Message ID | 1415033196-30529-4-git-send-email-frediano.ziglio@huawei.com |
---|---|
State | New |
Headers | show |
On 11/03/2014 04:46 PM, Frediano Ziglio wrote: > The GIC in this platform is mainly compatible with the standard > GICv2 beside: > - ITARGET is extended to 16 bit to support 16 CPUs; > - SGI mask is extended to support 16 CPUs; > - maximum supported interrupt is 510. > > Signed-off-by: Frediano Ziglio <frediano.ziglio@huawei.com> > Signed-off-by: Zoltan Kiss <zoltan.kiss@huawei.com> > --- > xen/arch/arm/gic-v2.c | 89 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-------- > xen/arch/arm/gic.c | 3 +- > xen/include/asm-arm/gic.h | 4 ++- > 3 files changed, 80 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/xen/arch/arm/gic-v2.c b/xen/arch/arm/gic-v2.c > index faad1ff..9461fe3 100644 > --- a/xen/arch/arm/gic-v2.c > +++ b/xen/arch/arm/gic-v2.c > @@ -79,16 +79,23 @@ static struct gic_info gicv2_info; > * logical CPU numbering. Let's use mapping as returned by the GIC > * itself > */ > -static DEFINE_PER_CPU(u8, gic_cpu_id); > +static DEFINE_PER_CPU(u16, gic_cpu_id); > > /* Maximum cpu interface per GIC */ > -#define NR_GIC_CPU_IF 8 > +static unsigned int nr_gic_cpu_if = 8; > +static unsigned int gicd_sgi_target_shift = GICD_SGI_TARGET_SHIFT; > +static unsigned int gic_cpu_mask = 0xff; > > static inline void writeb_gicd(uint8_t val, unsigned int offset) > { > writeb_relaxed(val, gicv2.map_dbase + offset); > } > > +static inline void writew_gicd(uint16_t val, unsigned int offset) > +{ > + writew_relaxed(val, gicv2.map_dbase + offset); > +} > + > static inline void writel_gicd(uint32_t val, unsigned int offset) > { > writel_relaxed(val, gicv2.map_dbase + offset); > @@ -132,7 +139,7 @@ static unsigned int gicv2_cpu_mask(const cpumask_t *cpumask) > cpumask_and(&possible_mask, cpumask, &cpu_possible_map); > for_each_cpu( cpu, &possible_mask ) > { > - ASSERT(cpu < NR_GIC_CPU_IF); > + ASSERT(cpu < nr_gic_cpu_if); > mask |= per_cpu(gic_cpu_id, cpu); > } > > @@ -203,6 +210,15 @@ static unsigned int gicv2_read_irq(void) > return (readl_gicc(GICC_IAR) & GICC_IA_IRQ); > } > > +/* Set target CPU mask (RAZ/WI on uniprocessor) */ > +static void gicv2_set_irq_mask(int irq, unsigned int mask) > +{ > + if ( nr_gic_cpu_if == 16 ) This check is very confusing, and even more in patch #5. Code executed under this check describes your platform and not a generic 16-CPU support (actually there is no spec for it). I would introduce a new boolean or hide this check in a macro. > diff --git a/xen/arch/arm/gic.c b/xen/arch/arm/gic.c > index 70d10d6..8050a65 100644 > --- a/xen/arch/arm/gic.c > +++ b/xen/arch/arm/gic.c > @@ -563,12 +563,13 @@ static void do_sgi(struct cpu_user_regs *regs, enum gic_sgi sgi) > void gic_interrupt(struct cpu_user_regs *regs, int is_fiq) > { > unsigned int irq; > + unsigned int max_irq = gic_hw_ops->info->nr_lines; > > do { > /* Reading IRQ will ACK it */ > irq = gic_hw_ops->read_irq(); > > - if ( likely(irq >= 16 && irq < 1021) ) > + if ( likely(irq >= 16 && irq < max_irq) ) On the previous version I've asked that need to explain in the commit message why this change is valid. Regards,
