| Message ID | 20181114090027.7580-1-benjamin.gaignard@linaro.org |
|---|---|
| Headers | show |
| Series | Add support of STM32 hwspinlock | expand |
Le mer. 14 nov. 2018 à 10:00, Benjamin Gaignard <benjamin.gaignard@linaro.org> a écrit : > > This serie adds the support of the hardware semaphore block for stm32mp1 SoC. > > version 4: > - add Linaro SoB Gentle ping on this series Regards, Benjamin > > version 3: > - fix clock name in properties description. > - use postcore_initcall() instead of module_platform_driver() > > version 2: > - fix comments done by Bjorn about clock naming, license terms in header, > alphabetic ordering in Makefile and Kconfig and remove function > - Do not push test module in this version while waiting for feedbacks about it > > Benjamin Gaignard (4): > dt-bindings: hwlock: Document STM32 hwspinlock bindings > hwspinlock: add STM32 hwspinlock device > ARM: dts: stm32: Add hwspinlock node for stm32mp157 SoC > ARM: dts: stm32: enable hwspinlock on stm32mp157c-ed1 > > .../bindings/hwlock/st,stm32-hwspinlock.txt | 23 +++ > arch/arm/boot/dts/stm32mp157c-ed1.dts | 4 + > arch/arm/boot/dts/stm32mp157c.dtsi | 9 ++ > drivers/hwspinlock/Kconfig | 9 ++ > drivers/hwspinlock/Makefile | 1 + > drivers/hwspinlock/stm32_hwspinlock.c | 156 +++++++++++++++++++++ > 6 files changed, 202 insertions(+) > create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/hwlock/st,stm32-hwspinlock.txt > create mode 100644 drivers/hwspinlock/stm32_hwspinlock.c > > -- > 2.15.0 >
Le jeu. 6 déc. 2018 à 02:12, Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@linaro.org> a écrit : > > On Fri 30 Nov 06:45 PST 2018, Benjamin Gaignard wrote: > > > Le mer. 14 nov. 2018 ą 10:00, Benjamin Gaignard > > <benjamin.gaignard@linaro.org> a écrit : > > > > > > This serie adds the support of the hardware semaphore block for stm32mp1 SoC. > > > > > > version 4: > > > - add Linaro SoB > > > > Gentle ping on this series > > > > Sorry about that Benjamin, I was convinced that I picked your patches > already. Applied first two patches to hwspinlock tree. Thanks. > > I expect the dts update to go through the ST tree, and I guess the > complaint from 0day tells us they already are? Yes I will send fixed dts patches for stm32 tree > > Regards, > Bjorn