Message ID | 1356951500-22490-4-git-send-email-amarendra.xt@samsung.com |
---|---|
State | New |
Headers | show |
On 12/31/2012 07:58 PM, Amar wrote: > This patch enumerates dwmci and set auto stop command during > dwmci initialisation. > EMMC read/write is not happening in current implementation > due to improper fifo size computation. Hence Modified the fifo size > computation to resolve EMMC read write issues. What issue for read/write? > > Changes from V1: > 1)Created the macros RX_WMARK_SHIFT and RX_WMARK_MASK in header file. > > Changes from V2: > 1)Updation of commit message and resubmition of proper patch set. > > Signed-off-by: Amar <amarendra.xt@samsung.com> > --- > drivers/mmc/dw_mmc.c | 14 ++++++++++++-- > 1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/mmc/dw_mmc.c b/drivers/mmc/dw_mmc.c > index 4070d4e..d8fa1a2 100644 > --- a/drivers/mmc/dw_mmc.c > +++ b/drivers/mmc/dw_mmc.c > @@ -136,6 +136,7 @@ static int dwmci_send_cmd(struct mmc *mmc, struct mmc_cmd *cmd, > return TIMEOUT; > } > timeout--; > + mdelay(1); Why add the mdelay(1)? Could you explain to me? > } > > dwmci_writel(host, DWMCI_RINTSTS, DWMCI_INTMSK_ALL); > @@ -314,7 +315,7 @@ static void dwmci_set_ios(struct mmc *mmc) > static int dwmci_init(struct mmc *mmc) > { > struct dwmci_host *host = (struct dwmci_host *)mmc->priv; > - u32 fifo_size, fifoth_val; > + u32 fifo_size, fifoth_val, ier; > > dwmci_writel(host, DWMCI_PWREN, 1); > > @@ -323,6 +324,14 @@ static int dwmci_init(struct mmc *mmc) > return -1; > } > > + /* Enumerate at 400KHz */ > + dwmci_setup_bus(host, mmc->f_min); > + > + /* Set auto stop command */ > + ier = dwmci_readl(host, DWMCI_CTRL); > + ier |= (1<<10); Use the define..ex) define DWMCI_CTRL_AUTO_STOP_CMD BIT(10) > + dwmci_writel(host, DWMCI_CTRL, ier); If set to auto stop command, then you didn't see any problem? Best Regards, Jaehoon Chung > + > dwmci_writel(host, DWMCI_RINTSTS, 0xFFFFFFFF); > dwmci_writel(host, DWMCI_INTMASK, 0); > > @@ -332,10 +341,11 @@ static int dwmci_init(struct mmc *mmc) > dwmci_writel(host, DWMCI_BMOD, 1); > > fifo_size = dwmci_readl(host, DWMCI_FIFOTH); > + fifo_size = ((fifo_size & RX_WMARK_MASK) >> RX_WMARK_SHIFT) + 1; > if (host->fifoth_val) > fifoth_val = host->fifoth_val; > else > - fifoth_val = MSIZE(0x2) | RX_WMARK(fifo_size/2 -1) | > + fifoth_val = MSIZE(0x2) | RX_WMARK(fifo_size/2 - 1) | > TX_WMARK(fifo_size/2); > dwmci_writel(host, DWMCI_FIFOTH, fifoth_val); > >
Hi Jaehoon, Thanks for the comments. Please find the response below. Thanks & Regards Amarendra Reddy On 2 January 2013 10:42, Jaehoon Chung <jh80.chung@samsung.com> wrote: > On 12/31/2012 07:58 PM, Amar wrote: > > This patch enumerates dwmci and set auto stop command during > > dwmci initialisation. > > EMMC read/write is not happening in current implementation > > due to improper fifo size computation. Hence Modified the fifo size > > computation to resolve EMMC read write issues. > What issue for read/write? After bootup, the command 'mmcinfo' was working fine. It displays the EMMC device properties(Manufacturer,OEM, SD version ... ) properly. But the EMMC read / write was not happening. Then I referred to chromium uboot working code and observed that FIFO size configuraion is missing in our code. After configuring FIFO size, read / write happened properly. That is what I meant. > > Changes from V1: > 1)Created the macros RX_WMARK_SHIFT and RX_WMARK_MASK in header file. > > Changes from V2: > 1)Updation of commit message and resubmition of proper patch set. > > Signed-off-by: Amar <amarendra.xt@samsung.com> > --- > drivers/mmc/dw_mmc.c | 14 ++++++++++++-- > 1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/mmc/dw_mmc.c b/drivers/mmc/dw_mmc.c > index 4070d4e..d8fa1a2 100644 > --- a/drivers/mmc/dw_mmc.c > +++ b/drivers/mmc/dw_mmc.c > @@ -136,6 +136,7 @@ static int dwmci_send_cmd(struct mmc *mmc, struct mmc_cmd *cmd, > return TIMEOUT; > } > timeout--; > + mdelay(1); > Why add the mdelay(1)? Could you explain to me? Again this one also I added after referring to chromium uboot working code. Without mdelay(), there