Message ID | 20171006214648.2077-1-robh@kernel.org |
---|---|
State | New |
Headers | show |
Series | [hwc] drm_hwcomposer: use upstream DRM_MODE_{ROTATE, REFLECT} defines | expand |
On Fri, Oct 06, 2017 at 04:46:48PM -0500, Rob Herring wrote: > The DRM_REFLECT_* and DRM_ROTATE_* defines were not upstream, but now > they are. Convert to using the upstream version which are defined as a > bit mask rather than a bit position. > > Signed-off-by: Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org> > --- > drmdisplaycompositor.cpp | 10 +++++----- > 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-) Reviewed-by: Thierry Reding <treding@nvidia.com>
Hey Rob, This looks good to me, added r-b and pushed. Rob. On Fri, 2017-10-06 at 16:46 -0500, Rob Herring wrote: > The DRM_REFLECT_* and DRM_ROTATE_* defines were not upstream, but now > they are. Convert to using the upstream version which are defined as > a > bit mask rather than a bit position. > > Signed-off-by: Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org> > --- > drmdisplaycompositor.cpp | 10 +++++----- > 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/drmdisplaycompositor.cpp b/drmdisplaycompositor.cpp > index a07d3588d1f5..036a45e8b88b 100644 > --- a/drmdisplaycompositor.cpp > +++ b/drmdisplaycompositor.cpp > @@ -572,15 +572,15 @@ int > DrmDisplayCompositor::CommitFrame(DrmDisplayComposition > *display_comp, > > rotation = 0; > if (layer.transform & DrmHwcTransform::kFlipH) > - rotation |= 1 << DRM_REFLECT_X; > + rotation |= DRM_MODE_REFLECT_X; > if (layer.transform & DrmHwcTransform::kFlipV) > - rotation |= 1 << DRM_REFLECT_Y; > + rotation |= DRM_MODE_REFLECT_Y; > if (layer.transform & DrmHwcTransform::kRotate90) > - rotation |= 1 << DRM_ROTATE_90; > + rotation |= DRM_MODE_ROTATE_90; > else if (layer.transform & DrmHwcTransform::kRotate180) > - rotation |= 1 << DRM_ROTATE_180; > + rotation |= DRM_MODE_ROTATE_180; > else if (layer.transform & DrmHwcTransform::kRotate270) > - rotation |= 1 << DRM_ROTATE_270; > + rotation |= DRM_MODE_ROTATE_270; > > if (fence_fd < 0) { > int prop_id = plane->in_fence_fd_property().id();
Hey Thierry, On Sat, 2017-10-07 at 01:29 +0200, Thierry Reding wrote: > On Fri, Oct 06, 2017 at 04:46:48PM -0500, Rob Herring wrote: > > The DRM_REFLECT_* and DRM_ROTATE_* defines were not upstream, but > > now > > they are. Convert to using the upstream version which are defined > > as a > > bit mask rather than a bit position. > > > > Signed-off-by: Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org> > > --- > > drmdisplaycompositor.cpp | 10 +++++----- > > 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-) > > Reviewed-by: Thierry Reding <treding@nvidia.com> I pushed this patch, but I slightly bungled it, and missed appending your r-b to the commit message. Sorry about that. Rob.
diff --git a/drmdisplaycompositor.cpp b/drmdisplaycompositor.cpp index a07d3588d1f5..036a45e8b88b 100644 --- a/drmdisplaycompositor.cpp +++ b/drmdisplaycompositor.cpp @@ -572,15 +572,15 @@ int DrmDisplayCompositor::CommitFrame(DrmDisplayComposition *display_comp, rotation = 0; if (layer.transform & DrmHwcTransform::kFlipH) - rotation |= 1 << DRM_REFLECT_X; + rotation |= DRM_MODE_REFLECT_X; if (layer.transform & DrmHwcTransform::kFlipV) - rotation |= 1 << DRM_REFLECT_Y; + rotation |= DRM_MODE_REFLECT_Y; if (layer.transform & DrmHwcTransform::kRotate90) - rotation |= 1 << DRM_ROTATE_90; + rotation |= DRM_MODE_ROTATE_90; else if (layer.transform & DrmHwcTransform::kRotate180) - rotation |= 1 << DRM_ROTATE_180; + rotation |= DRM_MODE_ROTATE_180; else if (layer.transform & DrmHwcTransform::kRotate270) - rotation |= 1 << DRM_ROTATE_270; + rotation |= DRM_MODE_ROTATE_270; if (fence_fd < 0) { int prop_id = plane->in_fence_fd_property().id();
The DRM_REFLECT_* and DRM_ROTATE_* defines were not upstream, but now they are. Convert to using the upstream version which are defined as a bit mask rather than a bit position. Signed-off-by: Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org> --- drmdisplaycompositor.cpp | 10 +++++----- 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)