Message ID | 20201007122256.28080-1-lukasz.luba@arm.com |
---|---|
Headers | show |
Series | Add upper and lower limits in IPA power budget calculation | expand |
On 07/10/2020 14:22, Lukasz Luba wrote: > The thermal cooling device specified in DT might be instantiated for > a thermal zone trip point with a limited set of OPPs to operate on. This > configuration should be supported by Intelligent Power Allocation (IPA), > since it is a standard for other governors. Change the code and allow IPA > to get power value of lower and upper bound set for a given cooling > device. > > Signed-off-by: Lukasz Luba <lukasz.luba@arm.com> > --- > drivers/thermal/gov_power_allocator.c | 6 ++++-- > 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/thermal/gov_power_allocator.c b/drivers/thermal/gov_power_allocator.c > index dd59085f38f5..f9ee7787b325 100644 > --- a/drivers/thermal/gov_power_allocator.c > +++ b/drivers/thermal/gov_power_allocator.c > @@ -96,7 +96,8 @@ static u32 estimate_sustainable_power(struct thermal_zone_device *tz) > if (instance->trip != params->trip_max_desired_temperature) > continue; > > - if (power_actor_get_min_power(cdev, tz, &min_power)) > + if (cdev->ops->state2power(cdev, tz, instance->upper, > + &min_power)) if (cdev->ops->state2power && cdev->ops->state2power(cdev, tz, instance->upper, &min_power)) ? > continue; > > sustainable_power += min_power; > @@ -404,7 +405,8 @@ static int allocate_power(struct thermal_zone_device *tz, > > weighted_req_power[i] = frac_to_int(weight * req_power[i]); > > - if (power_actor_get_max_power(cdev, tz, &max_power[i])) > + if (cdev->ops->state2power(cdev, tz, instance->lower, > + &max_power[i])) > continue; Same here ? > total_req_power += req_power[i]; >
On 07/10/2020 14:22, Lukasz Luba wrote: > Hi all, > > This patch set makes thermal governor Intelligent Power Allocation (IPA) > aware of cooling device limits for upper and lower bounds and respects them > in the internal power budget calculation. > The patch set should be applied on top of some already posted IPA changes [1][2]. > > Regards, > Lukasz > > [1] https://lore.kernel.org/linux-pm/20201002122416.13659-1-lukasz.luba@arm.com/ > [2] https://lore.kernel.org/linux-pm/9ecedd8a-fbc3-895c-d79c-f05af5c90ae5@arm.com/T/#t > > Lukasz Luba (3): > thermal: power_allocator: respect upper and lower bounds for cooling > device > thermal: core: remove unused functions in power actor section > thermal: move power_actor_set_power into IPA > > drivers/thermal/gov_power_allocator.c | 38 ++++++++++- > drivers/thermal/thermal_core.c | 90 --------------------------- > drivers/thermal/thermal_core.h | 6 -- > 3 files changed, 36 insertions(+), 98 deletions(-) Thanks for this series. Except a comment in patch 1/3, it looks good to me.
On 10/14/20 1:31 PM, Daniel Lezcano wrote: > On 07/10/2020 14:22, Lukasz Luba wrote: >> The thermal cooling device specified in DT might be instantiated for >> a thermal zone trip point with a limited set of OPPs to operate on. This >> configuration should be supported by Intelligent Power Allocation (IPA), >> since it is a standard for other governors. Change the code and allow IPA >> to get power value of lower and upper bound set for a given cooling >> device. >> >> Signed-off-by: Lukasz Luba <lukasz.luba@arm.com> >> --- >> drivers/thermal/gov_power_allocator.c | 6 ++++-- >> 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) >> >> diff --git a/drivers/thermal/gov_power_allocator.c b/drivers/thermal/gov_power_allocator.c >> index dd59085f38f5..f9ee7787b325 100644 >> --- a/drivers/thermal/gov_power_allocator.c >> +++ b/drivers/thermal/gov_power_allocator.c >> @@ -96,7 +96,8 @@ static u32 estimate_sustainable_power(struct thermal_zone_device *tz) >> if (instance->trip != params->trip_max_desired_temperature) >> continue; >> >> - if (power_actor_get_min_power(cdev, tz, &min_power)) >> + if (cdev->ops->state2power(cdev, tz, instance->upper, >> + &min_power)) > > if (cdev->ops->state2power && cdev->ops->state2power(cdev, tz, > instance->upper, > &min_power)) > > ? Yes, worth to check. I had this in [1] and missed it here while playing with re-base of these patch series and other test branches. I will send v2 with the needed cdev_is_power_actor() check. > >> continue; >> >> sustainable_power += min_power; >> @@ -404,7 +405,8 @@ static int allocate_power(struct thermal_zone_device *tz, >> >> weighted_req_power[i] = frac_to_int(weight * req_power[i]); >> >> - if (power_actor_get_max_power(cdev, tz, &max_power[i])) >> + if (cdev->ops->state2power(cdev, tz, instance->lower, >> + &max_power[i])) >> continue; > > Same here ? Inside that loop we check (just a few lines above): if (!cdev_is_power_actor(cdev)) continue; then we call this: if (cdev->ops->state2power(cdev, tz, instance->lower, &max_power[i])) So it should be safe. > >> total_req_power += req_power[i]; >> > > Thank you Daniel for reviewing this. Regards, Lukasz [1] https://lore.kernel.org/linux-pm/20201008170426.465-3-lukasz.luba@arm.com/