was a problem while writing into EMMC boot partitions. *Problem Description:* When I write into EMMC boot partition, -> It fails in first attempt and displays the error *"Timeout on data busy". * -> Immediately it retries and succeeds in second attempt. To avoid the above problem I added mdelay(). > > } > > > > dwmci_writel(host, DWMCI_RINTSTS, DWMCI_INTMSK_ALL); > > @@ -314,7 +315,7 @@ static void dwmci_set_ios(struct mmc *mmc) > > static int dwmci_init(struct mmc *mmc) > > { > > struct dwmci_host *host = (struct dwmci_host *)mmc->priv; > > - u32 fifo_size, fifoth_val; > > + u32 fifo_size, fifoth_val, ier; > > > > dwmci_writel(host, DWMCI_PWREN, 1); > > > > @@ -323,6 +324,14 @@ static int dwmci_init(struct mmc *mmc) > > return -1; > > } > > > > + /* Enumerate at 400KHz */ > > + dwmci_setup_bus(host, mmc->f_min); > > + > > + /* Set auto stop command */ > > + ier = dwmci_readl(host, DWMCI_CTRL); > > + ier |= (1<<10); > Use the define..ex) define DWMCI_CTRL_AUTO_STOP_CMD BIT(10) > Ok. > > + dwmci_writel(host, DWMCI_CTRL, ier); > If set to auto stop command, then you didn't see any problem? > Actually, it works fine even without setting auto stop command. Initially I referred to the working code from chromium uboot, and tried to maintain all our dwmci init code inline with chromium uboot. Hence I added "set auto command". > Best Regards, > Jaehoon Chung > > + > > dwmci_writel(host, DWMCI_RINTSTS, 0xFFFFFFFF); > > dwmci_writel(host, DWMCI_INTMASK, 0); > > > > @@ -332,10 +341,11 @@ static int dwmci_init(struct mmc *mmc) > > dwmci_writel(host, DWMCI_BMOD, 1); > > > > fifo_size = dwmci_readl(host, DWMCI_FIFOTH); > > + fifo_size = ((fifo_size & RX_WMARK_MASK) >> RX_WMARK_SHIFT) + 1; > > if (host->fifoth_val) > > fifoth_val = host->fifoth_val; > > else > > - fifoth_val = MSIZE(0x2) | RX_WMARK(fifo_size/2 -1) | > > + fifoth_val = MSIZE(0x2) | RX_WMARK(fifo_size/2 - 1) | > > TX_WMARK(fifo_size/2); > > dwmci_writel(host, DWMCI_FIFOTH, fifoth_val); > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > U-Boot mailing list > U-Boot@lists.denx.de > http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot >
diff --git a/drivers/mmc/dw_mmc.c b/drivers/mmc/dw_mmc.c index 4070d4e..d8fa1a2 100644 --- a/drivers/mmc/dw_mmc.c +++ b/drivers/mmc/dw_mmc.c @@ -136,6 +136,7 @@ static int dwmci_send_cmd(struct mmc *mmc, struct mmc_cmd *cmd, return TIMEOUT; } timeout--; + mdelay(1); } dwmci_writel(host, DWMCI_RINTSTS, DWMCI_INTMSK_ALL); @@ -314,7 +315,7 @@ static void dwmci_set_ios(struct mmc *mmc) static int dwmci_init(struct mmc *mmc) { struct dwmci_host *host = (struct dwmci_host *)mmc->priv; - u32 fifo_size, fifoth_val; + u32 fifo_size, fifoth_val, ier; dwmci_writel(host, DWMCI_PWREN, 1); @@ -323,6 +324,14 @@ static int dwmci_init(struct mmc *mmc) return -1; } + /* Enumerate at 400KHz */ + dwmci_setup_bus(host, mmc->f_min); + + /* Set auto stop command */ + ier = dwmci_readl(host, DWMCI_CTRL); + ier |= (1<<10); + dwmci_writel(host, DWMCI_CTRL, ier); + dwmci_writel(host, DWMCI_RINTSTS, 0xFFFFFFFF); dwmci_writel(host, DWMCI_INTMASK, 0); @@ -332,10 +341,11 @@ static int dwmci_init(struct mmc *mmc) dwmci_writel(host, DWMCI_BMOD, 1); fifo_size = dwmci_readl(host, DWMCI_FIFOTH); + fifo_size = ((fifo_size & RX_WMARK_MASK) >> RX_WMARK_SHIFT) + 1; if (host->fifoth_val) fifoth_val = host->fifoth_val; else - fifoth_val = MSIZE(0x2) | RX_WMARK(fifo_size/2 -1) | + fifoth_val = MSIZE(0x2) | RX_WMARK(fifo_size/2 - 1) | TX_WMARK(fifo_size/2); dwmci_writel(host, DWMCI_FIFOTH, fifoth_val);
This patch enumerates dwmci and set auto stop command during dwmci initialisation. EMMC read/write is not happening in current implementation due to improper fifo size computation. Hence Modified the fifo size computation to resolve EMMC read write issues. Changes from V1: 1)Created the macros RX_WMARK_SHIFT and RX_WMARK_MASK in header file. Changes from V2: 1)Updation of commit message and resubmition of proper patch set. Signed-off-by: Amar <amarendra.xt@samsung.com> --- drivers/mmc/dw_mmc.c | 14 ++++++++++++-- 1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)