Message ID | 1605006094-31097-6-git-send-email-magnus.karlsson@gmail.com |
---|---|
State | New |
Headers | show |
Series | [bpf-next,v2,1/5] samples/bpf: increment Tx stats at sending | expand |
Hi Magnus, I love your patch! Perhaps something to improve: [auto build test WARNING on bpf-next/master] url: https://github.com/0day-ci/linux/commits/Magnus-Karlsson/xsk-i40e-Tx-performance-improvements/20201110-190310 base: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/bpf/bpf-next.git master config: powerpc64-randconfig-r025-20201110 (attached as .config) compiler: clang version 12.0.0 (https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project 4d81c8adb6ed9840257f6cb6b93f60856d422a15) reproduce (this is a W=1 build): wget https://raw.githubusercontent.com/intel/lkp-tests/master/sbin/make.cross -O ~/bin/make.cross chmod +x ~/bin/make.cross # install powerpc64 cross compiling tool for clang build # apt-get install binutils-powerpc64-linux-gnu # https://github.com/0day-ci/linux/commit/b016bbeac6692a93e61b28efa430d64645032b5e git remote add linux-review https://github.com/0day-ci/linux git fetch --no-tags linux-review Magnus-Karlsson/xsk-i40e-Tx-performance-improvements/20201110-190310 git checkout b016bbeac6692a93e61b28efa430d64645032b5e # save the attached .config to linux build tree COMPILER_INSTALL_PATH=$HOME/0day COMPILER=clang make.cross ARCH=powerpc64 If you fix the issue, kindly add following tag as appropriate Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com> All warnings (new ones prefixed by >>): >> drivers/net/ethernet/intel/i40e/i40e_xsk.c:417:13: warning: unknown pragma ignored [-Wunknown-pragmas] #pragma GCC unroll 4 ^ 1 warning generated. vim +417 drivers/net/ethernet/intel/i40e/i40e_xsk.c 408 409 static void i40e_xmit_pkt_batch(struct i40e_ring *xdp_ring, struct xdp_desc *desc, 410 unsigned int *total_bytes) 411 { 412 u16 ntu = xdp_ring->next_to_use; 413 struct i40e_tx_desc *tx_desc; 414 dma_addr_t dma; 415 u32 i; 416 > 417 #pragma GCC unroll 4 418 for (i = 0; i < PKTS_PER_BATCH; i++) { 419 dma = xsk_buff_raw_get_dma(xdp_ring->xsk_pool, desc[i].addr); 420 xsk_buff_raw_dma_sync_for_device(xdp_ring->xsk_pool, dma, desc[i].len); 421 422 tx_desc = I40E_TX_DESC(xdp_ring, ntu++); 423 tx_desc->buffer_addr = cpu_to_le64(dma); 424 tx_desc->cmd_type_offset_bsz = build_ctob(I40E_TX_DESC_CMD_ICRC | 425 I40E_TX_DESC_CMD_EOP, 426 0, desc[i].len, 0); 427 428 *total_bytes += desc[i].len; 429 } 430 431 xdp_ring->next_to_use = ntu; 432 } 433 --- 0-DAY CI Kernel Test Service, Intel Corporation https://lists.01.org/hyperkitty/list/kbuild-all@lists.01.org
On Wed, Nov 11, 2020 at 2:38 AM kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com> wrote: > > Hi Magnus, > > I love your patch! Perhaps something to improve: > > [auto build test WARNING on bpf-next/master] > > url: https://github.com/0day-ci/linux/commits/Magnus-Karlsson/xsk-i40e-Tx-performance-improvements/20201110-190310 > base: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/bpf/bpf-next.git master > config: powerpc64-randconfig-r025-20201110 (attached as .config) > compiler: clang version 12.0.0 (https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project 4d81c8adb6ed9840257f6cb6b93f60856d422a15) > reproduce (this is a W=1 build): > wget https://raw.githubusercontent.com/intel/lkp-tests/master/sbin/make.cross -O ~/bin/make.cross > chmod +x ~/bin/make.cross > # install powerpc64 cross compiling tool for clang build > # apt-get install