On 11/04/2014 01:31 PM, Julien Grall wrote: > On 11/03/2014 04:46 PM, Frediano Ziglio wrote: >> The GIC in this platform is mainly compatible with the standard >> GICv2 beside: >> - ITARGET is extended to 16 bit to support 16 CPUs; >> - SGI mask is extended to support 16 CPUs; >> - maximum supported interrupt is 510. >> >> Signed-off-by: Frediano Ziglio <frediano.ziglio@huawei.com> >> Signed-off-by: Zoltan Kiss <zoltan.kiss@huawei.com> >> --- >> xen/arch/arm/gic-v2.c | 89 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-------- >> xen/arch/arm/gic.c | 3 +- >> xen/include/asm-arm/gic.h | 4 ++- >> 3 files changed, 80 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-) >> >> diff --git a/xen/arch/arm/gic-v2.c b/xen/arch/arm/gic-v2.c >> index faad1ff..9461fe3 100644 >> --- a/xen/arch/arm/gic-v2.c >> +++ b/xen/arch/arm/gic-v2.c >> @@ -79,16 +79,23 @@ static struct gic_info gicv2_info; >> * logical CPU numbering. Let's use mapping as returned by the GIC >> * itself >> */ >> -static DEFINE_PER_CPU(u8, gic_cpu_id); >> +static DEFINE_PER_CPU(u16, gic_cpu_id); >> >> /* Maximum cpu interface per GIC */ >> -#define NR_GIC_CPU_IF 8 >> +static unsigned int nr_gic_cpu_if = 8; >> +static unsigned int gicd_sgi_target_shift = GICD_SGI_TARGET_SHIFT; >> +static unsigned int gic_cpu_mask = 0xff; >> >> static inline void writeb_gicd(uint8_t val, unsigned int offset) >> { >> writeb_relaxed(val, gicv2.map_dbase + offset); >> } >> >> +static inline void writew_gicd(uint16_t val, unsigned int offset) >> +{ >> + writew_relaxed(val, gicv2.map_dbase + offset); >> +} >> + >> static inline void writel_gicd(uint32_t val, unsigned int offset) >> { >> writel_relaxed(val, gicv2.map_dbase + offset); >> @@ -132,7 +139,7 @@ static unsigned int gicv2_cpu_mask(const cpumask_t *cpumask) >> cpumask_and(&possible_mask, cpumask, &cpu_possible_map); >> for_each_cpu( cpu, &possible_mask ) >> { >> - ASSERT(cpu < NR_GIC_CPU_IF); >> + ASSERT(cpu < nr_gic_cpu_if); >> mask |= per_cpu(gic_cpu_id, cpu); >> } >> >> @@ -203,6 +210,15 @@ static unsigned int gicv2_read_irq(void) >> return (readl_gicc(GICC_IAR) & GICC_IA_IRQ); >> } >> >> +/* Set target CPU mask (RAZ/WI on uniprocessor) */ >> +static void gicv2_set_irq_mask(int irq, unsigned int mask) >> +{ >> + if ( nr_gic_cpu_if == 16 ) > > This check is very confusing, and even more in patch #5. Sorry, I meant #7. > Code executed under this check describes your platform and not a generic > 16-CPU support (actually there is no spec for it). > > I would introduce a new boolean or hide this check in a macro. > >> diff --git a/xen/arch/arm/gic.c b/xen/arch/arm/gic.c >> index 70d10d6..8050a65 100644 >> --- a/xen/arch/arm/gic.c >> +++ b/xen/arch/arm/gic.c >> @@ -563,12 +563,13 @@ static void do_sgi(struct cpu_user_regs *regs, enum gic_sgi sgi) >> void gic_interrupt(struct cpu_user_regs *regs, int is_fiq) >> { >> unsigned int irq; >> + unsigned int max_irq = gic_hw_ops->info->nr_lines; >> >> do { >> /* Reading IRQ will ACK it */ >> irq = gic_hw_ops->read_irq(); >> >> - if ( likely(irq >= 16 && irq < 1021) ) >> + if ( likely(irq >= 16 && irq < max_irq) ) > > On the previous version I've asked that need to explain in the commit > message why this change is valid. > > Regards, >
On 11/03/2014 04:46 PM, Frediano Ziglio wrote: > /* Set up the GIC */ > -static int __init gicv2_init(struct dt_device_node *node, const void *data) > +static int __init gicv2_init_common(struct dt_device_node *node, const void *data, bool hip04) > { > int res; > > dt_device_set_used_by(node, DOMID_XEN); > > + if ( hip04 ) > + { > + nr_gic_cpu_if = 16; > + gicd_sgi_target_shift = 8; > + gic_cpu_mask = 0xffff; > + } > + And this could be moved in hip04_gicv2_init. So there is no need of adding a boolean to the arguments.
