_child_node = software_node_get_next_child, > .get_named_child_node = software_node_get_named_child_node, > - .get_reference_args = software_node_get_reference_args > + .get_reference_args = software_node_get_reference_args, > + .graph_get_next_endpoint = software_node_graph_get_next_endpoint, > + .graph_get_remote_endpoint = software_node_graph_get_remote_endpoint, > + .graph_get_port_parent = software_node_graph_get_port_parent, > + .graph_parse_endpoint = software_node_graph_parse_endpoint, > }; > > /* -------------------------------------------------------------------------- */ -- Regards, Laurent Pinchart
Hi Laurent - thanks for comments as always On 18/12/2020 16:22, Laurent Pinchart wrote: > Hi Daniel, > > Thank you for the patch. > > On Thu, Dec 17, 2020 at 11:43:31PM +0000, Daniel Scally wrote: >> From: Heikki Krogerus <heikki.krogerus@linux.intel.com> >> >> This implements the remaining .graph_* callbacks in the >> fwnode operations structure for the software nodes. That makes >> the fwnode_graph*() functions available in the drivers also >> when software nodes are used. >> >> The implementation tries to mimic the "OF graph" as much as >> possible, but there is no support for the "reg" device >> property. The ports will need to have the index in their >> name which starts with "port@" (for example "port@0", "port@1", >> ...) and endpoints will use the index of the software node >> that is given to them during creation. The port nodes can >> also be grouped under a specially named "ports" subnode, >> just like in DT, if necessary. >> >> The remote-endpoints are reference properties under the >> endpoint nodes that are named "remote-endpoint". >> >> Signed-off-by: Heikki Krogerus <heikki.krogerus@linux.intel.com> >> Co-developed-by: Daniel Scally <djrscally@gmail.com> >> Signed-off-by: Daniel Scally <djrscally@gmail.com> >> --- >> Changes in v2: >> >> - Changed commit to specify port name prefix as port@ >> - Accounted for that rename in *parse_endpoint() >> >> drivers/base/swnode.c | 110 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++- >> 1 file changed, 109 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) >> >> diff --git a/drivers/base/swnode.c b/drivers/base/swnode.c >> index 2b90d380039b..0d14d5ebe441 100644 >> --- a/drivers/base/swnode.c >> +++ b/drivers/base/swnode.c >> @@ -540,6 +540,110 @@ software_node_get_reference_args(const struct fwnode_handle *fwnode, >> return 0; >> } >> >> +static struct fwnode_handle * >> +swnode_graph_find_next_port(const struct fwnode_handle *parent, >> + struct fwnode_handle *port) >> +{ >> + struct fwnode_handle *old = port; >> + >> + while ((port = software_node_get_next_child(parent, old))) { >> + if (!strncmp(to_swnode(port)->node->name, "port", 4)) > > Maybe we'll need to limit this to matching on "port" or "port@[0-9]+" to > avoid false positives, but that can be done later, if needed. Hmm yeah I guess that's a danger - ok, I'll stick it on the list. >> + return port; >> + old = port; >> + } >> + >> + return NULL; >> +} >> + >> +static struct fwnode_handle * >> +software_node_graph_get_next_endpoint(const struct fwnode_handle *fwnode, >> + struct fwnode_handle *endpoint) >> +{ >> + struct swnode *swnode = to_swnode(fwnode); >> + struct fwnode_handle *old = endpoint; >> + struct fwnode_handle *parent; >> + struct fwnode_handle *port; >> + >> + if (!swnode) >> + return NULL; >> + >> + if (endpoint) { >> + port = software_node_get_parent(endpoint); > > Here the reference count to port is incremented. > >> + parent = software_node_get_parent(port); >> + } else { >> + parent = software_node_get_named_child_node(fwnode, "ports"); >> + if (!parent) >> + parent = software_node_get(&swnode->fwnode); >> + >> + port = swnode_graph_find_next_port(parent, NULL); > > But here it isn't, software_node_get_next_child() doesn't deal with > reference counts. Not as in the kernel right now, but after patch one of this series, it does: [PATCH v2 01/12] software_node: Fix refcounts in software_node_get_next_child() I'm not sure that one linked to the thread correctly, but it's here if you haven't seen it: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-media/20201217234337.1983732-2-djrscally@gmail.com/T/#u The tl;dr of the change is that it will now get() the next node (if found) and **always** put() if one is passed. >> + } >> + >> + for (; port; port = swnode_graph_find_next_port(parent, port)) { > > So if the loop terminates normally, the reference acquired in the first > branch of the if will be leaked. > >> + endpoint = software_node_get_next_child(port, old); >> + if (endpoint) { >> + fwnode_handle_put(port); > > While in this case the reference not acquired in the second branch of > the if will be released incorrectly. > > I think it's software_node_get_next_child() that needs to be fixed if > I'm not mistaken. I think that's all handled in software_node_get_next_child() as amended by 01/12. The net effect of get_next_endpoint() should be one refcount increased for any endpoint returned, and 0 change to parent and any ports. >> + break; >> + } >> + >> + /* No