@@ -26,24 +26,9 @@ static int dbx500_cpufreq_target(struct cpufreq_policy *policy,
return clk_set_rate(armss_clk, freq_table[index].frequency * 1000);
}
-static unsigned int dbx500_cpufreq_getspeed(unsigned int cpu)
-{
- int i = 0;
- unsigned long freq = clk_get_rate(armss_clk) / 1000;
-
- /* The value is rounded to closest frequency in the defined table. */
- while (freq_table[i + 1].frequency != CPUFREQ_TABLE_END) {
- if (freq < freq_table[i].frequency +
- (freq_table[i + 1].frequency - freq_table[i].frequency) / 2)
- return freq_table[i].frequency;
- i++;
- }
-
- return freq_table[i].frequency;
-}
-
static int dbx500_cpufreq_init(struct cpufreq_policy *policy)
{
+ policy->clk = armss_clk;
return cpufreq_generic_init(policy, freq_table, 20 * 1000);
}
@@ -51,7 +36,7 @@ static struct cpufreq_driver dbx500_cpufreq_driver = {
.flags = CPUFREQ_STICKY | CPUFREQ_CONST_LOOPS,
.verify = cpufreq_generic_frequency_table_verify,
.target_index = dbx500_cpufreq_target,
- .get = dbx500_cpufreq_getspeed,
+ .get = cpufreq_generic_get,
.init = dbx500_cpufreq_init,
.name = "DBX500",
.attr = cpufreq_generic_attr,
We have common infrastructure available with us for getting a CPUs clk rate. Lets use it for this driver. We don't have to find closest frequency in platform specific ->get() routine wihch dbx500 driver was doing and hence it can be removed as well. Cc: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> --- drivers/cpufreq/dbx500-cpufreq.c | 19 ++----------------- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 17 deletions(-)