| Message ID | 20191001193316.3330-1-paolo.valente@linaro.org |
|---|---|
| Headers | show |
| Series | block, bfq: make bfq disable iocost and present a double interface | expand |
Jens, Tejun, can we proceed with this double-interface solution? Thanks, Paolo > Il giorno 1 ott 2019, alle ore 21:33, Paolo Valente <paolo.valente@linaro.org> ha scritto: > > Hi Jens, > > the first patch in this series is Tejun's patch for making BFQ disable > io.cost. The second patch makes BFQ present both the bfq-prefixes > parameters and non-prefixed parameters, as suggested by Tejun [1]. > > In the first patch I've tried to use macros not to repeat code > twice. checkpatch complains that these macros should be enclosed in > parentheses. I don't see how to do it. I'm willing to switch to any > better solution. > > Thanks, > Paolo > > [1] https://lkml.org/lkml/2019/9/18/736 > > Paolo Valente (1): > block, bfq: present a double cgroups interface > > Tejun Heo (1): > blkcg: Make bfq disable iocost when enabled > > Documentation/admin-guide/cgroup-v2.rst | 8 +- > Documentation/block/bfq-iosched.rst | 40 ++-- > block/bfq-cgroup.c | 260 ++++++++++++------------ > block/bfq-iosched.c | 32 +++ > block/blk-iocost.c | 5 +- > include/linux/blk-cgroup.h | 5 + > kernel/cgroup/cgroup.c | 2 + > 7 files changed, 201 insertions(+), 151 deletions(-) > > -- > 2.20.1
ping > Il giorno 9 ott 2019, alle ore 16:25, Paolo Valente <paolo.valente@linaro.org> ha scritto: > > Jens, Tejun, > can we proceed with this double-interface solution? > > Thanks, > Paolo > >> Il giorno 1 ott 2019, alle ore 21:33, Paolo Valente <paolo.valente@linaro.org> ha scritto: >> >> Hi Jens, >> >> the first patch in this series is Tejun's patch for making BFQ disable >> io.cost. The second patch makes BFQ present both the bfq-prefixes >> parameters and non-prefixed parameters, as suggested by Tejun [1]. >> >> In the first patch I've tried to use macros not to repeat code >> twice. checkpatch complains that these macros should be enclosed in >> parentheses. I don't see how to do it. I'm willing to switch to any >> better solution. >> >> Thanks, >> Paolo >> >> [1] https://lkml.org/lkml/2019/9/18/736 >> >> Paolo Valente (1): >> block, bfq: present a double cgroups interface >> >> Tejun Heo (1): >> blkcg: Make bfq disable iocost when enabled >> >> Documentation/admin-guide/cgroup-v2.rst | 8 +- >> Documentation/block/bfq-iosched.rst | 40 ++-- >> block/bfq-cgroup.c | 260 ++++++++++++------------ >> block/bfq-iosched.c | 32 +++ >> block/blk-iocost.c | 5 +- >> include/linux/blk-cgroup.h | 5 + >> kernel/cgroup/cgroup.c | 2 + >> 7 files changed, 201 insertions(+), 151 deletions(-) >> >> -- >> 2.20.1 >
Hi Jens, no issue has been raised in more than a month, and this version was requested by Tejun and is backed by you. So can it be queued for 5.5? Thanks, Paolo > Il giorno 23 ott 2019, alle ore 07:44, Paolo Valente <paolo.valente@linaro.org> ha scritto: > > ping > >> Il giorno 9 ott 2019, alle ore 16:25, Paolo Valente <paolo.valente@linaro.org> ha scritto: >> >> Jens, Tejun, >> can we proceed with this double-interface solution? >> >> Thanks, >> Paolo >> >>> Il giorno 1 ott 2019, alle ore 21:33, Paolo Valente <paolo.valente@linaro.org> ha scritto: >>> >>> Hi Jens, >>> >>> the first patch in this series is Tejun's patch for making BFQ disable >>> io.cost. The second patch makes BFQ present both the bfq-prefixes >>> parameters and non-prefixed parameters, as suggested by Tejun [1]. >>> >>> In the first patch I've tried to use macros not to repeat code >>> twice. checkpatch complains that these macros should be enclosed in >>> parentheses. I don't see how to do it. I'm willing to switch to any >>> better solution. >>> >>> Thanks, >>> Paolo >>> >>> [1] https://lkml.org/lkml/2019/9/18/736 >>> >>> Paolo Valente (1): >>> block, bfq: present a double cgroups interface >>> >>> Tejun Heo (1): >>> blkcg: Make bfq disable iocost when enabled >>> >>> Documentation/admin-guide/cgroup-v2.rst | 8 +- >>> Documentation/block/bfq-iosched.rst | 40 ++-- >>> block/bfq-cgroup.c | 260 ++++++++++++------------ >>> block/bfq-iosched.c | 32 +++ >>> block/blk-iocost.c | 5 +- >>> include/linux/blk-cgroup.h | 5 + >>> kernel/cgroup/cgroup.c | 2 + >>> 7 files changed, 201 insertions(+), 151 deletions(-) >>> >>> -- >>> 2.20.1 >> >
Jens, 5.5 has arrived too, and this version should do what you asked. Can you please consider this series? Thanks, Paolo > Il giorno 4 nov 2019, alle ore 07:55, Paolo Valente <paolo.valente@linaro.org> ha scritto: > > Hi Jens, > no issue has been raised in more than a month, and this version was > requested by Tejun and is backed by you. So can it be queued for 5.5? > > Thanks, > Paolo > >> Il giorno 23 ott 2019, alle ore 07:44, Paolo Valente <paolo.valente@linaro.org> ha scritto: >> >> ping >> >>> Il giorno 9 ott 2019, alle ore 16:25, Paolo Valente <paolo.valente@linaro.org> ha scritto: >>> >>> Jens, Tejun, >>> can we proceed with this double-interface solution? >>> >>> Thanks, >>> Paolo >>> >>>> Il giorno 1 ott 2019, alle ore 21:33, Paolo Valente <paolo.valente@linaro.org> ha scritto: >>>> >>>> Hi Jens, >>>> >>>> the first patch in this series is Tejun's patch for making BFQ disable >>>> io.cost. The second patch makes BFQ present both the bfq-prefixes >>>> parameters and non-prefixed parameters, as suggested by Tejun [1]. >>>> >>>> In the first patch I've tried to use macros not to repeat code >>>> twice. checkpatch complains that these macros should be enclosed in >>>> parentheses. I don't see how to do it. I'm willing to switch to any >>>> better solution. >>>> >>>> Thanks, >>>> Paolo >>>> >>>> [1] https://lkml.org/lkml/2019/9/18/736 >>>> >>>> Paolo Valente (1): >>>> block, bfq: present a double cgroups interface >>>> >>>> Tejun Heo (1): >>>> blkcg: Make bfq disable iocost when enabled >>>> >>>> Documentation/admin-guide/cgroup-v2.rst | 8 +- >>>> Documentation/block/bfq-iosched.rst | 40 ++-- >>>> block/bfq-cgroup.c | 260 ++++++++++++------------ >>>> block/bfq-iosched.c | 32 +++ >>>> block/blk-iocost.c | 5 +- >>>> include/linux/blk-cgroup.h | 5 + >>>> kernel/cgroup/cgroup.c | 2 + >>>> 7 files changed, 201 insertions(+), 151 deletions(-) >>>> >>>> -- >>>> 2.20.1 >>> >> >