more endpoints for that port, so stop passing old */ >> + old = NULL; > > I wonder if you could drop the 'old' variable and use 'enpoint' in the > call to software_node_get_next_child(). You could then drop these two > lines. That won't work, because endpoint would at that point not be a child of the port we're passing, and the function relies on it being one: if (!p || list_empty(&p->children) || (c && list_is_last(&c->entry, &p->children))) { fwnode_handle_put(child); return NULL; } >> + } >> + >> + fwnode_handle_put(parent); >> + >> + return endpoint; >> +} >> + >> +static struct fwnode_handle * >> +software_node_graph_get_remote_endpoint(const struct fwnode_handle *fwnode) >> +{ >> + struct swnode *swnode = to_swnode(fwnode); >> + const struct software_node_ref_args *ref; >> + const struct property_entry *prop; >> + >> + if (!swnode) >> + return NULL; >> + >> + prop = property_entry_get(swnode->node->properties, "remote-endpoint"); >> + if (!prop || prop->type != DEV_PROP_REF || prop->is_inline) >> + return NULL; >> + >> + ref = prop->pointer; >> + >> + return software_node_get(software_node_fwnode(ref[0].node)); >> +} >> + >> +static struct fwnode_handle * >> +software_node_graph_get_port_parent(struct fwnode_handle *fwnode) >> +{ >> + struct swnode *swnode = to_swnode(fwnode); >> + struct fwnode_handle *parent; >> + >> + if (!strcmp(swnode->parent->node->name, "ports")) >> + parent = &swnode->parent->parent->fwnode; >> + else >> + parent = &swnode->parent->fwnode; >> + >> + return software_node_get(parent); >> +} >> + >> +static int >> +software_node_graph_parse_endpoint(const struct fwnode_handle *fwnode, >> + struct fwnode_endpoint *endpoint) >> +{ >> + struct swnode *swnode = to_swnode(fwnode); >> + int ret; >> + >> + ret = kstrtou32(swnode->parent->node->name + 5, 10, &endpoint->port); >> + if (ret) >> + return ret; >> + >> + endpoint->id = swnode->id; >> + endpoint->local_fwnode = fwnode; >> + >> + return 0; >> +} >> + >> static const struct fwnode_operations software_node_ops = { >> .get = software_node_get, >> .put = software_node_put, >> @@ -551,7 +655,11 @@ static const struct fwnode_operations software_node_ops = { >> .get_parent = software_node_get_parent, >> .get_next_child_node = software_node_get_next_child, >> .get_named_child_node = software_node_get_named_child_node, >> - .get_reference_args = software_node_get_reference_args >> + .get_reference_args = software_node_get_reference_args, >> + .graph_get_next_endpoint = software_node_graph_get_next_endpoint, >> + .graph_get_remote_endpoint = software_node_graph_get_remote_endpoint, >> + .graph_get_port_parent = software_node_graph_get_port_parent, >> + .graph_parse_endpoint = software_node_graph_parse_endpoint, >> }; >> >> /* -------------------------------------------------------------------------- */ >
On 18/12/2020 20:37, Andy Shevchenko wrote: > On Thu, Dec 17, 2020 at 11:43:31PM +0000, Daniel Scally wrote: >> From: Heikki Krogerus <heikki.krogerus@linux.intel.com> >> >> This implements the remaining .graph_* callbacks in the >> fwnode operations structure for the software nodes. That makes >> the fwnode_graph*() functions available in the drivers also >> when software nodes are used. >> >> The implementation tries to mimic the "OF graph" as much as >> possible, but there is no support for the "reg" device >> property. The ports will need to have the index in their >> name which starts with "port@" (for example "port@0", "port@1", >> ...) and endpoints will use the index of the software node >> that is given to them during creation. The port nodes can >> also be grouped under a specially named "ports" subnode, >> just like in DT, if necessary. >> >> The remote-endpoints are reference properties under the >> endpoint nodes that are named "remote-endpoint". > > ... > >> + while ((port = software_node_get_next_child(parent, old))) { >> + if (!strncmp(to_swnode(port)->node->name, "port", 4)) >> + return port; >> + old = port; >> + } > > Dunno if we need defines for port and its length here. Mmm, maybe a comment? > ... > >> + ret = kstrtou32(swnode->parent->node->name + 5, 10, &endpoint->port); > > But here at least comment is needed what 5 means ('port@' I suppose). Ack - I'll add an explanatory comment (and yep, it's 'port@') >> + if (ret) >> + return ret; > >
On 18/12/2020 22:13, Daniel Scally wrote: >>> + break; >>> + } >>> + >>> + /* No more endpoints for that port, so stop passing old */ >>> + old = NULL; >> >> I wonder if you could drop the 'old' variable and use 'enpoint' in the >> call to software_node_get_next_child(). You could then drop these two >> lines. > > That won't work, because endpoint would at that point not be a child of > the port we're passing, and the function relies on it being one: > > if (!p || list_empty(&p->children) || > (c && list_is_last(&c->entry, &p->children))) { > fwnode_handle_put(child); > return NULL; > } > Wait, that's nonsense of course, because endpoint gets set to NULL when software_node_get_next_child() finds nothing - I'll double check but pretty sure you're right.
