| Message ID | 4309490.qRrvvx0n1Q@wuerfel |
|---|---|
| State | New |
| Headers | show |
On Tue, 2016-01-12 at 16:05 +0100, Arnd Bergmann wrote: > Newly added code in the bnxt driver uses a couple of variables that > are never initialized when CONFIG_BNXT_SRIOV is not set, and gcc > correctly warns about that: > > In file included from include/linux/list.h:8:0, > from include/linux/module.h:9, > from drivers/net/ethernet/broadcom/bnxt/bnxt.c:10: > drivers/net/ethernet/broadcom/bnxt/bnxt.c: In function 'bnxt_get_max_rings': > include/linux/kernel.h:794:26: warning: 'cp' may be used uninitialized in this function [-Wmaybe-uninitialized] > include/linux/kernel.h:794:26: warning: 'tx' may be used uninitialized in this function [-Wmaybe-uninitialized] > drivers/net/ethernet/broadcom/bnxt/bnxt.c:5730:11: warning: 'rx' may be used uninitialized in this function [-Wmaybe-uninitialized] > drivers/net/ethernet/broadcom/bnxt/bnxt.c:5736:6: note: 'rx' was declared here > > This changes the condition so that we fall back to using the PF > data if VF is not available, and always initialize the variables > to something useful. > > Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> > Fixes: 6e6c5a57fbe1 ("bnxt_en: Modify bnxt_get_max_rings() to support > shared or non shared rings.") > --- > This is the fix that made most sense to me, but that doesn't mean it's > the right thing to do for this driver, so please check carefully > whether falling back to PF is actually the correct behavior. > > I'm assuming that BNXT_PF(bp) is meant to always be true if > CONFIG_BNXT_SRIOV > is disabled, but I have not verified if this is guaranteed. The assumption is correct. Patch looks good. Thanks. Acked-by: Michael Chan <mchan@broadcom.com>
From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> Date: Tue, 12 Jan 2016 16:05:08 +0100 > Newly added code in the bnxt driver uses a couple of variables that > are never initialized when CONFIG_BNXT_SRIOV is not set, and gcc > correctly warns about that: > > In file included from include/linux/list.h:8:0, > from include/linux/module.h:9, > from drivers/net/ethernet/broadcom/bnxt/bnxt.c:10: > drivers/net/ethernet/broadcom/bnxt/bnxt.c: In function 'bnxt_get_max_rings': > include/linux/kernel.h:794:26: warning: 'cp' may be used uninitialized in this function [-Wmaybe-uninitialized] > include/linux/kernel.h:794:26: warning: 'tx' may be used uninitialized in this function [-Wmaybe-uninitialized] > drivers/net/ethernet/broadcom/bnxt/bnxt.c:5730:11: warning: 'rx' may be used uninitialized in this function [-Wmaybe-uninitialized] > drivers/net/ethernet/broadcom/bnxt/bnxt.c:5736:6: note: 'rx' was declared here > > This changes the condition so that we fall back to using the PF > data if VF is not available, and always initialize the variables > to something useful. > > Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> > Fixes: 6e6c5a57fbe1 ("bnxt_en: Modify bnxt_get_max_rings() to support shared or non shared rings.") Applied, thanks Arnd.
diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/broadcom/bnxt/bnxt.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/broadcom/bnxt/bnxt.c index 287bfb79ea2d..df835f5e46d8 100644 --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/broadcom/bnxt/bnxt.c +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/broadcom/bnxt/bnxt.c @@ -5711,21 +5711,23 @@ static void _bnxt_get_max_rings(struct bnxt *bp, int *max_rx, int *max_tx, { int max_ring_grps = 0; - if (BNXT_PF(bp)) { - *max_tx = bp->pf.max_tx_rings; - *max_rx = bp->pf.max_rx_rings; - *max_cp = min_t(int, bp->pf.max_irqs, bp->pf.max_cp_rings); - *max_cp = min_t(int, *max_cp, bp->pf.max_stat_ctxs); - max_ring_grps = bp->pf.max_hw_ring_grps; - } else { #ifdef CONFIG_BNXT_SRIOV + if (!BNXT_PF(bp)) { *max_tx = bp->vf.max_tx_rings; *max_rx = bp->vf.max_rx_rings; *max_cp = min_t(int, bp->vf.max_irqs, bp->vf.max_cp_rings); *max_cp = min_t(int, *max_cp, bp->vf.max_stat_ctxs); max_ring_grps = bp->vf.max_hw_ring_grps; + } else #endif + { + *max_tx = bp->pf.max_tx_rings; + *max_rx = bp->pf.max_rx_rings; + *max_cp = min_t(int, bp->pf.max_irqs, bp->pf.max_cp_rings); + *max_cp = min_t(int, *max_cp, bp->pf.max_stat_ctxs); + max_ring_grps = bp->pf.max_hw_ring_grps; } + if (bp->flags & BNXT_FLAG_AGG_RINGS) *max_rx >>= 1; *max_rx = min_t(int, *max_rx, max_ring_grps);
Newly added code in the bnxt driver uses a couple of variables that are never initialized when CONFIG_BNXT_SRIOV is not set, and gcc correctly warns about that: In file included from include/linux/list.h:8:0, from include/linux/module.h:9, from drivers/net/ethernet/broadcom/bnxt/bnxt.c:10: drivers/net/ethernet/broadcom/bnxt/bnxt.c: In function 'bnxt_get_max_rings': include/linux/kernel.h:794:26: warning: 'cp' may be used uninitialized in this function [-Wmaybe-uninitialized] include/linux/kernel.h:794:26: warning: 'tx' may be used uninitialized in this function [-Wmaybe-uninitialized] drivers/net/ethernet/broadcom/bnxt/bnxt.c:5730:11: warning: 'rx' may be used uninitialized in this function [-Wmaybe-uninitialized] drivers/net/ethernet/broadcom/bnxt/bnxt.c:5736:6: note: 'rx' was declared here This changes the condition so that we fall back to using the PF data if VF is not available, and always initialize the variables to something useful. Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> Fixes: 6e6c5a57fbe1 ("bnxt_en: Modify bnxt_get_max_rings() to support shared or non shared rings.") --- This is the fix that made most sense to me, but that doesn't mean it's the right thing to do for this driver, so please check carefully whether falling back to PF is actually the correct behavior. I'm assuming that BNXT_PF(bp) is meant to always be true if CONFIG_BNXT_SRIOV is disabled, but I have not verified if this is guaranteed.