| Message ID | 20151026101256.GF963@e106497-lin.cambridge.arm.com |
|---|---|
| State | New |
| Headers | show |
On Tue, Oct 27, 2015 at 08:55:05AM +0900, Olof Johansson wrote: > Hi, > > On Mon, Oct 26, 2015 at 10:12:57AM +0000, Liviu Dudau wrote: > > On Fri, Oct 23, 2015 at 10:42:53PM +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote: > > > On Wednesday 21 October 2015 12:36:29 Liviu Dudau wrote: > > > > The following changes since commit 25cb62b76430a91cc6195f902e61c2cb84ade622: > > > > > > > > Linux 4.3-rc5 (2015-10-11 11:09:45 -0700) > > > > > > > > are available in the git repository at: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Not pulled. > > > > > > All our branches are based on -rc4 or earlier, and we'd like to avoid > > > backmerges from mainline if at all possible. > > > > > > Can you rebase this to -rc4 and send again? > > > > > > Arnd > > > > Sure, I've rebased the branch on top of -rc4 now, so here is the new request. > > > > Many thanks, > > Liviu > > > > The following changes since commit 049e6dde7e57f0054fdc49102e7ef4830c698b46: > > > > Linux 4.3-rc4 (2015-10-04 16:57:17 +0100) > > > > are available in the git repository at: > > > > git://linux-arm.org/linux-ld for-upstream/juno-pcie > > This is showing up late by now, but Juno also isn't a high-volume platform > so exposure to regressions are limited. > > That being said, I really hope we won't have to pick up any fixes for > this due to lack of exposure to -next after the merge window. > > > Merged into next/arm64. Thanks, The PCIe setup has been tested pretty thoroughly (famous last words) inside ARM. The only surprises can come from various combinations of bootloaders and the kernel, and I'm happy to handle those. Best regards, Liviu > > > Thanks, > > -Olof >
Liviu Dudau <Liviu.Dudau@arm.com> writes: > On Tue, Oct 27, 2015 at 08:55:05AM +0900, Olof Johansson wrote: >> Hi, >> >> On Mon, Oct 26, 2015 at 10:12:57AM +0000, Liviu Dudau wrote: >> > On Fri, Oct 23, 2015 at 10:42:53PM +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote: >> > > On Wednesday 21 October 2015 12:36:29 Liviu Dudau wrote: >> > > > The following changes since commit 25cb62b76430a91cc6195f902e61c2cb84ade622: >> > > > >> > > > Linux 4.3-rc5 (2015-10-11 11:09:45 -0700) >> > > > >> > > > are available in the git repository at: >> > > > >> > > > >> > > >> > > Not pulled. >> > > >> > > All our branches are based on -rc4 or earlier, and we'd like to avoid >> > > backmerges from mainline if at all possible. >> > > >> > > Can you rebase this to -rc4 and send again? >> > > >> > > Arnd >> > >> > Sure, I've rebased the branch on top of -rc4 now, so here is the new request. >> > >> > Many thanks, >> > Liviu >> > >> > The following changes since commit 049e6dde7e57f0054fdc49102e7ef4830c698b46: >> > >> > Linux 4.3-rc4 (2015-10-04 16:57:17 +0100) >> > >> > are available in the git repository at: >> > >> > git://linux-arm.org/linux-ld for-upstream/juno-pcie >> >> This is showing up late by now, but Juno also isn't a high-volume platform >> so exposure to regressions are limited. >> >> That being said, I really hope we won't have to pick up any fixes for >> this due to lack of exposure to -next after the merge window. >> >> >> Merged into next/arm64. > > Thanks, > > The PCIe setup has been tested pretty thoroughly (famous last words) inside ARM. > The only surprises can come from various combinations of bootloaders and the > kernel, and I'm happy to handle those. > FWIW, I've also been testing PCIe on juno-r1. Unfortunately, it currently only works with the UEFI loader, but I understand PCIe init is on it's way upstream in mainline u-boo also, but I haven't been able to test that yet. Kevin _______________________________________________ linux-arm-kernel mailing list linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
On Thu, Oct 29, 2015 at 02:21:30AM -0700, Kevin Hilman wrote: > Liviu Dudau <Liviu.Dudau@arm.com> writes: > > > On Tue, Oct 27, 2015 at 08:55:05AM +0900, Olof Johansson wrote: > >> Hi, > >> > >> On Mon, Oct 26, 2015 at 10:12:57AM +0000, Liviu Dudau wrote: > >> > On Fri, Oct 23, 2015 at 10:42:53PM +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote: > >> > > On Wednesday 21 October 2015 12:36:29 Liviu Dudau wrote: > >> > > > The following changes since commit 25cb62b76430a91cc6195f902e61c2cb84ade622: > >> > > > > >> > > > Linux 4.3-rc5 (2015-10-11 11:09:45 -0700) > >> > > > > >> > > > are available in the git repository at: > >> > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > >> > > Not pulled. > >> > > > >> > > All our branches are based on -rc4 or earlier, and we'd like to avoid > >> > > backmerges from mainline if at all possible. > >> > > > >> > > Can you rebase this to -rc4 and send again? > >> > > > >> > > Arnd > >> > > >> > Sure, I've rebased the branch on top of -rc4 now, so here is the new request. > >> > > >> > Many thanks, > >> > Liviu > >> > > >> > The following changes since commit 049e6dde7e57f0054fdc49102e7ef4830c698b46: > >> > > >> > Linux 4.3-rc4 (2015-10-04 16:57:17 +0100) > >> > > >> > are available in the git repository at: > >> > > >> > git://linux-arm.org/linux-ld for-upstream/juno-pcie > >> > >> This is showing up late by now, but Juno also isn't a high-volume platform > >> so exposure to regressions are limited. > >> > >> That being said, I really hope we won't have to pick up any fixes for > >> this due to lack of exposure to -next after the merge window. > >> > >> > >> Merged into next/arm64. > > > > Thanks, > > > > The PCIe setup has been tested pretty thoroughly (famous last words) inside ARM. > > The only surprises can come from various combinations of bootloaders and the > > kernel, and I'm happy to handle those. > > > > FWIW, I've also been testing PCIe on juno-r1. Unfortunately, it > currently only works with the UEFI loader, but I understand PCIe init is > on it's way upstream in mainline u-boo also, but I haven't been able to > test that yet. Tom Rini was kind enough to pull the changes before 2015.10 was cut out, so mainline U-Boot works fine, that is what I'm using at the moment. Best regards, Liviu > > Kevin >