Hi Daniel and Heikki, On Thu, Dec 17, 2020 at 11:43:31PM +0000, Daniel Scally wrote: > From: Heikki Krogerus <heikki.krogerus@linux.intel.com> > > This implements the remaining .graph_* callbacks in the > fwnode operations structure for the software nodes. That makes > the fwnode_graph*() functions available in the drivers also > when software nodes are used. > > The implementation tries to mimic the "OF graph" as much as > possible, but there is no support for the "reg" device > property. The ports will need to have the index in their > name which starts with "port@" (for example "port@0", "port@1", > ...) and endpoints will use the index of the software node > that is given to them during creation. The port nodes can > also be grouped under a specially named "ports" subnode, > just like in DT, if necessary. > > The remote-endpoints are reference properties under the > endpoint nodes that are named "remote-endpoint". > > Signed-off-by: Heikki Krogerus <heikki.krogerus@linux.intel.com> > Co-developed-by: Daniel Scally <djrscally@gmail.com> > Signed-off-by: Daniel Scally <djrscally@gmail.com> > --- > Changes in v2: > > - Changed commit to specify port name prefix as port@ > - Accounted for that rename in *parse_endpoint() > > drivers/base/swnode.c | 110 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++- > 1 file changed, 109 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/base/swnode.c b/drivers/base/swnode.c > index 2b90d380039b..0d14d5ebe441 100644 > --- a/drivers/base/swnode.c > +++ b/drivers/base/swnode.c > @@ -540,6 +540,110 @@ software_node_get_reference_args(const struct fwnode_handle *fwnode, > return 0; > } > > +static struct fwnode_handle * > +swnode_graph_find_next_port(const struct fwnode_handle *parent, > + struct fwnode_handle *port) > +{ > + struct fwnode_handle *old = port; > + > + while ((port = software_node_get_next_child(parent, old))) { > + if (!strncmp(to_swnode(port)->node->name, "port", 4)) > + return port; > + old = port; > + } > + > + return NULL; > +} > + > +static struct fwnode_handle * > +software_node_graph_get_next_endpoint(const struct fwnode_handle *fwnode, > + struct fwnode_handle *endpoint) > +{ > + struct swnode *swnode = to_swnode(fwnode); > + struct fwnode_handle *old = endpoint; > + struct fwnode_handle *parent; > + struct fwnode_handle *port; > + > + if (!swnode) > + return NULL; > + > + if (endpoint) { > + port = software_node_get_parent(endpoint); > + parent = software_node_get_parent(port); > + } else { > + parent = software_node_get_named_child_node(fwnode, "ports"); > + if (!parent) > + parent = software_node_get(&swnode->fwnode); > + > + port = swnode_graph_find_next_port(parent, NULL); > + } > + > + for (; port; port = swnode_graph_find_next_port(parent, port)) { > + endpoint = software_node_get_next_child(port, old); > + if (endpoint) { > + fwnode_handle_put(port); > + break; > + } > + > + /* No more endpoints for that port, so stop passing old */ > + old = NULL; > + } > + > + fwnode_handle_put(parent); > + > + return endpoint; > +} > + > +static struct fwnode_handle * > +software_node_graph_get_remote_endpoint(const struct fwnode_handle *fwnode) > +{ > + struct swnode *swnode = to_swnode(fwnode); > + const struct software_node_ref_args *ref; > + const struct property_entry *prop; > + > + if (!swnode) > + return NULL; > + > + prop = property_entry_get(swnode->node->properties, "remote-endpoint"); > + if (!prop || prop->type != DEV_PROP_REF || prop->is_inline) > + return NULL; > + > + ref = prop->pointer; > + > + return software_node_get(software_node_fwnode(ref[0].node)); > +} > + > +static struct fwnode_handle * > +software_node_graph_get_port_parent(struct fwnode_handle *fwnode) > +{ > + struct swnode *swnode = to_swnode(fwnode); > + struct fwnode_handle *parent; > + > + if (!strcmp(swnode->parent->node->name, "ports")) > + parent = &swnode->parent->parent->fwnode; > + else > + parent = &swnode->parent->fwnode; If you happen to call this function on a non-port node for whatever reason, you may end up accessing a pointer that's NULL, can't you? Instead I'd do something like: swnode = swnode->parent; if (swnode && !strcmp(swnode->node->name, "ports")) swnode = swnode->parent; return swnode ? software_node_get(&swnode->fwnode) : NULL; You can also drop parent as a by-product of this. > + > + return software_node_get(parent); > +} > + > +static int > +software_node_graph_parse_endpoint(const struct fwnode_handle *fwnode, > + struct fwnode_endpoint *endpoint) > +{ > + struct swnode *swnode = to_swnode(fwnode); > + int ret; > + > + ret = kstrtou32(swnode->parent->node->name + 5, 10, &endpoint->port); > + if (ret) > + return ret; > + > + endpoint->id = swnode->id; > + endpoint->local_fwnode = fwnode; > + > + return 0; > +} > + > static const struct fwnode_operations software_node_ops = { > .get = software_node_get, > .put = software_node_put, > @@ -551,7 +655,11 @@ static const struct fwnode_operations software_node_ops = { > .get_parent = software_node_get_parent, > .get_next_child_node = software_node_get_next_child, > .get_named_child_node = software_node_get_named_child_node, > - .get_reference_args = software_node_get_reference_args > + .get_reference_args = software_node_get_reference_args, > + .graph_get_next_endpoint = software_node_graph_get_next_endpoint, > + .graph_get_remote_endpoint = software_node_graph_get_remote_endpoint, > + .graph_get_port_parent = software_node_graph_get_port_parent, > + .graph_parse_endpoint = software_node_graph_parse_endpoint, > }; > > /* -------------------------------------------------------------------------- */ -- Kind regards, Sakari Ailus
Hi Sakari - thanks for the reviews in previous emails On 21/12/2020 09:34, Sakari Ailus wrote: > Hi Daniel and Heikki, > > On Thu, Dec 17, 2020 at 11:43:31PM +0000, Daniel Scally wrote: > > +static struct fwnode_handle * > +software_node_graph_get_port_parent(struct fwnode_handle *fwnode) > +{ > + struct swnode *swnode = to_swnode(fwnode); > + struct fwnode_handle *parent; > + > + if (!strcmp(swnode->parent->node->name, "ports")) > + parent = &swnode->parent->parent->fwnode; > + else > + parent = &swnode->parent->fwnode; > If you happen to call this function on a non-port node for whatever reason, > you may end up accessing a pointer that's NULL, can't you? Yes, actually. > Instead I'd do > something like: > > swnode = swnode->parent; > if (swnode && !strcmp(swnode->node->name, "ports")) > swnode = swnode->parent; > > return swnode ? software_node_get(&swnode->fwnode) : NULL; > > You can also drop parent as a by-product of this. Yes ok, that looks good to me - thanks. >> + >> + return software_node_get(parent); >> +} >> + >> +static int >> +software_node_graph_parse_endpoint(const struct fwnode_handle *fwnode, >> + struct fwnode_endpoint *endpoint) >> +{ >> + struct swnode *swnode = to_swnode(fwnode); >> + int ret; >> + >> + ret = kstrtou32(swnode->parent->node->name + 5, 10, &endpoint->port); >> + if (ret) >> + return ret; >> + >> + endpoint->id = swnode->id; >> + endpoint->local_fwnode = fwnode; >> + >> + return 0; >> +} >> + >> static const struct fwnode_operations software_node_ops = { >> .get = software_node_get, >> .put = software_node_put, >> @@ -551,7 +655,11 @@ static const struct fwnode_operations software_node_ops = { >> .get_parent = software_node_get_parent, >> .get_next_child_node = software_node_get_next_child, >> .get_named_child_node = software_node_get_named_child_node, >> - .get_reference_args = software_node_get_reference_args >> + .get_reference_args = software_node_get_reference_args, >> + .graph_get_next_endpoint = software_node_graph_get_next_endpoint, >> + .graph_get_remote_endpoint = software_node_graph_get_remote_endpoint, >> + .graph_get_port_parent = software_node_graph_get_port_parent, >> + .graph_parse_endpoint = software_node_graph_parse_endpoint, >> }; >> >> /* -------------------------------------------------------------------------- */