binutils-powerpc64-linux-gnu > # https://github.com/0day-ci/linux/commit/b016bbeac6692a93e61b28efa430d64645032b5e > git remote add linux-review https://github.com/0day-ci/linux > git fetch --no-tags linux-review Magnus-Karlsson/xsk-i40e-Tx-performance-improvements/20201110-190310 > git checkout b016bbeac6692a93e61b28efa430d64645032b5e > # save the attached .config to linux build tree > COMPILER_INSTALL_PATH=$HOME/0day COMPILER=clang make.cross ARCH=powerpc64 > > If you fix the issue, kindly add following tag as appropriate > Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com> > > All warnings (new ones prefixed by >>): > > >> drivers/net/ethernet/intel/i40e/i40e_xsk.c:417:13: warning: unknown pragma ignored [-Wunknown-pragmas] > #pragma GCC unroll 4 > ^ > 1 warning generated. And I was hoping that unknown pragmas would be ignored, but that will obviously not be the case with -Wunknown-pragmas added. The unrolling of this inner loop where the code spends most of its time gives me nearly 1 Mpps extra in performance which is substantial, so I would like to get this unrolled in some way, but without the warning. Need some advice please. Here are some options that comes in mind: #1: Suppress unknown pragma warnings in this file only by adding CFLAGS_i40e_xsk.o += -Wno-unknown-pragmas (or whatever that option might be) in the Makefile #2: Force the compiler to loop-unroll the loop with for example a switch statement with four cases that all fall through. This will make the code less readable. #3: Manually loop-unroll the loop. This will make the code even less readable than #2. I prefer #1 as I like to keep the code readable, but you might have other better suggestions on how to tackle this. Thanks: Magnus > vim +417 drivers/net/ethernet/intel/i40e/i40e_xsk.c > > 408 > 409 static void i40e_xmit_pkt_batch(struct i40e_ring *xdp_ring, struct xdp_desc *desc, > 410 unsigned int *total_bytes) > 411 { > 412 u16 ntu = xdp_ring->next_to_use; > 413 struct i40e_tx_desc *tx_desc; > 414 dma_addr_t dma; > 415 u32 i; > 416 > > 417 #pragma GCC unroll 4 > 418 for (i = 0; i < PKTS_PER_BATCH; i++) { > 419 dma = xsk_buff_raw_get_dma(xdp_ring->xsk_pool, desc[i].addr); > 420 xsk_buff_raw_dma_sync_for_device(xdp_ring->xsk_pool, dma, desc[i].len); > 421 > 422 tx_desc = I40E_TX_DESC(xdp_ring, ntu++); > 423 tx_desc->buffer_addr = cpu_to_le64(dma); > 424 tx_desc->cmd_type_offset_bsz = build_ctob(I40E_TX_DESC_CMD_ICRC | > 425 I40E_TX_DESC_CMD_EOP, > 426 0, desc[i].len, 0); > 427 > 428 *total_bytes += desc[i].len; > 429 } > 430 > 431 xdp_ring->next_to_use = ntu; > 432 } > 433 > > --- > 0-DAY CI Kernel Test Service, Intel Corporation > https://lists.01.org/hyperkitty/list/kbuild-all@lists.01.org
On Wed, Nov 11, 2020 at 3:57 AM Magnus Karlsson <magnus.karlsson@gmail.com> wrote: > > On Wed, Nov 11, 2020 at 2:38 AM kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com> wrote: > > > > Hi Magnus, > > > > I love your patch! Perhaps something to improve: > > > > [auto build test WARNING on bpf-next/master] > > > > url: https://github.com/0day-ci/linux/commits/Magnus-Karlsson/xsk-i40e-Tx-performance-improvements/20201110-190310 > > base: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/bpf/bpf-next.git master > > config: powerpc64-randconfig-r025-20201110 (attached as .config) > > compiler: clang version 12.0.0 (https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project 4d81c8adb6ed9840257f6cb6b93f60856d422a15) ^ Note: clang > > reproduce (this is a W=1 