Message ID | 1417450537-7640-12-git-send-email-maxim.uvarov@linaro.org |
---|---|
State | New |
Headers | show |
On 2014-12-01 19:15, Maxim Uvarov wrote: > Signed-off-by: Maxim Uvarov <maxim.uvarov@linaro.org> > --- > test/validation/odp_pktio.c | 50 ++++++++++++++++++++++----------------------- > 1 file changed, 24 insertions(+), 26 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/test/validation/odp_pktio.c b/test/validation/odp_pktio.c > index 67dd8d0..cfdf3f8 100644 > --- a/test/validation/odp_pktio.c > +++ b/test/validation/odp_pktio.c > @@ -108,14 +108,34 @@ static void test_pktio_promisc(void) > return; > } > > +static CU_TestInfo test_mac[] = { > + {"mac", test_pktio_mac }, > + CU_TEST_INFO_NULL, > +}; > + > +static CU_TestInfo test_mtu[] = { > + {"mtu", test_pktio_mtu }, > + CU_TEST_INFO_NULL, > +}; > + > +static CU_TestInfo test_promisc[] = { > + {"promisc", test_pktio_promisc }, > + CU_TEST_INFO_NULL, > +}; > + > +CU_SuiteInfo suites[] = { > + { "MAC" , NULL, NULL, NULL, NULL, test_mac }, > + { "MTU" , NULL, NULL, NULL, NULL, test_mtu }, > + { "PROMISC" , NULL, NULL, NULL, NULL, test_promisc }, > + CU_SUITE_INFO_NULL, > +}; I think you should change the above to this: and then squash this patch into patch 4/11. CU_TestInfo test_odp_shm[] = { {"mac", test_pktio_mac }, {"mtu", test_pktio_mtu }, {"promisc", test_pktio_promisc }, CU_TEST_INFO_NULL, }; CU_SuiteInfo odp_testsuites[] = { {"Packet I/O", NULL, NULL, NULL, NULL, test_odp_pktio}, CU_SUITE_INFO_NULL, }; Cheers, Anders [1] http://lists.linaro.org/pipermail/lng-odp/2014-December/005710.html
On 2 December 2014 at 00:00, Anders Roxell <anders.roxell@linaro.org> wrote: > On 2014-12-01 19:15, Maxim Uvarov wrote: >> Signed-off-by: Maxim Uvarov <maxim.uvarov@linaro.org> >> --- >> test/validation/odp_pktio.c | 50 ++++++++++++++++++++++----------------------- >> 1 file changed, 24 insertions(+), 26 deletions(-) >> >> diff --git a/test/validation/odp_pktio.c b/test/validation/odp_pktio.c >> index 67dd8d0..cfdf3f8 100644 >> --- a/test/validation/odp_pktio.c >> +++ b/test/validation/odp_pktio.c >> @@ -108,14 +108,34 @@ static void test_pktio_promisc(void) >> return; >> } >> >> +static CU_TestInfo test_mac[] = { >> + {"mac", test_pktio_mac }, >> + CU_TEST_INFO_NULL, >> +}; >> + >> +static CU_TestInfo test_mtu[] = { >> + {"mtu", test_pktio_mtu }, >> + CU_TEST_INFO_NULL, >> +}; >> + >> +static CU_TestInfo test_promisc[] = { >> + {"promisc", test_pktio_promisc }, >> + CU_TEST_INFO_NULL, >> +}; >> + >> +CU_SuiteInfo suites[] = { >> + { "MAC" , NULL, NULL, NULL, NULL, test_mac }, >> + { "MTU" , NULL, NULL, NULL, NULL, test_mtu }, >> + { "PROMISC" , NULL, NULL, NULL, NULL, test_promisc }, >> + CU_SUITE_INFO_NULL, >> +}; > > I think you should change the above to this: > and then squash this patch into patch 4/11. > > CU_TestInfo test_odp_shm[] = { I failed to make this test correct change shm to pktio =) > {"mac", test_pktio_mac }, > {"mtu", test_pktio_mtu }, > {"promisc", test_pktio_promisc }, > CU_TEST_INFO_NULL, > }; > > CU_SuiteInfo odp_testsuites[] = { > {"Packet I/O", NULL, NULL, NULL, NULL, test_odp_pktio}, > CU_SUITE_INFO_NULL, > }; > > Cheers, > Anders > > [1] http://lists.linaro.org/pipermail/lng-odp/2014-December/005710.html
