| Message ID | 20190820080527.11796-1-linus.walleij@linaro.org |
|---|---|
| State | Accepted |
| Commit | 48057ed1840fde9239b1e000bea1a0a1f07c5e99 |
| Headers | show |
| Series | gpio: Fix irqchip initialization order | expand |
On Tue, Aug 20, 2019 at 10:05 AM Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org> wrote: > Wei: it would be great if you could test this and > confirm if it solves your problem, so I can apply this > for fixes. Wei, could you test this patch? I have a strong urge to push it to Torvalds as a fix for this problem but it'd be super if you could test it. Yours, Linus Walleij
Hi Linus, On 2019/8/20 16:05, Linus Walleij wrote: > The new API for registering a gpio_irq_chip along with a > gpio_chip has a different semantic ordering than the old > API which added the irqchip explicitly after registering > the gpio_chip. > > Move the calls to add the gpio_irq_chip *last* in the > function, so that the different hooks setting up OF and > ACPI and machine gpio_chips are called *before* we try > to register the interrupts, preserving the elder semantic > order. > > This cropped up in the PL061 driver which used to work > fine with no special ACPI quirks, but started to misbehave > using the new API. > > Fixes: e0d897289813 ("gpio: Implement tighter IRQ chip integration") > Cc: Thierry Reding <treding@nvidia.com> > Cc: Grygorii Strashko <grygorii.strashko@ti.com> > Cc: Wei Xu <xuwei5@hisilicon.com> > Cc: Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@gmail.com> > Reported-by: Wei Xu <xuwei5@hisilicon.com> > Reported-by: Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@gmail.com> > Signed-off-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org> > --- > Wei: it would be great if you could test this and > confirm if it solves your problem, so I can apply this > for fixes. Sorry for the late reply! There are some issues about my mail filter. Yes, this fixes the problem and tested based on gpio/devel branch. So, Tested-by: Wei Xu <xuwei5@hisilicon.com> Thanks! The log is as below: estuary:/$ cat /proc/interrupts CPU0 2: 2610 GICv3 27 Level arch_timer 4: 33 GICv3 33 Level uart-pl011 42: 0 GICv3 23 Level arm-pmu 43: 0 ARMH0061:00 3 Edge ACPI:Event IPI0: 0 Rescheduling interrupts IPI1: 0 Function call interrupts IPI2: 0 CPU stop interrupts IPI3: 0 CPU stop (for crash dump) interrupts IPI4: 0 Timer broadcast interrupts IPI5: 0 IRQ work interrupts IPI6: 0 CPU wake-up interrupts Err: 0 estuary:/$ dmesg | more [ 0.000000] Booting Linux on physical CPU 0x0000000000 [0x411fd070] [ 0.000000] Linux version 5.3.0-rc1-00036-gbe23e9a (joyx@Turing-Arch-b) (gcc version 4.9.1 20140505 (prerelease) (crosstool-NG linaro-1.13.1-4.9-2014.05 - Linaro GCC 4.9-2014.05)) #64 SMP Fri Aug 23 16:05:08 CST 2019 commit be23e9a097e55d6733eec4336c078fda93339265 Author: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org> Date: Tue Aug 20 10:05:27 2019 +0200 gpio: Fix irqchip initialization order Best Regards, Wei > --- > drivers/gpio/gpiolib.c | 30 +++++++++++++++--------------- > 1 file changed, 15 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/gpio/gpiolib.c b/drivers/gpio/gpiolib.c > index 80a2a2cb673b..cca749010cd0 100644 > --- a/drivers/gpio/gpiolib.c > +++ b/drivers/gpio/gpiolib.c > @@ -1373,21 +1373,13 @@ int gpiochip_add_data_with_key(struct gpio_chip *chip, void *data, > if (status) > goto err_remove_from_list; > > - status = gpiochip_irqchip_init_valid_mask(chip); > - if (status) > - goto err_remove_from_list; > - > status = gpiochip_alloc_valid_mask(chip); > if (status) > - goto err_remove_irqchip_mask; > - > - status = gpiochip_add_irqchip(chip, lock_key, request_key); > - if (status) > - goto err_free_gpiochip_mask; > + goto err_remove_from_list; > > status = of_gpiochip_add(chip); > if (status) > - goto err_remove_chip; > + goto err_free_gpiochip_mask; > > status = gpiochip_init_valid_mask(chip); > if (status) > @@ -1413,6 +1405,14 @@ int gpiochip_add_data_with_key(struct gpio_chip *chip, void *data, > > machine_gpiochip_add(chip); > > + status = gpiochip_irqchip_init_valid_mask(chip); > + if (status) > + goto err_remove_acpi_chip; > + > + status = gpiochip_add_irqchip(chip, lock_key, request_key); > + if (status) > + goto err_remove_irqchip_mask; > + > /* > * By first adding the chardev, and then adding the device, > * we get a device node entry in sysfs under > @@ -1424,21 +1424,21 @@ int gpiochip_add_data_with_key(struct gpio_chip *chip, void *data, > if (gpiolib_initialized) { > status = gpiochip_setup_dev(gdev); > if (status) > - goto err_remove_acpi_chip; > + goto err_remove_irqchip; > } > return 0; > > +err_remove_irqchip: > + gpiochip_irqchip_remove(chip); > +err_remove_irqchip_mask: > + gpiochip_irqchip_free_valid_mask(chip); > err_remove_acpi_chip: > acpi_gpiochip_remove(chip); > err_remove_of_chip: > gpiochip_free_hogs(chip); > of_gpiochip_remove(chip); > -err_remove_chip: > - gpiochip_irqchip_remove(chip); > err_free_gpiochip_mask: > gpiochip_free_valid_mask(chip); > -err_remove_irqchip_mask: > - gpiochip_irqchip_free_valid_mask(chip); > err_remove_from_list: > spin_lock_irqsave(&gpio_lock, flags); > list_del(&gdev->list);