build): > > wget https://raw.githubusercontent.com/intel/lkp-tests/master/sbin/make.cross -O ~/bin/make.cross > > chmod +x ~/bin/make.cross > > # install powerpc64 cross compiling tool for clang build > > # apt-get install binutils-powerpc64-linux-gnu > > # https://github.com/0day-ci/linux/commit/b016bbeac6692a93e61b28efa430d64645032b5e > > git remote add linux-review https://github.com/0day-ci/linux > > git fetch --no-tags linux-review Magnus-Karlsson/xsk-i40e-Tx-performance-improvements/20201110-190310 > > git checkout b016bbeac6692a93e61b28efa430d64645032b5e > > # save the attached .config to linux build tree > > COMPILER_INSTALL_PATH=$HOME/0day COMPILER=clang make.cross ARCH=powerpc64 > > > > If you fix the issue, kindly add following tag as appropriate > > Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com> > > > > All warnings (new ones prefixed by >>): > > > > >> drivers/net/ethernet/intel/i40e/i40e_xsk.c:417:13: warning: unknown pragma ignored [-Wunknown-pragmas] > > #pragma GCC unroll 4 > > ^ > > 1 warning generated. > > And I was hoping that unknown pragmas would be ignored, but that will > obviously not be the case with -Wunknown-pragmas added. The unrolling > of this inner loop where the code spends most of its time gives me > nearly 1 Mpps extra in performance which is substantial, so I would > like to get this unrolled in some way, but without the warning. Need > some advice please. Here are some options that comes in mind: > > #1: Suppress unknown pragma warnings in this file only by adding > CFLAGS_i40e_xsk.o += -Wno-unknown-pragmas (or whatever that option > might be) in the Makefile > > #2: Force the compiler to loop-unroll the loop with for example a > switch statement with four cases that all fall through. This will make > the code less readable. > > #3: Manually loop-unroll the loop. This will make the code even less > readable than #2. #4 support both compilers. Note Clang's syntax is slightly different here; it doesn't accept GCC specific pragmas, and uses a slightly different form: https://clang.llvm.org/docs/LanguageExtensions.html#loop-unrolling . If you wrap that in a macro based on `#ifdef __clang__`, that should do the trick. > > I prefer #1 as I like to keep the code readable, but you might have > other better suggestions on how to tackle this. > > Thanks: Magnus > > > vim +417 drivers/net/ethernet/intel/i40e/i40e_xsk.c > > > > 408 > > 409 static void i40e_xmit_pkt_batch(struct i40e_ring *xdp_ring, struct xdp_desc *desc, > > 410 unsigned int *total_bytes) > > 411 { > > 412 u16 ntu = xdp_ring->next_to_use; > > 413 struct i40e_tx_desc *tx_desc; > > 414 dma_addr_t dma; > > 415 u32 i; > > 416 > > > 417 #pragma GCC unroll 4 > > 418 for (i = 0; i < PKTS_PER_BATCH; i++) { > > 419 dma = xsk_buff_raw_get_dma(xdp_ring->xsk_pool, desc[i].addr); > > 420 xsk_buff_raw_dma_sync_for_device(xdp_ring->xsk_pool, dma, desc[i].len); > > 421 > > 422 tx_desc = I40E_TX_DESC(xdp_ring, ntu++); > > 423 tx_desc->buffer_addr = cpu_to_le64(dma); > > 424 tx_desc->cmd_type_offset_bsz = build_ctob(I40E_TX_DESC_CMD_ICRC | > > 425 I40E_TX_DESC_CMD_EOP, > > 426 0, desc[i].len, 0); > > 427 > > 428 *total_bytes += desc[i].len; > > 429 } > > 430 > > 431 xdp_ring->next_to_use = ntu; > > 432 } > > 433 > > > > --- > > 0-DAY CI Kernel Test Service, Intel Corporation > > https://lists.01.org/hyperkitty/list/kbuild-all@lists.01.org > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clang Built Linux" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to clang-built-linux+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. > To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/clang-built-linux/CAJ8uoz2aDjLPtcTgZ_pO-%3DS9TgXm3c57rN8TTPXdqT7HOOKrhA%40mail.gmail.com. -- Thanks, ~Nick Desaulniers
