Message ID | 20141114191637.GA9291@arm.com |
---|---|
State | New |
Headers | show |
On Fri, Nov 14, 2014 at 07:16:37PM +0000, Will Deacon wrote: > Hi Arnd, Olof, Russell, > > Please can you pull the following ARM perf updates into arm-soc? > > I usually send these via rmk's tree, but there's a bunch of CCI PMU > rework in here which is then relied upon by other patches in the series, > so it would be easiest to keep it all together. > > These have been in -next for a few weeks, so please let me know when > you've pulled and I'll drop my branch from there. Ping? Anything else you need from me to get this into arm-soc? Will > --->8 > > The following changes since commit cac7f2429872d3733dc3f9915857b1691da2eb2f: > > Linux 3.18-rc2 (2014-10-26 16:48:41 -0700) > > are available in the git repository at: > > git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/will/linux.git tags/arm-perf-3.19 > > for you to fetch changes up to af66abfe2ec8bd82211e9e4f036a64c902ff4cdb: > > arm: perf: fold hotplug notifier into arm_pmu (2014-10-30 12:17:01 +0000) > > ---------------------------------------------------------------- > This patch series takes us slightly further on the road to big.LITTLE > support in perf. The main change enabling this is moving the CCI PMU > driver away from the arm-pmu abstraction, allowing the arch code to > focus specifically on support for CPU PMUs. > > ---------------------------------------------------------------- > Mark Rutland (10): > bus: cci: move away from arm_pmu framework > arm: perf: factor out callchain code > arm: perf: add missing pr_info newlines > arm: perf: make PMU probing data-driven > arm: perf: use IDR types for CPU PMUs > arm: perf: limit size of accounting data > arm: perf: kill get_hw_events() > arm: perf: fold percpu_pmu into pmu_hw_events > arm: perf: dynamically allocate cpu hardware data > arm: perf: fold hotplug notifier into arm_pmu > > Will Deacon (1): > ARM: perf: use pr_* instead of printk > > chai wen (1): > ARM: perf: remove useless return and check of idx in counter handling > > arch/arm/include/asm/perf_event.h | 2 +- > arch/arm/include/asm/pmu.h | 36 ++- > arch/arm/kernel/Makefile | 2 +- > arch/arm/kernel/perf_callchain.c | 136 +++++++++ > arch/arm/kernel/perf_event.c | 162 ++--------- > arch/arm/kernel/perf_event_cpu.c | 181 ++++++------ > arch/arm/kernel/perf_event_v6.c | 12 +- > arch/arm/kernel/perf_event_v7.c | 72 +++-- > arch/arm/kernel/perf_event_xscale.c | 20 +- > drivers/bus/arm-cci.c | 552 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------- > 10 files changed, 772 insertions(+), 403 deletions(-) > create mode 100644 arch/arm/kernel/perf_callchain.c
On Thursday 20 November 2014 10:56:14 Will Deacon wrote: > On Fri, Nov 14, 2014 at 07:16:37PM +0000, Will Deacon wrote: > > Hi Arnd, Olof, Russell, > > > > Please can you pull the following ARM perf updates into arm-soc? > > > > I usually send these via rmk's tree, but there's a bunch of CCI PMU > > rework in here which is then relied upon by other patches in the series, > > so it would be easiest to keep it all together. > > > > These have been in -next for a few weeks, so please let me know when > > you've pulled and I'll drop my branch from there. > > Ping? Anything else you need from me to get this into arm-soc? > I'm still working through the backlog, it's on the list. Thanks for following up. Arnd
On Friday 14 November 2014, Will Deacon wrote: > Hi Arnd, Olof, Russell, > > Please can you pull the following ARM perf updates into arm-soc? > > I usually send these via rmk's tree, but there's a bunch of CCI PMU > rework in here which is then relied upon by other patches in the series, > so it would be easiest to keep it all together. > > These have been in -next for a few weeks, so please let me know when > you've pulled and I'll drop my branch from there. > Pulled into next/drivers. Russell, please yell if you have any objections. Arnd
On Thu, Nov 20, 2014 at 12:50:45PM +0000, Arnd Bergmann wrote: > On Friday 14 November 2014, Will Deacon wrote: > > Hi Arnd, Olof, Russell, > > > > Please can you pull the following ARM perf updates into arm-soc? > > > > I usually send these via rmk's tree, but there's a bunch of CCI PMU > > rework in here which is then relied upon by other patches in the series, > > so it would be easiest to keep it all together. > > > > These have been in -next for a few weeks, so please let me know when > > you've pulled and I'll drop my branch from there. > > > > Pulled into next/drivers. Russell, please yell if you have any objections. Thanks Arnd, I'll drop my branch from -next. Sorry for pestering! Will