| Message ID | a65f8fcb-fc4a-dd0c-da55-ce9670330493@netcologne.de |
|---|---|
| State | New |
| Headers | show |
On Tue, Nov 01, 2016 at 11:58:10AM +0100, Thomas Koenig wrote: > > the attached, rather simple, patch, fixes a regression where > the locus was not set, leading to an ICE on a warning. > > Regression-tested on trunk. OK on all affected and open branches > (7/6/5)? > Yes. -- Steve
Index: match.c =================================================================== --- match.c (Revision 241590) +++ match.c (Arbeitskopie) @@ -6265,8 +6265,12 @@ gfc_match_where (gfc_statement *st) c = gfc_get_code (EXEC_WHERE); c->expr1 = expr; + /* Put in the assignment. It will not be processed by add_statement, so we + need to copy the location here. */ + c->next = XCNEW (gfc_code); *c->next = new_st; + c->next->loc = gfc_current_locus; gfc_clear_new_st (); new_st.op = EXEC_WHERE;
Hello world, the attached, rather simple, patch, fixes a regression where the locus was not set, leading to an ICE on a warning. Regression-tested on trunk. OK on all affected and open branches (7/6/5)? Regards Thomas 2016-11-01 Thomas Koenig <tkoenig@gcc.gnu.org> PR fortran/69544 * match.c (gfc_match_where): Fill in locus for assigment in simple WHERE statement. 2016-11-01 Thomas Koenig <tkoenig@gcc.gnu.org> PR fortran/69544 * gfortran.dg/where_5.f90: New test.