On Wed, Nov 11, 2020 at 8:16 PM Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@google.com> wrote: > > On Wed, Nov 11, 2020 at 3:57 AM Magnus Karlsson > <magnus.karlsson@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > On Wed, Nov 11, 2020 at 2:38 AM kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com> wrote: > > > > > > Hi Magnus, > > > > > > I love your patch! Perhaps something to improve: > > > > > > [auto build test WARNING on bpf-next/master] > > > > > > url: https://github.com/0day-ci/linux/commits/Magnus-Karlsson/xsk-i40e-Tx-performance-improvements/20201110-190310 > > > base: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/bpf/bpf-next.git master > > > config: powerpc64-randconfig-r025-20201110 (attached as .config) > > > compiler: clang version 12.0.0 (https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project 4d81c8adb6ed9840257f6cb6b93f60856d422a15) > > ^ Note: clang > > > > reproduce (this is a W=1 build): > > > wget https://raw.githubusercontent.com/intel/lkp-tests/master/sbin/make.cross -O ~/bin/make.cross > > > chmod +x ~/bin/make.cross > > > # install powerpc64 cross compiling tool for clang build > > > # apt-get install binutils-powerpc64-linux-gnu > > > # https://github.com/0day-ci/linux/commit/b016bbeac6692a93e61b28efa430d64645032b5e > > > git remote add linux-review https://github.com/0day-ci/linux > > > git fetch --no-tags linux-review Magnus-Karlsson/xsk-i40e-Tx-performance-improvements/20201110-190310 > > > git checkout b016bbeac6692a93e61b28efa430d64645032b5e > > > # save the attached .config to linux build tree > > > COMPILER_INSTALL_PATH=$HOME/0day COMPILER=clang make.cross ARCH=powerpc64 > > > > > > If you fix the issue, kindly add following tag as appropriate > > > Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com> > > > > > > All warnings (new ones prefixed by >>): > > > > > > >> drivers/net/ethernet/intel/i40e/i40e_xsk.c:417:13: warning: unknown pragma ignored [-Wunknown-pragmas] > > > #pragma GCC unroll 4 > > > ^ > > > 1 warning generated. > > > > And I was hoping that unknown pragmas would be ignored, but that will > > obviously not be the case with -Wunknown-pragmas added. The unrolling > > of this inner loop where the code spends most of its time gives me > > nearly 1 Mpps extra in performance which is substantial, so I would > > like to get this unrolled in some way, but without the warning. Need > > some advice please. Here are some options that comes in mind: > > > > #1: Suppress unknown pragma warnings in this file only by adding > > CFLAGS_i40e_xsk.o += -Wno-unknown-pragmas (or whatever that option > > might be) in the Makefile > > > > #2: Force the compiler to loop-unroll the loop with for example a > > switch statement with four cases that all fall through. This will make > > the code less readable. > > > > #3: Manually loop-unroll the loop. This will make the code even less > > readable than #2. > > #4 support both compilers. Note Clang's syntax is slightly different > here; it doesn't accept GCC specific pragmas, and uses a slightly > different form: > https://clang.llvm.org/docs/LanguageExtensions.html#loop-unrolling . > If you wrap that in a macro based on `#ifdef __clang__`, that