Message ID | 20200815013145.539409-17-richard.henderson@linaro.org |
---|---|
State | Superseded |
Headers | show |
Series | target/arm: SVE2 preparatory patches | expand |
On Sat, 15 Aug 2020 at 02:32, Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org> wrote: > > Wrote too much with low-half zip (zip1) with vl % 512 != 0. > > Adjust all of the x + (y << s) to x | (y << s) as a style fix. > > Reported-by: Laurent Desnogues <laurent.desnogues@gmail.com> > Signed-off-by: Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org> > --- > target/arm/sve_helper.c | 25 ++++++++++++++----------- > 1 file changed, 14 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/target/arm/sve_helper.c b/target/arm/sve_helper.c > index fcb46f150f..b8651ae173 100644 > --- a/target/arm/sve_helper.c > +++ b/target/arm/sve_helper.c > @@ -1870,6 +1870,7 @@ void HELPER(sve_zip_p)(void *vd, void *vn, void *vm, uint32_t pred_desc) > intptr_t oprsz = extract32(pred_desc, 0, SIMD_OPRSZ_BITS) + 2; > int esz = extract32(pred_desc, SIMD_DATA_SHIFT, 2); > intptr_t high = extract32(pred_desc, SIMD_DATA_SHIFT + 2, 1); > + int esize = 1 << esz; > uint64_t *d = vd; > intptr_t i; > > @@ -1882,33 +1883,35 @@ void HELPER(sve_zip_p)(void *vd, void *vn, void *vm, uint32_t pred_desc) > mm = extract64(mm, high * half, half); > nn = expand_bits(nn, esz); > mm = expand_bits(mm, esz); > - d[0] = nn + (mm << (1 << esz)); > + d[0] = nn | (mm << esize); > } else { > - ARMPredicateReg tmp_n, tmp_m; > + ARMPredicateReg tmp; > > /* We produce output faster than we consume input. > Therefore we must be mindful of possible overlap. */ > - if ((vn - vd) < (uintptr_t)oprsz) { > - vn = memcpy(&tmp_n, vn, oprsz); > - } > - if ((vm - vd) < (uintptr_t)oprsz) { > - vm = memcpy(&tmp_m, vm, oprsz); > + if (vd == vn) { > + vn = memcpy(&tmp, vn, oprsz); > + if (vd == vm) { > + vm = vn; > + } > + } else if (vd == vm) { > + vm = memcpy(&tmp, vm, oprsz); Why is it OK to only check vd==vn etc rather than checking for overlap the way the old code did ? The commit message doesn't mention this. thanks -- PMM
On 8/25/20 6:49 AM, Peter Maydell wrote: > On Sat, 15 Aug 2020 at 02:32, Richard Henderson > <richard.henderson@linaro.org> wrote: >> >> Wrote too much with low-half zip (zip1) with vl % 512 != 0. >> >> Adjust all of the x + (y << s) to x | (y << s) as a style fix. >> >> Reported-by: Laurent Desnogues <laurent.desnogues@gmail.com> >> Signed-off-by: Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org> >> --- >> target/arm/sve_helper.c | 25 ++++++++++++++----------- >> 1 file changed, 14 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-) >> >> diff --git a/target/arm/sve_helper.c b/target/arm/sve_helper.c >> index fcb46f150f..b8651ae173 100644 >> --- a/target/arm/sve_helper.c >> +++ b/target/arm/sve_helper.c >> @@ -1870,6 +1870,7 @@ void HELPER(sve_zip_p)(void *vd, void *vn, void *vm, uint32_t pred_desc) >> intptr_t oprsz = extract32(pred_desc, 0, SIMD_OPRSZ_BITS) + 2; >> int esz = extract32(pred_desc, SIMD_DATA_SHIFT, 2); >> intptr_t high = extract32(pred_desc, SIMD_DATA_SHIFT + 2, 1); >> + int esize = 1 << esz; >> uint64_t *d = vd; >> intptr_t i; >> >> @@ -1882,33 +1883,35 @@ void HELPER(sve_zip_p)(void *vd, void *vn, void *vm, uint32_t pred_desc) >> mm = extract64(mm, high * half, half); >> nn = expand_bits(nn, esz); >> mm = expand_bits(mm, esz); >> - d[0] = nn + (mm << (1 << esz)); >> + d[0] = nn | (mm << esize); >> } else { >> - ARMPredicateReg tmp_n, tmp_m; >> + ARMPredicateReg tmp; >> >> /* We produce output faster than we consume input. >> Therefore we must be mindful of possible overlap. */ >> - if ((vn - vd) < (uintptr_t)oprsz) { >> - vn = memcpy(&tmp_n, vn, oprsz); >> - } >> - if ((vm - vd) < (uintptr_t)oprsz) { >> - vm = memcpy(&tmp_m, vm, oprsz); >> + if (vd == vn) { >> + vn = memcpy(&tmp, vn, oprsz); >> + if (vd == vm) { >> + vm = vn; >> + } >> + } else if (vd == vm) { >> + vm = memcpy(&tmp, vm, oprsz); > > Why is it OK to only check vd==vn etc rather than checking for > overlap the way the old code did ? The commit message doesn't > mention this. We only ever pass pred_full_reg_offset, so there will only ever be exact overlap. I can either split this out as a separate change or simply add it to the patch description. r~
On Fri, 28 Aug 2020 at 20:26, Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org> wrote: > > On 8/25/20 6:49 AM, Peter Maydell wrote: > > Why is it OK to only check vd==vn etc rather than checking for > > overlap the way the old code did ? The commit message doesn't > > mention this. > > We only ever pass pred_full_reg_offset, so there will only ever be exact > overlap. I can either split this out as a separate change or simply add it to > the patch description. Whichever you prefer, I guess. thanks -- PMM
diff --git a/target/arm/sve_helper.c b/target/arm/sve_helper.c index fcb46f150f..b8651ae173 100644 --- a/target/arm/sve_helper.c +++ b/target/arm/sve_helper.c @@ -1870,6 +1870,7 @@ void HELPER(sve_zip_p)(void *vd, void *vn, void *vm, uint32_t pred_desc) intptr_t oprsz = extract32(pred_desc, 0, SIMD_OPRSZ_BITS) + 2; int esz = extract32(pred_desc, SIMD_DATA_SHIFT, 2); intptr_t high = extract32(pred_desc, SIMD_DATA_SHIFT + 2, 1); + int esize = 1 << esz; uint64_t *d = vd; intptr_t i; @@ -1882,33 +1883,35 @@ void HELPER(sve_zip_p)(void *vd, void *vn, void *vm, uint32_t pred_desc) mm = extract64(mm, high * half, half); nn = expand_bits(nn, esz); mm = expand_bits(mm, esz); - d[0] = nn + (mm << (1 << esz)); + d[0] = nn | (mm << esize); } else { - ARMPredicateReg tmp_n, tmp_m; + ARMPredicateReg tmp; /* We produce output faster than we consume input. Therefore we must be mindful of possible overlap. */ - if ((vn - vd) < (uintptr_t)oprsz) { - vn = memcpy(&tmp_n, vn, oprsz); - } - if ((vm - vd) < (uintptr_t)oprsz) { - vm = memcpy(&tmp_m, vm, oprsz); + if (vd == vn) { + vn = memcpy(&tmp, vn, oprsz); + if (vd == vm) { + vm = vn; + } + } else if (vd == vm) { + vm = memcpy(&tmp, vm, oprsz); } if (high) { high = oprsz >> 1; } - if ((high & 3) == 0) { + if ((oprsz & 7) == 0) { uint32_t *n = vn, *m = vm; high >>= 2; - for (i = 0; i < DIV_ROUND_UP(oprsz, 8); i++) { + for (i = 0; i < oprsz / 8; i++) { uint64_t nn = n[H4(high + i)]; uint64_t mm = m[H4(high + i)]; nn = expand_bits(nn, esz); mm = expand_bits(mm, esz); - d[i] = nn + (mm << (1 << esz)); + d[i] = nn | (mm << esize); } } else { uint8_t *n = vn, *m = vm; @@ -1920,7 +1923,7 @@ void HELPER(sve_zip_p)(void *vd, void *vn, void *vm, uint32_t pred_desc) nn = expand_bits(nn, esz); mm = expand_bits(mm, esz); - d16[H2(i)] = nn + (mm << (1 << esz)); + d16[H2(i)] = nn | (mm << esize); } } }
Wrote too much with low-half zip (zip1) with vl % 512 != 0. Adjust all of the x + (y << s) to x | (y << s) as a style fix. Reported-by: Laurent Desnogues <laurent.desnogues@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org> --- target/arm/sve_helper.c | 25 ++++++++++++++----------- 1 file changed, 14 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-) -- 2.25.1