Message ID | 1486390912-24362-1-git-send-email-benjamin.gaignard@st.com |
---|---|
Headers | show |
Series | iio: Add parent_trigger attribute to triggers | expand |
On 02/06/2017 03:21 PM, Benjamin Gaignard wrote: > Thoses patches add parent_trigger attribute to IIO triggers. > The goal is to allow triggers to use triggers like is this done for iio > devices. > With this patch it will be possible to chain triggers, for example > stm32 triggers could be used as clock of an other triggers: > echo "tim1_trgo" > trigger0/parent_trigger. Can you explain how this is different to assigning the parent_trigger directly to the device?
2017-02-06 15:26 GMT+01:00 Lars-Peter Clausen <lars@metafoo.de>: > On 02/06/2017 03:21 PM, Benjamin Gaignard wrote: >> Thoses patches add parent_trigger attribute to IIO triggers. >> The goal is to allow triggers to use triggers like is this done for iio >> devices. >> With this patch it will be possible to chain triggers, for example >> stm32 triggers could be used as clock of an other triggers: >> echo "tim1_trgo" > trigger0/parent_trigger. > > Can you explain how this is different to assigning the parent_trigger > directly to the device? > It is the same but done on trigger structure without need to have an iio device. While writing stm32 trigger driver Jonathan explain me that I can't use an iio device without channel to chain my hardware blocks. Since my hardware allows to chain triggers, Jonathan suggest to create this parent_trigger attribute to ab able to link the triggers.
On 06/02/17 14:43, Benjamin Gaignard wrote: > 2017-02-06 15:26 GMT+01:00 Lars-Peter Clausen <lars@metafoo.de>: >> On 02/06/2017 03:21 PM, Benjamin Gaignard wrote: >>> Thoses patches add parent_trigger attribute to IIO triggers. >>> The goal is to allow triggers to use triggers like is this done for iio >>> devices. >>> With this patch it will be possible to chain triggers, for example >>> stm32 triggers could be used as clock of an other triggers: >>> echo "tim1_trgo" > trigger0/parent_trigger. >> >> Can you explain how this is different to assigning the parent_trigger >> directly to the device? >> > > It is the same but done on trigger structure without need to have an iio device. > > While writing stm32 trigger driver Jonathan explain me that I can't use an iio > device without channel to chain my hardware blocks. > Since my hardware allows to chain triggers, Jonathan suggest to create this > parent_trigger attribute to ab able to link the triggers. > I think Lars was looking for the more general explanation. How does one trigger drive another one? What does that mean?