should > do the trick. Yes, that did the trick. Tried it out with the compiler explorer at https://godbolt.org/ and it compiles nicely even for clang-powerpc64. Will spin a v3. Thank you: Magnus > > > > I prefer #1 as I like to keep the code readable, but you might have > > other better suggestions on how to tackle this. > > > > Thanks: Magnus > > > > > vim +417 drivers/net/ethernet/intel/i40e/i40e_xsk.c > > > > > > 408 > > > 409 static void i40e_xmit_pkt_batch(struct i40e_ring *xdp_ring, struct xdp_desc *desc, > > > 410 unsigned int *total_bytes) > > > 411 { > > > 412 u16 ntu = xdp_ring->next_to_use; > > > 413 struct i40e_tx_desc *tx_desc; > > > 414 dma_addr_t dma; > > > 415 u32 i; > > > 416 > > > > 417 #pragma GCC unroll 4 > > > 418 for (i = 0; i < PKTS_PER_BATCH; i++) { > > > 419 dma = xsk_buff_raw_get_dma(xdp_ring->xsk_pool, desc[i].addr); > > > 420 xsk_buff_raw_dma_sync_for_device(xdp_ring->xsk_pool, dma, desc[i].len); > > > 421 > > > 422 tx_desc = I40E_TX_DESC(xdp_ring, ntu++); > > > 423 tx_desc->buffer_addr = cpu_to_le64(dma); > > > 424 tx_desc->cmd_type_offset_bsz = build_ctob(I40E_TX_DESC_CMD_ICRC | > > > 425 I40E_TX_DESC_CMD_EOP, > > > 426 0, desc[i].len, 0); > > > 427 > > > 428 *total_bytes += desc[i].len; > > > 429 } > > > 430 > > > 431 xdp_ring->next_to_use = ntu; > > > 432 } > > > 433 > > > > > > --- > > > 0-DAY CI Kernel Test Service, Intel Corporation > > > https://lists.01.org/hyperkitty/list/kbuild-all@lists.01.org > > > > -- > > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clang Built Linux" group. > > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to clang-built-linux+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. > > To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/clang-built-linux/CAJ8uoz2aDjLPtcTgZ_pO-%3DS9TgXm3c57rN8TTPXdqT7HOOKrhA%40mail.gmail.com. > > > > -- > Thanks, > ~Nick Desaulniers
On Wed, Nov 11, 2020 at 11:45 PM Magnus Karlsson <magnus.karlsson@gmail.com> wrote: > > On Wed, Nov 11, 2020 at 8:16 PM Nick Desaulniers > <ndesaulniers@google.com> wrote: > > > > On Wed, Nov 11, 2020 at 3:57 AM Magnus Karlsson > > <magnus.karlsson@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > > On Wed, Nov 11, 2020 at 2:38 AM kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com> wrote: > > > > > > > > Hi Magnus, > > > > > > > > I love your patch! Perhaps something to improve: > > > > > > > > [auto build test WARNING on bpf-next/master] > > > > > > > > url: https://github.com/0day-ci/linux/commits/Magnus-Karlsson/xsk-i40e-Tx-performance-improvements/20201110-190310 > > > > base: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/bpf/bpf-next.git master > > > > config: powerpc64-randconfig-r025-20201110 (attached as .config) > > > > compiler: clang version 12.0.0 (https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project 4d81c8adb6ed9840257f6cb6b93f60856d422a15) > > > > ^ Note: clang > > > > > > reproduce (this is a W=1 build): > > > > wget https://raw.githubusercontent.com/intel/lkp-tests/master/sbin/make.cross -O ~/bin/make.cross > > > > chmod +x ~/bin/make.cross > > > > # install powerpc64 cross compiling tool for clang build > > > > # apt-get install binutils-powerpc64-linux-gnu > > > > # https://github.com/0day-ci/linux/commit/b016bbeac6692a93e61b28efa430d64645032b5e > > > > git remote add linux-review https://github.com/0day-ci/linux > > > > git fetch --no-tags linux-review Magnus-Karlsson/xsk-i40e-Tx-performance-improvements/20201110-190310 > > > > git checkout