mbox series

[v4,0/4] m68k: system call table generation support

Message ID 1540530377-3509-1-git-send-email-firoz.khan@linaro.org
Headers show
Series m68k: system call table generation support | expand

Message

Firoz Khan Oct. 26, 2018, 5:06 a.m. UTC
The purpose of this patch series is, we can easily add/modify/delete
system call table support by changing entry in syscall.tbl file 
instead of manually changing many files. The other goal is to unify 
the system call table generation support implementation across all 
the architectures. 

The system call tables are in different format in all architecture. 
It will be difficult to manually add, modify or delete the system 
calls in the respective files manually. To make it easy by keeping
a script and which'll generate uapi header file and syscall table 
file.

syscall.tbl contains the list of available system calls along with 
system call number and corresponding entry point. Add a new system 
call in this architecture will be possible by adding new entry in 
the syscall.tbl file.

Adding a new table entry consisting of:
        - System call number.
        - ABI.
        - System call name.
        - Entry point name.

ARM, s390 and x86 architecuture does exist the similar support. I 
leverage their implementation to come up with a generic solution.

I have done the same support for work for alpha, ia64, microblaze,
mips, parisc, powerpc, sh, sparc, and xtensa. Below mentioned git
repository contains more details.
Git repo:- https://github.com/frzkhn/system_call_table_generator/

Finally, this is the ground work to solve the Y2038 issue. We need 
to add two dozen of system calls to solve Y2038 issue. So this patch
series will help to add new system calls easily by adding new entry 
in the syscall.tbl.

Firoz Khan (4):
  m68k: rename system call table file name
  m68k: add __NR_syscalls along with NR_syscalls
  m68k: add system call table generation support
  m68k: generate uapi header and syscall table header files

 arch/m68k/Makefile                      |   3 +
 arch/m68k/include/asm/Kbuild            |   1 +
 arch/m68k/include/asm/unistd.h          |   3 +-
 arch/m68k/include/uapi/asm/Kbuild       |   1 +
 arch/m68k/include/uapi/asm/unistd.h     | 385 +-----------------------------
 arch/m68k/kernel/Makefile               |   2 +-
 arch/m68k/kernel/syscall_table.S        |  26 +++
 arch/m68k/kernel/syscalls/Makefile      |  38 +++
 arch/m68k/kernel/syscalls/syscall.tbl   | 389 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 arch/m68k/kernel/syscalls/syscallhdr.sh |  36 +++
 arch/m68k/kernel/syscalls/syscalltbl.sh |  32 +++
 arch/m68k/kernel/syscalltable.S         | 403 --------------------------------
 12 files changed, 529 insertions(+), 790 deletions(-)
 create mode 100644 arch/m68k/kernel/syscall_table.S
 create mode 100644 arch/m68k/kernel/syscalls/Makefile
 create mode 100644 arch/m68k/kernel/syscalls/syscall.tbl
 create mode 100644 arch/m68k/kernel/syscalls/syscallhdr.sh
 create mode 100644 arch/m68k/kernel/syscalls/syscalltbl.sh
 delete mode 100644 arch/m68k/kernel/syscalltable.S

-- 
1.9.1

Comments

Geert Uytterhoeven Oct. 27, 2018, 2:47 p.m. UTC | #1
Hi Firoz,

On Fri, Oct 26, 2018 at 7:06 AM Firoz Khan <firoz.khan@linaro.org> wrote:
> The purpose of this patch series is, we can easily add/modify/delete

> system call table support by changing entry in syscall.tbl file

> instead of manually changing many files. The other goal is to unify

> the system call table generation support implementation across all

> the architectures.

>

> The system call tables are in different format in all architecture.

> It will be difficult to manually add, modify or delete the system

> calls in the respective files manually. To make it easy by keeping

> a script and which'll generate uapi header file and syscall table

> file.

>

> syscall.tbl contains the list of available system calls along with

> system call number and corresponding entry point. Add a new system

> call in this architecture will be possible by adding new entry in

> the syscall.tbl file.

>

> Adding a new table entry consisting of:

>         - System call number.

>         - ABI.

>         - System call name.

>         - Entry point name.

>

> ARM, s390 and x86 architecuture does exist the similar support. I

> leverage their implementation to come up with a generic solution.

>

> I have done the same support for work for alpha, ia64, microblaze,

> mips, parisc, powerpc, sh, sparc, and xtensa. Below mentioned git

> repository contains more details.

> Git repo:- https://github.com/frzkhn/system_call_table_generator/

>

> Finally, this is the ground work to solve the Y2038 issue. We need

> to add two dozen of system calls to solve Y2038 issue. So this patch

> series will help to add new system calls easily by adding new entry

> in the syscall.tbl.


Thanks for the update!

Can you please tell the audience what has been changed in v4?

When posting a new version of a patch or patch series, it is a good
idea to include a changelog in the cover letter and/or patches.

Thanks!

Gr{oetje,eeting}s,

                        Geert

-- 
Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- geert@linux-m68k.org

In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But
when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that.
                                -- Linus Torvalds
Firoz Khan Oct. 29, 2018, 3:38 a.m. UTC | #2
Hi Geert,

On Sat, 27 Oct 2018 at 20:17, Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org> wrote:
>

> Hi Firoz,

>

> On Fri, Oct 26, 2018 at 7:06 AM Firoz Khan <firoz.khan@linaro.org> wrote:

> > The purpose of this patch series is, we can easily add/modify/delete

> > system call table support by changing entry in syscall.tbl file

> > instead of manually changing many files. The other goal is to unify

> > the system call table generation support implementation across all

> > the architectures.

> >

> > The system call tables are in different format in all architecture.

> > It will be difficult to manually add, modify or delete the system

> > calls in the respective files manually. To make it easy by keeping

> > a script and which'll generate uapi header file and syscall table

> > file.

> >

> > syscall.tbl contains the list of available system calls along with

> > system call number and corresponding entry point. Add a new system

> > call in this architecture will be possible by adding new entry in

> > the syscall.tbl file.

> >

> > Adding a new table entry consisting of:

> >         - System call number.

> >         - ABI.

> >         - System call name.

> >         - Entry point name.

> >

> > ARM, s390 and x86 architecuture does exist the similar support. I

> > leverage their implementation to come up with a generic solution.

> >

> > I have done the same support for work for alpha, ia64, microblaze,

> > mips, parisc, powerpc, sh, sparc, and xtensa. Below mentioned git

> > repository contains more details.

> > Git repo:- https://github.com/frzkhn/system_call_table_generator/

> >

> > Finally, this is the ground work to solve the Y2038 issue. We need

> > to add two dozen of system calls to solve Y2038 issue. So this patch

> > series will help to add new system calls easily by adding new entry

> > in the syscall.tbl.

>

> Thanks for the update!

>

> Can you please tell the audience what has been changed in v4?


Sure.
- I added the comments in syscall.tbl and solved mixed (space and tab)
  indentation.
- Modified the scripts (syscalltbl.sh and syscallhdr.sh) as per the feedback
  provided by Arnd, Finn Thain, Eugene Syromiatnikov and Rolf Eike Beer.

Eg:-
 - echo options are not portable; changed to printf
 - "let" is a bash extension; changed posix-conformant expression.
 - Finally I optimized the script and solved mixed indentation.

>

> When posting a new version of a patch or patch series, it is a good

> idea to include a changelog in the cover letter and/or patches.


Sure, will do!

Thanks
Firoz

>

> Thanks!

>

> Gr{oetje,eeting}s,

>

>                         Geert

>

> --

> Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- geert@linux-m68k.org

>

> In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But

> when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that.

>                                 -- Linus Torvalds