@@ -1961,12 +1961,15 @@ static ssize_t tun_chr_write_iter(struct kiocb *iocb, struct iov_iter *from)
struct tun_file *tfile = file->private_data;
struct tun_struct *tun = tun_get(tfile);
ssize_t result;
+ int noblock = 0;
if (!tun)
return -EBADFD;
- result = tun_get_user(tun, tfile, NULL, from,
- file->f_flags & O_NONBLOCK, false);
+ if ((file->f_flags & O_NONBLOCK) || (iocb->ki_flags & IOCB_NOWAIT))
+ noblock = 1;
+
+ result = tun_get_user(tun, tfile, NULL, from, noblock, false);
tun_put(tun);
return result;
@@ -2185,10 +2188,15 @@ static ssize_t tun_chr_read_iter(struct kiocb *iocb, struct iov_iter *to)
struct tun_file *tfile = file->private_data;
struct tun_struct *tun = tun_get(tfile);
ssize_t len = iov_iter_count(to), ret;
+ int noblock = 0;
if (!tun)
return -EBADFD;
- ret = tun_do_read(tun, tfile, to, file->f_flags & O_NONBLOCK, NULL);
+
+ if ((file->f_flags & O_NONBLOCK) || (iocb->ki_flags & IOCB_NOWAIT))
+ noblock = 1;
+
+ ret = tun_do_read(tun, tfile, to, noblock, NULL);
ret = min_t(ssize_t, ret, len);
if (ret > 0)
iocb->ki_pos = ret;
tun only checks the file O_NONBLOCK flag, but it should also be checking the iocb IOCB_NOWAIT flag. Any fops using ->read/write_iter() should check both, otherwise it breaks users that correctly expect O_NONBLOCK semantics if IOCB_NOWAIT is set. Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk> --- Had a bug report on io_uring, and it's due to tun not honoring IOCB_NOWAIT. Let's get this fixed.