b016bbeac6692a93e61b28efa430d64645032b5e > > > > # save the attached .config to linux build tree > > > > COMPILER_INSTALL_PATH=$HOME/0day COMPILER=clang make.cross ARCH=powerpc64 > > > > > > > > If you fix the issue, kindly add following tag as appropriate > > > > Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com> > > > > > > > > All warnings (new ones prefixed by >>): > > > > > > > > >> drivers/net/ethernet/intel/i40e/i40e_xsk.c:417:13: warning: unknown pragma ignored [-Wunknown-pragmas] > > > > #pragma GCC unroll 4 > > > > ^ > > > > 1 warning generated. > > > > > > And I was hoping that unknown pragmas would be ignored, but that will > > > obviously not be the case with -Wunknown-pragmas added. The unrolling > > > of this inner loop where the code spends most of its time gives me > > > nearly 1 Mpps extra in performance which is substantial, so I would > > > like to get this unrolled in some way, but without the warning. Need > > > some advice please. Here are some options that comes in mind: > > > > > > #1: Suppress unknown pragma warnings in this file only by adding > > > CFLAGS_i40e_xsk.o += -Wno-unknown-pragmas (or whatever that option > > > might be) in the Makefile > > > > > > #2: Force the compiler to loop-unroll the loop with for example a > > > switch statement with four cases that all fall through. This will make > > > the code less readable. > > > > > > #3: Manually loop-unroll the loop. This will make the code even less > > > readable than #2. > > > > #4 support both compilers. Note Clang's syntax is slightly different > > here; it doesn't accept GCC specific pragmas, and uses a slightly > > different form: > > https://clang.llvm.org/docs/LanguageExtensions.html#loop-unrolling . > > If you wrap that in a macro based on `#ifdef __clang__`, that should > > do the trick. > > Yes, that did the trick. Tried it out with the compiler explorer at > https://godbolt.org/ and it compiles nicely even for clang-powerpc64. > Will spin a v3. > > Thank you: Magnus Great job Magnus, I appreciate it! > > > > > > > I prefer #1 as I like to keep the code readable, but you might have > > > other better suggestions on how to tackle this. > > > > > > Thanks: Magnus > > > > > > > vim +417 drivers/net/ethernet/intel/i40e/i40e_xsk.c > > > > > > > > 408 > > > > 409 static void i40e_xmit_pkt_batch(struct i40e_ring *xdp_ring, struct xdp_desc *desc, > > > > 410 unsigned int *total_bytes) > > > > 411 { > > > > 412 u16 ntu = xdp_ring->next_to_use; > > > > 413 struct i40e_tx_desc *tx_desc; > > > > 414 dma_addr_t dma; > > > > 415 u32 i; > > > > 416 > > > > > 417 #pragma GCC unroll 4 > > > > 418 for (i = 0; i < PKTS_PER_BATCH; i++) { > > > > 419 dma = xsk_buff_raw_get_dma(xdp_ring->xsk_pool, desc[i].addr); > > > > 420 xsk_buff_raw_dma_sync_for_device(xdp_ring->xsk_pool, dma, desc[i].len); > > > > 421 > > > > 422 tx_desc = I40E_TX_DESC(xdp_ring, ntu++); > > > > 423 tx_desc->buffer_addr = cpu_to_le64(dma); > > > > 424 tx_desc->cmd_type_offset_bsz = build_ctob(I40E_TX_DESC_CMD_ICRC | > > > > 425 I40E_TX_DESC_CMD_EOP, > > > > 426 0, desc[i].len, 0); > > > > 427 > > > > 428 *total_bytes += desc[i].len; > > > > 429 } > > > > 430 > > > > 431 xdp_ring->next_to_use = ntu; > > > > 432 } > > > > 433 > > > > > > > > --- > > > > 0-DAY CI Kernel Test Service, Intel Corporation > > > > https://lists.01.org/hyperkitty/list/kbuild-all@lists.01.org > > > > > > -- > > > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clang Built Linux" group. > > > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to clang-built-linux+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. > > > To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/clang-built-linux/CAJ8uoz2aDjLPtcTgZ_pO-%3DS9TgXm3c57rN8TTPXdqT7HOOKrhA%40mail.gmail.com. > > > > > > > > -- > > Thanks, > > ~Nick Desaulniers -- Thanks, ~Nick Desaulniers
diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/i40e/i40e_txrx.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/i40e/i40e_txrx.c index d43ce13..c21548c 100644 --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/i40e/i40e_txrx.c +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/i40e/i40e_txrx.c @@ -676,6 +676,8 @@ void i40e_free_tx_resources(struct i40e_ring *tx_ring) i40e_clean_tx_ring(tx_ring); kfree(tx_ring->tx_bi); tx_ring->tx_bi = NULL; + kfree(tx_ring->xsk_descs); + tx_ring->xsk_descs = NULL; if (tx_ring->desc) { dma_free_coherent(tx_ring->dev, tx_ring->size, @@ -1277,6 +1279,13 @@ int i40e_setup_tx_descriptors(struct i40e_ring *tx_ring) if (!tx_ring->tx_bi) goto err; + if (ring_is_xdp(tx_ring)) { + tx_ring->xsk_descs = kcalloc(I40E_MAX_NUM_DESCRIPTORS, sizeof(*tx_ring->xsk_descs), + GFP_KERNEL); + if (!tx_ring->xsk_descs) + goto err; + } + u64_stats_init(&tx_ring->syncp); /* round up to nearest 4K */ @@ -1300,6 +1309,8 @@ int i40e_setup_tx_descriptors(struct i40e_ring *tx_ring) return 0; err: + kfree(tx_ring->xsk_descs); + tx_ring->xsk_descs = NULL; kfree(tx_ring->tx_bi); tx_ring->tx_bi = NULL; return -ENOMEM; diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/i40e/i40e_txrx.h b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/i40e/i40e_txrx.h index 2feed92..5f531b1 100644 --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/i40e/i40e_txrx.h +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/i40e/i40e_txrx.h @@ -389,6 +389,7 @@ struct i40e_ring { struct i40e_channel *ch; struct xdp_rxq_info xdp_rxq; struct xsk_buff_pool *xsk_pool; + struct xdp_desc *xsk_descs; /* For storing descriptors in the AF_XDP ZC path */ } ____cacheline_internodealigned_in_smp; static inline bool ring_uses_build_skb(struct i40e_ring *ring) diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/i40e/i40e_xsk.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/i40e/i40e_xsk.c index 61aa1fc..a271a02 100644 --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/i40e/i40e_xsk.c +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/i40e/i40e_xsk.c @@ -381,6 +381,78 @@ int i40e_clean_rx_irq_zc(struct i40e_ring *rx_ring, int budget) return failure ? budget : (int)total_rx_packets; } +static void i40e_xmit_pkt(struct i40e_ring *xdp_ring, struct xdp_desc *desc, + unsigned int *total_bytes) +{ + struct i40e_tx_desc *tx_desc; + dma_addr_t dma; + + dma = xsk_buff_raw_get_dma(xdp_ring->xsk_pool, desc->addr); + xsk_buff_raw_dma_sync_for_device(xdp_ring->xsk_pool, dma, desc->len); + + tx_desc = I40E_TX_DESC(xdp_ring, xdp_ring->next_to_use++); + tx_desc->buffer_addr = cpu_to_le64(dma); + tx_desc->cmd_type_offset_bsz = build_ctob(I40E_TX_DESC_CMD_ICRC | I40E_TX_DESC_CMD_EOP, + 0, desc->len, 0); + + *total_bytes += desc->len; +} + +/* This value should match the pragma below. Why 4? It is strictly + * empirical. It seems to be a good compromise between the advantage + * of having simultaneous outstanding reads to the DMA array that can + * hide each others latency and the disadvantage of having a larger + * code path. + */ +#define PKTS_PER_BATCH 4 + +static void