diff mbox

[1/1] drm/sti: use new Reset API

Message ID 20160722072254.20397-1-lee.jones@linaro.org
State Accepted
Commit c084c8dafce72bf67ad2bb7b873a4a732a9ce81c
Headers show

Commit Message

Lee Jones July 22, 2016, 7:22 a.m. UTC
Since 0b52297f228 ("reset: Add support for shared reset controls") the
new Reset API now demands consumers choose either an *_exclusive or
a *_shared line when requesting reset lines.

Signed-off-by: Lee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org>

---
 drivers/gpu/drm/sti/sti_compositor.c | 4 ++--
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

-- 
2.9.0

Comments

Lee Jones July 22, 2016, 4:14 p.m. UTC | #1
On Fri, 22 Jul 2016, Sean Paul wrote:

> On Fri, Jul 22, 2016 at 3:22 AM, Lee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org> wrote:

> > Since 0b52297f228 ("reset: Add support for shared reset controls") the

> > new Reset API now demands consumers choose either an *_exclusive or

> > a *_shared line when requesting reset lines.

> >

> > Signed-off-by: Lee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org>

> > ---

> >  drivers/gpu/drm/sti/sti_compositor.c | 4 ++--

> >  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

> >

> > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/sti/sti_compositor.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/sti/sti_compositor.c

> > index 3d2fa3a..c2ace02 100644

> > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/sti/sti_compositor.c

> > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/sti/sti_compositor.c

> > @@ -234,12 +234,12 @@ static int sti_compositor_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)

> >         }

> >

> >         /* Get reset resources */

> > -       compo->rst_main = devm_reset_control_get(dev, "compo-main");

> > +       compo->rst_main = devm_reset_control_get_shared(dev, "compo-main");

> 

> Seems like this patch also changes the behavior from being exclusively

> managed to shared. Is this intentional? If so, it's probably worth

> changing you commit message to be a little less innocuous.


Interesting turn of phrase.  You would like the commit message to be
more "harmful or offensive".  I'm sure I can rustle something up to
suit!

... or I could just mention why I'm changing the behaviour? ;)

v2 to follow.

> >         /* Take compo main out of reset */

> >         if (!IS_ERR(compo->rst_main))

> >                 reset_control_deassert(compo->rst_main);

> >

> > -       compo->rst_aux = devm_reset_control_get(dev, "compo-aux");

> > +       compo->rst_aux = devm_reset_control_get_shared(dev, "compo-aux");

> >         /* Take compo aux out of reset */

> >         if (!IS_ERR(compo->rst_aux))

> >                 reset_control_deassert(compo->rst_aux);

> >

> > _______________________________________________

> > dri-devel mailing list

> > dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org

> > https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel


-- 
Lee Jones
Linaro STMicroelectronics Landing Team Lead
Linaro.org │ Open source software for ARM SoCs
Follow Linaro: Facebook | Twitter | Blog
diff mbox

Patch

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/sti/sti_compositor.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/sti/sti_compositor.c
index 3d2fa3a..c2ace02 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/sti/sti_compositor.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/sti/sti_compositor.c
@@ -234,12 +234,12 @@  static int sti_compositor_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
 	}
 
 	/* Get reset resources */
-	compo->rst_main = devm_reset_control_get(dev, "compo-main");
+	compo->rst_main = devm_reset_control_get_shared(dev, "compo-main");
 	/* Take compo main out of reset */
 	if (!IS_ERR(compo->rst_main))
 		reset_control_deassert(compo->rst_main);
 
-	compo->rst_aux = devm_reset_control_get(dev, "compo-aux");
+	compo->rst_aux = devm_reset_control_get_shared(dev, "compo-aux");
 	/* Take compo aux out of reset */
 	if (!IS_ERR(compo->rst_aux))
 		reset_control_deassert(compo->rst_aux);