| Message ID | 1515137821-30583-1-git-send-email-jun.nie@linaro.org |
|---|---|
| Headers | show |
| Series | Add Bananapi Zero board with OTG supported | expand |
On Fri, Jan 5, 2018 at 1:06 PM, Jun Nie <jun.nie@linaro.org> wrote: > Add Bananapi Zero board defconfig and device tree. > OTG device is supported with enabling clock and adding necessary > controller configuration change. USB mass storage is tested as > a test case. > > Jun Nie (6): > sunxi: h3: add usb_otg and OHCI/EHCI for usbc0 on H3 > sunxi: musb: Add fifo config for H3 > sunxi: musb: Enable OTG device clock for H3 > sunxi: musb: Hack dynamic fifo support for H3 OTG > sunxi: usb_phy: Clear PHYCTL register before writing a64 on otg have in ML[1] check if any redundant otherwise it's OK., we will test these and send next version. > sunxi: Add initial Banana-Pi Zero support similar patch is already in ML [2] [1] https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/cover/847375/ [2] https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/832937/
Thank you very much! Will check. Jun
> > a64 on otg have in ML[1] check if any redundant otherwise it's OK., we > will test these and send next version. > >> sunxi: Add initial Banana-Pi Zero support > > similar patch is already in ML [2] > > [1] https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/cover/847375/ This serial patches in the link does not introduce any redundant change with my USB patches. So my patches 1-5 still deserve review. Conflict should be resolve of course because some change is made in the same line. Two points for patches in the link: - SUNXI_MUSB_BASE is redefined with the patches in the link for H3 configuration in my test. - Some coding style conflict with u-boot, such as USBC_SelectPhyToDevice. > [2] https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/832937/ This patch can replace my patch 6 and please ignore my patch 6. Jun > > -- > Jagan Teki > Free Software Engineer | www.openedev.com > U-Boot, Linux | Upstream Maintainer > Hyderabad, India.
On Fri, Jan 5, 2018 at 5:04 PM, Jun Nie <jun.nie@linaro.org> wrote: >> >> a64 on otg have in ML[1] check if any redundant otherwise it's OK., we >> will test these and send next version. >> >>> sunxi: Add initial Banana-Pi Zero support >> >> similar patch is already in ML [2] >> >> [1] https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/cover/847375/ > > This serial patches in the link does not introduce any redundant > change with my USB patches. So my patches 1-5 still deserve review. > Conflict should be resolve of course because some change is made in > the same line. > > Two points for patches in the link: > - SUNXI_MUSB_BASE is redefined with the patches in the link for H3 > configuration in my test. > - Some coding style conflict with u-boot, such as USBC_SelectPhyToDevice. I have some similar patches here: https://github.com/wens/u-boot-sunxi/commits/libretech-cc ChenYu >> [2] https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/832937/ > > This patch can replace my patch 6 and please ignore my patch 6. > > Jun >> >> -- >> Jagan Teki >> Free Software Engineer | www.openedev.com >> U-Boot, Linux | Upstream Maintainer >> Hyderabad, India.
2018-01-05 17:06 GMT+08:00 Chen-Yu Tsai <wens@csie.org>: > On Fri, Jan 5, 2018 at 5:04 PM, Jun Nie <jun.nie@linaro.org> wrote: >>> >>> a64 on otg have in ML[1] check if any redundant otherwise it's OK., we >>> will test these and send next version. >>> >>>> sunxi: Add initial Banana-Pi Zero support >>> >>> similar patch is already in ML [2] >>> >>> [1] https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/cover/847375/ >> >> This serial patches in the link does not introduce any redundant >> change with my USB patches. So my patches 1-5 still deserve review. >> Conflict should be resolve of course because some change is made in >> the same line. >> >> Two points for patches in the link: >> - SUNXI_MUSB_BASE is redefined with the patches in the link for H3 >> configuration in my test. >> - Some coding style conflict with u-boot, such as USBC_SelectPhyToDevice. > > I have some similar patches here: > > https://github.com/wens/u-boot-sunxi/commits/libretech-cc > > ChenYu ChenYu, Are you patches are in review process or merge process? When do you expected they are merged? Jun > >>> [2] https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/832937/ >> >> This patch can replace my patch 6 and please ignore my patch 6. >> >> Jun >>> >>> -- >>> Jagan Teki >>> Free Software Engineer | www.openedev.com >>> U-Boot, Linux | Upstream Maintainer >>> Hyderabad, India.
On Fri, Jan 5, 2018 at 5:20 PM, Jun Nie <jun.nie@linaro.org> wrote: > 2018-01-05 17:06 GMT+08:00 Chen-Yu Tsai <wens@csie.org>: >> On Fri, Jan 5, 2018 at 5:04 PM, Jun Nie <jun.nie@linaro.org> wrote: >>>> >>>> a64 on otg have in ML[1] check if any redundant otherwise it's OK., we >>>> will test these and send next version. >>>> >>>>> sunxi: Add initial Banana-Pi Zero support >>>> >>>> similar patch is already in ML [2] >>>> >>>> [1] https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/cover/847375/ >>> >>> This serial patches in the link does not introduce any redundant >>> change with my USB patches. So my patches 1-5 still deserve review. >>> Conflict should be resolve of course because some change is made in >>> the same line. >>> >>> Two points for patches in the link: >>> - SUNXI_MUSB_BASE is redefined with the patches in the link for H3 >>> configuration in my test. >>> - Some coding style conflict with u-boot, such as USBC_SelectPhyToDevice. >> >> I have some similar patches here: >> >> https://github.com/wens/u-boot-sunxi/commits/libretech-cc >> >> ChenYu > > ChenYu, > > Are you patches are in review process or merge process? When do you > expected they are merged? So far only "musb: sunxi: Use base address from device tree" has been sent out and was already reviewed, but pending. The rest I've not sent as I was still trying to get it to work in peripheral mode. Feel free to pick any of the patches if they suit your needs. ChenYu