i40e_xmit_pkt_batch(struct i40e_ring *xdp_ring, struct xdp_desc *desc, + unsigned int *total_bytes) +{ + u16 ntu = xdp_ring->next_to_use; + struct i40e_tx_desc *tx_desc; + dma_addr_t dma; + u32 i; + +#pragma GCC unroll 4 + for (i = 0; i < PKTS_PER_BATCH; i++) { + dma = xsk_buff_raw_get_dma(xdp_ring->xsk_pool, desc[i].addr); + xsk_buff_raw_dma_sync_for_device(xdp_ring->xsk_pool, dma, desc[i].len); + + tx_desc = I40E_TX_DESC(xdp_ring, ntu++); + tx_desc->buffer_addr = cpu_to_le64(dma); + tx_desc->cmd_type_offset_bsz = build_ctob(I40E_TX_DESC_CMD_ICRC | + I40E_TX_DESC_CMD_EOP, + 0, desc[i].len, 0); + + *total_bytes += desc[i].len; + } + + xdp_ring->next_to_use = ntu; +} + +static void i40e_fill_tx_hw_ring(struct i40e_ring *xdp_ring, struct xdp_desc *descs, u32 nb_pkts, + unsigned int *total_bytes) +{ + u32 batched, leftover, i; + + batched = nb_pkts & ~(PKTS_PER_BATCH - 1); + leftover = nb_pkts & (PKTS_PER_BATCH - 1); + for (i = 0; i < batched; i += PKTS_PER_BATCH) + i40e_xmit_pkt_batch(xdp_ring, &descs[i], total_bytes); + for (i = batched; i < batched + leftover; i++) + i40e_xmit_pkt(xdp_ring, &descs[i], total_bytes); +} + +static void i40e_set_rs_bit(struct i40e_ring *xdp_ring) +{ + u16 ntu = xdp_ring->next_to_use ? xdp_ring->next_to_use - 1 : xdp_ring->count - 1; + struct i40e_tx_desc *tx_desc; + + tx_desc = I40E_TX_DESC(xdp_ring, ntu); + tx_desc->cmd_type_offset_bsz |= (I40E_TX_DESC_CMD_RS << I40E_TXD_QW1_CMD_SHIFT); +} + /** * i40e_xmit_zc - Performs zero-copy Tx AF_XDP * @xdp_ring: XDP Tx ring @@ -390,45 +462,30 @@ int i40e_clean_rx_irq_zc(struct i40e_ring *rx_ring, int budget) **/ static bool i40e_xmit_zc(struct i40e_ring *xdp_ring, unsigned int budget) { - unsigned int sent_frames = 0, total_bytes = 0; - struct i40e_tx_desc *tx_desc = NULL; - struct xdp_desc desc; - dma_addr_t dma; - - while (budget-- > 0) { - if (!xsk_tx_peek_desc(xdp_ring->xsk_pool, &desc)) - break; - - dma = xsk_buff_raw_get_dma(xdp_ring->xsk_pool, desc.addr); - xsk_buff_raw_dma_sync_for_device(xdp_ring->xsk_pool, dma, - desc.len); - - tx_desc = I40E_TX_DESC(xdp_ring, xdp_ring->next_to_use); - tx_desc->buffer_addr = cpu_to_le64(dma); - tx_desc->cmd_type_offset_bsz = - build_ctob(I40E_TX_DESC_CMD_ICRC - | I40E_TX_DESC_CMD_EOP, - 0, desc.len, 0); - - sent_frames++; - total_bytes += desc.len; - - xdp_ring->next_to_use++; - if (xdp_ring->next_to_use == xdp_ring->count) - xdp_ring->next_to_use = 0; + struct xdp_desc *descs = xdp_ring->xsk_descs; + u32 nb_pkts, nb_processed = 0; + unsigned int total_bytes = 0; + + nb_pkts = xsk_tx_peek_release_desc_batch(xdp_ring->xsk_pool, descs, budget); + if (!nb_pkts) + return false; + + if (xdp_ring->next_to_use + nb_pkts >= xdp_ring->count) { + nb_processed = xdp_ring->count - xdp_ring->next_to_use; + i40e_fill_tx_hw_ring(xdp_ring, descs, nb_processed, &total_bytes); + xdp_ring->next_to_use = 0; } - if (tx_desc) { - /* Request an interrupt for the last frame and bump tail ptr. */ - tx_desc->cmd_type_offset_bsz |= (I40E_TX_DESC_CMD_RS << - I40E_TXD_QW1_CMD_SHIFT); - i40e_xdp_ring_update_tail(xdp_ring); + i40e_fill_tx_hw_ring(xdp_ring, &descs[nb_processed], nb_pkts - nb_processed, + &total_bytes); - xsk_tx_release(xdp_ring->xsk_pool); - i40e_update_tx_stats(xdp_ring, sent_frames, total_bytes); - } + /* Request an interrupt for the last frame and bump tail ptr. */ + i40e_set_rs_bit(xdp_ring); + i40e_xdp_ring_update_tail(xdp_ring); + + i40e_update_tx_stats(xdp_ring, nb_pkts, total_bytes); - return !!budget; + return true; } /**