diff mbox series

cpumask: provide a dummy cpumask_next_wrap

Message ID 20180813215546.3828228-1-arnd@arndb.de
State New
Headers show
Series cpumask: provide a dummy cpumask_next_wrap | expand

Commit Message

Arnd Bergmann Aug. 13, 2018, 9:55 p.m. UTC
The virtio_net driver has become the first one to call cpumask_next_wrap()
even if CONFIG_SMP is disabled, leading to a build error:

drivers/net/virtio_net.c: In function 'virtnet_set_affinity':
drivers/net/virtio_net.c:1916:10: error: implicit declaration of function 'cpumask_next_wrap'; did you mean 'cpumask_next_and'? [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
    cpu = cpumask_next_wrap(cpu, cpu_online_mask,

Add a stub function along the lines of cpumask_first(), cpumask_next() etc.
I'm not entirely sure what should be returned in this case, but at
least for virtio_net, anything should work.

Fixes: 2ca653d607ce ("virtio_net: Stripe queue affinities across cores.")
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Caleb Raitto <caraitto@google.com>
Cc: Willem de Bruijn <willemb@google.com>
Cc: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>

---
 include/linux/cpumask.h | 5 +++++
 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+)

-- 
2.18.0

Comments

Caleb Raitto Aug. 13, 2018, 10:01 p.m. UTC | #1
On Mon, Aug 13, 2018 at 2:55 PM Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> wrote:
>

> The virtio_net driver has become the first one to call cpumask_next_wrap()

> even if CONFIG_SMP is disabled, leading to a build error:

>

> drivers/net/virtio_net.c: In function 'virtnet_set_affinity':

> drivers/net/virtio_net.c:1916:10: error: implicit declaration of function 'cpumask_next_wrap'; did you mean 'cpumask_next_and'? [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]

>     cpu = cpumask_next_wrap(cpu, cpu_online_mask,

>

> Add a stub function along the lines of cpumask_first(), cpumask_next() etc.

> I'm not entirely sure what should be returned in this case, but at

> least for virtio_net, anything should work.


Sorry about the build break, I think this patch with a fix was already merged:

cpumask: make cpumask_next_wrap available without smp
https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/956670/

Thanks,
-Caleb
Arnd Bergmann Aug. 13, 2018, 10:05 p.m. UTC | #2
On Tue, Aug 14, 2018 at 12:02 AM Caleb Raitto <caraitto@google.com> wrote:
>

> On Mon, Aug 13, 2018 at 2:55 PM Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> wrote:

> >

> > The virtio_net driver has become the first one to call cpumask_next_wrap()

> > even if CONFIG_SMP is disabled, leading to a build error:

> >

> > drivers/net/virtio_net.c: In function 'virtnet_set_affinity':

> > drivers/net/virtio_net.c:1916:10: error: implicit declaration of function 'cpumask_next_wrap'; did you mean 'cpumask_next_and'? [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]

> >     cpu = cpumask_next_wrap(cpu, cpu_online_mask,

> >

> > Add a stub function along the lines of cpumask_first(), cpumask_next() etc.

> > I'm not entirely sure what should be returned in this case, but at

> > least for virtio_net, anything should work.

>

> Sorry about the build break, I think this patch with a fix was already merged:

>

> cpumask: make cpumask_next_wrap available without smp

> https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/956670/


Ok, that's also a better fix than mine I think.

Thanks,

        Arnd
David Miller Aug. 13, 2018, 10:57 p.m. UTC | #3
From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>

Date: Mon, 13 Aug 2018 23:55:16 +0200

> The virtio_net driver has become the first one to call cpumask_next_wrap()

> even if CONFIG_SMP is disabled, leading to a build error:

> 

> drivers/net/virtio_net.c: In function 'virtnet_set_affinity':

> drivers/net/virtio_net.c:1916:10: error: implicit declaration of function 'cpumask_next_wrap'; did you mean 'cpumask_next_and'? [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]

>     cpu = cpumask_next_wrap(cpu, cpu_online_mask,

> 

> Add a stub function along the lines of cpumask_first(), cpumask_next() etc.

> I'm not entirely sure what should be returned in this case, but at

> least for virtio_net, anything should work.

> 

> Fixes: 2ca653d607ce ("virtio_net: Stripe queue affinities across cores.")

> Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>


This should already be fixed in my tree, and:

> +static inline int cpumask_next_wrap(int n, const struct cpumask *mask, int start, bool wrap)

> +{

> +	return n;

> +}


this doesn't handle the "n==0 && wrap" case properly, in that situation you should
return '1'.
diff mbox series

Patch

diff --git a/include/linux/cpumask.h b/include/linux/cpumask.h
index 57f20a0a7794..079ba06309bd 100644
--- a/include/linux/cpumask.h
+++ b/include/linux/cpumask.h
@@ -159,6 +159,11 @@  static inline unsigned int cpumask_next_and(int n,
 	return n+1;
 }
 
+static inline int cpumask_next_wrap(int n, const struct cpumask *mask, int start, bool wrap)
+{
+	return n;
+}
+
 /* cpu must be a valid cpu, ie 0, so there's no other choice. */
 static inline unsigned int cpumask_any_but(const struct cpumask *mask,
 					   unsigned int cpu)