Message ID | 20180614163334.46827-1-agraf@suse.de |
---|---|
Headers | show |
Series | sandbox: efi_loader support | expand |
Hi, On 14 June 2018 at 10:33, Alexander Graf <agraf@suse.de> wrote: > This patch set augments Simon's patch set for efi_loader support > in sandbox[1], but follows a different memory allocation scheme. > > Instead of keeping U-Boot (physical) addresses in the EFI memory > map, this patch set makes the EFI memory map contain host virtual > (virtual) addresses. That way most logic "just works" and all EFI > interfaces automatically gain sandbox awareness. > > With this patch set in place, I can run a good chunk of the selftest > suite as well as efi binaries compiled using gnu-efi. Can you rebase this on top of my series? You seem to have picked up only a few patches from my series. Ideally I'd like to get those applied so that sandbox works, and then do future work on top of that. Regards, Simon
On 06/14/2018 06:55 PM, Simon Glass wrote: > Hi, > > On 14 June 2018 at 10:33, Alexander Graf <agraf@suse.de> wrote: >> This patch set augments Simon's patch set for efi_loader support >> in sandbox[1], but follows a different memory allocation scheme. >> >> Instead of keeping U-Boot (physical) addresses in the EFI memory >> map, this patch set makes the EFI memory map contain host virtual >> (virtual) addresses. That way most logic "just works" and all EFI >> interfaces automatically gain sandbox awareness. >> >> With this patch set in place, I can run a good chunk of the selftest >> suite as well as efi binaries compiled using gnu-efi. > Can you rebase this on top of my series? You seem to have picked up > only a few patches from my series. Ideally I'd like to get those > applied so that sandbox works, and then do future work on top of that. I did that on purpose, yes. I omitted patches that we either don't need (like the smbios one, because we already call the helpers with pointers) or that I think move us into the wrong direction (like the one that calls map_sysmem() in the allocation path or the new bootefi test target where I would rather like to see the selftest target extended. Alex