On 12/02/2014 02:15 AM, Anders Roxell wrote: > On 2 December 2014 at 00:00, Anders Roxell <anders.roxell@linaro.org> wrote: >> On 2014-12-01 19:15, Maxim Uvarov wrote: >>> Signed-off-by: Maxim Uvarov <maxim.uvarov@linaro.org> >>> --- >>> test/validation/odp_pktio.c | 50 ++++++++++++++++++++++----------------------- >>> 1 file changed, 24 insertions(+), 26 deletions(-) >>> >>> diff --git a/test/validation/odp_pktio.c b/test/validation/odp_pktio.c >>> index 67dd8d0..cfdf3f8 100644 >>> --- a/test/validation/odp_pktio.c >>> +++ b/test/validation/odp_pktio.c >>> @@ -108,14 +108,34 @@ static void test_pktio_promisc(void) >>> return; >>> } >>> >>> +static CU_TestInfo test_mac[] = { >>> + {"mac", test_pktio_mac }, >>> + CU_TEST_INFO_NULL, >>> +}; >>> + >>> +static CU_TestInfo test_mtu[] = { >>> + {"mtu", test_pktio_mtu }, >>> + CU_TEST_INFO_NULL, >>> +}; >>> + >>> +static CU_TestInfo test_promisc[] = { >>> + {"promisc", test_pktio_promisc }, >>> + CU_TEST_INFO_NULL, >>> +}; >>> + >>> +CU_SuiteInfo suites[] = { >>> + { "MAC" , NULL, NULL, NULL, NULL, test_mac }, >>> + { "MTU" , NULL, NULL, NULL, NULL, test_mtu }, >>> + { "PROMISC" , NULL, NULL, NULL, NULL, test_promisc }, >>> + CU_SUITE_INFO_NULL, >>> +}; >> I think you should change the above to this: >> and then squash this patch into patch 4/11. >> >> CU_TestInfo test_odp_shm[] = { > I failed to make this test correct change shm to pktio =) > >> {"mac", test_pktio_mac }, >> {"mtu", test_pktio_mtu }, >> {"promisc", test_pktio_promisc }, >> CU_TEST_INFO_NULL, >> }; >> >> CU_SuiteInfo odp_testsuites[] = { >> {"Packet I/O", NULL, NULL, NULL, NULL, test_odp_pktio}, >> CU_SUITE_INFO_NULL, >> }; >> >> Cheers, >> Anders Yes, I did a squash and it's looks logical. But I still not sure about what we name suites and tests. I did initial version which might be does not test all positive and negative cases. After some time tests can be extended. I think current file should have several suites and several tests. Not just one suite and number of tests. So we have binary: tests/validation/odp_<layer>.c which has features as "suites" and tests as different tests for that features. That might be already documented somewhere. Maxim. >> >> [1] http://lists.linaro.org/pipermail/lng-odp/2014-December/005710.html
diff --git a/test/validation/odp_pktio.c b/test/validation/odp_pktio.c index 67dd8d0..cfdf3f8 100644 --- a/test/validation/odp_pktio.c +++ b/test/validation/odp_pktio.c @@ -108,14 +108,34 @@ static void test_pktio_promisc(void) return; } +static CU_TestInfo test_mac[] = { + {"mac", test_pktio_mac }, + CU_TEST_INFO_NULL, +}; + +static CU_TestInfo test_mtu[] = { + {"mtu", test_pktio_mtu }, + CU_TEST_INFO_NULL, +}; + +static CU_TestInfo test_promisc[] = { + {"promisc", test_pktio_promisc }, + CU_TEST_INFO_NULL, +}; + +CU_SuiteInfo suites[] = { + { "MAC" , NULL, NULL, NULL, NULL, test_mac }, + { "MTU" , NULL, NULL, NULL, NULL, test_mtu }, + { "PROMISC" , NULL, NULL, NULL, NULL, test_promisc }, + CU_SUITE_INFO_NULL, +}; + int main(void) { odp_shm_t shm; void *pool_base; odp_buffer_pool_t pool; odp_queue_t out_queue; - CU_pSuite ptr_suite; - CU_pTest ptest; if (odp_init_global(NULL, NULL)) { printf("ODP global init failed.\n"); @@ -180,30 +200,8 @@ int main(void) if (CUE_SUCCESS != CU_initialize_registry()) return CU_get_error(); - /* add a suite to the registry */ - ptr_suite = CU_add_suite(__FILE__, NULL, NULL); - if (NULL == ptr_suite) { - CU_cleanup_registry(); - return CU_get_error(); - } - - ptest = CU_ADD_TEST(ptr_suite, test_pktio_mtu); - if (NULL == ptest) { - CU_cleanup_registry(); - return CU_get_error(); - } - - ptest = CU_ADD_TEST(ptr_suite, test_pktio_promisc); - if (NULL == ptest) { - CU_cleanup_registry(); - return CU_get_error(); - } - - ptest = CU_ADD_TEST(ptr_suite, test_pktio_mac); - if (NULL == ptest) { - CU_cleanup_registry(); - return CU_get_error(); - } + /* register suites */ + CU_register_suites(suites); /* Run all tests using the CUnit Basic interface */ CU_basic_set_mode(CU_BRM_VERBOSE);
Signed-off-by: Maxim Uvarov <maxim.uvarov@linaro.org> --- test/validation/odp_pktio.c | 50 ++++++++++++++++++++++----------------------- 1 file changed, 24 insertions(+), 26 deletions(-)