On Fri, Aug 23, 2019 at 10:31 AM Wei Xu <xuwei5@hisilicon.com> wrote: > Yes, this fixes the problem and tested based on gpio/devel branch. > So, > > Tested-by: Wei Xu <xuwei5@hisilicon.com> Awesome! Thanks a lot Wei! I'll get this to Torvalds tree ASAP. Yours, Linus Walleij
On Fri, Aug 23, 2019 at 12:02 PM Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org> wrote: > > On Fri, Aug 23, 2019 at 10:31 AM Wei Xu <xuwei5@hisilicon.com> wrote: > > > Yes, this fixes the problem and tested based on gpio/devel branch. > > So, > > > > Tested-by: Wei Xu <xuwei5@hisilicon.com> > > Awesome! Thanks a lot Wei! > I'll get this to Torvalds tree ASAP. Thanks, Linus, to fix this! -- With Best Regards, Andy Shevchenko
diff --git a/drivers/gpio/gpiolib.c b/drivers/gpio/gpiolib.c index 80a2a2cb673b..cca749010cd0 100644 --- a/drivers/gpio/gpiolib.c +++ b/drivers/gpio/gpiolib.c @@ -1373,21 +1373,13 @@ int gpiochip_add_data_with_key(struct gpio_chip *chip, void *data, if (status) goto err_remove_from_list; - status = gpiochip_irqchip_init_valid_mask(chip); - if (status) - goto err_remove_from_list; - status = gpiochip_alloc_valid_mask(chip); if (status) - goto err_remove_irqchip_mask; - - status = gpiochip_add_irqchip(chip, lock_key, request_key); - if (status) - goto err_free_gpiochip_mask; + goto err_remove_from_list; status = of_gpiochip_add(chip); if (status) - goto err_remove_chip; + goto err_free_gpiochip_mask; status = gpiochip_init_valid_mask(chip); if (status) @@ -1413,6 +1405,14 @@ int gpiochip_add_data_with_key(struct gpio_chip *chip, void *data, machine_gpiochip_add(chip); + status = gpiochip_irqchip_init_valid_mask(chip); + if (status) + goto err_remove_acpi_chip; + + status = gpiochip_add_irqchip(chip, lock_key, request_key); + if (status) + goto err_remove_irqchip_mask; + /* * By first adding the chardev, and then adding the device, * we get a device node entry in sysfs under @@ -1424,21 +1424,21 @@ int gpiochip_add_data_with_key(struct gpio_chip *chip, void *data, if (gpiolib_initialized) { status = gpiochip_setup_dev(gdev); if (status) - goto err_remove_acpi_chip; + goto err_remove_irqchip; } return 0; +err_remove_irqchip: + gpiochip_irqchip_remove(chip); +err_remove_irqchip_mask: + gpiochip_irqchip_free_valid_mask(chip); err_remove_acpi_chip: acpi_gpiochip_remove(chip); err_remove_of_chip: gpiochip_free_hogs(chip); of_gpiochip_remove(chip); -err_remove_chip: - gpiochip_irqchip_remove(chip); err_free_gpiochip_mask: gpiochip_free_valid_mask(chip); -err_remove_irqchip_mask: - gpiochip_irqchip_free_valid_mask(chip); err_remove_from_list: spin_lock_irqsave(&gpio_lock, flags); list_del(&gdev->list);
The new API for registering a gpio_irq_chip along with a gpio_chip has a different semantic ordering than the old API which added the irqchip explicitly after registering the gpio_chip. Move the calls to add the gpio_irq_chip *last* in the function, so that the different hooks setting up OF and ACPI and machine gpio_chips are called *before* we try to register the interrupts, preserving the elder semantic order. This cropped up in the PL061 driver which used to work fine with no special ACPI quirks, but started to misbehave using the new API. Fixes: e0d897289813 ("gpio: Implement tighter IRQ chip integration") Cc: Thierry Reding <treding@nvidia.com> Cc: Grygorii Strashko <grygorii.strashko@ti.com> Cc: Wei Xu <xuwei5@hisilicon.com> Cc: Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@gmail.com> Reported-by: Wei Xu <xuwei5@hisilicon.com> Reported-by: Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org> --- Wei: it would be great if you could test this and confirm if it solves your problem, so I can apply this for fixes. --- drivers/gpio/gpiolib.c | 30 +++++++++++++++--------------- 1 file changed, 15 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-) -- 2.21.0