@@ -92,7 +92,7 @@ behavior of a function called ``add``; t
the second parameter, in this case, is what the value is expected to be; the
last value is what the value actually is. If ``add`` passes all of these
expectations, the test case, ``add_test_basic`` will pass; if any one of these
-expectations fail, the test case will fail.
+expectations fails, the test case will fail.
It is important to understand that a test case *fails* when any expectation is
violated; however, the test will continue running, potentially trying other
@@ -202,7 +202,7 @@ Example:
kunit_test_suite(example_test_suite);
In the above example the test suite, ``example_test_suite``, would run the test
-cases ``example_test_foo``, ``example_test_bar``, and ``example_test_baz``,
+cases ``example_test_foo``, ``example_test_bar``, and ``example_test_baz``;
each would have ``example_test_init`` called immediately before it and would
have ``example_test_exit`` called immediately after it.
``kunit_test_suite(example_test_suite)`` registers the test suite with the
@@ -229,7 +229,7 @@ through some sort of indirection where a
such that the definition of that function can be changed without affecting the
rest of the code base. In the kernel this primarily comes from two constructs,
classes, structs that contain function pointers that are provided by the
-implementer, and architecture specific functions which have definitions selected
+implementer, and architecture-specific functions which have definitions selected
at compile time.
Classes
@@ -459,7 +459,7 @@ KUnit on non-UML architectures
By default KUnit uses UML as a way to provide dependencies for code under test.
Under most circumstances KUnit's usage of UML should be treated as an
implementation detail of how KUnit works under the hood. Nevertheless, there
-are instances where being able to run architecture specific code or test
+are instances where being able to run architecture-specific code or test
against real hardware is desirable. For these reasons KUnit supports running on
other architectures.
@@ -599,7 +599,7 @@ writing normal KUnit tests. One special
hardware state in between test cases; if this is not possible, you may only be
able to run one test case per invocation.
-.. TODO(brendanhiggins@google.com): Add an actual example of an architecture
+.. TODO(brendanhiggins@google.com): Add an actual example of an architecture-
dependent KUnit test.
KUnit debugfs representation
Fix minor grammar and punctutation glitches. Hyphenate "architecture-specific" instances. Signed-off-by: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@infradead.org> Cc: David Gow <davidgow@google.com> Cc: linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org Cc: kunit-dev@googlegroups.com Cc: Shuah Khan <shuah@kernel.org> Cc: Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org> Cc: Brendan Higgins <brendanhiggins@google.com> --- Documentation/dev-tools/kunit/usage.rst | 10 +++++----- 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)