Message ID | 20170410162208.20611-1-ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org |
---|---|
Headers | show |
Series | Platforms/ARM: FVP spring cleaning -- OpenPlatformPkg edition | expand |
On 10 April 2017 at 17:22, Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org> wrote: > This is now mainly focused on FVP, although some changes affect TC2 and Juno > as well. However, the switch to DtPlatformDxe, which is the primary purpose of > this series, is only implemented for FVP. > > Note that the full functionality is only enabled when building with > DT_SUPPORT=TRUE, in which case the platform is built with a bunch of DTB > images built in, and a menu option that allows choosing between ACPI and > DT (which does require working non-volatile storage). Without DT support, > the platform is essentially ACPI only, unless a DTB is supplied to the OS > via one of the available out-of-band mechanisms. > I'm not 100% convinced that disabling device tree by default is the right thing to do. But at the same time, it's not my call and I don't boot anything interesting using FVP anyway, so I don't mind. For the limited amount of stuff I need working, this all works fine on FVP Foundation & AEMv8, TC2 and Juno R0/1/2. Tested-by: Ryan Harkin <ryan.harkin@linaro.org> > Ard Biesheuvel (6): > Platforms/VExpress: remove unused logo PCD > Platforms/VExpress: remove unused StatusCode references > Platforms/VExpress: get rid of Tiano compression > Platforms/VExpress: remove BdsLib library class resolutions > Platforms/FVP: add DtPlatformDtbLoaderLib implementation > Platforms/FVP-AArch64: switch to simpler DT platform driver > > Platforms/ARM/Juno/ArmJuno.dsc | 8 ++ > Platforms/ARM/Juno/ArmJuno.fdf | 9 -- > Platforms/ARM/VExpress/ArmVExpress-CTA15-A7.dsc | 13 +- > Platforms/ARM/VExpress/ArmVExpress-CTA15-A7.fdf | 16 --- > Platforms/ARM/VExpress/ArmVExpress-FVP-AArch64.dsc | 33 ++--- > Platforms/ARM/VExpress/ArmVExpress-FVP-AArch64.fdf | 54 ++------ > Platforms/ARM/VExpress/ArmVExpress.dsc.inc | 24 +--- > Platforms/ARM/VExpress/Library/ArmVExpressDtPlatformDtbLoaderLib/ArmVExpressDtPlatformDtbLoaderLib.c | 134 ++++++++++++++++++++ > Platforms/ARM/VExpress/Library/ArmVExpressDtPlatformDtbLoaderLib/ArmVExpressDtPlatformDtbLoaderLib.inf | 39 ++++++ > 9 files changed, 221 insertions(+), 109 deletions(-) > create mode 100644 Platforms/ARM/VExpress/Library/ArmVExpressDtPlatformDtbLoaderLib/ArmVExpressDtPlatformDtbLoaderLib.c > create mode 100644 Platforms/ARM/VExpress/Library/ArmVExpressDtPlatformDtbLoaderLib/ArmVExpressDtPlatformDtbLoaderLib.inf > > -- > 2.9.3 >
On 11 April 2017 at 18:00, Ryan Harkin <ryan.harkin@linaro.org> wrote: > On 10 April 2017 at 17:22, Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org> wrote: >> This is now mainly focused on FVP, although some changes affect TC2 and Juno >> as well. However, the switch to DtPlatformDxe, which is the primary purpose of >> this series, is only implemented for FVP. >> >> Note that the full functionality is only enabled when building with >> DT_SUPPORT=TRUE, in which case the platform is built with a bunch of DTB >> images built in, and a menu option that allows choosing between ACPI and >> DT (which does require working non-volatile storage). Without DT support, >> the platform is essentially ACPI only, unless a DTB is supplied to the OS >> via one of the available out-of-band mechanisms. >> > > I'm not 100% convinced that disabling device tree by default is the > right thing to do. But at the same time, it's not my call and I don't > boot anything interesting using FVP anyway, so I don't mind. > DT_SUPPORT=TRUE will give you a build that defaults to device tree. Otherwise, you will get a build that defaults to ACPI. > For the limited amount of stuff I need working, this all works fine on > FVP Foundation & AEMv8, TC2 and Juno R0/1/2. > > Tested-by: Ryan Harkin <ryan.harkin@linaro.org> > Thanks! I take it this is with the two serieses combined?
On 11 April 2017 at 18:03, Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org> wrote: > On 11 April 2017 at 18:00, Ryan Harkin <ryan.harkin@linaro.org> wrote: >> On 10 April 2017 at 17:22, Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org> wrote: >>> This is now mainly focused on FVP, although some changes affect TC2 and Juno >>> as well. However, the switch to DtPlatformDxe, which is the primary purpose of >>> this series, is only implemented for FVP. >>> >>> Note that the full functionality is only enabled when building with >>> DT_SUPPORT=TRUE, in which case the platform is built with a bunch of DTB >>> images built in, and a menu option that allows choosing between ACPI and >>> DT (which does require working non-volatile storage). Without DT support, >>> the platform is essentially ACPI only, unless a DTB is supplied to the OS >>> via one of the available out-of-band mechanisms. >>> >> >> I'm not 100% convinced that disabling device tree by default is the >> right thing to do. But at the same time, it's not my call and I don't >> boot anything interesting using FVP anyway, so I don't mind. >> > > DT_SUPPORT=TRUE will give you a build that defaults to device tree. > Otherwise, you will get a build that defaults to ACPI. > I'm sure it's fine. >> For the limited amount of stuff I need working, this all works fine on >> FVP Foundation & AEMv8, TC2 and Juno R0/1/2. >> >> Tested-by: Ryan Harkin <ryan.harkin@linaro.org> >> > > Thanks! I take it this is with the two serieses combined? Yes :-) I should have said. I've sent a Tested-by for that series also.