diff --git a/drivers/base/swnode.c b/drivers/base/swnode.c index 2b90d380039b..0d14d5ebe441 100644 --- a/drivers/base/swnode.c +++ b/drivers/base/swnode.c @@ -540,6 +540,110 @@ software_node_get_reference_args(const struct fwnode_handle *fwnode, return 0; } +static struct fwnode_handle * +swnode_graph_find_next_port(const struct fwnode_handle *parent, + struct fwnode_handle *port) +{ + struct fwnode_handle *old = port; + + while ((port = software_node_get_next_child(parent, old))) { + if (!strncmp(to_swnode(port)->node->name, "port", 4)) + return port; + old = port; + } + + return NULL; +} + +static struct fwnode_handle * +software_node_graph_get_next_endpoint(const struct fwnode_handle *fwnode, + struct fwnode_handle *endpoint) +{ + struct swnode *swnode = to_swnode(fwnode); + struct fwnode_handle *old = endpoint; + struct fwnode_handle *parent; + struct fwnode_handle *port; + + if (!swnode) + return NULL; + + if (endpoint) { + port = software_node_get_parent(endpoint); + parent = software_node_get_parent(port); + } else { + parent = software_node_get_named_child_node(fwnode, "ports"); + if (!parent) + parent = software_node_get(&swnode->fwnode); + + port = swnode_graph_find_next_port(parent, NULL); + } + + for (; port; port = swnode_graph_find_next_port(parent, port)) { + endpoint = software_node_get_next_child(port, old); + if (endpoint) { + fwnode_handle_put(port); + break; + } + + /* No more endpoints for that port, so stop passing old */ + old = NULL; + } + + fwnode_handle_put(parent); + + return endpoint; +} + +static struct fwnode_handle * +software_node_graph_get_remote_endpoint(const struct fwnode_handle *fwnode) +{ + struct swnode *swnode = to_swnode(fwnode); + const struct software_node_ref_args *ref; + const struct property_entry *prop; + + if (!swnode) + return NULL; + + prop = property_entry_get(swnode->node->properties, "remote-endpoint"); + if (!prop || prop->type != DEV_PROP_REF || prop->is_inline) + return NULL; + + ref = prop->pointer; + + return software_node_get(software_node_fwnode(ref[0].node)); +} + +static struct fwnode_handle * +software_node_graph_get_port_parent(struct fwnode_handle *fwnode) +{ + struct swnode *swnode = to_swnode(fwnode); + struct fwnode_handle *parent; + + if (!strcmp(swnode->parent->node->name, "ports")) + parent = &swnode->parent->parent->fwnode; + else + parent = &swnode->parent->fwnode; + + return software_node_get(parent); +} + +static int +software_node_graph_parse_endpoint(const struct fwnode_handle *fwnode, + struct fwnode_endpoint *endpoint) +{ + struct swnode *swnode = to_swnode(fwnode); + int ret; + + ret = kstrtou32(swnode->parent->node->name + 5, 10, &endpoint->port); + if (ret) + return ret; + + endpoint->id = swnode->id; + endpoint->local_fwnode = fwnode; + + return 0; +} + static const struct fwnode_operations software_node_ops = { .get = software_node_get, .put = software_node_put, @@ -551,7 +655,11 @@ static const struct fwnode_operations software_node_ops = { .get_parent = software_node_get_parent, .get_next_child_node = software_node_get_next_child, .get_named_child_node = software_node_get_named_child_node, - .get_reference_args = software_node_get_reference_args + .get_reference_args = software_node_get_reference_args, + .graph_get_next_endpoint = software_node_graph_get_next_endpoint, + .graph_get_remote_endpoint = software_node_graph_get_remote_endpoint, + .graph_get_port_parent = software_node_graph_get_port_parent, + .graph_parse_endpoint = software_node_graph_parse_endpoint, }; /* -------------------------------------------------------------------------- */