> On 11/03/2014 04:46 PM, Frediano Ziglio wrote: > > The GIC in this platform is mainly compatible with the standard > > GICv2 beside: > > - ITARGET is extended to 16 bit to support 16 CPUs; > > - SGI mask is extended to support 16 CPUs; > > - maximum supported interrupt is 510. > > > > Signed-off-by: Frediano Ziglio <frediano.ziglio@huawei.com> > > Signed-off-by: Zoltan Kiss <zoltan.kiss@huawei.com> > > --- > > xen/arch/arm/gic-v2.c | 89 > +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-------- > > xen/arch/arm/gic.c | 3 +- > > xen/include/asm-arm/gic.h | 4 ++- > > 3 files changed, 80 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-) > > > > diff --git a/xen/arch/arm/gic-v2.c b/xen/arch/arm/gic-v2.c index > > faad1ff..9461fe3 100644 > > --- a/xen/arch/arm/gic-v2.c > > +++ b/xen/arch/arm/gic-v2.c > > @@ -79,16 +79,23 @@ static struct gic_info gicv2_info; > > * logical CPU numbering. Let's use mapping as returned by the GIC > > * itself > > */ > > -static DEFINE_PER_CPU(u8, gic_cpu_id); > > +static DEFINE_PER_CPU(u16, gic_cpu_id); > > > > /* Maximum cpu interface per GIC */ > > -#define NR_GIC_CPU_IF 8 > > +static unsigned int nr_gic_cpu_if = 8; static unsigned int > > +gicd_sgi_target_shift = GICD_SGI_TARGET_SHIFT; static unsigned int > > +gic_cpu_mask = 0xff; > > > > static inline void writeb_gicd(uint8_t val, unsigned int offset) { > > writeb_relaxed(val, gicv2.map_dbase + offset); } > > > > +static inline void writew_gicd(uint16_t val, unsigned int offset) { > > + writew_relaxed(val, gicv2.map_dbase + offset); } > > + > > static inline void writel_gicd(uint32_t val, unsigned int offset) { > > writel_relaxed(val, gicv2.map_dbase + offset); @@ -132,7 +139,7 > > @@ static unsigned int gicv2_cpu_mask(const cpumask_t *cpumask) > > cpumask_and(&possible_mask, cpumask, &cpu_possible_map); > > for_each_cpu( cpu, &possible_mask ) > > { > > - ASSERT(cpu < NR_GIC_CPU_IF); > > + ASSERT(cpu < nr_gic_cpu_if); > > mask |= per_cpu(gic_cpu_id, cpu); > > } > > > > @@ -203,6 +210,15 @@ static unsigned int gicv2_read_irq(void) > > return (readl_gicc(GICC_IAR) & GICC_IA_IRQ); } > > > > +/* Set target CPU mask (RAZ/WI on uniprocessor) */ static void > > +gicv2_set_irq_mask(int irq, unsigned int mask) { > > + if ( nr_gic_cpu_if == 16 ) > > This check is very confusing, and even more in patch #5. > > Code executed under this check describes your platform and not a > generic 16-CPU support (actually there is no spec for it). > > I would introduce a new boolean or hide this check in a macro. > In some cases is not so terrible, as it's the only 16-bit implementation and as it's assuming ITARGETSR is 16 bit instead of 8. In other cases (like the compatible cases) I fully agree. I agree a macro should be enough. Something like is_hip04() sounds ok? > > diff --git a/xen/arch/arm/gic.c b/xen/arch/arm/gic.c index > > 70d10d6..8050a65 100644 > > --- a/xen/arch/arm/gic.c > > +++ b/xen/arch/arm/gic.c > > @@ -563,12 +563,13 @@ static void do_sgi(struct cpu_user_regs *regs, > > enum gic_sgi sgi) void gic_interrupt(struct cpu_user_regs *regs, int > > is_fiq) { > > unsigned int irq; > > + unsigned int max_irq = gic_hw_ops->info->nr_lines; > > > > do { > > /* Reading IRQ will ACK it */ > > irq = gic_hw_ops->read_irq(); > > > > - if ( likely(irq >= 16 && irq < 1021) ) > > + if ( likely(irq >= 16 && irq < max_irq) ) > > On the previous version I've asked that need to explain in the commit > message why this change is valid. > Regards, Frediano
diff --git a/xen/arch/arm/gic-v2.c b/xen/arch/arm/gic-v2.c index faad1ff..9461fe3 100644 --- a/xen/arch/arm/gic-v2.c +++ b/xen/arch/arm/gic-v2.c @@ -79,16 +79,23 @@ static struct gic_info gicv2_info; * logical CPU numbering. Let's use mapping as returned by the GIC * itself */ -static DEFINE_PER_CPU(u8, gic_cpu_id); +static DEFINE_PER_CPU(u16, gic_cpu_id); /* Maximum cpu interface per GIC */ -#define NR_GIC_CPU_IF 8 +static unsigned int nr_gic_cpu_if = 8; +static unsigned int gicd_sgi_target_shift = GICD_SGI_TARGET_SHIFT; +static unsigned int gic_cpu_mask = 0xff; static inline void writeb_gicd(uint8_t val, unsigned int offset) { writeb_relaxed(val, gicv2.map_dbase + offset); } +static inline void writew_gicd(uint16_t val, unsigned int offset) +{ + writew_relaxed(val, gicv2.map_dbase + offset); +} + static inline void writel_gicd(uint32_t val, unsigned int offset) { writel_relaxed(val, gicv2.map_dbase + offset); @@ -132,7 +139,7 @@ static unsigned int gicv2_cpu_mask(const cpumask_t *cpumask) cpumask_and(&possible_mask, cpumask, &cpu_possible_map); for_each_cpu( cpu, &possible_mask ) { - ASSERT(cpu < NR_GIC_CPU_IF); + ASSERT(cpu < nr_gic_cpu_if); mask |= per_cpu(gic_cpu_id, cpu); } @@ -203,6 +210,15 @@ static unsigned int gicv2_read_irq(void) return (readl_gicc(GICC_IAR) & GICC_IA_IRQ); } +/* Set target CPU mask (RAZ/WI on uniprocessor) */ +static void gicv2_set_irq_mask(int irq, unsigned int mask) +{ + if ( nr_gic_cpu_if == 16 ) + writew_gicd(mask, GICD_ITARGETSR + irq * 2); + else + writeb_gicd(mask, GICD_ITARGETSR + irq); +} + /* * needs to be called with a valid cpu_mask, ie each cpu in the mask has * already called gic_cpu_init @@ -230,7 +246,7 @@ static void gicv2_set_irq_properties(struct irq_desc *desc, writel_gicd(cfg, GICD_ICFGR + (irq / 16) * 4); /* Set target CPU mask (RAZ/WI on uniprocessor) */ - writeb_gicd(mask, GICD_ITARGETSR + irq); + gicv2_set_irq_mask(irq, mask); /* Set priority */ writeb_gicd(priority, GICD_IPRIORITYR + irq); @@ -244,16 +260,21 @@ static void __init gicv2_dist_init(void) uint32_t gic_cpus; int i; - cpumask = readl_gicd(GICD_ITARGETSR) & 0xff; - cpumask |= cpumask << 8; - cpumask |= cpumask << 16; + cpumask = readl_gicd(GICD_ITARGETSR) & gic_cpu_mask; /* Disable the distributor */ writel_gicd(0, GICD_CTLR); type = readl_gicd(GICD_TYPER); gicv2_info.nr_lines = 32 * ((type & GICD_TYPE_LINES) + 1); - gic_cpus = 1 + ((type & GICD_TYPE_CPUS) >> 5); + if ( nr_gic_cpu_if == 16 ) + { + gic_cpus = 16; + } + else + { + gic_cpus = 1 + ((type & GICD_TYPE_CPUS) >> 5); + } printk("GICv2: %d lines, %d cpu%s%s (IID %8.8x).\n", gicv2_info.nr_lines, gic_cpus, (gic_cpus == 1) ? "" : "s", (type & GICD_TYPE_SEC) ? ", secure" : "", @@ -264,8 +285,19 @@ static void __init gicv2_dist_init(void) writel_gicd(0x0, GICD_ICFGR + (i / 16) * 4); /* Route all global IRQs to this CPU */ - for ( i = 32; i < gicv2_info.nr_lines; i += 4 ) - writel_gicd(cpumask, GICD_ITARGETSR + (i / 4) * 4); + if ( nr_gic_cpu_if == 16 ) + { + cpumask |= cpumask << 16; + for ( i = 32; i < gicv2_info.nr_lines; i += 2 ) + writel_gicd(cpumask, GICD_ITARGETSR + (i / 2) * 4); + } + else + { + cpumask |= cpumask << 8; + cpumask |= cpumask << 16; + for ( i = 32; i < gicv2_info.nr_lines; i += 4 ) + writel_gicd(cpumask, GICD_ITARGETSR + (i / 4) * 4); + } /* Default priority for global interrupts */ for ( i = 32; i < gicv2_info.nr_lines; i += 4 ) @@ -285,7 +317,7 @@ static void __cpuinit gicv2_cpu_init(void) { int i; - this_cpu(gic_cpu_id) = readl_gicd(GICD_ITARGETSR) & 0xff; + this_cpu(gic_cpu_id) = readl_gicd(GICD_ITARGETSR) & gic_cpu_mask; /* The first 32 interrupts (PPI and SGI) are banked per-cpu, so * even though they are controlled with GICD registers, they must @@ -366,7 +398,7 @@ static void gicv2_send_SGI(enum gic_sgi sgi, enum gic_sgi_mode irqmode, cpumask_and(&online_mask, cpu_mask, &cpu_online_map); mask = gicv2_cpu_mask(&online_mask); writel_gicd(GICD_SGI_TARGET_LIST | - (mask << GICD_SGI_TARGET_SHIFT) | sgi, + (mask << gicd_sgi_target_shift) | sgi, GICD_SGIR); break; default: @@ -581,7 +613,7 @@ static void gicv2_irq_set_affinity(struct irq_desc *desc, const cpumask_t *cpu_m mask = gicv2_cpu_mask(cpu_mask); /* Set target CPU mask (RAZ/WI on uniprocessor) */ - writeb_gicd(mask, GICD_ITARGETSR + desc->irq); + gicv2_set_irq_mask(desc->irq, mask); spin_unlock(&gicv2.lock); } @@ -684,12 +716,19 @@ const static struct gic_hw_operations gicv2_ops = { }; /* Set up the GIC */ -static int __init gicv2_init(struct dt_device_node *node, const void *data) +static int __init gicv2_init_common(struct dt_device_node *node, const void *data, bool hip04) { int res; dt_device_set_used_by(node, DOMID_XEN); + if ( hip04 ) + { + nr_gic_cpu_if = 16; + gicd_sgi_target_shift = 8; + gic_cpu_mask = 0xffff; + } + res = dt_device_get_address(node, 0, &gicv2.dbase, NULL); if ( res || !gicv2.dbase || (gicv2.dbase & ~PAGE_MASK) ) panic("GICv2: Cannot find a valid address for the distributor"); @@ -764,6 +803,16 @@ static int __init gicv2_init(struct dt_device_node *node, const void *data) return 0; } +static int __init gicv2_init(struct dt_device_node *node, const void *data) +{ + return gicv2_init_common(node, data, false); +} + +static int __init hip04_gicv2_init(struct dt_device_node *node, const void *data) +{ + return gicv2_init_common(node, data, true); +} + static const char * const gicv2_dt_compat[] __initconst = { DT_COMPAT_GIC_CORTEX_A15, @@ -777,6 +826,18 @@ DT_DEVICE_START(gicv2, "GICv2:", DEVICE_GIC) .init = gicv2_init, DT_DEVICE_END +static const char * const hip04_gicv2_dt_compat[] __initconst = +{ + DT_COMPAT_GIC_HIP04, + NULL +}; + +DT_DEVICE_START(hip04_gicv2, "GICv2:", DEVICE_GIC) + .compatible = hip04_gicv2_dt_compat, + .init = hip04_gicv2_init, +DT_DEVICE_END + + /* * Local variables: * mode: C diff --git a/xen/arch/arm/gic.c b/xen/arch/arm/gic.c index 70d10d6..8050a65 100644 --- a/xen/arch/arm/gic.c +++ b/xen/arch/arm/gic.c @@ -563,12 +563,13 @@ static void do_sgi(struct cpu_user_regs *regs, enum gic_sgi sgi) void gic_interrupt(struct cpu_user_regs *regs, int is_fiq) { unsigned int irq; + unsigned int max_irq = gic_hw_ops->info->nr_lines; do { /* Reading IRQ will ACK it */ irq = gic_hw_ops->read_irq(); - if ( likely(irq >= 16 && irq < 1021) ) + if ( likely(irq >= 16 && irq < max_irq) ) { local_irq_enable(); do_IRQ(regs, irq, is_fiq); diff --git a/xen/include/asm-arm/gic.h b/xen/include/asm-arm/gic.h index 187dc46..5adb628 100644 --- a/xen/include/asm-arm/gic.h +++ b/xen/include/asm-arm/gic.h @@ -155,10 +155,12 @@ #define DT_COMPAT_GIC_400 "arm,gic-400" #define DT_COMPAT_GIC_CORTEX_A15 "arm,cortex-a15-gic" #define DT_COMPAT_GIC_CORTEX_A7 "arm,cortex-a7-gic" +#define DT_COMPAT_GIC_HIP04 "hisilicon,hip04-gic" #define DT_MATCH_GIC_V2 DT_MATCH_COMPATIBLE(DT_COMPAT_GIC_CORTEX_A15), \ DT_MATCH_COMPATIBLE(DT_COMPAT_GIC_CORTEX_A7), \ - DT_MATCH_COMPATIBLE(DT_COMPAT_GIC_400) + DT_MATCH_COMPATIBLE(DT_COMPAT_GIC_400), \ + DT_MATCH_COMPATIBLE(DT_COMPAT_GIC_HIP04) #define DT_COMPAT_GIC_V3 "arm,gic-v3"