| Message ID | 83db66df70fc1f7cd4da8b580d264b9320991cf0.1448403503.git.geoff@infradead.org |
|---|---|
| State | New |
| Headers | show |
On Tue, Nov 24, 2015 at 10:25:34PM +0000, Geoff Levand wrote: > From: AKASHI Takahiro <takahiro.akashi@linaro.org> > > We should try best in case of kdump. > So even if not all secondary cpus have shut down, we do kdump anyway. > --- > arch/arm64/kernel/machine_kexec.c | 8 +++++++- > 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/machine_kexec.c b/arch/arm64/kernel/machine_kexec.c > index d2d7e90..482aae7 100644 > --- a/arch/arm64/kernel/machine_kexec.c > +++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/machine_kexec.c > @@ -148,7 +148,13 @@ void machine_kexec(struct kimage *kimage) > phys_addr_t reboot_code_buffer_phys; > void *reboot_code_buffer; > > - BUG_ON(num_online_cpus() > 1); > + if (num_online_cpus() > 1) { > + if (in_crash_kexec) > + pr_warn("kdump might fail because %d cpus are still online\n", > + num_online_cpus()); > + else > + BUG(); > + } Can you just rewrite the existing BUG_ON as: BUG_ON(num_online_cpus() && !WARN_ON(in_crash_kexec)); ? Will _______________________________________________ linux-arm-kernel mailing list linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
On 12/16/2015 02:05 AM, Will Deacon wrote: > On Tue, Nov 24, 2015 at 10:25:34PM +0000, Geoff Levand wrote: >> From: AKASHI Takahiro <takahiro.akashi@linaro.org> >> >> We should try best in case of kdump. >> So even if not all secondary cpus have shut down, we do kdump anyway. >> --- >> arch/arm64/kernel/machine_kexec.c | 8 +++++++- >> 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) >> >> diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/machine_kexec.c b/arch/arm64/kernel/machine_kexec.c >> index d2d7e90..482aae7 100644 >> --- a/arch/arm64/kernel/machine_kexec.c >> +++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/machine_kexec.c >> @@ -148,7 +148,13 @@ void machine_kexec(struct kimage *kimage) >> phys_addr_t reboot_code_buffer_phys; >> void *reboot_code_buffer; >> >> - BUG_ON(num_online_cpus() > 1); >> + if (num_online_cpus() > 1) { >> + if (in_crash_kexec) >> + pr_warn("kdump might fail because %d cpus are still online\n", >> + num_online_cpus()); >> + else >> + BUG(); >> + } > > Can you just rewrite the existing BUG_ON as: > > BUG_ON(num_online_cpus() && !WARN_ON(in_crash_kexec)); > > ? Yes, but BUG_ON((num_online_cpus() > 1) && !WARN_ON(in_crash_kexec)); Thanks, -Takahiro AKASHI > Will > _______________________________________________ linux-arm-kernel mailing list linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/machine_kexec.c b/arch/arm64/kernel/machine_kexec.c index d2d7e90..482aae7 100644 --- a/arch/arm64/kernel/machine_kexec.c +++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/machine_kexec.c @@ -148,7 +148,13 @@ void machine_kexec(struct kimage *kimage) phys_addr_t reboot_code_buffer_phys; void *reboot_code_buffer; - BUG_ON(num_online_cpus() > 1); + if (num_online_cpus() > 1) { + if (in_crash_kexec) + pr_warn("kdump might fail because %d cpus are still online\n", + num_online_cpus()); + else + BUG(); + } reboot_code_buffer_phys = page_to_phys(kimage->control_code_page); reboot_code_buffer = phys_to_virt(reboot_code_buffer_phys);
From: AKASHI Takahiro <takahiro.akashi@linaro.org> We should try best in case of kdump. So even if not all secondary cpus have shut down, we do kdump anyway. --- arch/arm64/kernel/machine_kexec.c | 8 +++++++- 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) -- 2.5.0 _______________________________________________ linux-arm-kernel mailing list linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel