| Message ID | 20200714145049.2496163-1-lee.jones@linaro.org |
|---|---|
| Headers | show |
| Series | Rid W=1 warnings in CPUFreq | expand |
On 14-07-20, 15:50, Lee Jones wrote: > This set is part of a larger effort attempting to clean-up W=1 > kernel builds, which are currently overwhelmingly riddled with > niggly little warnings. > > After these patches are applied, the build system no longer > complains about any W=0 nor W=1 level warnings in drivers/cpufreq. And you need to rebase this stuff of pm/linux-next, as there are some changes in cpufreq.c there. -- viresh
On Wed, 15 Jul 2020, Viresh Kumar wrote: > On 14-07-20, 15:50, Lee Jones wrote: > > This set is part of a larger effort attempting to clean-up W=1 > > kernel builds, which are currently overwhelmingly riddled with > > niggly little warnings. > > > > After these patches are applied, the build system no longer > > complains about any W=0 nor W=1 level warnings in drivers/cpufreq. > > And you need to rebase this stuff of pm/linux-next, as there are some > changes in cpufreq.c there. It's based on the latest -next. Is pm/linux-next in -next? -- Lee Jones [李琼斯] Senior Technical Lead - Developer Services Linaro.org │ Open source software for Arm SoCs Follow Linaro: Facebook | Twitter | Blog
On 15-07-20, 07:32, Lee Jones wrote: > On Wed, 15 Jul 2020, Viresh Kumar wrote: > > > On 14-07-20, 15:50, Lee Jones wrote: > > > This set is part of a larger effort attempting to clean-up W=1 > > > kernel builds, which are currently overwhelmingly riddled with > > > niggly little warnings. > > > > > > After these patches are applied, the build system no longer > > > complains about any W=0 nor W=1 level warnings in drivers/cpufreq. > > > > And you need to rebase this stuff of pm/linux-next, as there are some > > changes in cpufreq.c there. > > It's based on the latest -next. Is pm/linux-next in -next? Yes it is. Actually my bad, I based it on my next which didn't had pm/linux-next :) -- viresh
On Wed, 15 Jul 2020, Viresh Kumar wrote: > On 15-07-20, 07:32, Lee Jones wrote: > > On Wed, 15 Jul 2020, Viresh Kumar wrote: > > > > > On 14-07-20, 15:50, Lee Jones wrote: > > > > This set is part of a larger effort attempting to clean-up W=1 > > > > kernel builds, which are currently overwhelmingly riddled with > > > > niggly little warnings. > > > > > > > > After these patches are applied, the build system no longer > > > > complains about any W=0 nor W=1 level warnings in drivers/cpufreq. > > > > > > And you need to rebase this stuff of pm/linux-next, as there are some > > > changes in cpufreq.c there. > > > > It's based on the latest -next. Is pm/linux-next in -next? > > Yes it is. Actually my bad, I based it on my next which didn't had > pm/linux-next :) No problem. -- Lee Jones [李琼斯] Senior Technical Lead - Developer Services Linaro.org │ Open source software for Arm SoCs Follow Linaro: Facebook | Twitter | Blog
This set is part of a larger effort attempting to clean-up W=1 kernel builds, which are currently overwhelmingly riddled with niggly little warnings. After these patches are applied, the build system no longer complains about any W=0 nor W=1 level warnings in drivers/cpufreq. Hurrah! Lee Jones (13): cpufreq: freq_table: Demote obvious misuse of kerneldoc to standard comment blocks cpufreq: cpufreq: Demote lots of function headers unworthy of kerneldoc status cpufreq: cpufreq_governor: Demote store_sampling_rate() header to standard comment block cpufreq: sti-cpufreq: Fix some formatting and misspelling issues cpufreq/arch: powerpc: pasemi: Move prototypes to shared header cpufreq: powernv-cpufreq: Functions only used in call-backs should be static cpufreq: powernv-cpufreq: Fix a bunch of kerneldoc related issues cpufreq: acpi-cpufreq: Take 'dummy' principle one stage further cpufreq: acpi-cpufreq: Remove unused ID structs cpufreq: powernow-k8: Make use of known set but not used variables cpufreq: pcc-cpufreq: Remove unused ID structs cpufreq: intel_pstate: Supply struct attribute description for get_aperf_mperf_shift() cpufreq: amd_freq_sensitivity: Remove unused ID structs arch/powerpc/platforms/pasemi/pasemi.h | 15 ----------- arch/powerpc/platforms/pasemi/powersave.S | 2 ++ drivers/cpufreq/acpi-cpufreq.c | 16 ++---------- drivers/cpufreq/amd_freq_sensitivity.c | 6 ----- drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c | 32 ++++++++++++----------- drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq_governor.c | 2 +- drivers/cpufreq/freq_table.c | 6 ++--- drivers/cpufreq/intel_pstate.c | 2 ++ drivers/cpufreq/pasemi-cpufreq.c | 1 + drivers/cpufreq/pcc-cpufreq.c | 7 ----- drivers/cpufreq/powernow-k8.c | 2 ++ drivers/cpufreq/powernv-cpufreq.c | 15 ++++++----- drivers/cpufreq/sti-cpufreq.c | 8 +++--- include/linux/platform_data/pasemi.h | 28 ++++++++++++++++++++ 14 files changed, 70 insertions(+), 72 deletions(-) create mode 100644 include/linux/platform_data/pasemi.h -- 2.25.1